Showing posts with label Amnesty International. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amnesty International. Show all posts

August 05, 2008

Omar Kahdr Cries: Help Me - Help Me - Help Me

Another proud moment in US history

Omar Kahdr's Interrogation Video From Guantanamo.

Kahdr held in Concentration Camp for 5 years without charge.

A Canadian citizen born in Toronto, he is the youngest prisoner held in extrajudicial detention by the United States, Khadr is unique in that Canada has refused to seek extradition or repatriation despite the urgings of Amnesty International, UNICEF, the Canadian Bar Association and other prominent organisations.

Khadr is the only Guantanamo detainee who has faced a judge and who is not boycotting the military tribunals, and has spent six years in the Guantanamo Bay detention camps charged with war crimes and providing support to terrorism after allegedly throwing a grenade that killed a US soldier. In February 2008, the Pentagon accidentally released documents that revealed that although Khadr was present during the firefight, there was no other evidence that he had thrown the grenade. In fact, military officials had originally reported that another of the surviving militants had thrown the grenade just before being killed. and has been frequently referred to as a child soldier. The only Western citizen remaining in Guantanamo.

See the Video at:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20286.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7507991.stm

15/07/08 -- -- TORONTO -- Lawyers for a Canadian prisoner at Guantanamo Bay released excerpts of videotaped interrogations Tuesday, providing a first-ever glimpse into the secretive world of questioning enemy combatants at the isolated U.S. prison in Cuba.

The 10 minutes of video _ selected by Omar Khadr's Canadian lawyers from more than seven hours of footage recorded by a camera hidden in a vent _ shows a 16-year-old Khadr weeping, his face buried in his hands, during the 2003 interrogation that took place over four days.
The video, created by U.S. government agents and originally marked as secret, provides insight into the effects of prolonged interrogation and detention on the Guantanamo prisoner.

A Canadian Security Intelligence Services agent in the video grills Khadr about events leading up to his capture as an enemy combatant when he was 15. Khadr, a Canadian citizen, is accused of throwing a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier during a 2002 firefight in Afghanistan. He was arrested after he was found in the rubble of a bombed-out compound _ badly wounded and near death.

At one point in the interrogation, Khadr pulls off his orange prisoner shirt and shows the wounds he sustained in the firefight. He complains he can't move his arms and says he had requested, but hadn't received, proper medical attention.

"They look like they're healing well to me," the agent says of the injuries.

"No, I'm not. You're not here (at Guantanamo)," Khadr says.

The agent later accuses Khadr of using his injuries and emotional state to avoid the interrogation.

"No, you don't care about me," Khadr says.

Khadr also tells his interrogator that he was tortured while at the U.S. military detention center at the Bagram air base in Afghanistan, where he was first detained after his arrest in 2002.
Later on in the tape, a distraught Khadr is seen rocking, his face in his hands.

"Help me," he sobs repeatedly in despair.

On the final day, the agent tells Khadr that he was "very disappointed" in how Khadr had behaved, and tries to impress upon him that he should cooperate.

Khadr says he wants to go back to Canada.

"There's not anything I can do about that," the agent says.

The video is believed to be the first footage shown of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service in action during its 24-year history, offering an unprecedented glimpse into its interrogation strategies.

The video was made public under Canadian court orders, and released by Alberta-based lawyers Nathan Whitling and Dennis Edney a week after intelligence reports made public last week showed Khadr was abused in detention at the U.S. naval base-turned-prison on the tip of Cuba.
A Department of Foreign Affairs report said Canadian official Jim Gould visited Khadr in 2004 and was told by the American military that the detainee was moved every three hours to different cells to deprive him of sleep and familiar cell mates.

The report also says Khadr was placed in isolation for up to three weeks and then interviewed again.

Whitling and Edney released the video with hopes that public reaction to the footage will prompt Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to lobby for his repatriation.

"We hope that the Canadian government will finally come to recognize that the so-called legal process that has been put in place to deal with Omar Khadr's situation is grossly unfair and abusive," Whitling said. "It's not appropriate to simply allow this process to run its course."

Guantanamo’s Child: Omar Khadr

Freedetainees.org

Omar Khadr was taken into US custody when he was 15 years old. The US government has said that all detainees are “treated in a manner appropriate to their age and status”. If this is true, then the case of Omar Khadr indicates that an “appropriate manner” involves torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment as well as denial of any form of justice.

Omar Khadr is one of at least 22 Guantánamo Bay detainees who were aged under 18 when detained. In April 2003 the US authorities revealed that children as young as 13 were detained in the prison. Reports of torture and attempted suicide by juvenile detainees undermine the claim by US authorities that they are receiving “special emotional and physical care”. Contrary to international standards the Pentagon has defined child detainees as those aged under 16, rather than under 18.

Lieutenant Corporal Johnson, a spokesperson for the US military, stated in 2003 that, “until we ensure that they’re no longer a threat, that there’s no pending law enforcement against them, that they’re no longer of intelligence value”, the children would continue to be held.

Arrest and injury

‘You’re fortunate, people here care about you. No one cares about me.’ Omar Khadr to Moazzam Begg whilst in Bagram

Omar Khadr was wounded by US soldiers during a battle near Khost, Afghanistan, and taken into US custody on 27 July 2002. During his capture he was shot three times and is nearly blind in one eye as a result of his injuries. The US military allege that Omar Khadr killed a US soldier, Sergeant Christopher J. Speer, in the operation.

Even though Omar Khadr was seriously injured, his interrogation started as soon as he was taken into custody. A US official stated that captured prisoners were so scared of abuse by US soldiers that they would talk without prompting. The prisoners “sometimes think we are going to cut out their livers” he said, giving Omar Khadr as an example of a prisoner “singing like a bird”. Omar Khadr states that:

· he asked for pain medication for his wounds but was refused;

· during interrogations a bag was placed over his head and US personnel brought military dogs into the room to frighten him;

· cold water was thrown on him;

· his hands were tied above a door frame and he was forced to stand in this position for hours;
· he was not allowed to use the bathroom and was forced to urinate on himself.

Former detainees have described how Omar was:

· brought into Bagram Airbase with horrific gunshot wounds: chunks of his chest and shoulder blown out. In the words of one former detainee, “his chest looked like he’d just had a post mortem operation performed on him – whilst he was still alive”;

· treated by guards with contempt and hostility;

· screamed at by guards for the duration of the night;

· forced to stake crates of water bottles which would then be thrown down again;

· forced to assume stress positions whilst being hooded, his wrists shackled to the ceiling;

On 30 August 2002 Canadian officials sent a diplomatic note to the US authorities asking for consular access to Omar Khadr while he was held in the US airbase at Bagram, Afghanistan. The US denied the request on 9 September, saying only that they would notify the Canadian government if any Canadian citizens were transferred to Guantánamo Bay.

Guantánamo Bay

“I lost my eyes, I lost my feet” Omar Khadr to Canadian officials in Guantanamo
Omar Khadr was transferred to Guantánamo Bay in October 2002. He says that as soon as he arrived he was subjected to a range of torture and ill-treatment that included:

· being short-shackled by his hands and feet to a bolt in the floor and left for five to six hours; occasionally a US officer would enter the room to laugh at him;

· being kept in extremely cold rooms;

· being lifted up by the neck while shackled, and then dropped to the floor;

· being beaten by guards;

· having a finger pressed into a pressure point in his neck, causing severe pain and inability to breathe;

· being left short-shackled by guards in an interrogation room until he urinated on himself. Guards then poured a pine scented cleaning fluid over him and used him as a “human mop” to clean up the mess. He says that he was not provided with clean clothes for several days after this degradation.

Omar Khadr was held in Camp V of Guantánamo Bay for over a year. Camp V is the most notorious of the camps still operating at Guantánamo, styled on the harsh super maximum security units on the US mainland. It is reserved for “high value” or “uncooperative” detainees.
Omar Khadr says of his time in Camp V:

· the lights were kept on 24 hours a day and detainees were punished for trying to cover the lights with their clothes

· the air conditioning was kept on cold, which he says “destroyed his lungs”;

· he was routinely placed in isolation, sometimes for up to a month;

· he was only allowed exercise once every four or five days, and in 2005 went without exercise in daylight hours for several months.

In addition to the beatings, isolation and frequent interrogations, Omar Khadr has been threatened with transfer to Afghanistan, Jordan and other places. He understood that these were threats of transfer to places where he would be tortured. He was also told that an Egyptian soldier, known to him only as Soldier Number 9, would be sent to rape him.

Hunger strike

In protest against his treatment and conditions at Guantánamo, Omar Khadr embarked on a hunger strike in July 2005 along with up to 200 other detainees. He went without food for 15 days, during which he was taken to the camp hospital twice to be given intravenous fluids. Omar Khadr lost 30 pounds (13.5kg) during the strike. Another detainee, Omar Deghayes, says he witnessed Omar Khadr vomiting blood.

During the hunger strike the abuse did not stop. On one occasion, when guards were transferring him to the hospital, he was told to walk back to his cell. As he was too weak to do so, the guards allegedly lifted him off the ground and repeatedly kicked his leg.

The hunger strike ended in July when the US authorities apparently made a number of concessions to the detainees. The detainees resumed their hunger strike in August, however, because the camp authorities had not kept their promises and in response to particularly brutal abuse. One of those at the receiving end of a beating was Omar Khadr.

“Get ready for a miserable life.”

Interrogator to Omar Khadr in Guantánamo

In November 2004 Omar Khadr’s lawyers gave him a series of psychological tests which were sent to independent psychiatrists for evaluation. In answer to some of the questions Omar Khadr stated that he had flashbacks, difficulty sleeping and had heard voices when no one was there.

Dr Eric W. Trupin, an expert on the mental health of juveniles in correctional facilities, evaluated the tests. He said Omar Khadr’s symptoms were “consistent with those exhibited by victims of torture” and called for “the immediate cessation of mental and physical abuse”. He noted that the conditions in which Omar Khadr was held were particularly harmful to adolescents. He concluded that Omar Khadr had a mental disorder “including but not limited to post-traumatic stress disorder” and that he was “a moderate to high risk of suicide”.

Government lawyers sought to cast doubt on the doctors’ diagnosis by saying they had relied on second hand testimony, overlooking the dark irony that the same government was denying any kind of independent medical evaluation.

Role of Canadian authorities

“I’m not here to help you. I’m not here to do anything for you. I’m just here to get information.” Canadian interrogator to Omar Khadr in Guantánamo

Flying in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the Canadian government accepted the promise of the then Secretary of State Colin Powell, who stated that “all enemy combatants at Guantánamo are treated humanely” when writing to the Canadian authorities about Omar Khadr.

The Canadian government may not simply have neglected their responsibilities towards Omar Khadr. It may also have been complicit in his detention and ill-treatment.

Omar Khadr has been interrogated several times by Canadian officials. According to papers filed in a US court, Omar Khadr was visited by Canadian officials four times in four days, starting on 27 March 2003. Rather than asking about his health or if he wanted to send a message to his family, the Canadian officials interrogated him. A video of the interrogation was finally released on 15th July 2008.

Canadian lawyers for Omar Khadr filed a lawsuit against the Canadian government, arguing that the authorities had violated the Canadian Constitution by “participating in interviews or interrogations without a lawyer being present, without [Omar Khadr] being allowed access to consular representation to get advice, without him being allowed to speak to family and friends”.
Another lawsuit attempted to force the Canadian government to release all its files on Omar Khadr. The government argued that doing so would “be injurious to international relations, national defense or national security”. A memo of William Hooper, Assistant Director of Operations at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, which was made public as a result of this case, revealed the logic of the government’s neglect of the human rights of one of its citizens. It states that “any efforts to limit or fetter the service’s investigative powers… will hamper the service’s ability to advise the Canadian government”.

The Canadian government has since written to Amnesty International stating that it has raised the allegations of abuse of Omar Khadr with the US government. It said it was engaged in “ongoing diplomatic discussions” with the US regarding his legal status and had requested an independent medical evaluation.

Legal issues

The US government alleges that Omar Khadr is an “al-Qa’ida fighter” and has classified him as an “enemy combatant”. Despite this, it has refused to charge Omar Khadr with a recognizably criminal offence and give him a full and fair trial.

Instead, Omar Khadr is to be tried by military commission, though they will not seek the death penalty in his case. The military commissions are executive bodies with the power to hand down death sentences against which there is no right of appeal to any court. The military commissions are fundamentally flawed and cannot provide fair trials in accordance with internationally recognized standards.

TAKE ACTION FOR OMAR KHADR

Write to Omar Khadr Omar Khadr
ISN 766
Camp Delta
P.O. Box 160
Washington DC 20053 USA

Send a message of support to Omar’s family
Email us at contact@cageprisoners.com

Write to the US authorities:

Stating that Omar Khadr must be released or given a fair trial;
Calling on the US authorities to ensure that Omar Khadr is afforded adequate contact with his family;
Calling for a full and impartial investigation into the allegations of torture and ill-treatment of Omar Khadr while in US custody in Afghanistan and Guantánamo Bay, and for all those found responsible to be brought to justice;
Calling for military commissions to be abandoned and for the presidential order that created them to be revoked;
Calling for the US government to set up a commission of inquiry into all aspects of the USA’s “war on terror” detention policies and practices;
Calling for the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay to be closed, and for all other “war on terror” detention facilities to be opened up to external scrutiny.

Michael Mukasey Attorney General
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001, USA
Fax: + 1 202 307 6777
Email: AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

Write to the Canadian authorities:

· Calling for an independent investigation into the Canadian government’s involvement in Omar Khadr’s detention, interrogation and torture;
· Expressing deep concern that Omar Khadr is facing trial by a military commission system that does not comply with international fair trial standards, convened under discriminatory legislation that is incompatible with international law;
· urging the Government of Canada to demonstrate its stated commitment to principles of juvenile justice, ending the recruitment and use of child soldiers, and upholding human rights, by seeking Omar Khadr’s repatriation.
· Seeking assurances that, if returned to Canada, Omar Khadr will be released or charged with a recognizably criminal offence and given a fair trial, and that no evidence obtained under torture will be used in any proceedings;
· Asking the Canadian government to call for the abandonment of military commissions and for the detention facility at Guantánamo Bay to be closed.

The Right Honourable Stephen Harper Prime Minister of Canada Office of the Prime Minister 80 Wellington Street, Ottawa Ontario K1A 0A2, Canada Fax: +1 613-941-6900 Email: pm@pm.gc.ca
Salutation:
Dear Prime Minister

The Honourable David Emerson
Minister of Foreign Affairs
125 Sussex Drive,
Ottawa Ontario K1A 0G2,
Canada Fax: +1 613 996 3443
Email: Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca
Salutation: Dear Minister

USA: Who are the Guantanamo Detainees? Case Sheet 14, Amnesty International, AI Index: AMR 51/184/2005, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/184/2005/en/dom-AMR511842005en.html

July 15, 2008

Today's Amnesty statement on Omar Khadr

Guantanamo video: Omar Khadr should be repatriated to Canada

Posted: 15 July 2008

Reacting to today's release of a video publicly showing Canadian citizen Omar Khadr being questioned at the US detention centre in Guantánamo Bay, Amnesty International called for Khadr to be repatriated to Canada immediately.

The video is the first of a detainee being questioned in Guantánamo and shows Khadr being interrogated by Canadian officials in 2003 when he was just 16 years old.

While he is not shown being directly ill-treated, he is shown crying, calling out for help repeatedly and showing his wounds to the officials. He is also shown as being without legal representation.

Amnesty International said:

'No one who was a child at the time of their alleged crime should be tried by military commissions, which have no juvenile justice provisions whatsoever.

'Omar Khadr should either be repatriated and tried in Canada by an ordinary court or released.

'The treatment of Omar Khadr throughout his detention violates the USA's obligations under international law, which requires that in all actions concerning children the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration.

'The US has violated international standards by refusing to recognise Omar Khadr's status as a minor and treating him accordingly.'

On 19 June, Omar Khadr appeared at a military commission pre-trial hearing in Guantánamo. A trial date in his case was set for 8 October 2008. Amnesty International said that the entire military commission system is fundamentally flawed and the tribunals must be abandoned in all cases.

Background information
Omar Khadr was detained by the US military in Afghanistan in 2002, when he was 15 years old. He has been held in Guantánamo Bay since he was 16. He is now 21.

Successive Canadian governments have repeatedly stressed that they sought and received assurances from US authorities that Omar Khadr was being treated humanely in detention at Guantánamo Bay. However, documents released on 10 July 2008 (following a December 2007 Supreme Court of Canada decision that Omar Khadr should be granted access to some of the records of his interrogation by Canadian officials in 2003 and 2004) revealed that the Canadian government was aware that he was being subjected to so-called 'stress and duress' techniques. Yet, Canadian officials still proceeded with their interrogations of Omar Khadr.

June 26, 2008

Amnesty Int'l slams tolerance of torture
Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:40:54

Amnesty International accuses Europe of enactment over serious torture issues
Amnesty International has slammed Europe for tolerating human rights abuse and torture, highlighting cases that support its claims.

