September 17, 2007


Mukasey as next Attorney General?

or

How do you write an editorial on the man
when his motivations are so deeply stacked under outrage
for his stand on Jose Padillo?

<<:>> <<:>> <<:>>

First a comment that appeared in the Daily Kos:

Judge Mukasey (1+ / 0-)

He's a close friend of Rudy Giuliani.

I suspec6t he's "down" with the Israel-first, dual national neocon types like Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim, Richard Perle et al.; he is in any case an Orthodox Jew. No, I don't see being Jewish, or Orthodox, as a disqualification, but we don't need more high-level federal officials who believe American foreign policy should be dictated by the Israeli extreme right. His views on those matters ought to be questioned.

He certainly has a reputation as a "hanging judge" in criminal matters.

I -- a civil attorney -- tried one matter before him. He has a first-rate intellect, undeniably, but is also arrogant as all hell, and utterly convinced of his own rectitude, if not his infallibility.

He is also one of the most humorless men I have ever met in my life.


But there is much more to be concerned about this man becoming the next legal beagle, BuZh apologist for the White House, "stuff" that is incredibly hard to find out as it is buried on the internet under compilations of urls on the Jose Padillo case, a case that it appeared he would do the right thing, and then capitulated after being seen PRIVATELY by US officials, without Padillo's legal person being present. There went civil rights (and never forget that Jose Padillo is an American citizen ..)

So here comes the latest for the Daily Kos in its entirety ...

Now if this allegation below (no reason to think it isn't) is TRUE, it could well be an additional reasoon that Mukasey is the pick .. being PRO Labor racketerring (he covered it up) which is USEFUL if the North American Union comes into being!!! He is accused of helping CONGRESS cover up dirty money ... (which could explain why Congress would let him in AND further the NWO agenda at the same time ...

QUESTION FOR EXAMINATION
Did the Mukasey Panel by and through their Summary Order 03-3117 filed
January 14, 2004 (attached) continue a systematic pattern to hide documented Judicial Fraud and Extra Judicial Acts of Misconduct committed by District Judge Janet C. Hall – doing so by intentionally avoiding the procedural process of a 28 U.S.C. 455 affidavit and motion (the premise of the appeal) in order to circumvent the standard of review fora 28 U.S.C. 455 motion, that being: "Impartiality might reasonably be questioned"?"
And this is from a blog, facts about his son .... interesting CONNECTION. BINGO!!

Marc Mukasey - Partner at Bracewell & Giuliani where he "focuses on the defense of white collar criminal and regulatory cases." The firm also states: "Recently, Mr. Mukasey has been successful in persuading Department of Justice prosecutors to close an antitrust investigation against a major corporation without the filing of charges, and to drop securities fraud and mail fraud investigations of his business clients. He also successfully argued a downward departure motion that secured a favorable outcome for his client in the face of vigorous opposition by the Department of Justice." Marc's father, Michael Mukasey, former chief judge of the Southern District of New York, is also a member of Giuliani's Justice Advisory Committee.

And this is a great OpEd showing how Mukasey's brand of justice shown in the Padilla case will totally decimate the US Bill of Rights ..

Now I believe that there is FAR more to be seen about Mukasey. I will not stand corrected if I am wrong; for I know I am correct in this. The other four nominees were bandied about hoping we would be lead off the 'scent' .. and we were. This is massive political trojan horse project in the making on the part of the Administration. At best, it is simply a stall tactic . . . just as the announcement that Gonegonzales was delayed to give anyone the satisfaction of knowing that Alberto made a poor showing before Congress. The decision was made but took a month to be announced. Karl Rove's dirty paws seemed to be involved in the TACTIC. We can expect, eventually, that this will be as wildly unpopular as putting in Harriet Myers turned out to be.

So this Mukasey appointment may be just another of the stall, delay, obfuscate tactics of which we all have such intimate familiarity. But today is the day we earnestly begin our dedicated research.

It's a good day for taking out those pens and beginning to write away about our disgust. These letters and emails, they are not tactics; they are calls to continue a freedom loving lifestyle ... with certain inalienable rights ...

1 comment:

TomCat said...

Lady, the long on your Question for examination is bad. Otherwise, this looks like we think the same.

ShareThis