May 25, 2006

For other 9/11 blog entries on this blog, just run search this blog by entering "9/11"


(You might have to copy/paste this address two times..
the top one and then the second one right next to it)

with pictures and videos if you want them.
Read here or go see the site:

No Plane at Shanksville, Pennsylvania. No Crash, No Shoot down, No Flight 93.

No "Lets Roll" Hunt the Boeing – Can you can find it?

by The Surgeon
based on the article by Phil Jayhan

There is overwhelming physical evidence that Flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville, Pennsylvania on 9/11. Coupled with circumstantial and documentary evidence, plus the numerous government cover-ups and conflicting stories, lends credence to this allegation. What is crystal clear is that the official story concerning Flight 93 is a blatant lie. To prove this to yourself, research the history of the official story: at first, it was "brave passengers took over the plane and crashed it to save Washington, DC"; then the story was changed to "the hijackers crashed the plane". No new evidence was uncovered or discovered that would require a change in the story. Only when the passengers' families demanded to listen to the cockpit voice recording did the story change. However, the cockpit voice recording is bogus – there was no Flight 93 crash.

Lack of Aircraft Debris

The key evidence that the official story of Flight 93 is a complete lie is the missing Boeing 757 at the "crash site" in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. A Boeing 757-200 weighs +120,000 lbs (+54,000 kg) empty, has a length of 155 ft 3 in (47.3 m), wingspan of 124 ft 10 in (38 m) and a tail height of 44 ft 6 in (13.6 m). All of the eyewitnesses to the crash scene, which included firemen, were amazed that there was no evidence of the plane. There was a lot of small debris and paper, but 120,000 lbs of aircraft apparently disappeared. According to the official story, the one-time open pit mine had been filled with soft dirt which "liquefied" when the plane hit. The entire plane buried itself deeply in the ground. However, note the imprint of the tail. It is not very deep and there is no evidence of any debris from the tail.

The Faked Crash Imprint

The second key piece of evidence is the shape of the impact crater, or the crash imprint. The official story is that the 757 was at an extremely low altitude (less than 500 feet or 150 meters), the plane rolled onto its back and crashed at +500 mph (800 kmh). The crash imprint shows a vertical, or nearly vertical, impact. It is impossible for a 757 to change from horizontal flight a to vertical dive within a few hundred vertical feet – particularly when its at twice its' design speed for low altitude. Further, the all-electronic control systems of Boeing 757s have pre-set software limits that prevents pilots from making dangerous maneuvers: such as inverted flight or vertical dives. The crash imprint and lack of debris and fire damage outside the crater could only have been caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash. And this was not possible.

The Circular Crater

The third item evidence is the circular crater. Note that it is off-center of the tail imprint. If this crater were caused by the fuselage, it should be directly under the tail imprint. If the plane crashed at an angle, with one wing striking before the other, the crater could be off-center – however, the tail imprint would be larger. The circular crater is indicative of a below ground explosion.

Grass Growing in the Crater

The fourth piece of evidence is the grass and weeds growing in the areas where the "wing tips" and "tail assembly" imprinted the ground. Grass and vegetation is also seen growing on the sides of the burning crater walls! This grass must be the same as the PentaLawn grass, which is able to grow back within immediately after plane crashes. Clearly, the crash crater was made before 9/11 – long enough for grass to grow.

Lack of Fire Damage

The fifth piece of evidence that the official government story is a lie is the lack of fire damage. A Boeing 757 has a fuel capacity of 11,489 gal (43,490 l). Flight 93 was full for its planned cross country trip to California and would have had more than 9,000 gal (34,000 l) when it crashed. To put this inperspective, this amount of fuel would fill 500 automobiles. There is almost no fire damage outside the crash crater and that is only in the nearby woods.

The Mushroom Cloud

The sixth item of evidence is the picture taken moments after the crash which shows a relatively small mushroom cloud of smoke with a narrow base. There is no extended smoke base which would be typical ofaircraft crash. It is indicative of high explosive.

The Missing Three Minutes

The government asserts that Flight 93 crashed at 10:03 AM. A seismic recording station recorded a major event at 10:06 AM. Seismic recordings are calibrated by atomic clocks which are incredibly accurate. Cleveland Air Traffic Control also had the flight on its radar at 10:06 AM. Again, the government story contradicts physical evidence. While this does not provide any proof that Flight 93 did not crash, it does illustrate government complicity.