Coinciding with the UN's International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, Amnesty International has issued a report accusing European governments of complicity and inaction over US-led rendition and secret detention by which people have been unlawfully detained and transferred from one country to another outside of any judicial process.

The report focuses on a number of notorious rendition cases, one of whom is Binyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian national and UK resident, rendered in 2002, allegedly tortured in Morocco and now detained for nearly fours years without trial at Guantanamo Bay.

"European governments are in a state of denial and have been sidestepping the truth for too long," said Amnesty International. "Their involvement in renditions and secret detention runs in stark contrast to their claims to be responsible actors in the fight against terrorism."

The report highlights six cases involving 13 individuals, details the involvement of European states.

This ranges from governments permitting CIA flights headed for rendition circuits to use European airports and airspace, as with Shannon Airport, to hosting secret detention centers, or "black sites" and includes the participation by security services from European states in interrogations of their own citizens while concealing their whereabouts from their families.

Also US detainees are being regularly transferred to detention centers such as Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; a facility known for its brazen use of torture to extract information from prisoners.

A number of individuals have also been subjected to enforced disappearance and the whereabouts of some three dozen people remain unknown. Every one of the victims of rendition interviewed by Amnesty International has said they were tortured or otherwise ill-treated in custody.

FBA/MMN

Why is nothing said about CANADA? It used Goosebay for landings, it did illegal interrogations, it refuses to obey court orders to release Omar Khadr and there are "detainees" going around talking about their abuse !! And then there's the curious case of CHINA which "observed" illegal interrogations at Guantanamo Bay .. yet where is the international torture prosecutor on this?

Oh, yeah, I forgot! Canadian Amnesty International is ABOVE THE LAW !! And I should know.




February 08, 2008

Canadian Coaltion calls for taser moratorium

No essay is required on this. I've already said it ALL. The taser is an instrument of torture. It is banned by international law and the UK, although still buying them, has BANNED them at international armaments shows held there.

The principal financial holder in Taser International appears to be Marc Mukasey, the US Attorney General's son - you know, the guy who makes apologies for America's use of torture.

Simply push on the links at the bottom for a full load of information.

Sigh. Somedays are just too much.

V


Coalition calls for taser moratorium

Thu, 2008-02-07 13:52.
Shuyee Lee

A renewed call by a growing coalition for a moratorium on the use of Tasers by police.

The coalition includes Amnesty International, the Quebec Black Coalition and politicians of all stripes including Montreal city councillors, the NDP, and the PQ.

They want an independent study and a public Montreal meeting on Taser use, dissatisfied with the recent RCMP review and Quebec public security report on Tasers because they were compiled mostly by police officials.

Councillor for Loyola Warren Allmand.

"There are some worthwhile things that are in the report but it doesn't get to the basic problem which, (is) what is the real danger and impact of these weapons on a wide range of people."

Chantal Registre's brother Quilem was killed after police allegedly tasered him six times last October while trying to arrest him on a drunk driving charge. She says they still have no answers into his death.

"On attend toujours des réponses et on n'a pas de réponses."

The coalition says politicians and police have to take a closer look at the use of Tasers in the wake of almost 20 deaths of people in Canada after being tasered by police in the past five years.

December 04, 2007

Taking the Military Commissions Act to court is the ABC of WAR CRIMES opposition

Because I think right now is so important, pivotal, to stopping the killing, I am highlighting once more the Military Commissions Act in the title index of the blog.


I would love to reproduce the Amnesty's entire text on the matter but I know it makes scrolling the blog even more combersome. But really a thinking person must read it.

http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/ENGAMR511542006

PLEASE READ THIS MATERIAL just as the Center for Constituional Rights case comes to court. This is simply the most historic act since NUREMBERG. Bush, Cheney, and CONGRESS itself are going to be ON TRIAL for war crimes. Make no mistake about it, that is what is happening. And I think this make make the news about the NIE more understandable no matter what commentators (liberals!) say about it.

Try to get involved and support the Centre for Constitutional Right.

Stay aware and up to date on the MOST IMPORTANT LAW CASE in your lifetime, as it will determine just how far PRESIDENTIAL POWER can go and the legality of the Military Commissions Act.

