LadyBroadoak Visionary Planetary Healing Tutorial

May 30, 2006

A list of 9/11 links from
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-_2O8YZQ2fqg0i4rgwJwK4yE-?cq=1&p=1595

To me, it’s important not to focus on just one aspect of 9/11 such as the Pentagon incident. If debunkers can keep everyone focusing on this one part of it when there can never be proof either way produced, the overall aspect of what really happened on that dreadful day will never be uncovered. Let’s broaden the discussion.

I find that it's time to interject some thoughts that even my harshest critics might understand. My motivation in posting this controversial subject was to try and wake up a complacent society, even in my own small way. I am a passionate person, as you already know. Something very wrong happened on 9/11 and it wasn’t just the fact we were attacked. This goes back years and years, well before President Bush was elected President. Good men and women tried to bring information to the Justice Dept. that an attack was being planned. They were prevented from doing so. Now, if it was just one or two people, I could say that, yes the ball was dropped.
However, it is not the case. Yes, some of the material presented had political motivations, but they also bring up some very disturbing information that needs to be looked into. I hate, despise and have little respect for people using political motivations for anything, believe me. But I do look for the truth, even if it comes on the lips of an actor like Sheen. Shivers. I do not respect him but sometimes the pearl of truth comes buried in the muck.

Our rights and freedoms are being slowly stolen from us over 9/11 despite the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Now, if there is any doubt at all that the attack or the facts produced by the officials could come into doubt, any patriotic or caring person would check into diverse opinions and research on the subject. This is what I wanted people to do. To start thinking on their own. Did it ever occur to anyone how such an in-depth law such as the Patriot Act could be written so fast when the very same Congress can't even handle the immigration situation with prudence? Just throwing that out.

It may come as a shock to you all but I defend the right to bear arms. I come against those who want to take away my freedom of speech or my privacy or my property. (Eminent Domain) Our freedoms are under attack by the "Powers that Be" under the guise that there is a need to protect us from terrorism. I wholeheartedly agree that we are in a WAR and certain actions need to be done in order to protect the populace. All I ask is for people to not be so ready to give up their freedoms without questioning.

There is much more to this story than a video. Who do I trust? My father was a police officer, Royal Canadian Mounted Police, New York State Crime Commission, The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the Humane Society, private investigator and authored the first explosives training book used by the U.S. Government in explosive safety.
I’m a daughter of a man in uniform. A man who stood for what was right and taught his daughter the same. He always told me that if you look to the people who rise to the top of any organization, business or profession, these are the ones who are usually there for the wrong reasons. It’s the people at ground level who are there because they really care. These are the people who I really trust.

He taught me to get to the truth of the matter despite the opposition. So, it was his daughter who listened to the four hours of the 9-11 conversations between David Koresh of Mt. Carmel and the local Sheriff. I know what really happened. But few other’s even cared to check it out. Most repeated the same media bull that they were fed. So a girl throws her hands up in the air and hopes that somewhere, somehow and that someone will start thinking and researching for themselves. I'll end this by inserting a part of a letter I recently received. It made up for all the criticism I've received since posting this:

I was not overly impressed with the suggested video because I thought it poorly done & have some demolition back ground but after following up & viewing Jimmy Walters' & several other videos & listening to Karl Schwartz I don't know whether to thank you or curse you for forcing me to REALLY look at it. What frightens me the most are the implications that the philosophy & people behind this may go back for decades & that our country may already be controlled by them. Thank You (I think) for making ME think Keep it up

Below is a partial list of highly regarded individuals or organizations who are questioning.

Able Danger - used to determine vulnerabilities and linkages among and within al Qaeda

Army Reserve Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, of the Defense Intelligence Agency

Navy CAPT Scott Phillpott, a military intelligence officer with U.S. Special Operations Command
CIA Director George Tenant...warned about an impending attack

John O'Neill, FBI counter terrorism investigator who resigned in frustration with the President's administration, went to work as security chief of the World Trade Center and died on 9/11 attempting to rescue others.

Richard Clarke, US Counter terrorism Czar, National Security Council official, who exposed the President's incompetence both pre-9/11 and post-9/11 in his book, Against All Enemies and under oath at the 9/11 commission hearings.

Colleen Rawley, FBI investigator who blew the whistle and spoke publicly about how her attempts to get action on pre-9/11 intelligence on Al-Qaeda pilot training in the US were blocked by officials at the President's Justice Dept. in D.C.

