Showing posts with label AIPAC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AIPAC. Show all posts

August 03, 2008

Some Middle East news (NO WAR WITH IRAN, Plz)

Working for International Dialogue and Peace

U.S. sent envoy to Geneva talks to avoid pressure: Chomsky

by Noam Chomsky (source: Mehr News) August 3, 2008

"The Bush administration is under severe international and domestic pressure to rein in its radical extremism, which has led to catastrophes everywhere, and might bring about even worse ones" the American lecturer noted. "Sending a non-participant observer is a way to avoid negotiations and diplomacy while trying to fend off criticism," Chomsky commented. ››read more


Arabs don’t view Iran’s nuclear program as a threat

(source: Mehr News) August 3, 2008

Amr MoussaAmr MoussaTEHRAN, Aug. 3 (MNA) – Arab League chief Amr Moussa has called for a diplomatic solution to Iran’s nuclear standoff with the West. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the Non-Aligned Movement foreign ministers in Tehran on Wednesday, Moussa said the Arab league is opposed to any military attack against the Islamic Republic. ››read more


Americans protest war with Iran

by Jihan Hafiz (source: Press TV) August 3, 2008

On a US national day of protest against any military attack on Iran, tens of thousands marched on Saturday 2 August across America and Canada against the Bush Administration. View a video of the protestors in DC here. ››read more


The New York Times: Making Nuclear Extermination Respectable

by Prof. James Petras (source: Global Research) August 2, 2008

What does the publication by the New York Times of an article, which calls for the nuclear incineration of 70 million Iranians and the contamination of the better part of a billion people in the Middle East, Asia and Europe, tell us about US politics and culture? For it is the NYT, which informs the ‘educated classes’ in the US, its Sunday supplements, literary and editorial pages and which serves as the ‘moral conscience’ of important sectors of the cultural, economic and political elite. ››read more


Iran accuses U.S. of double standards

(source: Reuters) August 2, 2008

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran has accused the United States of double standards following a nuclear deal with India, state television said on Saturday, just before a deadline set by the West in a dispute over Tehran's own atomic ambitions. ››read more


Stop War on IRAN: Mass March in NYC & across the U.S.

(source: Stop War on Iran) August 2, 2008

Across the U.S. - in more than 87 cities - Response to the Emergency Call to Action has been enormous and in addition to the regional action in New York City, there will be protests, rallies, and other events in more than 87 cities, from Hawaii to Boston. ››read more


Nukes and Holocausts

by Gordon Prather (source: AntiWar.Com) August 2, 2008

Everyone, most especially the Israelis, realize they can not "take out" all the IAEA Safeguarded facilities in Iran with conventional weapons. But they could make a start, and then come to us with this threat – "either you finish the job for us, or we will, with nukes". ››read more


Want Lower Gas Prices? Lift AIPAC's Sanctions on Iran

by Robert Naiman (source: Huffington Post) August 1, 2008

Here's a first step: don't let AIPAC drive up gas prices even more. Ask Congress to reject AIPAC's resolution seeking to ban Iran's gas imports. ››read more


Oil Rises $3 on Israeli Comments About Iranian Nuclear Program

by Margot Habiby (source: Bloomberg) August 1, 2008

Oil price riseOil price riseAug. 1 (Bloomberg) -- Crude oil rallied more than $3 a barrel after Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz said that Iran is on a path toward a ``major breakthrough'' in its nuclear weapons program which he called ``unacceptable.'' ››read more


A Vote For Military Force Against Iran? AIPAC’s House Resolution, H. Con. Res. 362

by Ira Glunts (source: Inybay.org) August 1, 2008

naval blockadenaval blockadeDespite the expectation of easy passage, AIPAC’s controversial resolution is stalled in committee. The efforts of antiwar groups who mobilized messages of protest proved fruitful, but the debate over the use of military force in Iran is just beginning. ››read more


Candidate who wants Olmert's job once 'sought deaths of 70 Palestinians a day'

by Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem (source: The Independent ) August 1, 2008

Shaul MofazShaul MofazA leading candidate [Shaul Mofaz] to be Israel's next premier called for a death toll of 70 Palestinians a day when he was head of the military during the second intifada, according to a best-selling book by two Israeli journalists. ››read more


Editor's note: Shaul Mofaz, Israel's deputy prime minister, told local daily Yedioth Ahronoth on June 6 that the sanctions against Iran were ineffective and therefore "there will be no choice but to attack Iran to halt the Iranian nuclear program." He reiterated this threat against Iran in July.

New view on Mideast needed

by Yousef Munayyer (source: Chicago Tribune) August 1, 2008

The U.S. insists on the prevention of a nuclear Iran, when the Arab public is well aware that the world's largest per capita nuclear arsenal is in Israel. Further, the American position has largely been to not negotiate with Iran before it suspends its nuclear program. Yet the U.S. pushes the Palestinian Authority to negotiate while Israel continues settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank. ››read more


Interview with Soltanieh: NAM moves in support of nuclear Iran

by Ali Asghar Soltanieh, interview with Saman Kojouri (source: Press TV) August 1, 2008

Ali Asghar SoltaniehAli Asghar SoltaniehA new parameter in the NAM statement is that the ministers have welcomed Iran's willingness to enter negotiation with all countries of the Non-Aligned Movement and also the countries in the region. This sends a strong and positive signal to those who are saying that Iran is isolated. Iran is not isolated. Almost all world countries have sent their ministers and representatives to this country to say that they support Iran's peaceful nuclear activities. ››read more


Deadline ultimatum eases for Iran in nuclear showdown

(source: AFP) August 1, 2008

Gary SickGary SickWASHINGTON (AFP) — The United States and its European allies have pulled back from setting Saturday as a firm deadline for Iran to reply to the latest international offer of incentives for a freeze in its nuclear drive. ››read more


Germany defends export of gas equipment to Iran

(source: M & C) August 1, 2008

Berlin - Germany rejected Thursday criticism from Israel over a deal to export gas-liquefaction equipment to Iran.
››read more


US forces Statoil to hold back from Iran operations

by Ed Crooks in London (source: FT) August 1, 2008

StatoilHydro, the Norwegian national oil company, has become the latest big western energy group to commit against investment in Iran following pressure from the US. ››read more


Why Are Neocons Attacking Turkey?

by Avni Dogru (source: Just Foreign Policy) August 1, 2008

Some neoconservatives in Washington are obsessed with attacking Iran before President Bush leaves office at the end of this year. Hence, they have been pushing the Bush administration for increased economic and political isolation of Iran in order to weaken its current regime. Crucial to this plan is the support of Turkey, a traditional U.S. ally and an increasingly critical player in the region. ››read more


To Provoke War, Cheney Considered Proposal To Dress Up Navy Seals As Iranians And Shoot At Them

(source: Think Progress) August 1, 2008 Iranian Boat
Iranian Boat

March 29, 2008

Activism: Reminder to boycott Chapters

Heather Reiman has her fingers in MANY pies.

boycotting Chapters is important for many reasons - Isreali Apartheid being one - her membership on the SPP committe (CCCE membership) being another ..

Support local bookstores!! I do as is possible.

The purposely built Chapter's stories to keep out the disabled.

Figures.

Veeger


Report on a Canadian initiated boycott against Chapters and Indigo Bookstores - their President/CEO/Major shareholder is funding the Israeli military.

