Would some PLEASE give Boyd Graves a fair debate at a reputable venue!!

The clowns and scientologists are now pouring in to add injury .

Read the following..

Dr. Boyd Graves, Anapolis graduate needs a fair debating platfrom and I think YALE IS THE PLACE.

Virginia


Dear Charles: Perhaps if you read the 15 progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program, you would have a inkling of a clue as to what the issue is.
www.boydgraves.com/comments/

Now that you have denegrated my credentials , please note, Mr. Crowe has none. And Remember, it is easy for a nobody White man to ignore a ton of U.S. documents in which to put down a Black man, even if a graduate of Annapolis.-------------

Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

There is but one debate: Man or Nature: The Great AIDS ORIGiN Debate

Charles Geshekter <chollygee@earthlink.net> wrote: Dear David:

I just had a chance to listen to the April 1st radio debate you had
with Mr. Boyd Graves on a Toronto radio station regarding HIV and AIDS.

In my forty years in academic life, which has included the
presentation of papers at scholarly conferences from San Francisco to
New York to London to Rome to Dakar to Nairobi to Mogadishu to Dar-es-
Salaam to Johannesburg to Perth to Sydney to Honolulu to San
Francisco, I have never heard a more convoluted, disorganized,
embarrassingly witless and empty-headed stream of mindless blather
than what I heard Mr. Graves deliver on that radio program before he
rudely and spinelessly hung up.

Mr. Graves earned a law degree from what, in my opinion, is an
absolutely 2nd or 3rd rate law school called Ohio Northern. Most
American law schools awarded an Ll.b. degree which means bachelor of
laws, while some law schools simply call the very same degree a Juris
Doctor degree. In my experience, only law school graduates who aim to
preen or impress others would bother to call themselves a "Doctor"
based on that sort of degree. That is exactly what your Mr. Graves is
all about.

Finally, I found Mr. Graves one-note samba on HIV and AIDS to be
embarrassing in its emptiness, scary in its anti-science religious
zealotry, and appalling in its tawdry resort to conspiracy thinking.
His general ignorance of the past 30 years in the history of the
political economies of Africa was positively breathtaking and
cartoonish. You deserve the highest praise for staying calm and
resolute in the face of his tendentious and error-filled tirade.

Best wishes and please keep up your fine scientific work of synthesis
that helps expose the flaws, errors, contradictions and bankruptcy of
the orthodox line on HIV and AIDS.

Best regards,
Charles Geshekter

Activsim on AIDS

TRILATERAL GOVERNMENT AND U.S. MEDIA SILENT ON U.S. AIDS ORIGIN DOCUMENTS

By: Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.

www.boydgraves.com

Since 1997, U.S. patent #5676977 (“TETRASIL”) has sat quietly on the shelf of the government of the United States until recently. Last week, the Federal Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued a warning to the public that ‘Tetrasil’ was untested and unproven. However, the FDA was referring to a skin care product by the same name. Yet, upon closer evaluation, we find the FDA did not do their homework with respect to the skin care product as well. The Tetrasil skin care product was also tested and approved by the United States . See U.S. patent#6258385.

In subsequent email communications with the FDA, they have merely ‘thanked me for my comments’. The FDA, like the U.S. government can not have it both ways. They both purposefully exclude from the AIDS equation, the fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978). If there was a federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS, shouldn’t that program be reviewed and investigated? Therefore, why the hesitancy by the FDA and the U.S. government to review U.S. documents?

The answer lies in the fact there is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion, the United States developed, produced and proliferated the HIV/AIDS. Chief amongst the incriminating and compelling U.S. documents is U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 (“SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENT”). On June 9, 1969, the U.S. Pentagon sought and received a $10 million dollar Congressional Appropriation to make a “new” infectious microbe for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. The Pentagon says it will have it ready in ten years. We had HIV/AIDS by 1979.

We call upon anyone in the trilateral U.S. government to explain away the compelling sworn testimony of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS. We now can place a ’line in the sand’, whereby on our side, we see a clear path to the 22^nd Century upon review and investigation of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978). In the spirit of Dr. King; he would not wait until the next President.

Boyd Ed Graves is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and law school. He is in his ninth year as Director-AIDS CONCERNS, for the international medical research foundation, Common Cause, headquartered in Ontario , Canada . He is the author of two books on this issue, “STATE ORIGIN: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS, and “World War AIDS: The Third World War” (Zygote Media). Dr. Graves can be reached via email: boyded2003@yahoo.com

cdcchatterbox@comcast.net wrote:

Dear Mr. Roland Martin,

Congratulations on your new position with CNN. I often watch news programs like addict looking for a fix. Tonight, during the 360 program (Rev. Wright segment), you commented on his sermon about HIV / AIDS and Syphilis. You said that HIV / AIDS wasn’t man made and Syphilis wasn’t injected into subjects (Victims) during the Tuskegee Experiments. My question to you Sir is, what facts do you have to support your conclusion?

Please google Dr. Boyd Graves for evidence that contradicts your HIV / AIDS statement tonight. In reference to Syphilis, you are partially right, in that the victims of Tuskegee had not been injected with syphilis. However, they were allowed to go untreated for over four decades, in which time they “Injected” their loved ones with the fatal bacteria. My point is, the CDC of 1969 (United States Public Health Service [USPHS] 1932) , indirectly injected unknowing / unsuspecting African Americans with this deadly bacteria.

The MONSTER prior to 1932 was Syphilis. Ironically the origin of the HIV / AIDS has been traced to the same year of the onset of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Today Infectious Syphilis is an “Incendiary Device” for HIV/ AIDS! Despite the embracive langue used by Rev. Wright, on this topic, Sir, he was on point. I am respectfully requesting you research these facts and correct your comments made to the American People while on Anderson Cooper 360 this Friday Night.

Respectfully

Brian C. Robinson

Boyd Graves back in Ninth Circuit court; US special virus program again on trial

GRAVES WINS RIGHT TO APPEAL AIDS ORIGIN LAWSUIT

(San Diego, Ca.) In what some are calling a legal victory for government disclosure, the San Diego federal court today granted AIDS activist Boyd Ed Graves a right to appeal to the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California.

The federal court had ruled that Graves had not served the prior attorney general, (Gonzales) and dismissed his case "without prejudice". However, when Graves re-filed the new complaint, the federal court "rejected" the new complaint leaving Graves virtually no avenue to proceed, since the new complaint was never docketed by the court.

"The appeal will demonstrate to the higher court the lower court erred on two significant points. First, Defendant, U.S. Attorney General Gonzales, received the federal complaint and exhibits via certified mail, return receipt requested on or about May 17, 2007", said Graves. On this point alone the case should be returned to a fair minded jurist who intends to support the U.S. Constitution on behalf of the American people.

"Second, the original complaint was dismissed "without prejudice". The Court clearly errs in 'rejecting' the new complaint", he stated.

At issue in the case are the "missing progress reports" (#'s 14 and 15) of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978). Many experts believe this federal program is the birthplace of HIV/AIDS. See, www.boydgraves.com/comments/.

Defendant National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Dr. Alan S. Rabson, After we requested them, REMOVED those two progress reports from the archives of the NCI contrary to federal Freedom of Information Act law. The agency should be enjoined and compelled to replace the missing progress reports immediately and a global investigation into the U.S. Special Virus program get underway.

The missing progress reports are the end reports of the U.S. Special Virus program that persisted in the United States from 1962 – 1978. The fifteen progress reports are coordinated by a 1971 "research logic" flowchart of the secret federal program. The flowchart is first located at page 61 of progress report #8 (1971). The preceding sixty pages answer every question as to why we have HIV/AIDS. www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/ .

This federal lawsuit seeks to strengthen the security of the U.S. Constitution and the homeland of the United States of America. I have an inalienable right to life. My government does not have a right to make HIV/AIDS as I read.

# # # #

Boyd Graves faxes Michael Mukasey on AIDS case

Via mail, fax, email


November 10, 2007

The Honorable Michael Mukasey
Attorney General
United States of America
Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001

Re:
Case No. 07 cv 0453
Graves v. United States
Southern District of California
(U.S. documents PROVE U.S. ORIGIN of AIDS)


Dear Mr. Attorney General:

I write today to seek a response regarding an ongoing case before the federal government. On May 17, 2007, Attorney General Gonzales received certified mail of the federal complaint, yet the Southern District of California dismissed the case for failure to serve (without prejudice) July 25, 2007.

Upon the filing of the new complaint, the Court “rejected” the complaint without comment. The whitewashing of the U.S. judicial system will never allow this specific case to be heard without your extraordinary intervention.