Judicial Watch - As a non-partisan, non-profit foundation based in Washington, D.C., and with offices throughout the country and roots out corruption in our government and to make sure offenders are brought to justice.

Robert Wright, an agent for 10 years, was a member of an FBI counter- terrorism taskforce. He alleges that active agents were threatened and impeded in anti-terrorism investigations.

Rep. Curt Weldon (R-PA) speculates that a coverup may have occurred.

Steven E. Jones – Professor of Physics at Brigham Young University

Robert M Bowman - former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the United States Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations, and a former United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonol with 101 combat missions. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology

David Schippers is a lawyer. He was the chief prosecutor for the impeachment of Bill Clinton and stated that the government had been warned in 1995 about a future attack on a government building and that later he was contacted by three FBI agents who mentioned uncovering a possible terrorist attack planned for lower Manhattan

Professor James Fetzer http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/
Distinguished McKnight University Professor

University of Minnesota Duluth
David Ray Griffin http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8765.htm

David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, where he taught for over 30 years (retiring in 2004). He has authored or edited over two dozen books, including "God and Religion in the Postmodern World," "Religion and Scientific Naturalism," and "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11."

http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/david_ray_griffin__almost_perf.html

Information regarding 9/11: VIEW WITH DISCERNMENT! I DO NOT AGREE WITH NOR HAVE WATCHED ALL OF THE INFORMATION BELOW. AS PEOPLE WRITE ME I POST WHAT THEY FIND. IT'S UP TO YOU TO DO YOUR OWN INVESTIGATING. THINK FOR YOURSELVES!

Philanthropist Jimmy Walters:

http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/300306walter.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6032507852941583054

Karl Schwarz

Other videos for your discernment:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6757267008400743688
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5239334224660559722&q=in+plane+site&p...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4390283994402206696&q=loose+change+9...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose

More Information:

Contact: http://www.judicialwatch.org/ to keep up with their quest to get more of the camera feeds from the Pentagon.
http://www.waronfreedom.org/bookshelf.html Lots of information good and bad
http://newyorkmetro.com/news/features/16464/index.html
Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax 30 January 2006 press release
Simple Physics Reveals "The Big Lie" Forwarded by Nila Sagadevan
The Fall of the South Tower At video.google.com
Did Building 7 Commit Suicide? http://www.betterbadnews.com
"9/11 Revisited: Were explosives used?" http://www.911revisited.com/video.html
David Ray Griffin's Madison 9/11 Lecture www.911blogger.com
"Loose Change" (video), 2nd Edition At video.google.com
Big Lies: From JFK to 9/11 The Carp (Spring 2006), Jim Fetzer
MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition video.google.com
Steve Jones' UVSC PowerPoint Presentation www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy
"911 Eyewitness" (video) http://www.911eyewitness.com/
9/11: 80 Minutes of Unilateral Disarmament by Morgan Reynolds
Simple Math demonstrates the Official 9/11 Account is a Fabrication
29 Apr 2005, Global Research, Elias Davidsson
Professor Steve Jones' Utah Seminar on video www.911blogger.com
Flash lecture on 9/11 by James H. Fetzer www.youtube.com/w/?v=x-RjohsWGO4
Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11 by Morgan Reynolds
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? by Steven E. Jones, Ph.D. (reader comments)
The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True by David Ray Griffin, Ph.D.
Thinking about "Conspiracy Theories": 9/11 and JFK by James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Wikipedia: What it Doesn't Say about S9/11T by James H. Fetzer
Zogby Poll Finds Over 70 Million Voting Age Americans Support New 9/11 Investigation

May 22, 2006
BREAKING ...
New 911Truth.org-commissioned Zogby Poll reveals over 70 million voting age Americans distrust official 9/11 story and support new investigation of possible US government role in the attacks.*
Zogby's "Results from Nationwide Poll" report and raw data available for downloading at end of article.

No comments:

Post a Comment

~ What must be done next ~

Website: http://www.MoveToAmend.org Mission: We, the People of the United States of America, reject the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United, and move to amend our Constitution to: * Firmly establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights. * Guarantee the right to vote and to participate, and to have our votes and participation count. * Protect local communities, their economies, and democracies against illegitimate "preemption" actions by global, national, and state governments. Company Overview: On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. Human beings are people; corporations are legal fictions. The Supreme Court is misguided in principle, and wrong on the law. In a democracy, The People rule.

Proposed change to the US Constitution

We the People

I. Powers and Rights Reserved To We the People, Never Delegated or Violated Without Consent

A. The People are expressly defined as human beings and does not refer to corporations or contractual relationships.

B. No contract, agreement, or promise may ever bind any human to refuse to enforce the law, or prohibit them from speaking on matters of public interest.

C. We the People may believe anything, including the possible belief that this Constitution must be discarded and replaced with a superior document which defends the People and protects their power to enforce this Constitution against the Government.

D. The People are educated to apply the lessons of history to ensure rights are preserved, power asserted, and this Constitution is protected from domestic and foreign enemies.

E. The People have the enforceable right and power to review any public document and access any public official.

F. The People have the enforceable right to engage in any speech, communication, or discussion on issues of war crimes, government incompetence, or allegations of reckless government planning and maladministration.

G. Government officials, agencies, departments may not invoke any power or right they have denied to the People.

H. The People have the right to affordable housing. Where none is available, the government is denied the power to prosecute anyone for not living in a home, or residing in a public park, open forest, or public lands.

I. The People have the enforceable right to freely travel, without questions, and without delay. Any law enforcement officer, agents, or contacted security official who uses any ruse, scheme, or deception to engage in pretextual stops shall be enforced as a violation of this Constitution.

J. The People have the enforceable right to compel govenment officials, contractors, and securty personnel to identify themselves, disclose their policies and procedures, and respond to complaints about violations of this Constitution, the Supreme Law, or laws of war.

K. The People may not be subject to any electronic surveillance except on probable cause and a warrant before a judicial tribunal. The President, Congress and others are expressly denied the power to enact, create, use, or rely on quasi-judicial tribunals to self-certify warrants to conduct surveillance.

L. All denied powers to the US Government in this Constitution are reserved to the People to be used to defend the Constitution.

II. Powers and Rights Reserved to States

A. States shall have authority to enforce any law within their jurisdiction. Failure to enforce the laws of war shall be prosecuted as a war crime.

B. States shall, when the Federal Government refuses to enforce the Constitution or Supreme Law, enforce the national and international law against contractors, legal counsel, state or US government officials.

C. Any state may start impeachment investigations or proceedings against the President, Member of Congress, or US government official on issues of international laws of war, domestic rebellion, or violations of the Supreme Law oath of office, or Geneva Conventions. The States shall, upon receipt of an impeachment investigation or conviction from any other state, shall within 10 days debate that resolution. If convicted by 2/3 of the States, that US government official shall be removed from office. Any effort to thwart State efforts to enforce the US Constitution through impeachment investigations or impeachment proceedings at the State level may be construed as a subsequent violation of this Constitution and laws of war.

D. The States may, without notice, organize themselves to collectively defend this Constitution from the domestic enemies in the United States government. The States Governors have the standing power, right, and authority to use deadly combat force to enforce this Constitution against US government officials.

E. A failure of any State official to enforce the laws of war shall be subject to a war crimes trial within 90 days of discovering that evidence. Where there are credible allegations of war crimes, a failure to investigate shall be construed as a subsequent war crime, punishable by the death penalty.

F. States have the power to enforce contract obligations between contractors and the US government which affect the rights of their State citizens. Failure to enforce these contractual obligations against the contractors or US government could be construed as a subsequent violation under the laws of war and US Constitution against legal counsel, state officials, or court officers.

III. Independent Branch

A. All US government, contractor-provided, and legal counsel data shall be retained in an independent branch.

B. The President, Congress, and Judicial branches have no power, right or claim to not fully fund this Independent Branch.

C. The Independent Branch conducts electronic surveillance of the US government, stores that data, and ensures there are independent, safe, retained records of all US government transaction, including conversations and memos between legal counsel and government officials. Once created for the government or connected with any legal or illegal activity, these records are public records.

D. The data may be seen only upon a showing of reasonable belief or suspicion by the United States Congress, Court, or Executive Branch that the information may be useful in enforcing the Constitution, Supreme Law, or Geneva Conventions.

E. Private citizens may view any data, unless the US government provides sufficient, detailed evidence why that request for information should not be met for bonafide, lawful secrets. Any effort to hide evidence behind a claim of "state secrets," where that claim is linked with an effort to bypass the Constitution, oath of office, Supreme Law, or laws of war may be punishable by the death penalty.