Evidence Summary

To summarize, the physical evidence does not show that a Boeing 757-200 crashed at Shanksville:

• Amount of debris not consistent with a +120,000 lb aircraft
• Crash imprint could only be caused by a vertical, or near vertical crash, which was not possible
• Circular crater indicative of a below ground explosion
• Grass and weeds are growing in the crater which clearly indicates the crater was made before 9/11
• Lack of fire damage
• Mushroom cloud not consistent with 9,000 gallons of fuel exploding and burning
• The three minute discrepancy
• Flight 93: of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%)
Of these 45 people, none are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list: None.

Flight 93, no crash. No "Lets Roll"

What Probably Happened at Shanksville

As the 757 flew over the crash site, pre-planted explosives (remember this is a former mine) were detonated creating the central crater. This caused the mushroom cloud in the photo. The wing and tail imprints were dug in advance, plus some of the central crater, long enough for grass to grow. Aircraft debris, paper and fuel were pre-planted and blown out by the explosives.

What happened to the plane and its passengers?

We don't know. There is some evidence, as presented by the researcher woodybox, that Flight 93 landed at Cleveland-Hopkins airport.

Other Oddities and Coincidences

There are numerous other oddities and coincidences concerning Flight 93: ranging from terror drills at nearby airports to debris found miles away at two separate locations.

Further, a C-130H cargo plane saw Flight 77 crash into the Pentagon, continued on its journey to Minneapolis; was at the Flight 93 crash site and continued on its journey.

Plus, the impossible cell phone calls, the political and corporate connections to the land where Flight 93 crashed and much, much more.

NOTE to non-corrupt FBI agents and U.S. law enforcement officers: If you take a close look at the individuals who own this property, where Flight 93 is alleged to have crashed, and interrogate them in Guantanamo for a few weeks, we will get to the bottom of who pulled off 9/11. We guarantee it.

[End Article 1]

[Start Article 2]

9-11 Mysteries RemainThree Years After Terror Attacks,
Public Still Doubts `Official' Story

By Christopher Bollyn

Original link:

SOMERSET COUNTY, Pennsylvania—Three years after the events of 9-11, half of the residents of New York City believe U.S. leaders had foreknowledge and "consciously failed" to act to prevent the disasters, while two in three want a new investigation of the "still-unanswered questions."

In the first survey of public opinion about allegations of U.S. government complicity and whitewashing of the events of 9-11, a Zogby International poll found that fewer than two in five New Yorkers believe the official 9-11 commission "answered all of the important questions about what actually happened on Sept. 11.

"One in two New York City residents say that senior government officials "knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around Sept. 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act," according to the poll of Aug. 24-26, 2004.

Sixty-six percent called for another full investigation, by Congress or Elliot Spitzer (left), New York's attorney general, to resolve the "unanswered questions."

"I think these numbers show that most New Yorkers are now fed up with the silence, and that politicians trying to exploit 9-11 do so at their peril," said W. David Kubiak, executive director of, one of the groups that commissioned the poll. "The 9-11 case is not closed, and New York's questions are not going away."

The New York Times, on the other hand, told puzzled readers on Sept. 11, 2004, that it's possible to know what happened on 9-11 "without knowing what happened."

"In the three years since 9-11, we've begun to understand that it's possible to know what happened without knowing what happened," the editorial began. "Some of what we need to know publicly has been provided by the report of the 9-11 commission. Other answers are lacking."

Sept. 11 is "a central event in this nation's history," the Times editorial concluded. "It's important that we who live most immediately in its shadow press hard to learn everything that can be learned about that day and to make sure that nothing is allowed to fade into the world of the publicly unknowable."

The New York Times efforts, however, did not include sending a reporter to either of the two recent 9-11 conferences held on Broadway in downtown Manhattan that addressed the unanswered questions.

The first event, "The 9-11 Citizens Commission: The Omissions Hearings," was held Sept. 9 at Symphony Space on Broadway. This six-hour conference was chaired by former Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) and brought together panels of experts who presented new evidence and raised questions about the official version of what happened.

The second event, "Confronting the Evidence: 9-11 and the Search for Truth," was held at the Manhattan Center Ballroom during the evening of Sept. 11.

While American Free Press participated in both conferences, The New York Times, which says it should "press hard to learn everything that can be learned about that day," confirmed it had not covered either event.

While the Times carried a 9-11 story daily during the days leading up to the third anniversary, its reporting failed to ask critical questions. For example, in a Sept. 10 article entitled "Falling Bodies," the fate of more than 1,000 people trapped in the twin towers above the levels impacted by the planes is discussed without mentioning the possibility of rescue by helicopter—or the fact that the doors to the roof had been locked.


Both Manhattan events were sponsored by a remarkable and well-heeled citizen named Jimmy Walter, who has dedicated one-tenth of his net worth to bring attention to the yet-unanswered questions of 9-11.

