October 30, 2010
September 21, 2008
President Palin They've already stolen 2008 Rove has already fixed the 2008 election
Get used to it
Google "election fraud San Francisco"
My concern was that if this problem was not addresses, anyone could be put in the White House.
George Bush Jr. was just the beginning.
If, Karl Rove successfully rigged voter records in key swing states - and there is every evidence that he has - and if John McCain does not survive his term - and there is every evidence that he won't - Sarah Palin, the moose-eating, go-go boot wearer, oil company-loving moron, will be president of the United States.
My guess is 2010.
Impossible, you say.
Not at all.
Any country that would tolerate eight years of George Bush Jr. will tolerate anything.
I sincerely hope I'm wrong, but the possibility is very, very real.
May 24, 2008
HBO carries RECOUNT on Sunday (NYT continues to LIE)
New York Times Continues To Peddle Myth That Bush Won Florida In 2000
By MARC MCDONALDIn reviewing the upcoming HBO film, Recount, (which takes a look at the 2000 election fiasco), The New York Times continues to peddle the fairy tale that George W. Bush won the state of Florida in 2000.
In reviewing Recount, the Times makes this claim:
"In 2001 painstaking postmortems of the Florida count, one by The New York Times and another by a consortium of newspapers, concluded that Mr. Bush would have come out slightly ahead, even if all the votes counted throughout the state had been retallied."
But it's important to note exactly what the 2001 consortium report said. As the Times' own November 2001 article on the report stated, in Florida, "...a statewide recount---could have produced enough votes to tilt the election his (Gore's) way, no matter what standard was chosen to judge voter intent."
As Thom Hartmann pointed out in a 2004 article, the Times downplayed this shocking revelation (that Gore actually won the 2000 election) in its 2001 article on the story. Hartmann notes that the Times buried this fact in the 15th paragraph of the story.
In its review of Recount, the Times' does go on to include some confusing language that points out that Gore "probably" could have had the edge in the 2000 election. But the main impact of the article is that Bush won Florida and that this was supposedly confirmed by "painstaking postmortems of the Florida count."
It appears that the nation's self-appointed "newspaper of record" seems to be determined to continue muddy the waters on the historical record on this issue.
"Recount" will be shown on HBO on at 9 p.m. Eastern Time on Sunday.
Labels: 2000 election, New York Times, recount
April 14, 2008
Activism: Write now on HR 5036 re paper balloting
Paper Ballots and Audits in Time for Election Day 2008!
Tell Your Congressional Rep. to Vote for HR 5036 "The Emergency Election Assistance for Secure Elections Act"
Americans need to be able to trust the counting of the vote on Election Day. Paperless electronic voting is rife with computer mistakes and security problems. Only 17 states have a voter verified paper record and require an audit. With no paper record it is impossible to audit the vote and we cannot be sure the vote was counted accurately. Voters can only have an impact if we are sure our votes are counted as they are cast.
On Tuesday, April 15, the U.S. House of Representatives will vote on a bill that will help ensure election integrity in time for the November 2008 by providing funds to states for voter-verified paper records and audits of the vote on Election Day.
Please send the letter below to your member of Congress IMMEDIATELY. GO to the website of an allied organization TrueVote to send a letter. The U.S. House of Representatives needs to show overwhelming bi-partisan support for this bill so the Senate will quickly act and President Bush will sign the bill.
- - - - - - - - -
Dear Representative:
I am writing to urge you to support H.R. 5036 when it comes to the House Floor this Tuesday. The 'Emergency Election Assistance for Secure Elections Act' - the "EASY" bill - is needed to secure the November 2008 elections. Broad support in the House will ensure passage by the Senate and approval by the president in time for the November election.
H.R. 5036 will provide states with funding for paper-based voting systems and audits of the vote count. The bill will assure election integrity nationally by making sure that votes are counted in a transparent and audit-able way.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
- - - - - - - - -
CLICK HERE to send the letter. (You can edit the letter when you do so.) Thank you for taking the time to help improve the election integrity of elections in the United States. PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
Counting the vote right in a way people can trust is the foundation of legitimate government.
November 23, 2007
Have a look ... this if from Jason Call.
And people wonder what Greg Palast was on about! and gets on about! and why people like Andrew Meyer get tasared?
There are questions to be ASKED and ANSWERED.
Paper balloting can so easily be accomplished with the will to do so.
But voting has been politicized and made PROFITABLE.
Here is what is happening on the ground as people fight back against electronic voting, the profit$, the scam$, the windfalls corrupt politicians made as this outrage took place in the US during the Presidential and the other important elections took place since at least the year 2000.
Determine for yourself how important it IS that people fight back.
Remember what Palast says -- when people fight back against voter fraud, they always win. Always. And bear in mind, that the estimate is that nearly 2 million votes are ALREADY caged for the next election.
Remember that BuZh and Co. actually want toxic HiLIARy in and running the martial law/FEMA camps, aided and assisted by Bil Clinton (Rockefeller) right at her side.
You've all been WARNED!!
Watch the videos and see what Bob Fitrakis has to say --
Friends,
I was supposed to meet with Robert Adams, Bernalillo Deputy County Clerk, on Wednesday to present him with the numbers that essentially show strong evidence that there was something wrong in the 2006 election between Wilson and Madrid. The data show that there were a lot of Democrats who voted for Bingaman in the Senatorial race, but also chose Wilson in the House race – a minute statistical probability in a very polarized election year. This information has been available for over a year, but no one has ever challenged the results or demanded an audit. Madrid never had the opportunity to officially contest the election because SoS Mary Herrera did not post the spread of the votes in time, or in an analyzable format, until it was too late to officially challenge.
I think it is appropriate to start questioning what happened in that race, now that we have electronic voting machine company ES&S, which supplies all of New Mexico’s vote tabulators, demanding that NM counties pay exorbitant maintenance contract fees for the $18 million worth of tabulators that NM purchased for the 2006 elections. ES&S has a long history of software and hardware failure all over the country. On top of this, ES&S essentially controls New Mexico elections from top to bottom, and has refused to have their M100 tabulators undergo hack testing. SoS Mary Herrera’s website is maintained by ES&S, and following the 2004 elections, Herrera blocked lawsuits filed by people who saw their votes switch on the touchscreen machines (which are no longer used). Other county clerks have blocked inspection of machine components, on the flimsy argument that such inspection would invalidate warranties on the machines. Something is very wrong here.
Deputy Clerk Adams was not in his office when I came by for our scheduled appointment. I will try to meet with him next week, and present him with all of the articles that point out ES&S failure, including the recent developments in California where both SoS Debra Bowen and San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera (no relation) are suing ES&S in separate cases for a variety of offenses, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract.
Meanwhile, I have posted to YouTube a book talk given by Columbus Ohio Law Professor Bob Fitrakis, editor of www.FreePress.org (a fantastic investigative website). I attended this talk in late September, 2005 in Seattle, and got a copy of the video from a local journalist. Fitrakis wrote an 800-page manual titled “Did George W. Bush Steal America’s 2004 Election?” replete with affidavits and statistical evidence (that the mainstream media has completely ignored) that essentially prove the malfeasance in Ohio in 2004. Fitrakis knows more about this than just about anyone, and was one of only four individuals who filed suit to stop the certification of the Ohio vote based on massive and widespread disenfranchisement and other irregularities. This is an extremely informative video, and I would encourage everyone to familiarize yourself with this issue.
The video is not yet on my website, but I have all of the YouTube links below, in order from 1-11:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
Sincerely, and in Peace
Jason Call
Candidate, US Congress, New Mexico CD 1
