Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts

August 18, 2008

Nuclear and Indigenous Items of Interest

An Open Letter to Canada and All First Nation Leaders

It’s well known that Canada perpetuates discrimination against indigenous people at every level of government, but what does it mean when that discrimination causes the death of innocent people? Death that is enshrouded in bureaucracy, covered up by the government, and ignored by the so-called leaders?

Shelley Brant, from the Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory in southern Ontario, reaches for an answer in this open letter:

An Open Letter to Canada and All First Nation Leaders

Wednesday August 6th, 2008

The recent questionable killing of yet another First Nations man, Craig McDougall 26 by police in Winnipeg has led me to write this letter:

How many more inquiries and bodies is it going to take???? How many more unimplemented recommendations???? How many more police lies and cover-ups supported by the governments in this so called great country before people wake up to the truth????? How many more planted weapons in the media and on our own people?????

This is the list of First Nations people killed by police across Canada and some have led to inquiries and some haven’t and is probably not even a complete list:

Frank Paul, a 47-year-old Mik’maq man - Vancouver- Vancouver police officer dragged the man, soaking wet and unconscious, from the downtown holding cells and dumped him in an alley across town. - Paul had died of hypothermia accelerated by acute alcohol poisoning.

Dudley George, aged 38, - Ipperwash - Ontario - was killed by a police sniper during a Native land protest at Ipperwash Provincial Park.

Craig McDougall 26 - Winnipeg - shot 4 times by police while on a cell phone with his girlfriend.

Matthew Dumas, an 18-year-old Anishnabe, - Winnipeg - was pepper-sprayed, shot twice and killed by a Winnipeg Police officer.

Dennis St. Paul - Norway House Cree Nation reserve - Winnipeg - shot and killed by the RCMP.

Donald Miles - Winnipeg - shot and killed by police.

Howard Fleury - Winnipeg - shot and killed by police.

John Joseph Harper - Winnipeg - shot and killed by police.

Helen Betty Osbourne 16 - The Pas- police complicity in the murder case of Cree teen The Pas Manitoba.

Neil Stone child 17 - Saskatoon - inquiry was released, stating that the Saskatoon police investigation into the 1990 freezing death of the 17-year-old - Saskatoon.

Rodney Naistus and Lawrence Wegner - Saskatoon- whose bodies were also found on the outskirts of town in February, 2000

Geronimo Fobister at the Anishnabe - Ontario - reserve of Grassy Narrows

Lorraine Jacobsen 40 - British Columbia - on a Kwagiutl reserve at Alert Bay - shot and killed by police.

Gerald Chenery, a Nisga’ man - Vancouver - was shot 12 times and killed by two Vancouver cops

Michael Langan , Metis 19 - Winnipeg- Death by police taser

You stepped into Iraq with the U.S. because of a dictator who was killing his own people, yet there is no difference between mustard gas and police bullets, they are both a permanent means of death, which makes you no better!!!!!

Perhaps someone should invade Canada and come to the aid of the First Nations people in this country who are at the mercy of it’s governments and their police forces, just as Canada comes to the aid of people in other countries for the same reasons.

I will say right now that I am ashamed to live in a country so full of hatred and racism, to the point where you can’t even trust the very people who are suppose to protect you which are the police not to shoot to kill because you are a First Nations person. There is case after case after case of First Nations people being killed by police who lie and cover up their deaths, only for the ugly truth to come out later yet they get exonerated and you would like people to think these are isolated incidents. They are not, they are country wide and you turn a blind eye because it might stain your quaint reputation.

Well I am here to tell you: your secret is out and now we know why the U.N Declaration of Indigenous Rights did not get signed by Canada don’t we. It’s because in Canada we are not considered humans so therefore why should we have any rights that might empower us??????

It is quite apparent that the lives of First Nations people mean nothing in this country and I am ashamed to say it also doesn’t mean a lot to the Native leaders of this country either. If it did the people would not be left on their own to speak out on police killings or attempts, yet they remain silent, all except one group decrying the deaths of two recent First Nations men in Winnipeg.

My point???? This going on all across Canada and where is the public outcry from the First Nations leaders???????? It’s going on right here in Ontario, where is the public outcry from the First Nations leaders?????? Have we become so colonized and politicized that the human lives of our own people boil down to who they are???? Does one life means more than another????? Are we so afraid that we might not get a vote or that the government might deny us something that we can’t even speak out and stand up for what is wrong in this country together, even when life and death is at stake??????

Silence means consent as far as I am concerned and if we have lost the meaning and value of human lives, the lives of our own people then we have completely lost who we are as a people. We might as well quit the nation talk and quit the cultural talk and quit the talk about who we are as a people because they are just words, your actions as leaders of all the nations across this country tell me there is nothing left worthy of fighting for. The only things left are an illusion and come from the outside, which has no meaning when it comes to being a First Nations person in this country. I will stand here today and say that I am no longer proud to be a Mohawk woman whose leaders can’t even stand up and do what’s right for their own people and that goes for the rest of the leaders across the country too.

I hang my head in shame at both this country and the First Nations leaders it has produced who would rather be silent than stand together with their own people who are systematically being killed by the police in this country!!!!!!!!!

Canada you can take your apology and stick it where the sun don’t shine because they are just mere words that mean nothing and perhaps in another 100 years rather than do something about the deaths of First Nations people at the hands of police now, you can apologize again!!!!!!

Shelley Brant
Tyendinaga Mohawk Territory


May 05, 2008

reminder from the World Bank (like, wow! aint' they helpful)

Two-thirds of world's resources 'used up'

This article appeared in the Guardian on Wednesday March 30 2005 . It was last updated at 02:15 on March 30 2005.

The human race is living beyond its means. A report backed by 1,360 scientists from 95 countries - some of them world leaders in their fields - today warns that the almost two-thirds of the natural machinery that supports life on Earth is being degraded by human pressure.

The study contains what its authors call "a stark warning" for the entire world. The wetlands, forests, savannahs, estuaries, coastal fisheries and other habitats that recycle air, water and nutrients for all living creatures are being irretrievably damaged. In effect, one species is now a hazard to the other 10 million or so on the planet, and to itself.

"Human activity is putting such a strain on the natural functions of Earth that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain future generations can no longer be taken for granted," it says.

The report, prepared in Washington under the supervision of a board chaired by Robert Watson, the British-born chief scientist at the World Bank and a former scientific adviser to the White House, will be launched today at the Royal Society in London. It warns that:

· Because of human demand for food, fresh water, timber, fibre and fuel, more land has been claimed for agriculture in the last 60 years than in the 18th and 19th centuries combined.

· An estimated 24% of the Earth's land surface is now cultivated.

· Water withdrawals from lakes and rivers has doubled in the last 40 years. Humans now use between 40% and 50% of all available freshwater running off the land.

· At least a quarter of all fish stocks are overharvested. In some areas, the catch is now less than a hundredth of that before industrial fishing.

· Since 1980, about 35% of mangroves have been lost, 20% of the world's coral reefs have been destroyed and another 20% badly degraded.

· Deforestation and other changes could increase the risks of malaria and cholera, and open the way for new and so far unknown disease to emerge.

In 1997, a team of biologists and economists tried to put a value on the "business services" provided by nature - the free pollination of crops, the air conditioning provided by wild plants, the recycling of nutrients by the oceans. They came up with an estimate of $33 trillion, almost twice the global gross national product for that year. But after what today's report, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, calls "an unprecedented period of spending Earth's natural bounty" it was time to check the accounts.

"That is what this assessment has done, and it is a sobering statement with much more red than black on the balance sheet," the scientists warn. "In many cases, it is literally a matter of living on borrowed time. By using up supplies of fresh groundwater faster than they can be recharged, for example, we are depleting assets at the expense of our children."

Flow from rivers has been reduced dramatically. For parts of the year, the Yellow River in China, the Nile in Africa and the Colorado in North America dry up before they reach the ocean. An estimated 90% of the total weight of the ocean's large predators - tuna, swordfish and sharks - has disappeared in recent years. An estimated 12% of bird species, 25% of mammals and more than 30% of all amphibians are threatened with extinction within the next century. Some of them are threatened by invaders.

The Baltic Sea is now home to 100 creatures from other parts of the world, a third of them native to the Great Lakes of America. Conversely, a third of the 170 alien species in the Great Lakes are originally from the Baltic.

Invaders can make dramatic changes: the arrival of the American comb jellyfish in the Black Sea led to the destruction of 26 commercially important stocks of fish. Global warming and climate change, could make it increasingly difficult for surviving species to adapt.

A growing proportion of the world lives in cities, exploiting advanced technology. But nature, the scientists warn, is not something to be enjoyed at the weekend. Conservation of natural spaces is not just a luxury.

"These are dangerous illusions that ignore the vast benefits of nature to the lives of 6 billion people on the planet. We may have distanced ourselves from nature, but we rely completely on the services it delivers."


May 03, 2008

Luxury community of "conscience"

When the locals cried green-wash, the elite developer cried class envy. Welcome to Paradise Valley.

By Fred Haefele


Read more: Environment, Opinion, Global Warming

News

Image: Ameya Preserve

Rendering of home at Ameya Preserve.