To bring these issues to a wider audience, Walter is purchasing full-page ads in mainstream magazines and newspapers raising key points and promoting books such as Painful Questions by Eric Hufschmid.

Walter told AFP he is spending $250,000 to bring public attention to the official cover-up of 9-11. Walter said he had only realized that something was seriously wrong with the government's version of events after having seen Hufschmid's book and videos, which was like "an epiphany."

Before that "epiphany," Walter said he had believed that 9-11 had been "a sin of omission, not commission." "I believe explosives [were] used," Walter said about the destruction of the twin towers. Told that the Anti-Defamation League attacked this writer for an article about eyewitness evidence of explosions in the towers immediately after 9-11, Walter said: "The Mossad is in it up to their necks."

Walter, 57, described himself as a "Bush clone." The son of a millionaire, Walter graduated cum laude from a prestigious prep school and then obtained an undergraduate degree from the University of North Carolina.

Like Bush, Walter said he served in the Air National Guard in Florida and found the regulation that allowed him to skip out the last two years. After bouts of drug use and alcohol abuse, Walter said he "found the truth."

"I want to do something significant," Walter said. And bringing public attention to the unanswered questions about 9-11 is the best way to do that, he said. Walter recently purchased full-page ads in Reader's Digest, Business Week, New Yorker and Inc

.When 9-11 "activist" and conference "advisor" Nicolas Levis hysterically tried to steer the second conference away from discussion of the evidence, security guards removed him from the theater.

This writer was then asked to join the second panel, which discussed the physical evidence, with author Webster G. Tarpley and engineer Jeff King.

Both Tarpley and King agree that the towers were demolished in a crime that employed both conventional and exotic technologies.


American Free Press visited Somerset County to look into some of the questions surrounding United Airlines Flight 93, which allegedly turned over and crashed in a refilled strip mine between Lambertsville and Shanksville, Pa., taking 44 lives with it.

Many local residents believe the plane was shot down, which they say would explain why parts of the plane and its contents were found strewn over a large area.

One question, "is what happened to the physical wreckage of the plane?"

"There was no plane," Ernie Stull, mayor of Shanksville, told German television in March 2003:"My sister and a good friend of mine were the first ones there," Stull said. "They were standing on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so they were the first here—and the fire department came. Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane."

"They had been sent here because of a crash, but there was no plane?" the reporter asked.

"No. Nothing. Only this hole."

When AFP asked Stull about his comments, he disagreed about when he had gone to the crash site.

"A day or two later," Stull said, was about when he went to the site. But he reiterated the fact that they saw little evidence of a plane crash.

Nena Lensbouer, who had prepared lunch for the workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, was the first person to go up to the smoking crater.

Lensbouer told AFP that the hole was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot trailer in her front yard. She described hearing "an explosion, like an atomic bomb"—not a crash.

Lensbouer called 911 and stayed on the line as she ran across the reclaimed land of the former strip mine to within 15 feet of the smoking crater.

Lensbouer told AFP that she did not see any evidence of a plane then or at any time during the excavation at the site, an effort that reportedly recovered 95 percent of the plane and 10 percent of the human remains.

While specific details vary, the explanation for the disappearance of the plane is that the reclaimed land acted like liquid and absorbed the aircraft, which is said to have impacted at between 450 and 600 miles per hour.

This explanation is also used to explain why there was only a brief explosion with one short-lived smoke cloud, not unlike a bomb blast.

"I never saw that smoke," Paula Long, an eyewitness, told AFP. Long ran "immediately" after hearing the crash but did not see the cloud of smoke caught in the now-famous photograph by Valencia McClatchey, she said.

"It [the ground] liquefied," Bob Leverknight, an active member of the Air National Guard and correspondent with Somerset's Daily American, told AFP regarding how the wreck and much of the fuel disappeared. One of the massive engines, Leverknight said, however, bounced off the ground and was found in the woods.

Jim Svonavec, whose company worked at the site and provided excavation equipment, told AFP that the recovery of the engine "at least 1,800 feet into the woods," was done solely by FBI agents using his equipment.

See page 24 for an ad for AFP's unrefuted, 20-page 9-11 report.

© American Free Press 2004

Missile at the World Trade Center - Caught by 4 Different News Sources

The Odyssey of Flight 175 Geronimo Jones - Controlled Demolition

The Pentagon and the Strange Case of the Missing Boeing 757

Hunt the Boeing in Shanskville, PA, and see if you can spot it!

NASA & Remote Controlled Flight - 1984

No comments: