March 27, 2008

Activsim on AIDS

By: Boyd Ed Graves, J.D.
Since 1997, U.S. patent #5676977 (“TETRASIL”) has sat quietly on the shelf of the government of the United States until recently. Last week, the Federal Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued a warning to the public that ‘Tetrasil’ was untested and unproven. However, the FDA was referring to a skin care product by the same name. Yet, upon closer evaluation, we find the FDA did not do their homework with respect to the skin care product as well. The Tetrasil skin care product was also tested and approved by the United States . See U.S. patent#6258385.
In subsequent email communications with the FDA, they have merely ‘thanked me for my comments’. The FDA, like the U.S. government can not have it both ways. They both purposefully exclude from the AIDS equation, the fifteen progress reports of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978). If there was a federal virus development program that preceded HIV/AIDS, shouldn’t that program be reviewed and investigated? Therefore, why the hesitancy by the FDA and the U.S. government to review U.S. documents?
The answer lies in the fact there is a substantial basis in U.S. law and fact for the allegation and the conclusion, the United States developed, produced and proliferated the HIV/AIDS. Chief amongst the incriminating and compelling U.S. documents is U.S. House Resolution 15090, page 129 (“SYNTHETIC BIOLOGICAL AGENT”). On June 9, 1969, the U.S. Pentagon sought and received a $10 million dollar Congressional Appropriation to make a “new” infectious microbe for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. The Pentagon says it will have it ready in ten years. We had HIV/AIDS by 1979.
We call upon anyone in the trilateral U.S. government to explain away the compelling sworn testimony of the laboratory birth of HIV/AIDS. We now can place a ’line in the sand’, whereby on our side, we see a clear path to the 22nd Century upon review and investigation of the U.S. Special Virus program (1962 – 1978). In the spirit of Dr. King; he would not wait until the next President.
Boyd Ed Graves is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and law school. He is in his ninth year as Director-AIDS CONCERNS, for the international medical research foundation, Common Cause, headquartered in Ontario , Canada . He is the author of two books on this issue, “STATE ORIGIN: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS, and “World War AIDS: The Third World War” (Zygote Media). Dr. Graves can be reached via email: wrote:
Dear Mr. Roland Martin,
Congratulations on your new position with CNN. I often watch news programs like addict looking for a fix. Tonight, during the 360 program (Rev. Wright segment), you commented on his sermon about HIV / AIDS and Syphilis. You said that HIV / AIDS wasn’t man made and Syphilis wasn’t injected into subjects (Victims) during the Tuskegee Experiments. My question to you Sir is, what facts do you have to support your conclusion?
Please google Dr. Boyd Graves for evidence that contradicts your HIV / AIDS statement tonight. In reference to Syphilis, you are partially right, in that the victims of Tuskegee had not been injected with syphilis. However, they were allowed to go untreated for over four decades, in which time they “Injected” their loved ones with the fatal bacteria. My point is, the CDC of 1969 (United States Public Health Service [USPHS] 1932) , indirectly injected unknowing / unsuspecting African Americans with this deadly bacteria.
The MONSTER prior to 1932 was Syphilis. Ironically the origin of the HIV / AIDS has been traced to the same year of the onset of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Today Infectious Syphilis is an “Incendiary Device” for HIV/ AIDS! Despite the embracive langue used by Rev. Wright, on this topic, Sir, he was on point. I am respectfully requesting you research these facts and correct your comments made to the American People while on Anderson Cooper 360 this Friday Night.
Brian C. Robinson

No comments: