Showing posts with label trilateral commission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trilateral commission. Show all posts

July 22, 2008

Humankind Benefits From New World Order: We Need One-World Government

By Robert Paul Reyes


"The Bilderberg Group is an unofficial annual invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of influence in the fields of business, media and politics. The elite group meets annually at luxury hotels or resorts throughout the world -- normally in Europe -- and once every four years in the United States or Canada." [Quotation from Wikipedia]

"The ultra-elite Bilderberg Group held its annual secret meeting at the sealed-off Westfields Marriott Hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, near Washington, D.C., June 5-8. Attendees at Bilderberger gatherings comprise the A-list of global power brokers from the worlds of politics, business, central banking, finance, and media. They also represent the top levels of membership of globalist, one-world organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the World Economic Forum, and the Bohemian Grove.

As usual, the entire proceedings were held behind closed doors and cordons of armed personnel, including the U.S. Secret Service, local police, and private security guards." [Quotation from the New American]

The first description of the Bilderberg Group is from Wikipedia, an objective source; the second is from a right wing Web site.

The Bilderberg Group is not a satanic cabal scheming to take over the world; they are powerful, influential, and civic-minded overachievers who enjoy each others company.

The conspiracy-minded lunatic fringe argues: How come only international bankers, politicians and media heavyweights are invited? Well duh, it's only natural that the powerful would want to network with each other; I'm not holding my breath waiting for an invitation.

Some conservative nuts need a bogeyman (Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commissions) to explain their failure to achieve anything of significance. "I'm working at Burger King because the Bilderberg Group is destroying America by outsourcing all the good jobs."

I wish there were an international group of statesmen working to set up a one-world government. Sovereignty will one day be a thing of the past; it's a luxury this little world can no longer afford. Only a one-world government can adequately address the great issues of today: Overpopulation, terrorism, global warming, pandemics, tribal warfare, oil crisis, poverty...

It's a global economy, it's a global village and eventually it will be a one-world government. Don't be on the losing side of history, get with the program.

Robert Paul Reyes is a NewsBlaze writer on Politics, Pop Culture and Pointless Pontificating. Contact him by writing to NewsBlaze.

To comment on this story, email to comment@newsblaze.com

Click here to get NewsBlaze News in your email

Copyright © 2008, NewsBlaze, Daily News

March 22, 2008

The ruling class klusterfuck PLAN, Zbig: Webster Tarpley

I've been building up the ongoing reader with my arguments and hunting down the latest Webster .. for I do not believe that he and I would call the KlusterfucK much differently ..

I encourage the reader from WHEREVER, to push on the links for full whack of the full whack which I call the KLUSTERFUCK, you can call it what you like.

I am not going to say WHAT I think, too risky, BUT ..

Can anyone spell assassination??

I can see why the Free Republic guys are just losing their minds, I really can.

For three years I've said Donald Rumsfield is dieing to attack CHINA. He left and played the war games. He got his ideas about assymetric warfare and cyberwarfare right down to crossing the "t" .. he really did .. and now we are DUE.

This ride is gonna get bumpier than I ever though, ever dreamed.

I want to get raptured. Or at least shot when they come for me.

Veeger


Confirmed - Obama Is
Zbigniew Brzezinski Puppet


Commentary
By Webster Tarpley
3-21-8

Any lingering doubts about Obama's status as an abject puppet of Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission ended this morning when the withered mummy of imperialism himself appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe* to campaign for Obama, urged on by his own moronic daughter, Mika Brzezinski, an Obama groupie and sycophant.

Zbigniew, a low-level Polish aristocrat whose life has been devoted to hatred for Russia, lauded Obama for his 2002 speech opposing the Iraq war, saying that he himself was the source of Obama's arguments back then - thus confirming Obama's long-term status as his puppet, which probably began in 1981-1983, when Obama was a student at Columbia University, and Zbig was directing the anti-Russian institute.


The aging revanchist showed all the misogynism of his szachta origins with a scurrilous attack on Sen. Clinton as a mere housewife, a Mamie Eisenhower running against charismatic a JFK played by Zbig's own Manchurian candidate, and as a woman whose foreign policy experience was worth as much as that of Zbig's own travel agent.


Zbig, who was kept in the closet for many months during the Carter administration because of his hideous Dr. Strangelove persona, portrayed Obama as a peace candidate who wanted to end the Iraq war and usher in peace in the Middle East. Zbig is an infamous Cold War hawk who has managed to re-invent himself in the eyes of some dupes by opposing the Iraq adventure, mainly because it is bad for imperialism.