All the material here has been taken from the Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid (caiaweb.org) leaflets[1] on the subject - slightly modified to include the launch by "Boycott Israeli Apartheid Campaign" of a picket outside Chapters Bookstore in Vancouver on 12 May 2007.[2]

[1]CAMPAIGN LEAFLET: http://www.caiaweb.org/files/indigo_leaflet_revised_jan_07.pdf
HESEG FACTSHEET: http://www.caiaweb.org/files/website1_HESEG_factsheet_v2.3.pdf

[2]http://www.newsocialist.org/index.php?id=1248


Boycott Chapters & Indigo


Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid
7 February 2007



Picket outside Indigo, Toronto 17 Feb 2007

The majority shareholders of Chapters and Indigo Bookstores, Heather Reisman and Gerry Schwartz, established a fund called Heseg – Foundation for Lone Soldiers – a program of financial support for former “lone soldiers’ in the Israeli military.
The Israeli military is responsible for war crimes in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and Lebanon.

Do not buy any products from Indigo, Chapters, World’s Biggest Bookstore, SmithBooks, Coles, The Book Company or Indigospirit until their controlling owners publicly announce that they will cut all financial ties to Heseg – the Foundation for Lone Soliders.

Cutting the Ties to Israeli Apartheid
Indigo/Chapters Boycott Launch - 23 Dec 2006




Picket outside Indigo, Toronto 17 Feb 2007

This report was conducted and produced by Mostafa Henaway of ckut 903 fm in montreal, and CKLN 881FM in Toronto.

DownloadMP3 (9.5Mb)


Many members of the Heseg Board are high-ranking Israeli military personnel. This includes Doron Almog, who avoided arrest in London last year by refusing to disembark from his plane because of a warrant issued for his arrest on suspicion of war crimes..

Heather Reisman and Gerry Schwartz own or control over 68 percent of the shares in Indigo Books and Music Inc. which owns and operates bookstores under the names Indigo, Chapters, World’s Biggest Bookstore, SmithBooks, Coles, The Book Company or Indigospirit. Reisman is chair and CEO of Indigo Books and Music Inc.



Picket outside Indigo, Toronto 17 Feb 2007

February 20, 2008

Sibelgate, AIPAC, Cynthia McKinney, impeachment and the deccimation of Arabs in the USA

This story is interesting for many reasons.

First, it shows what a Very Good Woman Cynthia McKinney actually is.

Second, she is raising some very interesting points about official US policy towards those of color.

Three, she is not soft soaping what happens to people who run afoul of AIPAC.

Four, some of the same old crew pops up - like Douglas Feith.

and another thing is that point she raises about Dennis Kucinich being visited by AIPAC. This visit has been repudiated by David Swanson, and I was called to task for blogging it. I've personally asked that Dennis Kucinich HIMSELF repudiate the story - not reply in a second-hand fashion. If it is NOT true, then why is Cynthia McKinney repeating it? I am more likely to believe her than David Swanson at this point.

And six, but least, she makes me think she is a real LEADER, which is more than I can say about most other Presidential candidates.

Veeger

Framing Muslims and Locking Up Their Money PDF Print E-mail


Wednesday, 20 February 2008

by Cynthia McKinneyCynthiaMuslimWomenPray

The U.S. government has for years been engaged in a witch hunt against Muslim charities, seizing assets and persons on little or manufactured evidence of "terrorist" activities. Meanwhile, blatant spying on behalf of Israel goes unprosecuted, and is even rewarded with promotions to the highest, most sensitive levels of government. Human rights cease to exist in a legal free-fire zone in which all things Muslim or Arab are deemed subversive. All pretense of constitutional government vanishes when institutions and individuals are targeted based on ethnicity and religion. The real conspiracy against so-called "American values" is headquartered in U.S. law enforcement and "security" agencies that "wreak fear and terror inside this country's Muslim community."

Framing Muslims and Locking Up Their Money

by Cynthia McKinney

"The government falsified evidence and broke the law while spying on the Foundation."

Former Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney delivered the following remarks to a banquet for the Dallas Muslim Legal Fund of America.

CynthiaSpeaking

What I want to talk to you about tonight, is why you must support the Muslim Legal Fund of America even more now than ever before. I know there are some big donors in here, but everyone must donate until you feel it. Then you will know that you did something with your money. You will remember this contribution. And soon enough, you will be glad you did.

That's because we haven't reached a point where human rights are respected in this country. We haven't reached a point where justice rolls down like a might stream in this country. And so, we must be prepared for times of injustice, times of abuse, times of great pain and hurt.

To illustrate my point, I would like you to consider the case of a powerful and famous organization. It had friends that lavished it with money and it learned to use its resources to achieve its goals. Pretty soon, this organization had a multimillion dollar budget. It became very powerful, some said the largest of its kind in the country. Soon, the organization became so effective that people began to take notice. People began to wonder if the organization was really American, advancing American values, or was in service to non-American or even anti-American goals? Eventually, the organization became ensnared in our country's legal system and its supporters were accused of criminal activity. In some cases even treason! People were maligned, had their lives ruined, and some were even jailed.

"We haven't reached a point where human rights are respected in this country."

Imagine, you've got large sums of money, foreign intrigue, political power, a court battle, charges of treason, and nothing written in the newspapers at all about the sordid mess. What's the difference between the Holy Land Foundation and the organization I'm talking about?

For eight long years, the FBI watched the Holy Land Foundation with surveillance that included illegal wiretaps. The government would have had the jury believe that the supporters and the managers of the Holy Land Foundation and just about every other Muslim organization in the United States that was tied into the litigation was guilty of a crime. Millions of dollars later, after wreaking fear and terror inside this country's Muslim community, the jury told the government what the men and women whose lives were on trial already knew. The charges leveled by the government could not stand the jury's scrutiny. So why was the allegation even leveled in the first place? Why did the press parrot the allegations without one moment of questioning whether or not the government could have been as off in its assessments of the Holy Land Foundation as it was in its estimates of pre-war Iraq's weapons of mass destruction?

I would like to take a moment to follow the trail of another trial involving the sale or give-away of U.S. national security secrets to a foreign government; the name of that government is never mentioned; and the litigation never pierces the American psyche due to an effective news blackout. News of this is nowhere to be found while we know in detail the mental state of Brittany Spears.

"Why did the press parrot the allegations without one moment of questioning whether or not the government could have been so off in its assessments of the Holy Land Foundation."

Consider for just a moment what is happening, though unpublicized, today. In case number one, a Pentagon man is found with 83 top secret documents at his home, some of them having been passed to American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) who then passed them to Israel - known in the newspapers as Country A. The other case involves the outing of a CIA agent who was tracking nuclear proliferation in the Middle East. This is the case of Ambassador Joseph Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, that saw the chief of staff of the Vice President of the United States sentenced to prison, only to be later pardoned by the President!

Interestingly, when George Bush came to the White House, he brought with him Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and others. Perle would soon leave because it was learned that he tried to use his position as head of the Defense Policy Board to make money off the War on Terror. Feith, as head of the Office of Special Plans, presided over the most ignominious period in the history of the Pentagon, with it producing faked intelligence, stovepiping it to the White House, and then to the American people and the U.S. Congress, sending our young men and women into war in Iraq. Feith left the Pentagon as soon as the investigation into Larry Franklin, his subordinate in his Office, started to get hot. Larry Franklin is now in jail.

When Franklin met with two AIPAC operatives, Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, what he didn't know was that every word was being recorded. Franklin, Rosen, and Weissman formed a neat circle. Elliot Abrams at the National Security Council, Dov Zakheim, Comptroller at the Pentagon, Doug Feith number three at the Pentagon in its Office of Special Plans, and Paul Wolfowitz, number two at the Pentagon, closed that circle.