Though Amnesty wrote President Bush in September 2001 and urged him to be cognizant of human rights considerations after 9/11 attacks, this is what has happened since then:

Human rights violations have included:
    • Secret detention
    • Enforced disappearance
    • Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
    • Outrages upon personal dignity, including humiliating treatment
    • Denial and restriction of habeas corpus
    • Indefinite detention without charge or trial
    • Prolonged incommunicado detention
    • Arbitrary detention
    • Unfair trial procedures
Yet at the same time, US officials have continued to characterize the USA as a "nation of laws" and one that in the "war on terror" is committed to what it calls the "non-negotiable demands of human dignity", including the "rule of law".

November 24, 2007

TASARS - MORE!!

Here's an EXPERT'S view of the Dzeikanski event


So, obviously there are people who know exactly the procedures to be followed in emergency situations in Canada. Also, without the video that was made, the NDP would never have gotten on the stick to get something done to get an investigation going.


the youtube site where this video resides has much much more on police corruption in BC ..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dmso2dg-RMI&feature=related

Now some older sites with taZer information:

Video clip from Saturday August 20, 2005. anti-recruiting protest on forbes.

QuickTime movie at 4.7 mebibytes

A woman is on the ground, restrained by police officers, when a bald police officer arrived and fired a taser into her thigh. [yeah, like it was NECESSARY to taZer her? C'mon boyz! All these clips are gonna come out on investigations as to their use. Women really get a good ZAPPING when "needs" be when they couldn't possibly hurt those who are attacking them with the ZAP! Who is kidding who???]

the bald-headed cop fired his taser at the crowd

Now you see how they are instruments of torture? This photo PROVES that they aren't used as pacifiers for crazy people or to protect cops, but to TORTURE people exercising their right to free assembly ... Real nice, um Hmmm .. real nice. I am positive Taser International has seen this photo. IT comes from Pittsburgh Indy Media.

Here is a report on what transpired that day in Pittsburgh, as activists LEFT a protest against military recruitment,

As the speech finished, someone taped a cardboard sign to the stations
door reading �No Lies Told Today, Recruitment Center Has Been Shut Down.� At this point, a cameraman from Fox News shoved his camera into the face of a protester who was standing by the sign. When that individual asked that it be pointed somewhere else (instead of his face) the cameraman became aggressive. An altercation ensued at which point he started screaming to the cops to arrest people for assaulting his camera. Police from the City Of Pittsburgh and the University of Pittsburgh promptly began to attack the crowd on the sidewalk. The first person arrested (and according to the police, the person Fox is pressing charges against) was hit and pepper sprayed, during which time a cop held a taser two inches from his face. After that, a women in the crowd was grabbed, hit, pepper sprayed in the face while on the ground, and then tasered, all while three large cops stood around her. She is currently in the hospital and we are unsure of her condition. A male protester was also arrested, pepper-sprayed and tasered. An overwhelming police presence started ordering people to disperse from the sidewalk, and a police dog began pursuing people. Cops hit and shoved people, while the dog lunged forward and bit a 68-year-old grandmother who was walking away with her back to the dog. The police also let the dog bite a videographer, who narrowly avoided injury as the dog only got his pants. Further outrages occurred as the police grabbed a 17 year-old girl off the sidewalk and slammed her to the ground. Her crime? She questioned the legality of their earlier actions. Pepper spray also hit a group of children and the police knocked over a man in a wheelchair.


So you see that's how it works - you disable people with pepper spray (a chemical weapon) and THEN you taser them AFTER they are totally disabled. Nice, real nice.

National class action suit against TASER, Int.

author: Debbie Russell

National Class Action Suit--possible growing list of Police Depts/plaintiffs--against Taser, In. based on false advertising. Meanwhile, Taser, Int. admits death can occur - while saying they've known all along. ; now that first coronor rules taser as primary cause of death. Austin beginning to recognize it's first death - a year ago.

National Class Action lawsuit:

http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&cid=1121763921063

and more 'surprises' outlined in this week's Chronicle, Naked City-she does make note of our year-old Taser death:

Multiple tases may kill
BY JORDAN SMITH

Repeated Taser shocks "may impair" breathing and may lead to death, according to a new safety bulletin published by Arizona-based Taser International Inc., the leading manufacturer of electro-shock weapons used by nearly 7,000 law enforcement agencies nationwide. In a June 28 bulletin, the company warned that "repeated, prolonged and/or continuous exposure to the Taser may cause strong muscle contractions that may impair breathing and respiration, particularly when the [weapon's metal] probes are placed across the chest or diaphragm," The Arizona Republic reported on July 30. In previous training manuals, however, "Taser … told police to use repeated shocks to control a suspect," the daily reported. The bulletin also warns that multiple shocks and corresponding muscle contractions could cause injury to "tissues, organs, bones, muscles, tendons, ligaments, nerves, joints and stress/compression fractures to bones," reports the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Nonetheless, Tom Smith, Taser's founder and president, told the J-C that the warning is "nothing new" and is merely a regular training update. "We are just being more specific than we were before," Smith said.