Zbig did not mention that the reason he wants to downplay certain aspects of US aggression in the Middle East is to free up resources for use in the much bigger and more dangerous adventures which the Trilateral Commission is now directing.

Zbig is the mastermind of the Kosovo secession under KLA terrorist auspices, a gambit against Serbia and Russia to prepare a coming Operation Barbarossa II against Moscow. With the help of his son Mark Brzezinski, another top foreign policy controller of Obama, Zbig is also behind the new Euromissiles crisis involving US ABM installations in Poland. Zbig is the enforcer for the new CIA policy of killing Pakistanis (as "terrorists") without consulting the government of that country, a nuclear power twice as big as Iran.


Most dangerous of all, Zbig is the obvious mastermind of the massive destabilization of China now ongoing, starting with the CIA/MI-6 Tibet insurrection, which has placed the US on a collision course with China, a superpower with 1.4 billion people and thermonuclear weapons which can strike US cities, a far cry from the helpless and defenseless targets preferred by the neocons. It is an open secret that Zbig intends to attempt a color revolution or CIA people power coup in China under the cover of the Beijing Olympics later this year. He may also make the Taiwan crisis explode. The dangers of these lunatic policies are infinitely worse than anything that could ever come out of the Middle East.


Senator Jay Rockefeller and Trilateral/BIlderberger boss Joseph Nye are also actively campaigning for Obama. Nye is the theoretician of "soft power," a new form of imperialist aggression based on economic warfare, subversion, deception, and people power coups. They want Obama to mobilize soft power to give a face lift to US imperialism.


Brzezinski's goal is confrontation with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the main world center for resistance to US-UK global domination.


Anti-war activists are still fixated on Iran, but not Brzezinski is not - his target is China, TWENTY times bigger than Iran, with ICBMs ready to launch, followed by Russia, the world's biggest nuclear power. Such confused activists need to focus on stopping the next war - the final global showdown with Pakistan, China, and Russia. That means rejecting Brzezinski's puppet candidate Obama.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23726367#23726367

March 18, 2008

articles on the global financial crisis ..

<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money008/03/17/ccview117.xml>US
losing confidence vote as investors flee
Asian, Mid East and European investors stood aside at last week's
>auction of 10-year US Treasury notes. "It was a disaster," said Ray
>Attrill from 4castweb. "We may be close to the point where the
>uglier consequences of benign neglect towards the currency are revealed."
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html#080473>Mar 16,
>2008 11:00 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html>ECONOMY
>
>
><http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aS87YcPKuDDE&refer=worldwide>Dollar
>Doomsayers Draw Signs From Bernanke Rate Cuts
>Ben S. Bernanke's interest-rate cuts have touched off a vicious
>circle of doom for the dollar.
>
>The Federal Reserve reduced the rate on direct loans to commercial
>banks by a quarter-point to 3.25 percent before Asian financial
>markets opened today. It will likely lower its target rate for
>overnight loans between banks tomorrow to at least 2.25 percent from
>3 percent, according to futures traded on the Chicago Board of
>Trade. Lower borrowing costs work against the dollar by making
>fixed-income securities issued by the government less appealing to
>global investors.
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html#080472>Mar 16,
>2008 10:59 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html>ECONOMY
>
>
><http://wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/bear-m15.shtml>Fed rescue of
>Bear Stearns raises specter of Depression-era crash
>Invoking a little-used provision added to the Federal Reserve Act in
>1932, at the height of the Great Depression, the US central bank
>agreed to allow the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to insure an
>infusion of credit to Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase. Under the
>terms of the "secured loan facility," to extend for up to 28 days,
>the risk of a default by Bear Stearns will be borne by the Federal
>Reserve Bank of New York, not JP Morgan Chase. The latter will serve
>essentially as a conduit for the cash provided by the US central bank.
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html#080471>Mar 16,
>2008 10:58 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html>ECONOMY
>
>
><http://www.infowars.com/?p=822>U.S. No Longer Number One Economy
>The U.S. economy lost the title of "world's biggest" to the euro
>zone this week as the value of the dollar slumped in currency markets.
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html#080470>Mar 16,
>2008 10:55 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html>ECONOMY
>
>
><http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=10870166&fsrc=RSS>Stripped
>Bear
>A CENTURY after John Pierpont Morgan bailed out Wall Street, his
>bank is at it again. In a dramatic move on Friday March 14th, the
>Federal Reserve Bank of New York and JPMorgan Chase made emergency
>funding available to Bear Stearns after other market players lost
>confidence in the beleaguered investment bank as a trading partner.
>As the credit crunch has deepened and broadened, the worst fear of
>many on Wall Street has been the collapse or forced rescue of a big
>bank or broker. That moment is now upon them.
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html#080469>Mar 16,
>2008 10:53 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html>ECONOMY
>
>
><http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/19/2008/3054>Ohio's
>voting machines are now an official crime scene
>At least 15 touch-screen voting machines that produced improbable
>numbers in Ohio's 2006 statewide election are now under double-lock
>in an official crime scene. And the phony "Homeland Security Alert"
>used by Republicans to build up George W. Bush's 2004 vote count in
>a key southwestern Ohio county has come under new scrutiny.
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_vote_fraud.html#080468>Mar
>16, 2008 10:52 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_vote_fraud.html>VOTE FRAUD
>
>WRH: If Bush isn't the legally elected President, then we don't have
>to pay for his wars.
>
>
><http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/17/world/asia/17market.html?ref=world>Major
>Stock Markets in Asia Tumble
>Major Asian stock markets fell sharply in early trading on Monday as
>pessimism continued to spread despite the Fed's dramatic moves over
>the weekend, sending Tokyo's benchmark index to a three-year low.
>Posted
><http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html#080467>Mar 16,
>2008 10:48 PM PST
>Category: <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cat_economy.html>ECONOMY
>
>~~~
>The above article(s) &/or letter(s) are accessible through links
>posted on the WHAT REALLY HAPPENED website today... For a variety of
>opinions on what's really happening around the world, visit this
>site frequently: http://whatreallyhappened.com ...and Reader
>Letters: http://whatreallyhappened.com/letters