May 3, 2008 | LIVINGSTON, Mont. -- Somewhere on his 9,500-acre ranch in Montana's Paradise Valley, maybe as he watched the sun-dazzled Yellowstone River slide by the 12,000-foot Absaroka Mountains, Wall Street tycoon and self-described conservationist Wade Dokken must have had a vision: He would create a new kind of luxury community in the heart of the American West. Different from the typical recreation-based developments, utopian in concept, his Ameya Preserve would be a place of unsurpassed beauty, where bright and uncommonly well-heeled people could, however briefly, take their ease in a community implementing the kind of cutting-edge technology that could one day save the planet.

Along these lines, Ameya (Sanskrit for "without boundaries") would be powered entirely by solar, wind or geothermal sources, the buildings would be constructed according to the most advanced environmental specifications. Most prominently, Ameya would also be designed to "zero out," which means that the carbon emitted in the construction process would be scrupulously calculated, then offset by planting forest tracts somewhere else in the West.

In place of golf or skiing, residents could participate in a variety of Chautauqua-like events, conducted by Ameya "cultural directors," community members with distinguished backgrounds in the arts and sciences. Indeed, the people Ameya would have on board include some of the brightest stars on the American scene: best-selling author and restaurateur Alice Waters; soprano Renée Fleming; paleontologist Jack Horner; and former head of New York's Metropolitan Museum, Thomas Hoving, to name a few.

In terms of best and brightest, Dokken could hardly hope for better. The only thing he might wish is that Park County locals stay too dazzled to notice that his project is a meticulously designed biosphere for the über-riche, built smack in the middle of habitat that conservationists are fighting to save.

It's fair to say that, for the world's wealthiest, environmental issues have not always been a prime concern. Often enough, ignoring the environment is exactly how they got rich, and nowhere is this more true than in the American West, where the ravening extractive industries have run roughshod for over a century. It's not surprising that plush developments like Big Sky's Yellowstone Club (where skiers schuss on trademarked "Private Powder") occasionally have issues with the EPA.

The ultimate glitzification of sleepy mountain towns like Aspen, Colo., and Jackson Hole, Wyo., was more about insouciance than noblesse oblige. So to many, it was refreshing to hear a high-end developer talking knowledgeably about aquifers and habitat depletion. At first, Dokken got a lot of good ink about how painstakingly his initial proposal was put together. "I was kind of blown away (with it)," Jim Barrett, director of the Park County Environmental Council, told David Nolt, who penned an in-depth investigation of Ameya in NewWest.net ("The Voice of the Rocky Mountains"). "It's not perfect, but if we were to write the handbook on smart growth development ... that's basically what it was."

A North Dakota native, Dokken made his fortune on Wall Street as president of American Skandia, a financial services company. He sold Skandia to Prudential in 2003, returned west to deal in high-end real estate. (Price for an "Ameya Estate Preserve Lot": $2.1 million.) A tycoon who votes Democratic, a developer who sees himself as a conservationist, Dokken had straddled enough fences to know that if he was to build Ameya in a place like Paradise Valley, it would help to win over the community, and a fairly sophisticated one at that.

For years, the cowboys, ranchers, artists and working people of Livingston coexisted peaceably with celebrities, from movie folk like Sam Peckinpah and Jeff Bridges to famous writers like Jim Harrison and Tim Cahill. What they all had in common was they knew a great place when they saw one, and they liked it the way it was. In this manner, except for the bank account, notoriety and charisma, their move to the Montana Rockies was much like my own. I know a good place when I see one, too.

By last June, Ameya seeded the local papers with ads trumpeting the smorgasbord of benefits that the development, were it approved, would bring to Park County. These included a large spike in property tax revenues, a $50,000 donation to the rural fire department, the building of one Habitat for Humanity house for every 50 built at Ameya, funding for two advanced-placement teachers at Park County High School, and a 200-acre reservation for Livingston's "Farms for Families," a local program that promotes organic farming.

If such high-flying P.R. made locals a bit leery ("One can't help but notice the lengths to which Ameya is going ... to make their project palatable to the public," one letter to the Livingston Enterprise observed), the discovery that Ameya would try to buy two sections of public land made them downright skeptical. Though the project was still in the early planning stages, by July, locals began airing their doubts in a series of blogs and letters to the papers.

While some thought it laudable that Ameya eschewed the traditional 6,000-square-foot "Log-Mahal" for more discreet 4,000 footers, and that these homes would be powered renewably, and that the acreage upon which they'd be built was subjected to exhaustive impact studies, many struggled with pronouncements like "Ameya will be the most sustainable community ever built." Other project descriptions seemed almost nonsensical. A "private national park"? A "community of culture and conscience"? Finally, Ameya's assertion that "this project preserves natural resources that couldn't be preserved by any other means" involved the kind of death-defying, leap-of-faith logic few besides Dokken could manage.


Neither did it help that Ameya had a way of getting ahead of itself, and was prone to make claims it couldn't substantiate; for example, it was news to Thomas Hoving to learn he'd accepted Ameya's invitation, and it was news to the Corporation for the Northern Rockies to read that they'd already endorsed Dokken's project. More to the point, locals objected to a large-scale development built in a fire-prone drainage; they objected to the fact these were second, third or even fourth vacation homes; they objected to what seemed like Dokken's selective environmentalism.

Park County wildlife ecologist Peter Feigley, who smelled green wash early on, questioned Ameya's principles on the blog Luxist. "How many homes do the prospective clients [already] own, and how large are they? Think of how much jet fuel and gasoline is wasted by the ultra wealthy and their families, bopping around between their various homes and resorts." Feigley would go on to describe Ameya as "a sham; targeting wealthy and naïve, if not arrogant, individuals."

For Dokken, this proved too much. When you cracked on the ultra-wealthy, you were cracking on his people, and he couldn't let such a remark go unchallenged. He fired off a letter to Park County planner Mike Inman in which, among other things, he berated his critics for "class envy," claiming remarks like Feigley's were directed "at people who have had more success in life than the letter writers and blog writers ... Perhaps they were smarter. Perhaps they worked harder. Perhaps they managed their money better ..."

There followed a brief communal gasp. Had the locals just been scolded for not respecting their betters? Had Dokken been drinking? Whatever the case, everyone knew what really happened: A millionaire finally used the C-word.

It's weird to be discussing "class" in the 21st century West. For openers, many of us moved here precisely to get away from such a concept, and besides, the West is known for its frontier egalitarianism and hard-nosed reality checks; a beautiful but uncompromising place you were required to meet on its own terms. In short, it was a place where old-world conceits like "class" and "privilege" would get you nowhere, quickly.

Still, the fact that the high-end real estate market fairly suppurates with descriptors like "elite," "privileged" and "exclusive," underscores an unpleasant truth; the people who can afford to buy up the most beautiful spots in the West have no intention of leaving their aristocratic values back home. This would also seem to underscore Dokken's contention that the development of areas like the Paradise Valley is inevitable, and if he doesn't do it, some less visionary person will.

Be that as it may, Dokken seems to want it all; he wants to make money doing something that seems, environmentally speaking, indefensible, but he wants to be well thought of, too. Following his now infamous letter to the Park County Planning Board, he quickly wrote the Enterprise that he "deeply regretted (his) choice of words." He went on to state that "a careful reading of the remainder of the letter ... revealed an outline of environmental initiatives ..." that would, essentially, authenticate his commitment to conservation.

Mostly, a careful reading of the letter brings forth a number of statements that seem in direct opposition to the term as most people understand it. Consider: "Ameya Preserve will be the first carbon neutral community in the U.S. ... addressing the potentially greatest issue of our day in the single most responsible manner." On any green scale, how is the clearing, excavation and paving of elk habitat to build baronial-size, seldom-used luxury homes to be viewed as "responsible," no matter how they are powered, how many organic farming projects, easements or carbon switcheroos are in the works?

In any event, Dokken was hard-pressed to put the genie back in the bottle. For weeks, the Enterprise printed responses like the following:

"It is difficult to forgive Mr. Dokken for insinuating ... that we are stupid enough not to recognize a land speculator when we see one."


"The stark reality is that the Ameya Preserve will turn ... Paradise Valley into upscale suburbia."

"One piece of advice for you, Mr. Dokken. Don't get stuck in a snow drift, coming out of your 'preserve' ... you may find that nobody wants to stop and help you."

And finally: "Years from now, we will look back on the loss of these public sections with regret. The developer and his clients are the only ones who will be happy."

The coming summer promises interesting times for Ameya. While many elite developments have been hit hard by the slumping market (the Yellowstone Club and Idaho's Promontory, among them), interest in Ameya appears to continue unabated; in spite of local opinion, the development goes apace. In the past month, Dokken sold 4,000 acres of Ameya land to neighbor and fellow millionaire candy-magnate Giorgio Perfetti. The deal helped eliminate most of Dokken's debt, and helped move his project along toward final approval. Interestingly enough, Perfetti wanted to buy the land because he didn't want to watch it get developed.

The real genius to Ameya Preserve is that it foresees that global warming might take the fun out of being rich. What if they wouldn't let you jet to two vacation homes per week? But at Ameya, some of the wealthiest people in the world would get to feel that, with no noticeable change in their habits or behavior, they could still be part of the solution. In this way, what Dokken offers most closely resembles the medieval sale of Indulgences; instead of examining or changing behavior, well-heeled sinners simply paid the fine, went right on sinning. After all, they could afford it.

Not one word mentioned about the indigenous population of Montana, which leaves in one of the WORST of all Reservations.

Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice.

February 16, 2008

Canada's oil Sands a massive disaster!!

I have a little news for everyone .. the militarization and annexation of Canada is nearly complete - the US and Israeli bombers must fly.

Untilt Canada has a truly green Prime Minister, this is going to stay OPEN, no matter what or the US will withdraw the military contracts that our Trade Minister so eagerly laps up.

Virginia

Canada’s Oil Sands A Massive Disaster: Green Group

OTTAWA - Canada’s massive oil sands are “the most destructive project on earth” and the federal government must intervene to clean up the mess, a leading green group said on Friday.0216 03

Environmental Defense said excavation of the oil sands in the western province of Alberta — home to the richest petroleum deposits outside the Middle East — is producing vast amounts of greenhouse gases and poisoning local water supplies.

“This is Canada’s problem — our federal elected leaders need to clean it up or shut it down,” said Aaron Freeman of Environmental Defence.

The group called on the Conservative government to impose a firm cap on emissions from the oil sands and enforce regulations designed to prevent pollution.

The process to strip the tar-like bitumen out of the sands and turn it into synthetic crude oil is very energy intensive.

Alberta is a Conservative Party stronghold and critics say the government does not want to alienate the powerful energy industry by clamping down. Ottawa denies the charge and says a plan it unveiled last year will cut overall emissions by 20 percent from 2006 levels by 2020.

“All the major polluters, emitters of greenhouse gas emissions, will have to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, and that includes the oil sands,” said Mark Warawa, parliamentary secretary to the environment minister.

The Alberta provincial government says it has issued leases for 4,264 oil sands projects covering 25,065 square miles . New projects costing more than C$100 billion are on the books for the oil sands region and production is expected to triple to 3 million barrels a day by 2015.

($1=$1.01 Canadian)

Reporting by David Ljunggren; Editing by Peter Galloway



February 10, 2008

Why we need an Education for Democracy project now

How about a sugar daddy about now?

I really think that the Education for Democracy Project DVD needs to happen, be given a url, gave teeshirts made, and we need to start now - because no one is "up to speed". My trip to the Toronto Libray showed me that this information isn't even readily available!!

If you read this and have an idea either email me or leave a comment. I know that comments here are few and far between, but maybe someone will drop by and either agree to get involved or critique just why I am wrong on this.

Virginia

Bush Ad Infinitum Hotlist

Sun Feb 10, 2008 at 11:33:47 AM PST

While most calendars start on January 1 and end on December 31, I think I'm not alone in saying that the X's on my fridge are counting down toward January 20, 2009. I might mention the alarm set to go off at the stroke of noon, but that would seem obsessive. Still, while I may give a hearty cheer (and I'm trying to select between a set of appropriate quips) the truth is, we won't be shed of George W. Bush on that wondrous day.

He's not leaving. He's never leaving.

By that I don't mean that Bush has a nefarious plot to exercise the Poppa Doc President for Life clause. I mean that the Bush legacy will not be restricted to that "the less said, the better" note he'll receive in future history books. The evil that presidents' do lives after them; the good is left as a target for the next conservative president. Bush hasn't left much good behind him, but what he has left is a set of policies and decisions that may cripple whichever of our Democratic candidates is so unfortunate as to succeed Bush.

First up in the things we may have to live with for a long, long time is the gift of a radicalized Supreme Court. While it's easy to say that it will take a generation to mend, the truth is a generation might not be enough. Of the sitting Supreme Court justices, two of them are Reagan appointees from the mid-80s. One of them is an appointee of Gerry Ford who has been in his robe since 1975 (thank you, Justice Stephens, and hang in there). That means that we could still be dealing with Alito's snarling rants when Malia Obama is facing off against senior senator Hillary Duff. Even a couple of back to back Democratic administrations might not be enough to patch the tears put into the Constitution by the "strict constructionists," as the three youngest members of the court are Roberts, Alito, and Thomas.

Moving beyond the court, there's the perennial target of the Republicans: the people, their pocketbooks, and the planet.

There's a popular theory of a "business cycle" in which the economy goes up and down in somewhat regular waves. I can't help but view it as a political cycle, one in which a decade or so is enough to make people forget that conservatism does not work. Watch the folks around you for the next few years. As the Iraq Recession cuts into their lives, they'll momentarily get that splash of cold water awareness that the Laffer Curve has absolutely no evidence, that trickle down economics is a joke, and that the Magical Invisible Hand of Greed only ends up bankrupting the nation to the benefit of a chosen few. Then, as Democrats gradually put the world back together again, eyelids will droop, and the siren song of "you can have your cake and eat it too" will once more ring out across the land.

The only thing that might prevent this cycle from repeating again over the next few years is how spectacularly conservatism has failed during this spin of the wheel. Having presided over seven years of the spendthrift's ball, wrecked most every fundamental of the economy, invested a couple of trillion as a downpayment on the new Hundred Years War, and cheered an "expansion" in which the average American went backwards, you might think that the public would be in no hurry to trust Republicans with the check book again. Don't bet on it. After all Saint Ronald of Death Valley Days reversed thirty years of saving in a single decade while taking the national debt from 30% to 60% of the GDP. The expanded spending under Reagan so outpaced economic growth that a plot of it looks steeper than the Nepalese approach to Everest. Yet Ronnie is now regarded as a champion of sound economic practices. Why are we that stupid? Well, there are at least three television networks completely dedicated to spreading the "go greed!" message 24/7 (for every other TV network, promoting greed is only on 23 hours out of 24). Wake me when the Sustainability Network gets on the air.

In casting his inky-red shadow across coming administrations, Bush is still insisting that his tax cuts for the wealthy be extended -- right now, today -- even though they don't run out until 2010. Expect that theme to be a part of the race next fall and, no matter who wins, expect any effort to allow these cuts to expire to be portrayed as a "massive tax increase." In fact, I'll give you 10:1 odds it's called "the greatest tax increase in American history" before we get to pull the lever in November. This will be done by using revenue projections that run from now until the entropy death of the sun.

A great deal will be made of how, after seven years of residing over skyrocketing Republican graft and record setting corporate handouts, Bush has decided to play fiscal hardball when it comes to "earmarks." Except, of course he hasn't. He's only threatened to put into effect an executive order that would limit the number of earmarks to something greater than that ever passed by a Democratic president. And that limit starts in fiscal 2009. So any program cuts resulting from this new flowering of restraint won't come due under Bush's watch, they'll only affect the next president. And yet, should our next president rescind this order, you'll have to cover your ears to keep from being deafened by the howls of Republicans who are suddenly dead set against anyone doing what they've been doing for a decade.

That's the Bush economic goal at this point: lay mines around the gravy train they've built, pretend that they left something less than the worst fiscal catastrophe since the Big Bang, and scream if anyone touches their cheese. We had better hope we can land 60 Democrats in the Senate, because otherwise everything the next president attempts to do will be filibustered in support of the "economic discipline" Republicans were never able to practice when they had control.

Of course the Bush legacy will include Iraq. Not just the unsustainable deployment of troops, but the shotgun marriage to the dysfunctional Iraqi government. And then there are the permanent enduring bases in Iraq. At this moment, the Bush administration is negotiating a treaty that will "maintain our current level of authority to conduct operations in Iraq" indefinitely and secure those permanent enduring bases. You can bet that any attempt to move a single soldier from Iraq will bring cries of "retreat" and closing those bases will be "surrender." Oh, and expect the same Republicans who have spent the Bush administration sneering at any international treaty, to suddenly discover that any treaties negotiated by Bush deserve a reverence somewhere between mom and apple pie.

But as bad is the situation in Iraq is and will be, perhaps the worst thing Bush can still stick us with in this final year is something less visible in the short term, but vitally important in the long term. Having started his administration destroying the environment through executive orders bearing laughable names like "Clear Skies," Bush is ending his official tenure by systematically dismantling out last wild places.

In the last month, Bush has placed a giant "for sale" sign on America's largest national forest, the Tongass rainforest in Alaska. 58 million acres there have been opened up to development. The same thing has happened recently in Idaho and Colorado. It's not just the trees that are threatened. Last week the Bush administration auctioned off oil drilling rights in the Chukchi Sea, just off Alaska's northwest shore, despite the fact that it's an environmentally fragile area where polar bears are struggling to hang on. You'll be happy to know that Shell and ConncoPhillips now hold the rights to drill an area about the size of the state of Pennsylvania.

It may not seem like it, but on many fronts the now Democratic congress can act as a check on the Bush administration and stifle their worst impulses, but when it comes to the lands held in public trust, the president's authority is expansive. And where recovering from the foolish economic voodoo of conservatism can take decades, public lands surrendered to private greed is forever. Wilderness squandered is wilderness lost.

Repairing the damage that Bush has done is going to be an enormous task. Before the next president can move the nation forward, that president will first have to fill in the massive hole dug during this administration. Education. Our right to privacy. Trade policies. The tarnished reputation of the United States around the world. Even locating all the damage Bush has started rolling could take the next President most of her/his tenure.

To save time, I suggest the next president start with Executive Order #1: Every executive order issued by George W. Bush is hereby rescinded. Effective immediately.


  • Your lips to God's ears (11+ / 0-)

    Actually, I think it might be an interesting exercise to take out an ad in the NY Times and other papers across the country, and just list the legislation that BushCo chose to ignore through signing statements.