"Perle and Feith were investigated by the FBI for passing secret information to Israel."

Ex-CIA agent Phil Giraldi in "Kill the Messenger" confirms that both Perle and Feith were investigated by the FBI for passing secret information to Israel. He continues, "In no cases, were any of them convicted. The prosecutions were dropped ... in my opinion because of political pressure not to get into this kind of case that involves Israel and espionage." Wolfowitz was under investigation for passing U.S. secrets to Israel through AIPAC.

Spying inside the United States is not new.

In 2001, the FBI discovered new, "massive" Israeli spying operations in the East Coast, including New York and New Jersey," and they began watching Naor Gilon (at the Israeli Embassy), who eventually led them to Franklin.

In 1970 while working for a U.S. Senator, Richard Perle was caught by the FBI giving classified information to Israel.

In 1985, the New York Times reports that the FBI is aware of at least a dozen incidents in which classified information is transferred to Israel.

In 1987, the Wall Street Journal headlined that Israel's role in the Iran-Contra scandal would not be investigated by Congress.

In 1993, the Anti-Defamation League is caught operating a massive spying operation on critics of Israel, Arab-Americans, the San Francisco Labor Council, ILWU Local 10, Oakland Educational Association, NAACP, Irish Northern Aid, International Indian Treaty Council, the Asian Law Caucus and the San Francisco police. Data collected was sent to Israel and in some cases to South Africa. Pressure from certain organizations forces the city to drop the criminal case, but the ADL settles a civil lawsuit for an undisclosed sum of cash.

General Karen Kwiatkowski, who quit the Pentagon, wrote that during her time there, Doug Feith gave the Israeli military access to the Pentagon without signing in, in violation of security policy.

"Data collected was sent to Israel and in some cases to South Africa."

And finally, Sibel Edmonds, who has a gag order on her, but she courageously is now speaking, says that Patrick Fitzgerald will find more than just a few guys spying for Israel if he conducts a real investigation. Sibel says that it's basically the same people over and over again and the activities include multi-billion dollar black-market nuclear sales to terrorists and unsavory regimes. She says that the beauty of the larger case is that you can start form any angle. If you start from the AIPAC angle, you wind up at the same people. If you start from the Valerie Plame case, you end up with the same people. The FBI probe of Pentagon intelligence activities had as its target Doug Feith's Office of Special Plans. On her website, Sibel Edmonds shows photographs of those involved. I went to her website and I recognized the following photographs:

Retiring former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, retiring Member of Congress Tom Lantos, and Pentagon and State Department officials.

Sibel concludes that the investigations were shut down in 2000 and in 2001 "because they ended up going to higher levels and involving maybe way too many people, US persons. I'm talking about individuals who are breaking the law, misusing the trust and abusing their power, and in some cases I would even say engaging in treason."

Now in the face of all of this, why is it that we have to defend a young Muslim girl, talented at running track, from being put off the team because she wants to cover her body consistent with Islamic practice?

Why is it that Dennis Kucinich gets a visit from representatives of Nancy Pelosi and AIPAC and they tell him that they will guarantee his reelection if he drops his impeachment effort. That tells us, that at the end of the day, AIPAC feels that it can guarantee someone a Congressional seat if the AIPAC agenda is put forward. This exchange, recently made public, might also tell us why impeachment is off the table.

"I'm talking about individuals who are breaking the law, misusing the trust and abusing their power."

Now, by golly, that's power. Especially if they can get away with it in the midst of an investigation that has already put one person in jail and seen Condoleezza Rice on a list of witnesses to be subpoenaed.
In the meantime, the newspapers were filled with the news of a 42-count indictment against the Holy Land Foundation that had to be defended. The government falsified evidence and broke the law while spying on the Foundation. The LA Times reported: "The government's allegations not only proved unpersuasive but engendered skepticism among some jurors.

"The whole case was based on assumptions that were based on suspicions," said juror Scroggins, who added: "If they had been a Christian or Jewish group, I don't think [prosecutors] would have brought charges against them."

In Lima, Ohio recently, a young mother was murdered by the police as she held her baby in her arms. Yet the face of terror on your local television news is Muslim and the face of crime is black.

Dr. King reminded us that injustice anywhere was a threat to justice everywhere. What has happened to you is unjust. But what are you going to do about it? My father paid a price because I recognized that all human beings are supposed to have human rights. And I've paid a price, too for believing that.

The Muslim Legal Fund of America gives you an important tool in defense of your rights. And I'm smart enough to know that when your rights are protected, mine are too. So give to the Muslim Legal Fund - give until your bank account knows that you've given. The level of injustice in the world ensures that we'll need it far sooner than we wish.

Cynthia McKinney is a candidate for President of the United States. Go to her campaign web site: http://www.runcynthiarun.org/.

February 11, 2008

The Bilderbergers, the CFR, and Thomas Freidman go GREEN!!

http://sendenergy.blogspot.com/2008/02/greening-of-globalization.html

I detest Thomas Freidman, and what's more I do not like the NYT's science editor. This is Big Business at its worst. Pass the barf bag, please!!

The last bullshit:



Monday, February 11, 2008

The GREENING of Globalization!



April 15, 2007

ThThe New York Timese Power of Green

I.

One day Iraq, our post-9/11 trauma and the divisiveness of the Bush years will all be behind us — and America will need, and want, to get its groove back. We will need to find a way to reknit America at home, reconnect America abroad and restore America to its natural place in the global order — as the beacon of progress, hope and inspiration. I have an idea how. It’s called “green.”


I am not going to dignify this load of CRAP and the complicated rationale Friedman uses by posting it in full - some of it is highly interesting but it falls short, very short.

. That said, maybe now MISTER Freidman is now, at long last, waking up. Maybe. But until he tackles the grueling question on carbon trading and fully affronts Albert Gore, I am not too interested in his suggestions.

For one thing, lightbulbs with mercury in them provided by Big Business are NOT the way to go.

For another, my suggestion that the US residents immediately go in and put in home insulation - cutting oil use by up to as much as 25% - is totally achievable by the end of 2008, assuming there was a WILL TO DO SO, but are we going to see a CONgress that will pass laws to this effect? Nope. Won't even pursue impeachment of KNOWN CRIMINALS and they're dirty hands are in the oil tanks looking for more dollar$ for themselves. Like a bunch of spoiled brats, they'll pay for armaments to blast out real human people (by the millions) to keep Dick Cheney's Halliburton pumping profits and ask the US taxpayer to foot the bill. But ask the US public to insulate their homes? A truly global gesture of good will that all will be able to see? Not on your life.

Do we need a Green President of the United States, you bet we do , the entire world needs us to have a Green President!! But is there a global movement afoot to help elect a Green President? Of course not. We had a perfect candidate - Dennis Kucinich! But everyone sold him out. The guy had the DREAM TEAM, too. A fantasitic economist, a great great legal team, activist environmentalists, Native Americans, feminists .. active and involved people!! People who communicate!! People with vision!! and to bang it in - PEOPLE WHO ACTIVELY GIVE A SHIT.

The fact is, yes, they are all "green" now at the top, perhaps they are showing signs at last of wanting healthy survival- they want to coopt a true grass roots movement as quickly as they can and keep control. But the future is bleak these days and perhaps we are seeing the turning of the screw. I hope so. I increasinlgy see signs that they read what I say - the lowly pamphleteer who everyone rips off!! But I made sense, I try very hard to understand the issues and what is to be done for the good of ALL living things. I try to speak for those who cannot speak for themselves. Our living planet needs better advocates.