>Reader letters are archived at
><http://alaskafreepress.com/msgboard/wrh_reader_letters>http://alaskafreepress.com/msgboard/
><http://alaskafreepress.com/msgboard/wrh_reader_letters>wrh_reader_letters

If you're not OUTRAGED...
you're not paying ATTENTION !!

The following is a statement by David Rockefeller (founder of the
Trilateral Commission), in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral
Commission, in June, 1991:

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our
plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of
publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more
sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The
supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers
is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in
past centuries."


How hot is the water? McCain would continue the Bush 2 disaster

McCAIN WOULD CONTINUE THE BUSH 2 DISASTER


PART 1 of 2

By Steven Yates
March 16, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

Whether we like it or not, the power elite is getting what it wants again this election year. Having recognized the philandering, cross-dressing Rudy Giuliani as unappealing to most Republican voters and having been able to black out Ron Paul for the most part, they have gotten behind John McCain as their GOP standard-bearer. The evidence: before Christmas, McCain seemed to have few prospects and was running out of money. Now, with his having reached the magic number of 1,191 delegates, we are looking at yet another coronation.

Are Republican voters really supporting this guy? Perhaps they have very short memories and don’t recall McCain’s involvement in four attempts last year—spearheaded by President Bush and ultra-liberal Ted Kennedy (and South Carolina’s arch-RINO Lindsey Graham)—to ram amnesty-for-illegals legislation through Congress and down our throats. Or perhaps Diebold electronic voting machines did their number working overtime. Or both. Or maybe the majority of the electorate really does lack all concern for where we are headed, so long as their paychecks keep coming and cable sports stays on the air.

If this country places this man in the White House in November, it will be making a huge and grim mistake!

Not that anyone should vote for a Democrat, of course. The choices our elites have made available this year have clearly reached an all-time low. This is especially distressing because there have been alternatives to power-elite selectees. It will be very tempting to tell people, “Unless you voted for Ron Paul—and supported him with donations to his campaign, phone calls, letters to the editor or articles, etc., when the corporate media would not report on him—shut up already about the loss of your few remaining freedoms. Didn’t H.L. Mencken define democracy as the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard?” (Not that this was supposed to be a democracy, of course, and not that the electorate really decides anything of importance in this country anymore.)