    In fact, there's a diary I could do as an extension of this one -- the public education necessary to expose all that this criminal administration has done, simply to keep it from happening again. It's as if we need some sort of Truth Commission, to pour lye on the ground of government so that even the roots of the Imperial Presidency are killed.

    Bruce in Louisville
    Visit me at brucemaples.com

    by bmaples on


    • Great idea (2+ / 0-)

      Please send this idea on to someone who can raise the money and do it. MoveOn?

    • * [new] Same idea, Education for Democracy Project

      Try explaining how Nancy Pelosi all by herself to a 23-year old and you'll see how frustrating it really is.

      So I took out a pencil and wrote down things that a participant in democracy should know and think it should be put on a DVD/CD ROM and given away FREE.

      how to write a petition
      how to file a complaint]
      how to get an arrest warrant for war criminality
      names of state's attorney generals and Constitional lawyers to contact
      The Constitution
      how the ICC works and with that the
      story of Nuremeberg
      federal laws that have been broken (Presidential Records Act)
      That whole list of Cheney/BuZh violations
      International Declaration of Human Rights

      and so on ..

      If people would cross fertize it could have videos and shockwave and so on that a young person would watch and appeal to both sides of the brain rather than being a stale execise.

      And because I live in Canada and see the same problems here (NATO alighed rememver?) section on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

      human rights
      environmental rights
      the military code of conduct
      and then rope off things like the Patriot Act, FISA, MCA somewhere .. somewhere very very seperate.

      there are some videos on youtube by pinky. they are a bit stodgy real, they move a bit too slow for younger people, but they give a good idea of what could be done for very little money and have a huge impact.

      If anyone is up for this I am really up for it and have posted on my site about it. If we do a good job, then at least the young people will know what problems they are inheriting ..

      I think that something like the NLG would be good to take the idea as they (unlike the ACLU) supports impeachment. All those signed onto H Res 333 might be recruited into the project.

      It should not be flag waving stuff - but rather showing how to be a global citizen.

      I think it needs to be done NOW before Cheney gets in there after BuZh resigns and Dirty Dickie grants The Decider&the rest of the cabal pardons.

      IF you email me Bruce, maybe we could brainstorm it better and come up with a proposal. IT would be so great to have for people passing around impeachment petitions and make people THIHK.

      There must be some people on this forum with experience of doing a project of this kind. It would be a very adult thing to do.

      Veeger
      ladybroadaok@gmail.com


February 02, 2008

Carolyn Baker reviews "The Final Empire" by Kotke

Carolyn Baker Reviews “The Final Empire” By William Kotke

Dandelion Salad

by Carolyn Baker
Speaking Truth to Power
Friday, 01 February 2008

My intention in reviewing this stunning book is to share how it has illumined my understanding that collapse and vision are not separate, but that in fact, they travel together and need each other. That is to say that collapse makes vision possible, and vision makes collapse the most desirable option of all as we confront the earth community’s current dilemma.

Disaster is not approaching,

It has arrived.

It is happening now.

Blessings and Grace are not approaching

They have arrived.

They are here now

I say I believe in Grace

But I think, feel and move as though

Only Damnation is real.

Or if Grace does exist,

It is for someone else.

I close my heart to pain

But it doesn’t help,

I cannot circumvent disaster.

But in closing my heart to disaster

perhaps I can circumvent Grace.

Can I bear the burden

Of knowing disaster and Grace,

Each in its own awful fullness?

James Hillman says our problem

Comes down to a failure of imagination.

I need an image, a picture…

Who would I be

If I were willing to risk believing

That Grace is real?

~By Paul Tierney~

It has repeatedly been my experience that when a book is supposed to enter my life, it does. Often it falls off the shelf into my lap, and at other times a friend suggests it, or the author him/herself sends me a copy for review. William Kotke has written articles for this website, and his Final Empire has been reviewed elsewhere, most notably by Dan Armstrong. However, the timing of my requesting a review copy of the book from him could not have been more momentous. As a result, I am not only reviewing the book, but using the review as an opportunity for sharing a recent shift in my perspective that may make this the most important article I’ve ever written in my life. It is written in two parts: The first contains Kotke’s extraordinary analysis of why civilization is collapsing and must collapse, and the second offers his vision of what is possible when empire has been eliminated.

My intention in reviewing this stunning book is to share how it has illumined my understanding that collapse and vision are not separate, but that in fact, they travel together and need each other. That is to say that collapse makes vision possible, and vision makes collapse the most desirable option of all as we confront the earth community’s current dilemma.

For at least the past two years I have been writing and speaking about the collapse of empire/ civilization, along with a chorus of other voices such as Matt Savinar, Mike Ruppert, Dmitry Orlov, Catherine Austin Fitts, Richard Heinberg, James Howard Kunstler, and Tim Bennett and Sally Erickson. I name only a few of us, mindful that ours are not the only voices speaking from the depths of exhaustive research and personal experience. And now in the first month of 2008, the world is beginning to witness a dramatic unraveling of civilization. The spectacle has begun with the convergence of what I have been naming for years as the “Terminal Triangle”: Peak Oil, climate change, and global economic meltdown. A number of related issues such as population overshoot, species extinction, and global pandemics, abide in the mix, but the “Big Three” are now juxtaposed in what appears to be the beginning of the end of life as we have known it on planet earth.

William Kotke has brilliantly articulated what I would not only describe as an “encyclopedia of collapse” but has skillfully depicted a vision of possibility imbedded within the core of apocalypse. The introduction and first chapter of this masterpiece can be read online, but they do not include what I believe are the book’s fundamental underpinnings consisting of Chapter 9, “The Cultural Dynamics Of Empire” and Chapter 10, “The Psychology Of Empire”, nor do they contain Kotke’s elaboration of the exquisite vision he holds for the earth community.

The author painstakingly describes the history of the disintegration and the collapse of the ecosystems in such a manner that the reader cannot escape the reality that all of this is inherent in the very nature of civilization itself. In fact, he thoroughly convinces us that no project in the history of the human race has been so unequivocally doomed from its inception as civilization, its ultimate destiny being its demise and the obliteration of everyone and everything in its wake. Had I had the slightest doubt that civilization must and will collapse in order to spare what it has not yet annihilated on this planet, my uncertainty would have been expunged by Kotke long before arriving at Chapters 9 and 10.

The Cultural Dynamics of Empire

Kotke takes on the linear concept of cultural evolution which assumes that natural cultures of ancient times were "in much worse condition than we are today" and that "we are at the forefront of social evolution." Contained within this notion is the delusion that humans invented agriculture as an escape from unsatisfactory conditions. (197) This myth presumes that "there has been a qualitative advancement with the change from forager/hunter culture to civilization." On the contrary, Kotke notes, compared with natural culture, civilization has brought forth a lowering of living standards and a world in which starvation is increasing--where "progress" is defined primarily by the technological objects that we have invented.

But the fundamental question that must be asked is: "What is it about the culture of empire that has produced the prospect of planetary suicide for the earth community?" Most of us know the standard answers to this question: Human culture changed from cooperation to competition; from social equality to hierarchy; from matrilocal consciousness to patriarchy and an emphasis on the warrior. (199)

Yet even more specifically, natural culture understood that each living thing is a spiritually conscious entity as well as understanding that "everything in material reality was spiritually vivified." The hallmark of that culture was a "continuing and direct spiritual contact with the cosmos" and one in which decisions were made with their repercussions on subsequent generations in mind. (200-201)

The culture of empire is characterized by a rejection of adaptation and insistence on control. It may be argued that as a result of natural culture's intimacy with the cosmos, its most remarkable asset was a willingness to adapt; whereas a culture immersed in materialism can only manage, manipulate, and dominate. Natural culture is one informed and guided by something greater than itself, but the culture of empire is a culture where the ego reigns supreme. Civilization inculcates the belief that bigger is better in every realm, and especially with respect to population. Increase in numbers of citizens offers the hope of physical safety, and economic growth delivers the false promise of immunity to scarcity. In summary, "a profound change takes place in the psyche of the culture when this change from forager/hunter to civilized, imperial energy systems occurs." (203)

Imperial culture, Kotke emphasizes, in contrast to natural culture, is shortsighted and accumulative. No longer is value found in preserving soil, water, forests, or other resources. Thus he argues that:

No one in the empire advocates long-term gain in soil fertility when the short-term gain of profit margins or production quotas are the whole point of the effort. This is the reason that nothing real will be done to avoid the final collapse of civilization. The structure of empire is to enrich the emperor/elite at the expense of the earth and society, not to manage affairs for the benefit of the whole life of the earth. (205)

Therefore, the culture of empire is one in which the earth is a "resource" to be used for the benefit and gratification of empire. Another word for this is quite simply, fascism.

Kotke's brilliant analysis of the cultural dynamics of empire confirms nothing if not the desirability, indeed the absolute necessity, of the collapse of civilization.

In "The Psychology of Empire" we are offered an intimate exploration of empire's impact on our hearts, souls, and bodies with a daring statement by Kotke that "We live in a culture that conditions us toward psychological disintegration" and the admonition that "the examination of these disintegrative factors will aid us in creating a new culture that is pointed toward healing and wholeness." (216) He then presents the analogy of malignancy, stating that "empire feeds on the earth like a tumor" because humans do not depend on the life of the earth for their sustenance but on what human society produces by way of using and exploiting the earth.