However, all across the country and the world, this case is being heard. Mr. Attorney General, today, over four million people have the U.S. document evidence proof of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS. See, www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/

The Justice Department can no longer have it both ways. There is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion the United States made AIDS.

Chief amongst the evidence:
1. the 1971 blueprint of the program.
The 1971 “research logic” flowchart of the U.S. Special Virus program is first located at page 61 of progress report #8 (1971). The preceding sixty pages answer every question as to the “purpose”, “desire” and “intent” of the United States to make a “candidate human virus”. Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program and its fifteen progress reports will solve and end HIV/AIDS. Specifically, according to the 1972 report, the United States began testing the AIDS vaccine in 1972.

2. the 1997 CURE for AIDS
Any review of the U.S. Special Virus program will further prove the program is based on a “mouse model” and that a CURE for AIDS was developed in the laboratory mice. See, U.S. patent# 5676977.

3. U.S. House Resolution 15090
The page 129 testimony proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the United States has subrogated the U.S. Constitution. The early files are located in the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. This Congressional funding of AIDS development is consistent with Foreign Policy Statement-21 (“FPS-21”), February 1948. It is also consistent with the 1946 Appropriations, See, “Better” Than the Bomb, Time Magazine, June 3, 1946.

4. U.S. Public Law 91-213
On March 16, 1970, President Nixon handed out pens as he signed the development of HIV/AIDS into law. Even before 15090, Fort Detrick’s April 4 -5 , 1969 conference, “Entry and Control of Foreign Nucleic Acid” led the way. These conference papers will also show the complete criminal culpability of our government to make a silent weapon for a quiet war contrary to the United States Constitution and every world governing authority regarding genocide, weapons of mass destruction and human life. Nixon was clairvoyant, there ‘WERE explosive deaths in the last third of the 20th Century.

5. NSSM-200
At the 1974 World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania, the African leaders ‘balked’ at the idea of the “introduction” of AIDS (only) in Africa and only to Blacks. The United States agreed to give it to White people here. The United States recruited 1086 White, promiscuous homosexuals and gave them AIDS (the U.S. Special Virus) in batch #751 of Merck’s experimental hepatitis b vaccine. It is alleged the U.S. Department of Justice is illegally withholding this specific information.

6. Nixon’s July 18, 1969 Secret Memo on Overpopulation
This Memo speaks for all the good, innocent citizens who are dead who believed in our Constitution.

7. The sheep (visna) etiology of AIDS
ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, HIV/AIDS EVOLVED FROM AN “ICELANDIC” SHEEP DISEASE. See, Science, VOL 227, pp. 173 – 7, January 1985. See also, PROC NAS VOL 83, pp. 4007 – 11, June 1986, PROC NAS Vol 92, pp. 3283 – 3287, April 11, 1995. The Icelandic sheep sequences defy explanation in the genome of HIV/AIDS for a number of reasons. Most noticeable however is the narrative associated from the United States progress reports. On page 39 of progress report #8 (1971), the United States concedes that visna had not yet been associated with human disease. However, on July 18 1983 Dr. Matthew Gonda informed the U.S. AIDS Task Force that HIV/AIDS had evolved from visna. When and how did visna “cross species” between 1971 and 1983 so as to become the ‘etiological agent’ of HIV/AIDS? The issue of reparations revolves around the visna in my blood. A simple oral swab for a human test for visna will determine the reparations issue. If I test affirmative for visna. I should be repaired.

8. The missing progress reports
Dr. Alan Rabson was a member of the “Developmental Committee” of the U.S. Special Virus program and as Deputy Director of the National Cancer Institute, he has removed progress reports #’s 14 and 15 of the U.S. Special Virus program from the NCI archives. Dr. Rabson has been maintained in his position solely to allow the U.S. Special Virus program to fester. His actions are in clear violation of U.S. law.

Mr. Attorney General, we believe there is no more important an issue than one that seeks to buttress the Constitution. We write today to strengthen the security of our homeland, the United States of America, by requesting an investigation into the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978), its 1971 flowchart and fifteen progress reports, as well as the ten-year on the shelf CURE for AIDS, U.S. patent#5676977. See, www.uspto.gov .

How long before any apology? Not just to us, but to all the others in the world.

Respectfully submitted,



Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
574 Garrett Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
619-849-9364
www.boydgraves.com