But Thomas, don't give me this blame it all on "the Dick Cheney factor" crap - everyone one agreed to Leavitt heading up the EPA .. or he woudn't be there!! What has he done since he got in there .. ever see his name in print except to see the EPA get sued or create another big blunder. How are we gonna clean out the EPA, the Department of Energy, the DoJ and all the other rascals ruining things? When are YOU going to support impeachment? I am waiting and alot of other living things are waiting too - and they're not buying green products!!

Didn't think so!!

the new york times link for EPA

and this is the link on the US department of energy

NYT file on US Congress alternative energy


LETTER; Carbon Offsets



Published: January 16, 2008

To the Editor:


To the Editor:

The Federal Trade Commission is quite right to scrutinize companies' advertising of carbon offset programs (''F.T.C. Asks if Carbon-Offset Money Is Winding Up True Green,'' Business Day, Jan. 9). But despite the high potential for greenwashing, the carbon offset market can also be a great environmental boon -- provided it's made accountable and transparent.

Curbing deforestation is one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We're currently losing forests at the rate of a land area the size of Kentucky each year, which accounts for 24 percent of carbon dioxide emissions.

Carbon offsets reward owners for conserving forests, countering the current perverse incentives to cut them down. But to work, they must conform to internationally recognized standards and be accessible to communities in developing countries, while forest conservation initiatives must be independently audited and verified.

Admittedly, these mechanisms are still in the early stages of development, but they are emerging and show promise. More scrutiny from government and N.G.O.'s ought to speed the evolution, helping carbon offset trading translate reliably into reducing emissions, protecting biodiversity and making land-based livelihoods more sustainable.

Tensie Whelan
Executive Director, Rainforest Alliance
New York, Jan. 11, 2008







  1. NOMINEE FOR E.P.A. DEFENDS HIS JOB AS UTAH GOVERNOR

    Gov. Michael O. Leavitt today defended his environmental record...to be made at the extremes,'' Mr. Leavitt said in an interview in his office here...Despite such amiable words, Governor Leavitt's record has drawn criticism from conservationists...

    August 14, 2003 - - Front Page - 1268 words
  2. Utah G.O.P. Welcomes Cheney and Adopts a New Tone

    ...Republican Party appeared united. Gov. Michael O. Leavitt was not booed. Senator Orrin...that arose last year, when Mr. Leavitt and Mr. Hatch were attacked as...conservatives against each other. Mr. Leavitt, who went on to win a third term...

    August 26, 2001 - - U.S. - 970 words
  3. U.S.-Utah Land Accord Incites Unlikely Critics

    ...the country. They zeroed in on Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, a third-term Republican...after the 2004 elections. Mr. Leavitt said he had expected all of that...here, the deals have caused Mr. Leavitt a bigger political headache than...

    May 23, 2003 - - U.S. - 1002 words
  4. Utah Law Creates First 'Pornography Czar'

    ...explicit material in his state, Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah is planning to sign into...first pornography czar. Mr. Leavitt conceded that the new obscenity...almost all aspects of life, Mr. Leavitt said the law would ''codify...

    March 16, 2000 - - Technology - 981 words
  5. Bush Nominates Utah Governor To Lead Environmental Agency

    ...President Bush today nominated Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, the three-term Republican...President Bush's choice of Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah as administrator...President Bush's choice of Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah as administrator...

    August 12, 2003 - - Front Page - 1232 words
  6. THE 2000 CAMPAIGN: THE CONTESTS AHEAD; West's Primaries Are Denied Spotlight

    ...presidential selection process. Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah led a vigorous bipartisan...assured Vice President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush of Texas their...if only faintly,'' said Mr. Leavitt, a strong Bush supporter, arguing...

    March 9, 2000 - - U.S. - 608 words
  7. Hearing on E.P.A. Nominee Takes an Ideological Turn

    ...confirmation hearing today on Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah, President Bush's choice...Public Works Committee told Mr. Leavitt repeatedly that the job he was...Washington. In response, Mr. Leavitt said that he viewed himself as...

    September 24, 2003 - - U.S. - 1011 words
  8. Democrats End Effort to Block Bush's Choice To Lead E.P.A.

    ...Environmental Protection Agency, Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah, clearing the way for Mr. Leavitt's confirmation in a vote by...agreement ended a standoff over Mr. Leavitt's nomination that had lasted...

    October 28, 2003 - - U.S. - 648 words
  9. Bush Choice to Head E.P.A. Asks Clinton Administrator for Reference

    By 6 o'clock this morning, Utah time, Gov. Michael O. Leavitt, President Bush's choice for administrator of the Environmental...Browner, a Democrat, was an indication that Governor Leavitt, a Republican, was executing a comprehensive confirmation...

    August 13, 2003 - - U.S. - 944 words
  10. After Long Delay, Senate Confirms Utah Governor as Head of E.P.A.

    Gov. Michael O. Leavitt of Utah was confirmed on Tuesday as head...of major environmental battles. Mr. Leavitt, who was confirmed, 88 to 8, will...watchers raised concerns about how Mr. Leavitt would handle occasionally tense relations...

February 03, 2008

The War on Corruption--Still Code Red

I think it would be fair to say that the DC Madame got caught up in this web of corruption.

She faces 55 years in prison if the full extent of the corruption and how she was "set up" is not fully investigated.

I would say under Judge Mukasey the chances of

DO THE RIGHT THING

are deeply reduced ..

Veeger


Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;


February 2, 2008 at 00:39:36

Headlined on 2/2/08:
The War on Corruption--Still Code Red

by Laurence A. Toenjes Page 1 of 1 page(s)

http://www.opednews.com



Tell A Friend

There were two overriding issues in the 2006 Congressional elections-the Iraq War and the Culture of Corruption. Both of these seem to be slipping from public consciousness as the faltering economy increases in importance, as the surge in U.S. troop levels takes credit for reduced levels of violence in Iraq (even though violence is rising in Afghanistan), and as Democratic earmarks overtake Republican earmarks. The National Intelligence Estimate issued late last year essentially pulled the rug out from under those calling for war with Iran, temporarily defusing that issue.

In the same way that a new terrorist incident could bring back the fears associated with September 11th, an unexpected revelation of corruption in high places could put that issue back on the front burner in this election year as well. Therefore, a brief reminder of what has happened, and what could happen, is helpful if not entertaining.

Some of the stars in the Republican version of the Culture of Corruption (RCC) were ex-Congressman Tom DeLay, ex-Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham, and ex-super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Cunningham and Abramoff are both in prison now, while Tom DeLay awaits trial in Texas on conspiracy and campaign money laundering charges. These three conservative Republicans were centrally placed within overlapping networks of other congressmen, lobbyists and defense contractors that are still being untangled, investigated and litigated.

Reporter Dean Calbreath described many of the individuals and organizations that were at the center of the RCC in an important article which appeared in the San Diego Union-Tribune February 5, 2006. Calbreath described how over 70 different individuals, businesses, and committees were intricately intertwined in unique and complicated ways, sort of a DNA string of politics fully capable of self-replication. A visual representation of most of that interlinked, tangled web is shown in the following diagram.