When one considers the cancer epidemic of recent decades in the light of the above assertion, one can only wonder to what extent our collective "feeding on the earth like a tumor" is influencing the incidence of this fatal disease. Kotke quotes cell biologist, L. L. Larison Cudmore, who states that "Cancer cells do not respect the territorial rights of other cells and refuse to obey the two rules obeyed by all other cells: they neither stop growing nor stop moving when they encounter another cell, and they do not stick to their own kind. Quite simply, they are cells that have decided on autonomy and independent growth, rather than cooperation....Cancer will not stop its hideous course of uncontrolled growth and invasion until it or its victim is dead." (218)

In other words, the cancer dynamic is without limits, inherently colonizing, omnipotent, and anti-dependent. Can we find a more apt description of empire consciousness?

Enculturation to empire begins in the birthing process itself which is not given the proper reverence it deserves, often complicated by or intruded upon by medication, technology, or both. Equally sacred is the bonding process, so frequently minimized, thwarted, or non-existent in the culture of empire. Yet another characteristic of civilization is its stilted relationship with erotic pleasure and the "anguish, shame, guilt, and automatic negative response to sexual love." (237) Thus the "civilized" child frequently enters adulthood carrying massive anxiety and little sense of connectedness with other humans or the earth. One of the most common outcomes is addiction, which empire feeds and perpetuates endlessly with a plethora of substances, things, activities, and people. Unlike growing up in natural culture, the child of empire "Not knowing the security of life and the earth and not knowing the security of a natural clan providing the learning of human sociability, the industrial human becomes a victim of all the forces of society that tend to make the person powerless and dependent, the perfect subject of addictive dependencies." (248)

Therefore, Kotke wisely concludes: "The logical extrapolation of civilization is the mental institution." (249) Neurosis, schizophrenia, and catatonic states, politically defined as insanity, are simply "logical extensions of the already existing social isolation of the individual in the culture of empire. It is also the logical end of the culture itself in the cosmos, lost in space and surrounded by life but talking only to itself." (250)

By the end of "The Psychology of Empire" it is difficult to even consider arguing for "reform" or the prevention of collapse. In fact, Kotke boldly and blatantly argues for collapse!:

We are not fighting to reform a maladaptive and dying social body. There is no conflict with civilization, it is passing away. There is no battle for civilization's power, the power to kill. There is only the open, positive and sharing sustenance of the new life. (252)

That is to say: Stop trying to fix a dying system. Rather, in Kotke's words, "As with a physical wound, the imperial tissue that has lost integration with the body, lost coherence with the complex flows of energy, falls away. One allows the diseased and injured portions to fall away, while resisting injury to that which is still healthy. One focuses on the new growth, the area of healing....In the case of civilization, it is now poised, tipping and beginning the slide into complete disintegration."

We must realize, says Kotke, that "the dear thing cannot be saved, even with major surgery."

The Ramifications Of Surrender

Some may object to the use of the word "surrender", with its spiritual undertones. However, I was greatly inspired last year by Sally Erickson's blog piece "Catastrophe As Spiritual Practice" in which she shared how surrender to collapse can be a powerful component of our personal, as well as planetary, evolution. These past two years have been for me a cellular-level experience of comprehending more deeply than ever what that actually means. The spiritual dimension for me is non-religious and non-theistic, yet informed by something greater than myself.

From the beginning of this millennium until I encountered the topic of collapse, I had been a prisoner of ego, intent on doing battle with the darkness of empire, hopeful that enough grassroots momentum could be marshaled to affect change and return the United States to the principles of a democratic republic verbalized in the Constitution, albeit not always practiced, through political and community action. What I have learned from my willingness to descend into the abyss of collapse is that there is no return to the "Common Sense" of Thomas Paine, nor is the prevention of collapse even desirable. On the contrary, the collapse of civilization is the only "hope" humanity has of restoring sanity to its own species.

Unfortunately, as I have written profusely about the desirability of collapse, some readers have argued that embracing collapse is synonymous with "giving up." For this reason, the second part of this review of Kotke's Final Empire will be devoted to exploring the other half of the book, "The Seed Of The Future," in which I will demonstrate that surrendering to collapse is anything but giving up.

What natural cultures understand that empire culture does not and cannot, is that before we can take action that makes a significant difference, we must surrender to the worst case scenario; that is, we must be willing to abandon, reject, and resist "hope" and open to abject despair. In other words, as Paul Tierney's poem reminds us, when we circumvent pain, we also circumvent grace.

Hope Vs. Vision/Mindset

As Truth To Power readers know, I have a strong reaction to the word "hope", and I take great pains to distinguish it from vision or mindset. For those who don't know, I want to explain why-again. My 2007 "The End Of The World As We Know It: Hope Vs. Mindset" addressed the issue by illuminating the word "hope" as an unfortunate casualty of the language of empire. Although not quite as cynical about it as James Howard Kunstler, I agree with him when he argues that any hope we have must come from within ourselves. Empire has inculcated in us the belief that our hope lies in something external-politicians, policies, programs, or other people, and as a result, the tendency is to embrace those as our "hope" rather than journeying into the recesses of our own psyches in order to create a vision that we can manifest in relationship with our fellow humans and the entire earth community. More often than not, our "hope" is a defense against feeling despair, but until we have visited the abyss, we are ill-equipped to affect meaningful change and are more likely to engage in activities that appear to be innovative but actually perpetuate denial-our own and that of our allies.

When I abandon the ego-driven project of preventing collapse, when I surrender to utter hopelessness, a fertile space is created in my psyche and my life for giving birth to and nurturing my vision. No longer is my vision jaded by fantasy or a compulsion to circumvent upheaval. I can stand in the tracks of the non-humans struggling to avoid extinction engendered by "superior" humans and open to the possibility of sacrificing myself and my own species so that they may live. My surrender allows me to find my proper place and purpose in the earth community-one species among countless others, willing to allow those others the last word because, of course, they will have it anyway.

Part II of this review will explore "The Seed Of The Future", creating and tending one's vision.

Wm. H. Kötke is widely traveled and published. His most recent book, prior to Planet Garden, was the underground classic, The Final Empire: The Collapse of Civilization and the Seed of the Future. He has been a journalist, a radio script writer, a pamphleteer, a novelist, an essayist, and has had many articles published in periodicals. He lives in Geyserville, California and may be contacted at wmkotke@earthlink.net This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it .


FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

see

The Plan By William Kotke (Survival; resources)

THE HERO’S JOURNEY By William Kotke


December 05, 2007

Crosspost: CHEMTRAILS and HAARP and other horrifics

Chemtrail Clouds and Electromagnetic Energy

Posted by Sopan Greene on December 4, 2007

PUBLIC LAW 95-79 [P.L. 95-79] TITLE 50, CHAPTER 32, SECTION 1520 “CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE PROGRAM” “The use of human subjects will be allowed for the testing of chemical and biological agents by the U.S. Department of Defense, accounting to Congressional committees with respect to the experiments and studies. The Secretary of Defense [may] conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological [warfare] agents on civilian populations [within the United States].” -SOURCE- Public Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977, 91 Stat. 334. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 91, page 334, you will find Public Law 95-79. Public Law 97-375, title II, Sec. 203(a)(1), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1882. In U.S. Statutes-at-Large, Vol. 96, page 1882, you will find Public Law 97-375

From BariumBlues.com:

I live in Duluth, Minnesota and photographed this extraordinary energy display from my back yard at midday (12:57 PM) January 21, 2003. It lasted 7 minutes.

These aerosol clouds were glowing, shimmering and colorful. They appeared to be vibrating dramatically with a force or energy such as I’ve never seen before. Needless to say, it wasn’t the wind. Nor was it the effect of light on ice crystals. (Please look at the series of photos which follow after you read this.)

This was the most startling event that I’ve witnessed since I started documenting the chemtrails phenomenon. It erased any lingering doubts about the possibility of an electromagnetic component to the aerosol-related operations. Electromagnetic radiation of some type appears to be key to some of these operations. I’ve continued on occasion to observe other instances of highly anomalous electromagnetic activity in aerosol-created clouds.

These artificial clouds are accepted by the population as being natural because aerosols have been gradually introduced. They’ve sprayed aerosols in the atmosphere for well over 5 years. In fact, they were spraying segments of the population 50 years ago. We’ve been naive. There hasn’t been the necessary awareness that intentional spraying of the atmosphere and/or population could actually be occurring, so we became accustomed to the appearance of these chemtrails and aerosol clouds and now regard them as being familiar and therefore “normal”.

This electromagnetic energy is manmade and these clouds may contain conductive material, with barium being the leading candidate. Something bizarre is happening, but most people aren’t aware of it yet.

Chemtrails appear to affect life at the planetary level: the ionosphere and magnetosphere, control of the weather, and multiple possible effects upon human physiology are all involved.

The possible uses for this technology and the camouflage being used to create it are something you probably need to know about. It appears that the atmosphere is being changed by these aerosols to become increasingly conductive of electromagnetic radiation. This makes the atmosphere a possible platform for several applications of environmental modification– such as weather control — and for the use of HAARP technology.

This seems like science fiction to many people when they first hear of it, but these scientific and military programs have in fact been developing for decades.

Many people don’t realize that electromagnetism is inherent in the human anatomy. Every time a muscle moves, there are electrical discharges. Brain waves are electrical, all the sensory information that moves through the body to the brain is electrical, enzymes, which keep the whole organism of the body informed about various aspects about itself, are electrically influenced. Cell division is electrical, the signal for the body to initiate wound healing is electrical, and the heartbeat is electrical.