It may be that McCain is the power elite’s designated loser, and that they have their sights on a Democrat this go around. Might we speculate? Perhaps the power elite is using Barack Obama’s charismatic presence to make sure Hillary Clinton stays on her leash. However, with power-elitist Zbigniew Brzezinski working behind the scenes for Obama, and with Obama now the leading (delegate-wise) Democrat, the truth could be the other way around (minus the charisma, of course, since Hillary has about as much of that as a fence post). But given the ongoing drama between those two, maybe McCain isn’t the designated loser. Both Democrats are vulnerable on multiple counts. The corporate media could lower the boom on either of them at any time.

I don’t move in power elite circles, so I really don’t know what is planned. But one thing is for sure: the elite can count on a McCain presidency further nailing down policies that are firmly in place after seven and a fraction years of George W. Bush. There is every indication that while we may see a few predictable bimbo eruptions and token debates and criticisms, when push comes to shove the support McCain needs will be there when he needs it, from the right quarters. Areas where his past transgressions are serious—think Keating Five—will disappear cleanly down the corporate media memory hole.

This, too, will be unfortunate because from the standpoint of We the People, the Bush II presidency has been a disaster of leviathan proportions.

The first thing to note is that no one with a functioning brain still thinks Bush II is a conservative. He’s a globalist and a corporatist. He has surrounded himself with neocons—Straussians and ex-Trotskyites who share his globalist vision and his intoxication with power. Almost nothing he has done has benefited We the People. Let’s look at it.

(1) Under Bush II’s watch, the national debt has soared to over $9.3 trillion as of this writing; that’s over $79,000 for every taxpayer. This, of course, is just the reported fraction of a total indebtedness that continues to mount alongside the Bush regime’s and the Federal Reserve’s efforts to quick-fix the situation. Now someone will read the last paragraph and remind me about Bush II’s tax cuts. Yes, he cut taxes, but it should be a no-brainer that unless government also cuts spending it will either have to run up huge deficits or print more and more fiat money or both. Since Bush II has expanded government faster than any Republican regime in history, we have seen both. All of which brings me to (2).

(2) The dollar is collapsing under Bush II appointee Helicopter Ben’s manipulations (following two decades of Alan Greenspan manipulations). It has lost roughly 60 percent of its value just since 2000; red alerts went off back in March 2006 when the Federal Reserve stopped reporting M3. The price of gold has reached record highs this year and is zeroing in on $1,000/oz. Foreign investors are jittery; our stock market is yo-yoing. Two things are saving the dollar right now: the fact that it remains the world’s reserve currency, plus the onward-and-upward forever mindset of the “old school” working under the assumption that all we are seeing is the recent of many bumps in the road.

(3) We are mired in two (so far!) unwinnable foreign wars entered into under dubious pretexts. We have failed to capture Osama bin Forgotten (oops, I mean bin Laden)—perhaps because an Osama bin Laden on the loose is more valuable to those in power than an Osama bin Laden under lock and key. The Iraq War, of course, long ago became a quagmire, Faux News (and McCain campaign) propaganda about “the surge” not withstanding. Almost 4,000 Americans have been killed in Iraq for no good reason. Approximately 1,173,000 Iraqis have been killed. Some of us warned back in 2002 that this would happen, and—imagine my surprise!—no one would listen. The U.S. is building a Vatican-sized embassy over there, suggesting that the reason Bush II never had an exit strategy was that his handlers did not intend on Americans’ leaving. At least, not until the power elite’s incipient world government can move in and take over. While I am not an advocate of national health care, it is possible that something like that could have been accomplished with the $500 billion-plus that has been squandered in Iraq.

(4) There is overwhelming evidence of government lying about the true state of the U.S. economy, with full corporate media compliance, of course. For example, both government and mainstream sources cite a “core” inflation rate that purposefully omits increased food and energy costs. It is also clear that the official means of calculating unemployment—reporting those who have applied for unemployment compensation, actively sought work in the past four weeks (sometimes competing against illegal aliens willing to do the same work for a fraction of the cost while living ten or more to an apartment), and whose benefits have not run out—systematically underreports the actual amount of unemployment in America. We know that home foreclosures reached all time highs last year. Personal bankruptcies reached all time highs earlier in the decade. Americans rendered homeless by long-term unemployment have moved into “tent cities” in places like Vancouver and suburban California. (There are no figures for underemployment, of course.)