Nonetheless, the warning was posted the same day a Chicago, Ill., medical examiner ruled that the February death of 54-year-old Ronald Hasse was an electrocution caused by two Taser jolts delivered by a Chicago police sergeant. The ruling marks the first time that a medical examiner has listed a jolt from the electro-shock weapon as the primary cause of death. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, Cook Co. Deputy Medical Examiner Scott Denton reported that Hasse received a five-second jolt, followed by a second, 57-second charge. Hasse was intoxicated on methamphetamine at the time, the daily reported, but it was the Taser, not the drugs, that ultimately caused his death – the Taser, Denton said, was what "pushed [Hasse] over the edge." The Sun-Times further reported that Denton plans to meet with Chicago PD officials this week to "suggest" that Tasers not be used on people who "are acting psychotic or appear to be under the influence of drugs." In fact, many of the people who've died after being shocked by Tasers have been determined to have had drugs in their system – including the Austin case of Abel Perez, who was tased several times and later died. The autopsy listed "accidental overdose" as the cause of death.

source url: http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&cid=1121763921063

Amnesty Intl USA: Third So-Called "Independent" TASER Study Linked to Manufacturer

author: AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL (USA)

(Washington, DC)�Today Dr. William F. Schulz, Executive Director of Amnesty International USA (AIUSA), released the following statement regarding documents listing Taser International executives, consultants and businesses partners as panelists in the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) TASER study. This discovery reported over the weekend by the Arizona Republic marks the third time in five months that the manufacturer has been linked to "independent" studies:
A policeman demonstrating a US-style Taser stun gun
A policeman demonstrating a US-style Taser stun gun
"Police departments around the world are purchasing TASERs based, in part, on constant reassurances from the manufacturer that numerous 'independent' studies have proven the electro-shock weapons to be safe and effective. But new revelations reported by the Arizona Republic over the weekend have made it abundantly clear that the company did not voluntarily reveal its connections to this study and the individuals who actually made the claim that TASERs are safe. In October 2004, a Taser International executive called the DoD report the 'granddaddy' of all independent studies. However, even as he made that claim, the company knew that their employees, business partners, and a long list of Taser's clients and supporters had participated in virtually every aspect of producing this report.

For example, the report states that the final version is a product that was reviewed by the 'Independent External Review Workshop.' But, Taser International has consistently failed to voluntarily reveal the fact that nearly half of the members of that panel were either employees of or had some other type of relationship with the company."
(End of Statement)


The Arizona Republic story marks the third time in five months that it has been revealed that Taser International has tried to hide its involvement in so-called independent studies. In January, media reports exposed information that three of the four researchers on an allegedly independent study were employees of Taser International and one was a paid consultant for the company. Two weeks ago, the public learned that the recipient of a $500,000 federal research grant tried to hide the fact that he would be paying Taser International's medical director $18,000 to consult on his supposedly independent study.

Amnesty International continues to call for comprehensive, independent medical studies to determine the risks TASER shocks pose to the general public. Everyday that TASER supporters refuse to engage in an honest debate and stonewall attempts to find answers to these questions is another day that the real, lifesaving potential of this new technology will go unrecognized.

###

Contact: Edward Jackson (202) 544-0200 x 302 or (202) 251-3894 (cell)
-source url: http://www.amnestyusa.org/regions/americas/
document.do?id=28984E0BBCAF8AB58525700A0080C81F
phone:phone: (202) 544-0200

November 22, 2007

More TaZer news . UGH. and surely more to follow ...

I hope Amnesty starts circulating a WORLD WIDE petition SOON,
as the ones in CANADA cannot be sign by foreigners.

Canada usually moves forward ONLY when confronted by
WORLD WIDE pressure these days.

Now for how the AUSTRALIAN Mainstream media is posting about these
"incidents" and the repercussions.

Probably MORE later today.

Impossible to stop and strip all this information today right now.

Sigh.

A Taser International representative demonstrates the company's stun gun.
Canada's third taser death sparks probe
November 23, 2007 - 7:22AM
Source: ABC

A third death in five weeks linked to the use of taser stun guns by police in Canada has prompted a ministerial inquiry in the easternmost Nova Scotia province.

Justice Minister Cecil Clarke ordered the review into the use of tasers in Nova Scotia following the death of a 45-year-old man who died in police custody on Wednesday, hours after being zapped.

"I have ordered Police Services officials in my department to immediately begin a review of policies and procedures regarding taser use in Nova Scotia" by law enforcement, corrections staff and sheriffs, Mr Clarke said in a statement.

"At the same time, RCMP are being called in to investigate the circumstances of the death at the correctional facility and I understand Halifax Regional Police will also have the RCMP conduct an external investigation into the arrest."

Earlier deaths

In October, Robert Dziekanski, 40, died after being shocked repeatedly by policemen with a taser only 60 seconds after they first approached him at the Vancouver airport in westernmost Canada.

A bystander's video released last week showed the four officers then piled on top of the distraught traveler as he lay writhing and screaming in pain on the floor, and within minutes he fell still.

Days later, a Montreal man died in hospital after being shocked by police with a stun gun, touted as a safer alternative to firearms.

In the wake of these fatalities, Amnesty International urged authorities to suspend the use of tasers, saying it had documented 16 prior deaths in Canada that raise "serious questions about the health risks involved in electro-shock weapons."

- AFP

September 17, 2007

Amnesty International Seeking 500,000 “protesters” to Complete Virtual Tear-down of Guantánamo


41, 138 pixels to date!!

(Washington, D.C.) – Today Amnesty International USA (AIUSA) launches tearitdown.org, and with it an online movement to tear down the prison at Guantánamo Bay. Visitors to the new Web site can eliminate one pixel from a photo of Guantánamo by signing a pledge protesting the U.S. government’s detention center. This project is part of AIUSA’s America I Believe In campaign that seeks to restore America’s leadership on human rights and end abuses in the war on terror. All 500,000 petitions will be delivered in person to the president, encouraging the U.S. government to close the real prison.

“This new Web site pushes the limits of Flash technology,” says internet communications director Steve Daigneault. “Instead of merely signing a petition and spreading the word through e-mail, this site allows the user to actually ‘own’ the pixel that he tears from the photo of Guantánamo. Every pixel is different. Personalized, the pixel becomes part of a larger picture and vision of justice and the restoration of human rights.”

Signing the online pledge pulls a pixel from a photograph depicting hooded and handcuffed prisoners at the detention site. The pixel is replaced with the user’s name, serving as a permanent reminder of his participation in the project. After removing a pixel, each visitor will be given a badge that he can take and post on his social networking page.

The Web site also contains case studies, other actions and information about upcoming protest concerts happening around the country in the next six months.

In partnership with Amnesty International, HUGE Inc. of New York designed and produced the Tear It Down Web site. A well-respected strategic design organization that specializes in interactive Web sites, HUGE created this cutting-edge environment encouraging users to relate and interact with the message.

“At HUGE,” said Gene Liebel, director of user experience, “we believe that a user-centered design is critical to the success of online campaigns today. The Guantánamo issue is especially engaging and has the potential to mobilize thousands of people from all political backgrounds. This Web site allows the user not only to rally around the issue, but take a concrete and real part in ‘tearing down’ this prison while ‘owning’ that piece that was torn away.”

The concept was brought to Amnesty International by Dan Weeks and Derek Sherman, two creative directors at leading advertising agencies. Working pro-bono and under the name “Middle Child,” Weeks and Sherman believed that if well-executed, the project could play an important role in the struggle to end the human rights abuses at Guantanamo Bay.

The America I Believe In campaign has addressed issues such as the creation of the detention site at Guantánamo and the signing of the Military Commissions Act of 2006. The campaign outlines the harsh, indefinite and isolating reality of life at Guantánamo, which amounts to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and is in violation of international law, according to Amnesty International. A goal of the campaign is to ensure that all those who remain in detention either be charged with a crime and given a fair trial or released unconditionally. Closing the site would be the beginning of this process.

About Amnesty International

Amnesty International's 2.2 million members include people from all walks of life taking action to protect people wherever justice, freedom, truth and dignity are denied. Amnesty International, the world's largest human rights organization and winner of the 1977 Nobel Peace Prize, investigates and exposes abuses, educates and mobilizes the public and helps transform societies to create a safer, more just world.

www.amnestyusa.org

ShareThis