Culture of Corruption Network--2006

The main focus of Calbreath was on businessmen Brent Wilkes and Mitchell Wade and their dealings with Congressman Cunningham. Individuals and firms associated with Wilkes and Wade are shown in purple in the diagram. These relationships intersected with Congressman DeLay and his associates, including Abramoff, which are shown in green. Congressmen are coded red. George Nethercutt at that time was already an ex-Congressman and a member of a lobbying firm. Several governmental entities are painted black, and the final player, Barbara Bonfiglio, is colored yellow. Calbreath actually did not deal with Bonfiglio. However, she was the treasurer for campaign funds or leadership funds for 6 of the 8 congressmen discussed in his article. Therefore Bonfiglio was included in the diagram, it being clear she was a major player in the network.

Money, the strong force of politics, is what bound the network together. Earmarked appropriations went to Wilkes' and Wade's companies, such as ADCS and Perfect Wave (there were others). These companies employed lobby firms that in turn employed family members of congressmen. Most of the partners and employees of the lobby firms made numerous campaign contributions not only to these congressmen but to others as well, strategically chosen and encompassing an even larger network. Large amounts of campaign cash went directly from Wilkes, Wade, and Abramoff to members of Congress, while staff members of some of these congressmen slid over into positions in the lobby firms or PACs. Then a new round of earmarks, contributions, and, in some cases, warm social experiences would occur. The expectation was that the arrangements would last forever. If an emergency should arise, special assistance was available at Tom DeLay's K-Street pharmacy, a dispenser of over-the-counter political Viagra (r) without the 4-hour warning.

The party did not last forever, of course, due in large part to the excesses of Jack Abramoff and his associates, many of whom were ex-staff members of DeLay, and to the unbridled greed of Wilkes, Wade, and Rep. Cunningham. The next diagram indicates what has happened to many of those individuals and organizations two years, several investigations, one election, and many hours of introspection later.


Culture of Corruption Network--2008

* Mitchell Wade-Pleaded guilty to bribing Rep. Cunningham.


* http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4856470.stm">Jack Abramoff-Pleaded guilty to conspiracy and fraud, received 70 months in federal prison.


* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Rudy">Tony Rudy-Pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy.


* Brent Wilkes-Convicted of bribery, awaiting sentencing (could get up to 60 years).


* Randy "Duke" Cunningham-Pleaded guilty to accepting bribes and conspiracy to commit bribes, ordered to pay $1.8 million in restitution and to serve 100 months in prison.


* Tom Delay-Indicted on charges of money laundering and conspiracy to launder money, resigned from Congress, awaiting trial.


* Duncan Hunter-Will not seek reelection.


* John Doolittle-Under FBI investigation, will not seek reelection.


* Jerry Lewis-Under FBI investigation.


* Ken Calvert-Calif. Grand Jury: "Land sale to Rep. Ken Calvert violated the law."


* Roy Blunt-Under FBI investigation.


* TRMPAC-Tom DeLay's Texas fund, "indicted (in Texas) for accepting $120,000 in allegedly illegal corporate campaign contributions."


* Doolittle PAC-Will become defunct upon Rep. Doolittle's retirement.


* Alexander Strategy Group-Lobby firm, shut down in January 2006.


* http://www.firedupamerica.com/bonfiglio_is_everywhere">Barbara Bonfiglio-Resigned from Williams & Jensen legal and lobby firm, and gave up her position as treasurer for several dozen campaign funds. No public reason was ever offered for her departure. One article about Bonfiglio was titled "When She Catches A Cold, The Entire GOP Leadership Gets Sick."

It remains to be seen if Congressmen Lewis, Blunt, and Calvert will in fact seek reelection. Rep. Lewis has already passed the $1 million mark in legal expenses and he hasn't even been indicted yet. Perhaps the only way some of these congressmen can raise enough money to pay their legal fees is by remaining eligible for campaign cash as long as possible. In fact, the timing of Tom DeLay's resignation announcement in 2006, coming shortly after his easy victory in the primary election, strongly suggested such a strategy. At that time DeLay, too, was experiencing mounting legal expenses.

Several other highly visible names associated with the Culture of Corruption were not mentioned in the Calbreath article, and were therefore not included in the diagrams. Among these are the now imprisoned Rep.Bob Ney of Ohio and Rep. Mark Foley of Florida, who resigned from Congress amid charges of preying on teenage interns. Rep. William Jefferson of Louisiana, a Democrat and therefore an aberration in the pattern described above, is still under investigation for possibly taking bribes and hiding them in his freezer. A number of members of the Bush Administration were also found guilty of committing various illegal acts. These included Scooter Libby, the ex-assistant to Cheney, David H. Safavian, ex- White House chief procurement officer, and Steven Griles, ex- Deputy Secretary for the U.S. Department of Interior.

One relatively junior member of the Administration who assumed a major role in the corruption network is Lawrence A. Franklin , a Pentagon analyst who worked for Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith and then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz. Both Feith and Wolfowitz were fierce advocates for the Iraq War. Franklin eventually was sentenced to 12 years and 7 months in prison for passing classified information to two high-ranking employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman. Rosen and Weissman have been charged with receiving classified information and passing it on to a foreign nation, namely the State of Israel. It is sometimes forgotten that Israel is indeed a foreign nation!

Lest anyone claim it is a stretch to include the Lawrence Franklin case within a discussion of the more traditional Culture of Corruption, it is pointed out that of the nine current or former congressmen included in the corruption diagrams above, all but one, Devin Nunes, received campaign fund contributions from various pro-Israel PACs. For example: Tom DeLay--$101,450; Roy Blunt--$59,450; Jerry Lewis--$26,750; Duncan Hunter--$37,500. These figures are based on data downloaded from the Federal Elections Commission web site. They cover multi-year contributions from pro-Israel PACs identified by the Center for Public Policy on its website.

There are some who would also place President Bush and Vice President Cheney on the Culture of Corruption list as well. However, one of Speaker Pelosi's first decisions was that impeachment of them would not be pursued. Of course, another of her decisions was to remove language from an appropriation bill, at the behest of AIPAC and other members of the Israel Lobby, that would have required the President to get explicit approval from Congress prior to undertaking military action against Iran.

The Culture of Corruption may have receded somewhat from the public's attention, but its aftermath is still being felt. The underlying conditions that gave rise to it-special interests, lobbyists, money, and greed-are still in place. Like seeds scattered across a dry desert, they only need a gentle reign to bring forth Flowers and cover the sand once again with a lush, green carpet.


**********************************************************


Note: A link to a description of the methodology and software used to create the diagrams above from the original newspaper article can be found here. The file will be a zipped MS Word document appearing there with the highlighted phrase "DL_NETVIEW\HOWTONETWORKS.ZIP"

Laurence A.Toenjes is retired from the University of Houston ?s Department of Sociology where he was a researcher with The Sociology of Education Research Group. Toenjes received his doctorate in economics from Southern Illinois University.



November 25, 2007

MOSSADGATE, Spying and Canada: Connecting some DOTS

Story of note as Canada is set to sign a deal to have Israel do all the computer [Homeland Security] work for us ..

Although our dear Minister tells us NO deal has been signed (right!), this is TRUE. And consider that the Arabs of Canada won't sit at a dinner that has Stockwell Day at it, he is THAT well known for his support of Israel (not to mention security certificates)

Posted AT 3:22 AM EST on 14/11/07

Ottawa negotiating pact with Israel

From Wednesday's Globe and Mail

With a report from Carolynne Wheeler in Jerusalem

OTTAWA -- Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day's office yesterday confirmed that Canada is negotiating a non-binding co-operation agreement with the Israeli government covering counterterrorism and homeland-security matters.Hours after alleging that an Israeli government statement issued after talks between Mr. Day and Israel's Minister of Public Security, Ari Dichter, was "inaccurate," a spokeswoman for Mr. Day conceded that the details of the Israeli statement were accurate, although she insisted no agreement had actually been signed yet.

Okay, so NEXT .. we go to Stockwell Day's website and there is NOTHING there indicating that this announcement was ever made! Gone! Poof! and the big taZer scandal busted open the very next (how convenient!) day.

If one puts in Avi Dechter .. Nothing.

But this punches up on the Public Safety website:

Travel and hospitality expenses detailed report

For:Geller, Hilary, Chief of Staff
Purpose:Member of a delegation led by Minister Carolyn Bennett ( Minister of State, Public Health) to Israel concerning emergency management
Date(s): 2005-01-02 to 2005-01-09
Destination(s):Tel Aviv

ExpenseCost
Air Fare $2,624.80
Other Transportation $80.00
Accommodation $1,581.54
Meals and incidentals $337.02
Total$4,623.

Of interest to ME, is that Carolyn Bennett just happens to be MY MP!! Yup, a nice juicy LIBERAL. Now just WHY is nearly $5,000 being spent by a Canadian MP to travel to Isreal to discuss Emergency Management ??

Am I paranoid OR ...??

No, seems like this was a real JUNKET .. details of who went can be found here. Seems someone found some virus or another, saying it was BIOTERROR related.

http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/media/advisories_avis/israel_e.html

So one is STILL asking (and will be calling the writer at the Globe and Mail, OBVIOUSLY, to find out what happened to the cool Israel and Canada security agreement.

After looking for Stockwell Day and Isreal via google, at last this came up:

Israel, Canada sign security accord



In a further step toward security cooperation between Canada and Israel, Public Security Minister Avi Dichter met Monday in Toronto with his Canadian counterpart, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Stockwell Day. Following the meeting, Dichter and Day announced that they would accelerate negotiations toward the signing of a mutual cooperation agreement on homeland security.

Public Security Minister Avi Dichter.
Photo: Ariel Jerozolimski

The two signed an interim agreement through which, in the upcoming week, three teams will be established to enable cooperation in the fields of combating terror, fighting crime, and border security. Later, the two ministries will work to iron out details involving the final cooperation agreement, culminating in the signing of a joint agreement.

During the Toronto meeting, Dichter and Day exchanged updates on matters of mutual interest and sought to identify methods to improve the implementation of the bilateral cooperation between the two ministries. They also agreed to work to identify options for direct communication in order to maximize the exchange of information, technology and operational activity.

The two also reviewed the activities of parallel ministry bodies in terms of both administrative management as well as local activity in confronting homeland security issues.

Dichter has been on an official visit to the United States and Canada since last week, during which he met with US Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff (Israeli citizen), as well as US Marshalls Service head John Clark, with whom he discussed Israel's nascent witness protection program.

During his stay in the US, the Kadima minister has also been active in helping to lay the groundwork for the upcoming Annapolis summit as well as addressing the annual convention of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee).


And then to round this off before getting to MOSSAD/Israel "dot", consider this:


Straight Issues

Harper tilts Canada to Israel

Straight Issues By Charlie Smith

The photograph right comes from a southern suburb of Beirut, where Israel has conducted an extensive bombing campaign. Pictures of death and destruction are also coming out of Northern Israel, where Hezbollah rockets have fallen on an apartment block, a train station, and other civilian targets.

As the Georgia Straight went to press, there were more than 400 deaths in Lebanon and 40 deaths in Israel since hostilities began. A Canadian was among the four United Nations military observers killed in an Israeli air strike on July 25.

The United Nations' emergency-relief coordinator, Jan Egeland, told the British Broadcasting Corporation on July 20 that one-third of the dead and injured were children. Independent journalist Dahr Jamail reported on July 25 that 55 percent of all casualties at the Beirut Government University Hospital are children 15 years old and under, according to hospital records.

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has called for a cease-fire and talks involving all the parties, including Iran and Syria. So far, Canada has refused to back the plan. Prime Minister Stephen Harper initially described Israel's actions as a “measured response” to Hezbollah's kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers and the killing of eight others. Harper has continued to side with Israel even after it bombed the Beirut airport and destroyed Lebanon's transportation networks. On July 25, Harper told reporters that he hopes the international community will deal with non-state actors who stockpile weapons and launch attacks in the region.

Not everyone is impressed. Former Liberal foreign-affairs minister Lloyd Axworthy claimed in a recent Globe and Mail article that Canada “showed reluctance in discharging its basic responsibility to protect thousands of its own citizens trapped by the fighting in Lebanon” by refusing to endorse a cease-fire. Others have claimed that Harper has abandoned Canada's tradition of maintaining a balanced stance on the Middle East.

However, there are signs that Harper is articulating a position that was already developing under former Liberal prime minister Paul Martin. In October 2004, Globe and Mail columnist John Ibbitson claimed that unnamed senior government officials were “increasingly angry” about a “surreptitious shift” in foreign policy in the Middle East. “Canada, they say, is moving away from a balanced approach in the Middle East in favour of explicit and virtually unqualified support for Israel,” Ibbitson wrote.

During Martin's reign, Conservative foreign-affairs critic Stockwell Day repeatedly attacked the Liberal government for not supporting Israel strongly enough. Under Martin, Canada abstained from a UN vote on a resolution criticizing Israel's decision to build a security wall extending into the West Bank.

A recent Ipsos Reid poll for CanWest News found that 45 percent of Canadians agreed with the statement that Harper's position is “fair and balanced and completely appropriate”, and another 11 percent felt that Harper hasn't expressed enough support for Israel.

A Pew Research Center survey of residents of 15 countries from March to May of this year demonstrated that Americans had the most sympathy toward Israel. Pew analysts Jodie T. Allen and Alec Tyson recently wrote that 48 percent of Americans supported Israel, compared with just 13 percent of Americans who supported the Palestinians.

One in three Americans said their support for Israel arose from their religious beliefs. White evangelicals who described themselves as political conservatives were more than three times as likely to back Israel as self-identified “moderate” evangelicals. A Pew survey in 2003 found that 36 percent of U.S. adults believe that the creation of the state of Israel is a necessary precursor for the second coming of Jesus Christ.

The recent Pew survey showed that Britons and Spaniards were more supportive of the Palestinians, whereas Germans and Russians were more sympathetic to Israel. The French were evenly divided.



Israeli Spying:
The Mother of all Scandals

Once again, Israel has been caught with spies at the highest levels of the US Government.

At the heart of the investigation are two people who work at The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a powerful pro-Israel lobby in Washington. The FBI investigation, headed up by Dave Szady, has involved wiretaps, undercover surveillance and photography that CBS News was told document the passing of classified information from the mole, to the men at AIPAC, and on to the Israelis.

CBS sources say that last year the suspected spy, described as a trusted analyst at the Pentagon, turned over a presidential directive on U.S. policy toward Iran while it was, "in the draft phase when U.S. policy-makers were still debating the policy." This put the Israelis, according to one source, "inside the decision-making loop" so they could "try to influence the outcome." [CBS News]

Once again Israel denies wrongdoing, or faced with incontrovertible evidence (in this case one of the spies has reportedly cooperated with the FBI) dismisses the spying with the claim that such spying is harmless, because Israel and the United States are such good friends.

Well, let us take a closer look at that idea of “harmless espionage” by recalling Israel’s most famous failed spy, Jonathan Pollard.

Jonathan Pollard is an American of Jewish descent, born in Galveston Texas, who established a career as an intelligence analyst for the US Navy. There have been many theories offered as to why Pollard decided to betray his country of birth to the Jewish state, but that Pollard did betray his country of birth to Israel is beyond all doubt. Pollard’s defense was that he did not spy so much against the United States, only that he spied for Israel, sending them documents that in his opinion the US should have shared with Israel anyway.

That it was never Pollards job to decide what documents Israel should have was apparently irrelevant. Pollard arrogated that authority to himself. From his position of trust within the US Navy, Pollard delivered over 1000 classified documents to Israel for which he was well paid. Included in those documents were the names of over 150 US agents in the Mideast, who were eventually “turned” into agents for Israel.

But by far the most egregious damage done by Pollard was to steal classified documents relating to the US Nuclear Deterrent relative to the USSR and send them to Israel. According to sources in the US State Department, Israel then turned around and traded those stolen nuclear secrets to the USSR in exchange for increased emigration quotas from the USSR to Israel. Other information that found its way from the US to Israel to the USSR resulted in the loss of American agents operating inside the USSR. Casper Weinberger, in his affidavit opposing a reduced sentence for Pollard, described the damage done to the United States thus, "[It is] difficult to conceive of a greater harm to national security than that caused by... Pollard's treasonous behavior."

This should end the suggestion that Israel’s spies are harmless. They are not. The United States’ nuclear deterrent cost an estimated five trillion taxpayer dollars during the 50s and 60s to build and maintain, and less than $100,000 for Pollard to undermine. Israel waited 13 years to admit Pollard had been spying for them, and now lobbies for his release, having granted him Israeli citizenship.

Pollard is hardly the only Israeli spy operating in the United States. He just had the misfortune to get caught. Here are just a few examples of the Israeli spy operations that have been detected.

1947. Information collected by the ADL in its spy operations on US citizens is used by the House Select Committee on Unamerican Activities. Subcommittee Chair Clare Hoffman dismisses the ADL’s reports on suspected communists as “hearsay."

1950 John Davitt, former chief of the Justice Department's internal security section notes that the Israeli intelligence service is the second most active in the United States after the Soviets.

1954 A hidden microphone planted by the Israelis is discovered in the Office of the US Ambassador in Tel Aviv.

1956 Telephone taps are found connected to two telephones in the residence of the US military attaché in Tel Aviv.

1954 "The Lavon Affair". Israeli agents recruit Egyptian citizens of Jewish descent to bomb Western targets in Egypt, and plant evidence to frame Arabs, in an apparent attempt to upset US-Egyptian relations. Israeli defense minister Pinchas Lavon is eventually removed from office, though many think real responsibility lay with David Ben-Gurion.

1965 Israel apparently illegally obtains enriched uranium from NUMEC Corporation. (Washington Post, 6/5/86, Charles R. Babcock, "US an Intelligence Target of the Israelis, Officials Say.")

1967 Israel attacks the USS Liberty, an intelligence gathering vessel flying a US flag, killing 34 crew members. See "Assault on the Liberty," by James M. Ennes, Jr. (Random House). In 2004, Captain Ward Boston, Senior Legal Counsel for the Navy’s Court of Inquiry into the attack swears under oath that President Lyndon Johnson ordered the investigation to conclude accident, even though the evidence indicates the attack was deliberate. Given the use by Israel of unmarked boats and planes, and the machine-gunning of USS Liberty’s lifeboats, the most likely explanation is that USS Liberty was to be sunk with all hands, with evidence left to frame Egypt for the sinking. This would have dragged the US into the war on Israel’s side.

1970 While working for Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson, Richard Perle is caught by the FBI giving classified information to Israel. Nothing is done.

1978, Stephen Bryen, then a Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffer, is overheard in a DC hotel offering confidential documents to top Israeli military officials. Bryen obtains a lawyer, Nathan Lewin, and the case heads for the grand jury, but is mysteriously dropped. Bryen later goes to work for Richard Perle.

1979 Shin Beth [the Israeli internal security agency] tries to penetrate the US Consulate General in Jerusalem through a “Honey Trap”, using a clerical employee who was having an affair with a Jerusalem girl.

1985 The New York Times reports the FBI is aware of at least a dozen incidents in which American officials transferred classified information to the Israelis, quoting [former Assistant Director of the F.B.I.] Mr. [Raymond] Wannal. The Justice Department does not prosecute.

1985 Richard Smyth, the owner of MILCO, is indicted on charges of smuggling nuclear timing devices to Israel (Washington Post, 10/31/86).

1987 April 24 Wall Street Journal headline: "Role of Israel in Iran-Contra Scandal Won't be Explored in Detail by Panels"

1992 The Wall Street Journal reports that Israeli agents apparently tried to steal Recon Optical Inc's top-secret airborne spy-camera system.

1992 Stephen Bryen, caught offering confidential documents to Israel in 1978, is serving on board of the pro-Israeli Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs while continuing as a paid consultant -- with security clearance -- on exports of sensitive US technology.

1992 "The Samson Option," by Seymour M. Hersh reports, “Illicitly obtained intelligence was flying so voluminously from LAKAM into Israeli intelligence that a special code name, JUMBO, was added to the security markings already on the documents. There were strict orders, Ari Ben-Menashe recalled: "Anything marked JUMBO was not supposed to be discussed with your American counterparts."

1993. The ADL is caught operating a massive spying operation on critics of Israel, Arab-Americans, the San Francisco Labor Council, ILWU Local 10, Oakland Educational Association, NAACP, Irish Northern Aid, International Indian Treaty Council, the Asian Law Caucus and the San Francisco police. Data collected was sent to Israel and in some cases to South Africa. Pressure from Jewish organizations forces the city to drop the criminal case, but the ADL settles a civil lawsuit for an undisclosed sum of cash.

1995 The Defense Investigative Service circulates a memo warning US military contractors that "Israel aggressively collects [US] military and industrial technology." The report stated that Israel obtains information using "ethnic targeting, financial aggrandizement, and identification and exploitation of individual frailties" of US citizens.

1996 A General Accounting Office report "Defense Industrial Security: Weaknesses in US Security Arrangements With Foreign-Owned Defense Contractors" found that according to intelligence sources "Country A" (identified by intelligence sources as Israel, Washington Times, 2/22/96) "conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against the United States of any US ally." The Jerusalem Post (8/30/96) quoted the report, "Classified military information and sensitive military technologies are high-priority targets for the intelligence agencies of this country." The report described "An espionage operation run by the intelligence organization responsible for collecting scientific and technologic information for [Israel] paid a US government employee to obtain US classified military intelligence documents." The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (Shawn L. Twing, April 1996) noted that this was "a reference to the 1985 arrest of Jonathan Pollard, a civilian US naval intelligence analyst who provided Israel's LAKAM [Office of Special Tasks] espionage agency an estimated 800,000 pages of classified US intelligence information."

The GAO report also noted that "Several citizens of [Israel] were caught in the United States stealing sensitive technology used in manufacturing artillery gun tubes."

1996 An Office of Naval Intelligence document, "Worldwide Challenges to Naval Strike Warfare" reported that "US technology has been acquired [by China] through Israel in the form of the Lavi fighter and possibly SAM [surface-to-air] missile technology." Jane's Defense Weekly (2/28/96) noted that "until now, the intelligence community has not openly confirmed the transfer of US technology [via Israel] to China." The report noted that this "represents a dramatic step forward for Chinese military aviation." (Flight International, 3/13/96)

1997 An Army mechanical engineer, David A. Tenenbaum, "inadvertently" gives classified military information on missile systems and armored vehicles to Israeli officials (New York Times, 2/20/97).

1997 The Washington Post reports US intelligence has intercepted a conversation in which two Israeli officials had discussed the possibility of getting a confidential letter that then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher had written to Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat. One of the Israelis, identified only as “Dov”, had commented that they may get the letter from "Mega”, the code name for Israel’s top agent inside the United States.

1997 US ambassador to Israel, Martin Indyk, complains privately to the Israeli government about heavy-handed surveillance by Israeli intelligence agents.

1997 Israeli agents place a tap on Monica Lewinsky’s phone at the Watergate and record phone sex sessions between her and President Bill Clinton. The Ken Starr report confirms that Clinton warned Lewinsky their conversations were being taped and ended the affair. At the same time, the FBI’s hunt for “Mega” is called off.

2001 It is discovered that US drug agents’ communications have been penetrated. Suspicion falls on two companies, AMDOCS and Comverse Infosys, both owned by Israelis. AMDOCS generates billing data for most US phone companies and is able to provide detailed logs of who is talking to whom. Comverse Infosys builds the tapping equipment used by law enforcement to eavesdrop on all American telephone calls, but suspicion forms that Comverse, which gets half of its research and development budget from the Israeli government, has built a back door into the system that is being exploited by Israeli intelligence and that the information gleaned on US drug interdiction efforts is finding its way to drug smugglers. The investigation by the FBI leads to the exposure of the largest foreign spy ring ever uncovered inside the United States, operated by Israel. Half of the suspected spies have been arrested when 9-11 happens. On 9-11, 5 Israelis are arrested for dancing and cheering while the World Trade Towers collapse. Supposedly employed by Urban Moving Systems, the Israelis are caught with multiple passports and a lot of cash. Two of them are later revealed to be Mossad. As witness reports track the activity of the Israelis, it emerges that they were seen at Liberty Park at the time of the first impact, suggesting a foreknowledge of what was to come. The Israelis are interrogated, and then eventually sent back to Israel. The owner of the moving company used as a cover by the Mossad agents abandons his business and flees to Israel. The United States Government then classifies all of the evidence related to the Israeli agents and their connections to 9-11. All of this is reported to the public via a four part story on Fox News by Carl Cameron. Pressure from Jewish groups, primarily AIPAC, forces Fox News to remove the story from their website. Two hours prior to the 9-11 attacks, Odigo, an Israeli company with offices just a few blocks from the World Trade Towers, receives an advance warning via the internet. The manager of the New York Office provides the FBI with the IP address of the sender of the message, but the FBI does not follow up.

2001 The FBI is investigating 5 Israeli moving companies as possible fronts for Israeli intelligence.

2001 JDL’s Irv Rubin arrested for planning to bomb a US Congressman. He dies before he can be brought to trial.

2002 The DEA issues a report that Israeli spies, posing as art students, have been trying to penetrate US Government offices.

2002 police near the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station in southern Washington State stop a suspicious truck and detain two Israelis, one of whom is illegally in the United States. The two men were driving at high speed in a Ryder rental truck, which they claimed had been used to "deliver furniture." The next day, police discovered traces of TNT and RDX military-grade plastic explosives inside the passenger cabin and on the steering wheel of the vehicle. The FBI then announces that the tests that showed explosives were “false positived” by cigarette smoke, a claim test experts say is ridiculous. Based on an alibi provided by a woman, the case is closed and the Israelis are handed over to INS to be sent back to Israel. One week later, the woman who provided the alibi vanishes.

2003 The Police Chief of Cloudcroft stops a truck speeding through a school zone. The drivers turn out to be Israelis with expired passports. Claiming to be movers, the truck contains junk furniture and several boxes. The Israelis are handed over to immigration. The contents of the boxers are not revealed to the public.

2003 Israel deploys assassination squads into other countries, including the United States. The US Government does not protest.

2004 Police near the Nuclear Fuel Services plant in Tennessee stop a truck after a three mile chase, during which the driver throws a bottle containing a strange liquid from the cab. The drivers turn out to be Israelis using fake Ids. The FBI refuses to investigate and the Israelis are released.

2004 Two Israelis try to enter Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base, home to eight Trident submarines. The truck tests positive for explosives.

This brings us to the present scandal. Two years into an investigation of AIPAC’s possible role as a spy front for Israel, Larry Franklin, a mid-level Pentagon Analyst is observed by the FBI giving classified information to two officials of AIPAC suspected of being Israeli spies. AIPAC hires lawyer Nathan Lewin to handle their legal defense, the same lawyer who defended suspected Israeli spy Stephen Bryen in 1978.

Larry Franklin worked in the Pentagon Office of Special Plans, run by Richard Perle, at the time Perle (who was caught giving classified information to Israel back in 1970) was insisting that Iraq was crawling with weapons of mass destruction requiring the United States to invade and conquer Iraq. There were no WMDs, of course, and Perle has dumped the blame for the “bad intelligence” on George Tenet. But what is known is that the Pentagon Office of Special Plans was coordinating with a similar group in Israel, in Ariel Sharon’s office.

With two suspected Israeli spies (at least) inside the office from which the lies that launched the war in Iraq originated, it appears that the people of the United States are the victims of a deadly hoax, a hoax that started a war.

The leaking of the investigation of AIPAC to the media on August 28th, 2004 gave advance warning to other spies working with Franklin. The damage to the FBI’s investigation was completed when United States Attorney General John Ashcroft ordered the FBI to stop all arrests in the case. Like the Stephen Bryen case and the hunt for “Mega”, this latest spy scandal seems destined by officials who have their own secret allegiances to protect, barring a massive public outcry.

The organization at the heart of the latest spy investigation, AIPAC, wields tremendous influence over the US Congress. Through its members and affiliated PACs, AIPAC directs a huge flow of campaign cash in favor of, and occasionally against, Senators and Representatives solely on the basis of their willingness to support Israel. As an example, in 2002, U.S. Rep. Artur Davis, D-Birmingham received so much help from pro-Israeli pacs that 76% of his campaign budget came from OUTSIDE the state of Alabama, mostly from New York.

Let me repeat that. A Congressman AIPAC wanted elected received more money from pro-Israel groups outside his state than from his own constituents inside his state. Who is that Congressman going to be thinking of when he votes in Congress?

So here is the mother of all scandals.

For two years, the FBI has suspected AIPAC of spying for a foreign country, and for those two years (and for decades before) that group suspected of spying for Israel has been reshaping the US Congress for the benefit of a foreign government.

And THAT is the mother of all scandals.

Think about that as billions of your tax dollars flow to Israel while your roads and schools crumble and decay and services are cut.

Think about that as the coffins come home with your loved ones inside.

Think about that when you and a million of your fellow citizens march down the streets of America opposing wars built on lies and deceptions and wonder why the government just doesn’t want to listen to you any more.

More on Pollard here:

http://www.omedia.org/Show_Article.asp?

DynamicContentID=1866&MenuID=726&ThreadID=1014017

and this by Seymour Hersh http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/576453/posts

on Larry Franklin

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Franklin

http://www.physics911.net/franklinindictment

Here is the url for the infamous Mearsheimer report:

http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/

RWP06-011/$File/rwp_06_011_walt.pdf


ShareThis