(5) While supposedly fighting a “war on terror” Bush II has stymied every effort to secure our borders, which is what We The People wanted from any “immigration reform” package. Bush II has thus overseen the colonization of this country by over 20 million illegal aliens (again, the federal government and the corporate media underreport the figure at just 12 million). At least one tenth of Mexico’s population is in the U.S. illegally. There is, moreover, a complete media blackout on the illegal alien crime wave—the spree of murders, assaults, rapes, vehicular homicides by drunk drivers, etc., committed by illegal aliens. Two border patrol agents, Ignacio Ramos and José Compion, remain imprisoned on the testimony of a known drug dealer while Bush II cynically commuted the prison sentence of his buddy “Scooter” Libby last summer. If I worked for the U.S. Border Patrol, I would have had to resign long ago to maintain my sanity. The absurdity of our illegal alien situation and the need to destroy those devoted to securing our borders cannot be understood, however, without:

(6) also understanding how Bush II has furthered the globalist / integrationist policies of his father, George H.W. Bush, and of the Fabian / Rhodes / CFR / Trilateralist axis which gave us NAFTA and the GATT / WTO during the Bill Clinton era (do we need more evidence that both Democrats and Republicans are controlled by this axis?). Under Bush II we saw CAFTA and more bilateral “free trade” agreements reached in lieu of a comprehensive FTAA (so far beaten back by South American leaders who want nothing to do with British-American “capitalism”). NAFTA has cost this country over 2.4 million manufacturing jobs. It has also lowered real wages and aggravated income inequality in Mexico—one of the reasons a tenth of that nation’s population has migrated here. Even back in the “booming” (credit-expansionist) late 1990s I recall reading of how our economy was “shifting” from manufacturing to domestic services. Jobs in this latter sector, of course, pay a fraction of those in the former. It was a wake-up call to realize this was no accident; it had all been carefully scripted—read America’s Engineered Decline by William Norman Grigg. Now, ten years later, it is clear that without the potentially endless opportunities for personal borrowing against the future made possible by credit cards, we would have already seen a massive decline in the American standard of living. Strictly speaking, of course, our present moment is as awash in pseudo-prosperity as the world is in fiat dollars. Americans owe $9.9 trillion in credit card debt. You don’t have real prosperity when you are carrying five figures of debt no matter how big your house is or how many SUVs you own. Think of the subprime mortgage lending meltdown. Eventually the piper always demands payment. Economic law tells us that we cannot build malinvestments on top of malinvestments forever. But I digress; our subject was globalism / economic-integrationism under Bush II

Vicente Fox and Bush II have agreed on North American integration and a common currency, in effect confirming Jerome R. Corsi’s allegations. More recently, Fox’s successor Felipe Calderon has confirmed his intent to continue the effort including meeting with the Trilateral Commission. There can be no doubt that the power elite wants to be sure Bush II’s successor will further the goals of the SPP and other integration efforts on the horizon such as between the U.S. and the European Union. Author Chris Bentley has shown how both unrestricted immigration and economic integration further the goals of regional government and ending national sovereignty. The European Union began with “free trade” accords, after all. Once the North American Union is built and we are living under a North American Parliament along the lines of the one assuming control over Europe (and for which American students are already being prepared), there will be no “illegal aliens” since we will have free movement of peoples across borders rendered as meaningless as those in Europe. For part two click below.

Click here for part -----> 2,

© 2007 Steven Yates - All Rights Reserved


August 29, 2007

Courtesy the August Review

The Trilateral Commission: Usurping Sovereignty

The Trilateral Commission is approaching its 35th anniversary. Trilateral policy has been to create a "New International Economic Order" but the means to the end involved hijacking the Executive Branch of the U.S. government. Starting with James Earl Carter in 1976, every successive administration has been dominated by members of the Commission -- for 35 years, they have had their way with trade policy, creation of global treaties, monetary policy and the usurping or American Accordingly, the internal authority of the state supersedes that of all other bodies.', CAPTION, 'Sovereignty',BELOW,RIGHT, WIDTH, 300, FGCOLOR, '#CCCCFF', BGCOLOR, '#333399', TEXTCOLOR, '#000000', CAPCOLOR, '#FFFFFF', OFFSETX, 10, OFFSETY, 10);" onmouseout="return nd();">Sovereignty.

Read more...
Toward a North American Union

The global elite, through the direct operations of President George Bush and his Administration, are creating a North American Union that will combine Canada, Mexico and the U.S. into a superstate called the North American Union. There is no legislation or Congressional oversight, much less public support, for this massive restructuring of the U.S. It's primary perpetrators are mostly members of the Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973 to foster a "New International Economic Order."

MUST SEE VIDEO: Canadian political party rejects North American Union
MUST SEE VIDEO: AIM Editor Cliff Kincaid on Lou Dobbs/CNN
MUST SEE VIDEO: CNN Fight against North American Union
See Lou Dobbs on North American Union Orwellian Brave New World!
See Arizona State University teaching curriculum Building North America

Read more...
How to understand Globalization
  1. Follow the money, follow the power
  2. Discern illusion from reality, especially with media outlets
  3. Listen to experts who offer a meaningful critique
  4. Study & verify sources and footnotes
  5. Apply liberal doses of common sense

What is Globalization? It is the collective effect of purposeful and amoral manipulation that seeks to centralize economic, political, technological and societal forces in order to accrue maximum profit and political power to global banks, global corporations and the elitists who run them.

"Free Trade" is the central mantra. Globalization is set against national Accordingly, the internal authority of the state supersedes that of all other bodies.', CAPTION, 'Sovereignty',BELOW,RIGHT, WIDTH, 300, FGCOLOR, '#CCCCFF', BGCOLOR, '#333399', TEXTCOLOR, '#000000', CAPCOLOR, '#FFFFFF', OFFSETX, 10, OFFSETY, 10);" onmouseout="return nd();">Sovereignty, closed borders, trade tarrifs and anything that would restrict its goals and methods used to achieve them.

Globalization promotes regional and global government, a one-world economic system of trade and a form of fascism where global corporations and their elite control the policies and directives of individual governments.

The original and primary perpetrators of modern-day globalization number only in the 100's, representative of which, but not exclusively, are members of The Trilateral Commission.

To understand the genesis of the Trilateral Commission, read the transcript of the 1979 radio show between Antony C. Sutton, Patrick M. Wood and George S. Franklin, Jr. -- Coordinator of the Trilateral Commission!

Where did Globalization come from? The "New International Economic Order" was the coinage of the Trilateral Commission starting in 1973. This purpose was stated repeatedly in its papers, journals and conferences. In 1991, President George H.W. Bush, a member of the Trilateral Commission, began to openly talk about the New World Order, which expanded the concept to include governance as well as economic unity.


Initial speech was actually delivered on September 11, 1990

August 25, 2007

Some somewhat dated SPP material that needs publication ...

Kim Campbell on North American Union

Former PC PM Kim Campbell was on the PBS News Hour last night revealing the dirty truth about Trilateralism, the SPP and the coming North American Union aka NAFTA2.

She was joined in her paean to the joy of Trilateralism and the new continentalism by former Mexican Foreign Minister Jorge Castaneda. Both of them criticized the 'secrecy' of the meetings between the Three Amigos and their Corporate Counterparts.


KIM CAMPBELL:We have the world's longest undefended border, and there is a concern to create a security perimeter that will create confidence on both sides of the border that those movements can pass relatively quickly, that there's trust in the documentation, trust in the broader security system. And we've had to deal with that.

It's something that predates 9/11, but the 9/11 brought it into very, very high profile. And I think we have to recognize we have in Canada, you know, the nationalists who are concerned that any kind of collaboration, any kind of harmonization of standards is the thin edge of the wedge of Canada losing its identity. And I'm amused to see that there are people in the United States who think that, you know, what they call "socialist Canada" is somehow going to come down and corrupt them.

But the fact of the matter is, our three countries are the world's largest trading region, the largest energy market. We really have an extraordinary future together, if we can find ways of dealing with the impediments for the movements of the things that we want to move and ways of ensuring that the public is confident that their security and that their standards of well-being are assured.

And I think one of the ways of doing that is to take this process -- this is the third summit in this security and prosperity partnership process -- is maybe to take it a little bit even more public and get the debate more open, because I think President Bush has been a bit quiet about it, even Prime Minister Harper. I don't know how President Calderon is dealing with this in Mexico. He's got a new government.

But these are important issues. And if we don't get them right, we really will lose the competitive battle, but also lose a lot of opportunities for prosperity and for security.

Building a trilateral relationship

RAY SUAREZ: Well, Professor, you heard the prime minister talking about the roles security has played in the trilateral relationship since 9/11. Is this a concern that is equally shared on both sides of these borders? Or is this a question of two close allies responding to what's seen as an American need, an American agenda, American wishes to toughen up both borders, north and south?