F. All government data belongs to the People. Any legal counsel working for the US government shall ensure that the People's right to reliable information is protected. A failure to protect this information could be construed as a war crime.

IV. Prosecutorial Branch

A. All prosecutorial options are denied of the President.

B. The Prosecutorial branch has the power to raise independent combat power, support them, and may lawfully use that deadly combat force to confront Members of Congress, the Judicial Branch Officers, or the Presidents upon showing of probable cause for war crimes.

C. The prosecutorial power is the exclusive power of the prosecution branch. However, anyone may make a claim of illegal activity, and enforce the laws of the United States and States respectively. Any effort to block anyone from unilaterally attempting to enforce the laws of war through discovery, investigation, and open discussion of those alleged war crimes shall be construed as a possible subsequent offense under the laws of war.

D. Legal counsel are subject to public review, audit, and can be required, with fair notice, of a requirement to demonstrate before any court their compliance with the laws of war.

E. Legal counsel may be denied authority to conduct discovery during any investigation when that discovery is linked with efforts that would thwart war crimes investigation, enforcement of the Supreme law or Geneva Conventions.

V. Judicial Branch

A. The Judicial Branch is above the Legislative Branch and Executive Branch only in order of precedence. The Judicial Branch is a co-equal branch, and closest to the People and Constitution. It is least responsive, and most slow to the People's daily interests to enforce the Constitution and Supreme Law or Geneva Conventions.

B. Where the Judicial Branch does not timely enforce the Constitution, Supreme Law, or laws of war, the States and People retain the power and right to investigate and prosecute allegations of US government illegal activity, war crimes, or violations of the Supreme law.

C. All precedents under the laws of war are binding on the Judicial Branch, US government, and the People through enforcement actions.

D. Any decision by any judicial officer not to fully enforce the laws of war, Supreme Law, or this Constitution may be construed as a war crime, subject to the death penalty.

VI. Legislative Branch

A. The Legislative Branch is listed after the Judicial Branch because it is less responsive to the People.

B. The Members of Congress may be stopped between sessions and held to account for their failure to enforce the laws of war.

C. Refusing to investigate or impeach the President, Judicial Officers, or any current or former US government official for alleged war crimes, maladministration, illegal warfare, or other crimes against the People, States, or US Government shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to not fully assert ones oath of office, and punishable by the death penalty under the laws of war.

D. There are three chambers to the Congress. The Senate and House have a legal duty to fully enforce the laws. Any decision to not timely review evidence of impeachable offenses, or not investigate war crimes or maladministration could be construed as subsequent offenses under the laws of war.

E. The Superior Chamber shall decide, before any debate, whether the proposed bill is or is not Constitutional. This determination is subject to approval, challenge, and rejection by the People, States, and Judicial Branch.

F. The Congress is denied the exclusive power to make rules. Any rule which prohibits any investigation into alleged malfeasance in re the laws of war, Supreme Law, or oath of office is illegal, and may be construed as a subsequent offense under the laws of war.

G. The Congress shall comply with public audits, and timely provide within 45 days of an audit report a statement of remedy, and outline a plan within 90 days to fully comply with all legal obligations under the Statute, Supreme Law, oath of office, and laws of war.

H. The Congress may raise and support an army, and independently order that army only against the President when the President refuses to enforce the laws of war, or comply with his legal obligations under this Constitution.

VII. Executive Branch

A. The Executive Branch is led by three Presidents, co-equal with non-overlapping jurisdictions. The Executive Branch has one power: Executive Power. All actions taken under that one power are lesser authorities not powers. The Executive Branch has no power to create new powers or assign itself broader power.

B. The Executive Branch is listed last because it is the least responsive to the People, and the greatest threat of tyranny to this Constitution. The President is a clerk, not a King or Emperor. The President only manages programs. The President has no power to ignore, rewrite, or refuse to enforce the law. Each of the three Presidents shall have an ongoing requirement to demonstrate to the People and States and Congress and Courts compliance with the Constitution, Supreme Law, oath of office, and laws of war.

C. The Domestic Affairs President is responsive to the States and US Government on internal affairs.

D. The Foreign Affairs President shall have exclusive power to interact with foreign powers. The Foreign Affairs President is denied any power to violate the laws of war, or use covert activity against American citizens.

E. The Executive Branch, Congress, Judiciary, and Foreign Affairs President are denied the power to thwart any lawful State action to organize with foreign powers and agents to defend the US Constitution, enforce the laws of war, or protect the rights and powers of the People and States against domestic encroachments by the US government, legal counsel, or other US government officials.

F. The Commander in Chief shall only have power to lead combat operations during war time. Congress shall conduct ongoing, public reviews whether the Commander in Chief is or is not competent in managing combat operations. The Presidents and Commander in Chief are denied the power to prohibit Congress from using electronic surveillance or use separately raised and supported armies to conduct this oversight during wartime and peacetime.

G. The Executive Branch is denied the power to block anyone from getting access to illegal activity related to the laws of war.

H. During Peacetime, the Commander in Chief shall periodically cooperate with ongoing Oversight of US combat forces to ensure they are combat ready, fully trained on the laws of war, and prepared to lawfully be used to defend the Constitution against foreign and domestic enemies.

I. The Executive Branch and Presidents and officers, agents, contractors, and personnel are denied the power, right, or authority to order anyone to ignore any statute, law, legal requirement, or obligation under the Constitution.

J. The Executive Branch has no power or authority to directly contact the Legislative Branch by name. The President may only request, not order other branches of government. All Communications between the Executive and Legislative Branch shall pass through the Prosecutorial Branch, and retained in the National Archives. Those records are available for public inspection at any time. The People have the enforceable right to compel the Executive Branch, Legislature, and Judicial Branch to produce documents.

K. The Executive Branch, Congress, Judicial Branch, and Prosecutorial Branch, and States are denied the power to wage warfare, information warfare, or harass American civilians through his agents, combat troops, or third parties in the United states or from overseas. Any funds used for this illegal purpose belong to the People and States. Contracts used to enforce, compel, or organize this illegal activity are not enforceable, and contrary to public policy.

L. The Presidents are denied a presumption of competence until proven. The President shall always have the burden of proof, and is expressly denied a presumption of good faith until demonstrated with overwhelming evidence in public. An election result is not proof of competence nor does it satisfy a presumption of good faith, only of mastery to win an election through legal or illegal methods and deception.

M. The Executive Branch and Presidents and subordinate agency head, contractor, and employees are expressly denied any assurance any conversation he has related to illegal activity, war crimes, unlawful acts, or other threats to the US Constitution shall remain secret behind any shield, scheme, agreement, or technology. Any order a President or anyone gives to anyone to hide, destroy,not provide, or conceal evidence of illegal activity may be construed as a subsequent war crime, punishable by the death penalty. This restriction against following illegal orders may not be bypassed by claiming the order was from a non-person, electronic device, or other non-Constitutionally recognized entity, database, policy, guide, or other document.

N. The Presidents are denied the power to use any combat force, technology, or other military weapon or plan against American civilians, except in cases of internal rebellion which only the Congress shall approve in writing. When the Congress fails to act, or abuses its authority, the State Governors may lawfully use deadly combat force to detain and enforce the laws of war prohibiting illegal use of force against American civilians.

O. The Presidents are denied the power to induce any civilian to take any action that might deny them on any Geneva protections as a civilian. Any order, ruse, scheme, propaganda, or unreliable information to induce anyone to wage war, information warfare, or any action to harass civilians is punishable by the death penalty, and may be enforced as a violation of the laws of war.

P. The President, when delegating any power to any agency head, agrees that that agency shall be organized as if it were a separate, lesser, and not coequal branch. Those agencies shall fully cooperate with the other branches of government to ensure power within the branch or department is divided. There is no single agency, division, or office in the Executive Branch that is beyond ongoing oversight by the other four branches.

Q. The President shall have no power to block the Congress, States, Judiciary, Prosecutorial, and Independent Branch from a having co-equal status to oversee, manage, and organize that lesser branch. If the President refuses to substantially comply with that requirement, Congress may not lawfully provide funding for that agency, and the funds return to the States and People.

LadyBroadoak Visionary Planetary Healing Tutorial

May 30, 2006

No comments:

ShareThis

~ What must be done next ~

~ Please sign and pass on ~

Search This Blog

Facebook Badge

Followers

BlogCatalog

Current information clusters

War crimes/Impeachment/arrest swicki then "Peak oil, peak dollar KlusterfucK swicki

Lady Broadoak

Translate Blog

Blog Archive

LINKS, real good stuff!

Proposed change to the US Constitution

sitemeter

About Me

Labels