Electromagnetic radiation can be utilized for geophysical effects such as triggering earthquakes. The earth itself is capable of being used as a weapon with this technology. Changes in the earth’s atmosphere bring about corresponding changes in the Earth’s weather and climate.

Increasing the conductivity of the atmosphere (by spraying barium) increases the efficacy of HAARP. In fact, the HAARP patent even calls for it. HAARP technology is a source of powerful ELF (extremely low frequency) radiation.

By the way, did you know that the brain receives ELF signals? Frequencies have been designed which can create particular emotional, physical and mental conditions such as tiredness, loss of memory, nausea, and depression. An enormous range of human experience can be induced with electromagnetic radiation. (See On the Possibility of Accessing every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms and also P oor Monkey.)

Do you recognize chemtrails and artificial aerosol clouds? Chemical clouds and trails become increasingly obvious once you know what to look for. I’m amazed at how oblivious we are to them– although of course I was oblivious once myself. I naturally assumed that the clouds were normal until I made a study of it. Most people don’t observe clouds, and simply take them for granted. We should be able to take them for granted! However, this lack of awareness has probably helped the aerosol operations to escalate freely.

There has been a relentless onslaught of these aerosols where I live. I found it unbelievable until I repeatedly observed the process of their creation, movement and changes with my own eyes. Daily observation over several months led to identifying repetitive patterns and finally to recognizing the presence of electromagnetic energies in the process.

December 2005 update: Since writing this over 2 years ago, it has become apparent that the aerosol operations are an enormous global phenomenon. However, I have two friends who just moved back to the U.S. after 20 years in Columbia. They immediately noticed the strangeness of the chemtrails when they spotted them here because they weren’t accustomed to seeing them in Columbia.

I’ve noticed that people over 50 are surprisingly closed minded about this information. My friends from Columbia are over 80 and yet seem more alert and open minded than most of my peers in the baby boomer generation — a generation which prided itself on being so “hip” and well informed.

Please help raise people’s awareness about this. This is OUR sky, our health, our life.

Notes:

Research descriptions and results can be found at Clifford Carnicom’s Aerosol Operation Crimes and Cover-up website. http://www.carnicom.com

I first saw photos of EMF aerosols at “Chemtrail Hall of Shame” http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/hos3.htm.

On the Possibility of Accessing every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms

Poor Monkey

EM “mind control”

HAARP

HAARP patent

November 20, 2007

Editorial: Reconsidering the tar sands


All I can say to this is: NO KIDDING! and that is why the Harperistas must GO! What kind of CANADA do we really want to leave our kids?? I think we need DOZENS of editorials appearing all over Canada every day of the week until reason, common sense, sanity and real concern prevail. Again, EH??

Reposted from the McGill Daily


Going by mainstream media coverage, the Athabasca tar sands in Alberta are like a 21st century Wild West: breathless reports speak about the “boom” economy, bushels of money being made, and about how everything is gigantic. But as the tar sands have become the centrepiece of a new energy corridor sending oil and gas to the U.S., scant attention has been paid to the profound economic, ecological, and social costs that are at stake.

The U.S. invasion of Iraq was to have included secure access to Iraqi oil as one of its spoils, but the destabilization of the Middle East has set oil prices spiraling upward, turning U.S. attention closer to home. As Naomi Klein succinctly put it in The Nation: “Baghdad burns, Calgary booms.” Despite the fact that its oil is much more expensive to extract, Canada has come to occupy a special place in U.S. strategy, as a dependent source fueling its industrial needs and war-based economy. According to Vice-President Dick Cheney, Canada is now a “pillar of sustainable North American energy and economic security.”

Only Cheney could call ecological blowout “sustainable.” The tar sands are the largest hydrocarbon deposit in the world – estimated to hold anywhere between 1.75 and 2.5-trillion barrels of heavy crude. This thick, gooey tar is mined, not pumped, and it creates an extremely dirty kind of synthetic oil that ravages the northern environment with its destructive production methods. The refining process requires an enormous amount of natural gas – if the Mackenzie pipeline is built to bring the gas to the tar sands from the Arctic south, hundreds of kilometres of permafrost and fragile ecosystems will be threatened with environmental devastation. Finally, the greenhouse emissions created by the extraction process almost single-handedly undermine Canada’s commitment to the Kyoto Protocol. But to promoters of the oil sands like Alberta’s ex-Premier Ralph Klein, the Kyoto Protocol is “the goofiest, most devastating thing that was ever conceived.”

High prices and the export needs of the U.S. have blinded the federal and Alberta provincial government to other social and political consequences. Public services, especially in Fort McMurray, have collapsed, and there are ominous moves toward using exploitative, non-unionized, and cheap foreign labour. The rights of indigenous nations like the Dene, over whose land the Mackenzie pipelines would cross, have not been taken into account. The Canadian government has sought to extinguish rather than respect their sovereignty. The government has collected meager royalties while foreign corporations reap ridiculously high profits, revenue which might otherwise have been used for important social programs.

Northerners, indigenous peoples, Albertans, and Canadians are paying a high cost to expedite U.S., access to Canada’s oil and gas, with no planning and almost no public debate. The government should be asking if the tar sands and its development are environmentally sustainable, or if our energy needs could be met by alternative sources. Rather than become an energy satellite of the U.S. empire, Canada needs to develop an independent, long-range energy policy that promotes a future free from oil dependency.

November 19, 2007

Update:

UKRAINE, RUSSIA FACE OFF OVER CLEANING UP OIL SPILL IN SEA OF AZOV

By John C.k. Daly

Monday, November 19, 2007

On November 11 a powerful storm arose in the northeastern Black Sea. By the end of it, Russia and Ukraine faced serious environmental damage from an oil spill and a potentially acrimonious diplomatic situation.

According to Ukraine's Emergency Situations Ministry, after the storm four ships had foundered, another six had run aground, and two tankers were damaged in the narrow Kerch Strait, at the entrance to the Sea of Azov between Russia and Ukraine. One of the damaged ships was the Volgoneft-139, which was carrying more than 4,000 tons of fuel oil. Smashed by 67 mph winds and 16-foot waves, the ship split in two, spilling more than half its cargo (Ukrains'ke Radio, November 13).

The only good news from the storm was that the ecological catastrophe could have been much worse. The majority of the nautical damage took place in the Kerch Strait, where, despite the storm alert, there were nearly 150 ships. Besides the Volgoneft-139, the dry cargo bulk carrier Volnogorsk sank with its cargo of about 2,600 tons of sulfur near Kerch port, while the Kovel freighter, also carrying sulfur, crashed into the sunken Volnogorsk and slid beneath the waves. The Georgian vessel Khach-izmail also sank. Another sulfur carrier, the Nakhichevan, wrecked. Groundings included the Ukrainian dry cargo vessel Vira Voloshyna, beached near Kapsel Bay, and the Turkish Ziya Kos and a Georgian ship carrying about 800 tons of metal, both of which ran aground close to the port of Novorossiysk. Completing the scene, the Dika barge, loaded with 4,149 tons of fuel oil, was beached on a sandbar at Tuzla, along with the Demetra barge, which was carrying 3,757 tons of fuel (Kommersant, November 12). In all, about 10 ships sank or ran aground and 20 sailors remain missing.

Black Sea neighbors were quick to assist, with the Romanian Navy's Constanta Maritime Rescue Center director, Adrian Alexe, responding to a request from Russian naval authorities for the 100-ton capacity Gigant floating crane to assist commercial vessels sunk in the storm (Rompres, November 13).

The finger pointing has already started. Krasnodar governor Alexander Tkachev, said,
"Some 30,000 birds have died and it's not possible to count how many fish. The damage is so great that it's hard to assess. It can be equated with an ecological catastrophe" (Interfax, November 13).
The damages caused by the wrecked ships have been estimated at up to $163 million. Russian and Ukrainian tugs have hauled the stern of the Volgoneft-139 into Kavkaz, where an additional 933 tons of fuel oil were pumped out (Interfax-Ukraine, November 15). While clean-up crews are already attacking the oil drifting onto beaches, the authorities are nervously awaiting possible additional pollution from sulfur granules (Itar-Tass, November 15).

A Russian-Ukrainian intergovernmental committee began meeting on November 15 in Kerch to discuss the progress of search-and-rescue and cleanup operations. Deputy Transport Minister Boris Korol heads the Russian delegation, while participating Ukrainians include officials from the Emergencies Ministry, Ministry of Natural Resources, and the Foreign Ministry. Deputy Minister of Transport and Communications Vladimir Korniyenko heads the Ukrainian team (Itar-Tass, November 15).

The catastrophe has already wreaked havoc on the Sea of Azov's commercial fish stocks, including gobies and Azov anchovies, while World Wildlife Fund officials remain concerned about the fate of dolphins located around the Kerch Strait; two dead dolphins have already washed ashore.

The incident has caused additional friction between Russia and Ukraine, as the Kerch strait passage remains poorly delineated 16 years after the collapse of the USSR. Ukraine insists on dividing the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait along the conventional Soviet Union border that passed through two midpoints of the coast of the Kerch Strait and the Taganrog Bay, while Russia insists on an equal delimitation of the sea area.

The ultimate diplomatic wrangle may occur further to the south, however, as Turkey has insisted for years that unrestricted tanker traffic through the Turkish Straits is an environmental hazard. In 2006 more than 36,000 vessels transited the Turkish Straits, with tankers carrying over 140 million tons of oil under treaty rights guaranteed by the 1936 Montreaux Convention, despite constant Turkish warnings that such constant passages, working out to a tanker every 15 minutes, were a prelude to disaster.

Ukrainian Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych said that the government is now studying the possibility of limiting tanker passages through the Kerch Strait and is consulting with maritime specialists. They are particularly interested in Turkey's experience with the Bosporus and Dardanelles channels. If there is any good news for Moscow, its prime oil export facility at Novorossiysk is south of the straits and Kyiv currently does not plan to claim compensation from Russia for ecological damage (Rosbalt, November 12). The damage from last week's storm, however, seems destined shortly to move from the environmental to the diplomatic sphere.

November 13, 2007

Bush's Appalachian War: "Immunity" For Mining Companies


Stick this out and get to the activist steps at the

bottom!!


by: Patriot Daily







Source: Photo by Penny Loeb of Valley Fill

Bush has "legalized" valley fills despite the devastating impacts to people and environment. For years, mining companies obtained de facto "immunity" from environmental laws: Regulators simply ignored or twisted the laws to "authorize" valley fills. Citizens and environmental groups fought back with multipronged litigation to force compliance with the laws. Lower courts were shocked by the extent of regulator noncompliance and issued permanent injunctions to stop the valley fills. Not surprisingly, the conservative Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated these decisions, but not usually on the merits.

Given the blatant illegalities and massive destruction to Appalachia, it was only a matter of time before some case would be too egregious for even the Fourth Circuit to ignore. So, Mr. Unitary Decider replaced long-standing laws with those de facto exemptions used to evade the law.

The impact of the new rules is not limited to Appalachia. The mining waste in the Appalachian waterways will flow into the rivers and streams in the region that share the same headwaters. It is not solely a regional issue because now permits authorize mining waste to be dumped into waters on the West Coast. And, it is not limited to the coal industry because the Clean Water Act is not limited to mining waste.

The impacts may be exacerbated because Bush has argued that all waters of the US are unitary waters. Under this theory, the Clean Water Act would not regulate the discharge or transfer of polluted water from one waterway into another.

If you support environmental human rights and justice, then please let your fingers do the walking to Congress via email or phone to obtain more sponsors for the Clean Water Protection Act. HR 2169 is designed to repeal Bush's new rule on fill material --- the subject of this diary.

Tomorrow I will post Part 2 of Bush's Appalachian War: "Immunity" For Mining Companies, which addresses a few more fixes by Bush to ensure that valley fills are legalized without the inconvenience of thorough, objective environmental review of impacts.

1. Why Valley Fills Are Really Valley Kills

In mountaintop removal (MTR), the mining company uses bombs to "decapitate" the top 500-1,000 vertical feet of the mountaintop. The bombing blends together the rock and dirt from the former mountaintop with the blasting chemicals, and then "millions of tons" of waste that may be hundreds of feet deep are dumped into the valleys. A "single fill may be over 1,000 feet wide and over a mile long (pdf file)." The mining companies call these waste sites "valley fills."

Looking only at several environmental impacts recognized by our government provides an indicator of how much destruction Bush will permit so that mining companies may continue business on the cheap:

1. CRS reports that valley fills are killing the streams, aquatic and wildlife habitat (pdf file) by suffocation, altering flow patterns, increasing the number and severity of floods and degrading water quality with mining overburden pollutants.

2. During 1985-2001, there were 6,700 valley fills in central Appalachia. The EPA estimated more than 1,200 miles of valley streams had been "impacted" and more than 700 miles of streams had been killed, buried entirely.

3. Government studies show that streams not buried by mining waste "carry high levels of silt and toxic chemicals."

4. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimated that 244 species, including endangered species, suffered "unprecedented" impacts by the loss of forest and aquatic habitats.

5. A study by federal regulators predicted that one valley fill "could increase peak runoff flow by as much as 42 percent" resulting in increased flooding.

In the past, the mining debris was placed at the headwaters of streams with intermittent flow. Now, mining companies use any stream because the increased usage of MTR has exhausted (pdf file) "smaller upstream disposal sites."

Despite knowledge of this destruction, the Bush gang fixed the laws to legalize environmental rape. After Bush was selected president, his minion J. Steven Griles (who was subsequently sentenced to prison for lying to Senate committee about his ties to Jack Abramoff) publicly pledged to the coal mining industry in August 2001 that they would "fix the federal rules very soon on water and spoil placement."

Bush frames the issue as one of necessity for national security, but it really is simply corporate profiteering at the expense of people and environment. Mining companies claim MTR is not possible without valley fills. Not exactly true: "[S]tudies have identified more benign, though admittedly more costly, ways to dispose of the waste." So, mining companies used their deep pockets to persuade our government to ignore the laws.

2. The Fill Fix

In order to legalize valley fills, the first fix involved a little restructuring of the Clean Water Act (CWA), which has two regulatory programs with different substantive jurisdiction. The program that had jurisdiction would not likely issue a permit for valley fills due to stringent standards. So, for years our government violated the law by issuing permits from a different regulatory program. Then, a court issued a permanent injunction to stop this illegal practice. Bush responded by changing the jurisdictional rules, which also enabled the mining companies to achieve a secondary goal of participating in a streamlined permitting process (called NWP and discussed in Part 2) for which valley fills did not qualify --- until another fix was implemented. The Clean Water Protection Act is designed to undo this fix of the CWA.

Under the CWA, it is unlawful to discharge any pollutants into waters without a permit. The CWA has two primary regulatory regimes: Section 402 regulates the discharge of most pollutants into our waters and Section 404 regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters at specified sites. Whether a discharge is regulated by 402 or 404 is dependent upon whether the discharge constitutes "fill material:" Fill material is subject to 404 while discharge of non-fill material is regulated by 402. Historically, disposal of waste into waters has been regulated by 402 pursuant to NPDES permits that impose stringent technology-based limitations on dischargers and can be quite expensive and time-consuming. As the CRS noted, if mining waste were regulated by the NPDES permit, it "would effectively prohibit (pdf file) a broad range of mining activities which have been allowed by longstanding current practice" due to more stringent standards:

[T]he types of materials associated with surface mining activities (e.g., rock and sand) are defined in the Clean Water Act as pollutants when discharged into U.S. waters. If such materials are subject to the act's Section 402 NPDES requirements, they are evaluated on the basis of whether they alter the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of the water. That standard is more stringent than evaluation under Section 404, which authorizes permits for fill discharges for constructive or useful purposes.

For years, our government issued unlawful 404 permits for valley fills. Then, a federal district court held that long-standing rules prohibited regulators from issuing 404 permits for valley fills used solely for waste disposal. Moreover, the judge permanently enjoined (pdf file) this practice. [Kentuckians for the Commonwealth v. Rivenburgh (S.D. W.Va. 2002) 204 F.Supp. 2d 927] The Court of Appeal reversed.

However, the district court's opinion provided sound legal reasoning which also illustrates what lies in our future should Bush's new rule not be reversed. The Bush team have cited two primary reasons for changing the rules. One, Bush claimed there was an interagency conflict that required "clarification," which is discussed below. Two, it was claimed that regulators could not comply with laws that were out of synch with mining practices. However, the rules changed by Bush were adopted after the coal industry started MTR.

The central issue is the meaning of fill material, which is not defined in the CWA. While the Corps heads up the 404 program, the EPA also has a role, and both agencies defined fill material in their regulations. However, the definitions created different tests (pdf file) to determine whether a material constituted "fill material":

While the Corps' definition centered on evaluating what is the primary purpose of a
prospective discharge to determine whether it would be regulated by Section 404 or Section 402, EPA's definition … focused on the effect of the material.

Since 1977, the Corps has defined "fill material" as:

any material used for the primary purpose of replacing an aquatic area with dry land or of changing the bottom elevation of a waterbody. The term does not include any pollutant discharged into the water primarily to dispose of waste, as that activity is regulated under section 402 of the Clean Water Act." 33 C.F.R. § 323.2(e)

Valley fills clearly did not constitute "fill material" under the Corps' definition. The primary purpose of valley fills is waste disposal, not replacement of an aquatic area with dry land or changing the elevation, which was a secondary or incidental effect of valley fills. As the district court stated, "filling to create dry land or elevate a bottom must be undertaken for some constructive or useful purpose" which excluded waste disposal. Moreover, "fill material" was defined to exclude pollutants (which includes rock and sand) discharged primarily for waste disposal. After all, the purpose of the CWA is to improve water quality, not authorize the dumping of waste into waters as some new garbage site. Therefore, the Corps did not have legal authority to issue 404 permits for valley fills, which should have been regulated by the NPDES program.

A momentary ambiguity was introduced by the EPA definition of "fill material" that was adopted in 1988 as:

any pollutant which replaces portions of the waters of the United States with dry land or which changes the bottom elevation of a water body for any purpose. 40 C.F.R. § 232.2

This EPA rule was used for decades to issue 404 permits for valley fills used for waste disposal. [Kentuckians for the Commonwealth v. Rivenburgh (S.D. W.Va. 2002) 204 F.Supp. 2d 927] It has two key components. One, did the fill have the effect of filling. Given that all fills have the effect of fill, not a difficult test to pass. Two, it expanded 404 jurisdiction by changing the focus of the purpose test. Under the Corps' primary purpose test, "the purpose for discharging § 404 fill is the construction or development or use for which the fill is needed." Under the EPA "any purpose" test, the key is the "purpose for which the material is discharged." In other words, the EPA "any purpose" test focused on the use or purpose of the discharge whereas the Corps' test focused on the use or purpose of the fill. Thus, permits were issued for mining waste disposal because the EPA model allowed discharges "for any purpose." The court held this interpretation conflicted with the CWA and the definition of "discharge of fill material."

It is this conflict between the agencies as to what constituted fill material, and consequently, which agency should be regulating valley fills, that Bush grabbed as a reason to change the rule to expressly authorize valley fills.

However, when there is an apparent conflict in the law, the role of statutory interpretation is assigned to our courts, not Mr. Decider. In order to resolve the conflict between these two definitions of fill material, the district court in Kentuckians for the Commonwealth looked at the definition of "discharge of fill material" by the two agencies. This made sense because the two agencies agreed upon this definition. Moreover, this definition answered the question of whether the fill had to be for the primary purpose of a permissible activity or use (Corps definition) or could it be for any purpose (EPA definition).

The key here is that "discharge of fill material" defined those activities or discharges which may be authorized by a 404 permit. [33 C.F.R. § 323.2(f) (Corps definition); 40 C.F.R. § 232,2 (EPA definition)] All of the activities described in this definition have the common element that the fill material is discharged in an incidental or secondary role for the primary beneficial purposes of construction, development or property protection of specified structures. In other words, fill may be used when it is necessary for an approved structure to be constructed in a waterway, such as dams or levees. The definition of "discharge of fill material" shows that both the Corps and EPA did not intend for fill material to be dumped into waters when there was not any approved structure to be constructed. This definition would exclude valley fills because the fill is the project.

The district court found this interpretation to be consistent with Congressional intent. Section 1344(f)(2) of the CWA provides that:

Any discharge of dredged or fill material into the navigable waters incidental to any activity having as its purpose bringing an area of the navigable waters into a use to which it was not previously subject, where the flow or circulation of navigable waters may be impaired or the reach of such waters be reduced, shall be required to have a permit under this section.

Similar to the Corps' and EPA's definition of "discharge of fill material," Congress focused on fill material being discharged for the purpose of "bringing an area into a new use" because it is the constructive use or purpose that justified filling US waters. [Kentuckians for the Commonwealth]

In short, the EPA definition of fill material was a minority view that was contrary to its own definition of "discharge of fill material." Moreover, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth noted that the EPA had agreed with the interpretation by the Corps and Congress until May 3, 2002, which just happened to be the date that the "agencies signed for publication the final version" of the new Bush rule while the court was considering this case.

So, the Bush team wrote a new rule to redefine "fill material" to include valley fills. The fix actually started earlier though. On April 6, 2001, National Mining Association reps met with EPA officials for 90 minutes to advocate changes in the rule to permit MTR. Bush's final rule "contained nearly all the changes the mining industry requested."

Fill material is now defined as "material" placed in US waters that has the "effect" of replacing water with dry land or changing the bottom elevation. [33 C.F.R. 323.2(e) & 40 C.F.R. 232.2] Examples of fill material now subject to 404 jurisdiction include "rock, sand, soil, clay, plastics, construction debris, wood chips, overburden from mining or other excavation activities, and materials used to create any structure or infrastructure in the waters of the United States."

Bush used a lot of words to provide a silly tautological definition of fill: Fill material is defined as material which has the effect of filling. However, the impact of this tautology is to expand the Corps' jurisdiction to "allow the waters of the United States to be filled, polluted, and unavoidably destroyed, for any purpose, including waste disposal." [Kentuckians for the Commonwealth] The final rule eliminated the regulatory language that excluded waste discharges from 404 jurisdiction. Now, when the "waste has the effect of fill," it is regulated by 404 (pdf file):

One analyst observed that the result of the 2002 rule revisions was to change the
baseline of what is regulated by the 404 program and the NPDES program
. Under the Corps' previous regulation, the disposal of waste was solely subject to Section 402. Now, where the waste has the effect of fill, the government believes that regulation under Section 404 is appropriate. Thus, fill material now defines the extent of the NPDES program, because only pollutants subject to effluent limitations are excluded from regulation as fill. According to this view, the Section 404 permitting program has been expanded at the expense of EPA's NPDES program.

The government and mining industry maintain that excluding all waste from 404 is not appropriate because "some waste (e.g., mine overburden) consists of material such as soil, rock and earth, that is similar to 'traditional' fill material (pdf file) used for purposes of creating fast land for development." In other words, the mining industry claims that its waste is similar to traditional fill material that does not have health or environmental concerns and thus mining waste should not be treated differently just because its primary purpose is waste disposal. However, unlike traditional fill material, mining overburden also includes the chemicals used for blasting off the mountaintops.

To tie up loose ends, Bush expanded the types of discharge activities subject to 404 permits by amending the definition of "discharge of fill material" to include the "placement of overburden, slurry, or tailings or similar mining-related materials." Now, 404 permits may be authorized for valley fills which are the only activities that are not incidental to the primary purpose of the construction of some authorized structure.

The result is that the illegal practice of issuing 404s for waste disposal is now legal.

The impact of this rule extends beyond Appalachia because fill material may now be argued to authorize any waste (pdf file) discharge, including coal ash refuse, provided that the effect of filling is to fill. The Corps has now issued 404 permits "for an array of activities" that discharge waste into waters, including the discharge of 4.5 million tons of chemically processed gold mining tailings into a lake at Tongass National Forest. This is the "first time (pdf file) since the Clean Water Act was passed that the Corps has allowed a mining operation to dump process wastewater directly into a lake, river or stream as 'fill.'"

3. Repealing The Fix With HR 2169

The mining companies have whined that they can not do MTR if they do not get a free ride on valley fills. This is one time I hope they are being truthful. One way to find out is to round up more sponsors for HR 2169:

Clean water protection act HR 2169

FILL MATERIAL- The term 'fill material' means any pollutant which replaces portions of the waters of the United States with dry land or which changes the bottom elevation of a water body for any purpose. The term does not include any pollutant discharged into the water primarily to dispose of waste.

The intent of HR 2169 is to reverse Bush's tinkering of the fill rule by indicating that valley fills do not constitute fill material. Therefore, the mining companies would have to obtain a NPDES permit, which is not likely to happen given the need to comply with water quality standards.

I support HR 2169 as a good start to ending valley fills but do have some concerns:

(1) It makes me nervous that HR 2169 is primarily based on the EPA's/Bush's model rather than the Corps' model. In fact, HR 2169 is the EPA definition of fill material except for the last sentence. Thus, 2169 is a combination of the EPA's effects or filling test, the EPA's any purpose test and part of the Corps' waste clause.

(2) HR 2169 may be interpreted as providing that fill material is any pollutant that has the effect of filling US waters for any purpose except discharges primarily for waste disposal. It is the tautology model that may be easily used to expand 404 jurisdiction. This leaves the door open for mining companies to argue that coal waste products are appropriate fill material if the primary purpose is other than waste disposal, such as structural support.

(3) I liked the original Corps' definition of fill material, which required the fill material be discharged for some "primary, beneficial purpose" such as construction of authorized structures or development in the waters. Using the EPA phrase of "any purpose" eliminates this distinction.

(4) Bush expanded 404 jurisdiction to include discharge activities involving the "placement of overburden, slurry, or tailings or similar mining-related materials." This creates a conflict with HR 2169, which sometimes excludes mining waste as fill material. The definition of "discharge of fill material" should be amended to exclude this overburden clause.

I think this diary provides a few good reasons why we should call, email or write lawmakers to sponsor the Clean Water Protection Act. As Devilstower says:

Momentum is on the side of the Clean Water Protection Act. Wheels are turning, people are moving, and the odds that this bill will emerge from committee with the momentum it needs to sweep the full House is looking better every day. And I don't think your participation in this has gone unnoticed.

Now is the time we need to apply even more pressure to win over the holdouts. In particular, these Congressmen sit on the Water Resources Subcommittee. None of them have said they won't support the CWPA, but they've also not signed on. Adding just a few of these names to the list of cosponsors would be a huge boost.

NameDistrictLocal #D.C. #
Eddie Bernice JohnsonTX-30(214) 922-8885(202) 225-8885
Gene TaylorMS-4(228) 864-7670(202 225-5772
Brian BairdWA-3(360) 695-6292(202) 225-3536
Jerry CostelloIL-12(618) 233-8026(202) 225-5661
Russ CarnahanMO-3(314) 962-1523(202) 225-2671
John SalazarCO-3(970) 245-7107(202) 225-4761
Mazie HironoHI-2(808) 541-1986(202) 225-4906
Harry MitchellAZ-5(480) 946-2411(202) 225-2190
Steve KagenWI-8(920) 437-1954(202) 225-5665
Grace NapolitanoCA-38(562) 801-2134(202) 225-5256
Michael ArcuriNY-24(315) 252-2777(202) 225-3665

Why is Michael Arcuri's name lined out? Because Arcuri signed onto the CWPA just yesterday. Now, we just need to get the rest of them. So call. If you can't call, write.

Patriot Daily :: Bush's Appalachian War: "Immunity" For Mining Companies

ShareThis