JORGE CASTANEDA: Well, Ray, I wouldn't want to speak for the Canadians, obviously. I think in Mexico we've been very forthcoming and very cooperative with the United States since 9/11 on security issues. Some of the things the Americans have asked for, we have done with great difficulty. Others we have suggested and they have accepted. And so I think we've come a long way.

But I agree completely with Prime Minister Campbell, Ray, that this could be a lost opportunity, this summit in Montebello, unless the three leaders really decide that they have nothing to be ashamed of in saying that they want to work towards a North American economic union, towards a North American security perimeter, towards a North American energy market.

If each one of the three leaders because of their domestic weaknesses get so scared of saying anything, of doing anything, of even moving an inch off just boiler-plate rhetoric, then this will be a huge lost opportunity. President Calderon has a lot to say about immigration, has a lot to say about drug enforcement, a lot to say about security.

President Bush has to understand that he has to combat his extreme right-wing in the United States which opposes any type of greater cooperation with Canada and with Mexico, because if he doesn't, they will eventually get to him and the Congress the way they got to him on immigration.

And Prime Minister Harper, I think, also perhaps should be a bit more forthcoming with a more trilateral vision of the relationship, instead of continuing to insist, as many Canadian prime ministers have in the past, that Canada has a better deal dealing bilaterally with the U.S. instead of trilateralizing the relationship, so to speak.

So I hope they really use this summit to move forward instead of standing still and being terrified of what their respective oppositions in the three countries would do to the three leaders if they were more forthright and clear about what they want.
Of course its hard to have open discussions when the agenda for Trilateralism and the New Contientalism is being pushed by the Corporate Elite.

*snip*

"The problem with this process is that there has been no public consultation, and no parliamentary debate in any of our three countries," says Meera Karunananthan, a spokeswoman for the Council of Canadians, one of many activist organizations planning to attend the protests in Montebello.

You can't have authentic Trilateralism without Tripartitism, that is a balance between the interests of government, business and the missing partner in all this; labour and civil society.


SEE:

Will Canadian Labour Accept Free Trade?

May 15, 2007

In order to understand the concern on the part of the Council of Canadians, this appears to be a valuable resource ...

www.augustreview.com/Issues

What I found here on the site, includes NUMEROUS white papers, a news watch, an audio archive (some INTERESTING interviews!!), lots on banking (Ron Paul, where ARE you??)

1979 Interview With George S. Franklin, Jr
.

In the original analysis of the Trilateral Commission in the 1970’s, the only persons to actually interview and debate members of that elite group were Antony C. Sutton and Patrick M. Wood. From 1978 through 1981, we together or individually engaged at least seven different Commission members in public debate.

On July 27, 1979, Radio Station KLMG, Council Bluffs, Iowa aired a highly informative interview with George S. Franklin, Jr., Coordinator of the Trilateral Commission and long-time associate of David Rockefeller.

Joe Martin, the commentator on the program, invited authors Antony Sutton and Patrick Wood to participate in the questioning. The program was probably the most penetrating view of Trilateralism yet uncovered.
Read more...

Toward a North American Union


The global elite, through the direct operations of President George Bush and his Administration, are creating a North American Union that will combine Canada, Mexico and the U.S. into a superstate called the North American Union. There is no legislation or Congressional oversight, much less public support, for this massive restructuring of the U.S. It's primary perpetrators are mostly members of the Trilateral Commission, founded in 1973 to foster a "New International Economic Order."

MUST SEE VIDEO: Canadian political party rejects North American Union
MUST SEE VIDEO: AIM Editor Cliff Kincaid on Lou Dobbs/CNN
MUST SEE VIDEO: CNN Fight against North American Union
See Lou Dobbs on North American Union Orwellian Brave New World!
See Arizona State University teaching curriculum Building North America

Read more...

The Globalization Strategy: America and Europe in the Crucible


Globalization is not a random-walk process. It moves forward according to a tangible, coherent and well-defined strategy. This article offers the reader a glimpse into one aspect of the globalization stratagem – one that recast Europe and is now reshaping north America. Regionalization, as you will see, is a necessary stepping-stone toward and an essential component of globalization.
Read more...

Globalization: The Final Demise of National Security

National security has never been in worse shape than today. Companies owned by the communist Chinese government control both ends of the strategic Panama Canal, plus many shipping and intermodal facilities on the west coast. Dubai Ports World, owned by the United Arab Emirates government, may take over 21 seaports on the gulf and east coast. The global elite want money, not national security.
Read more...

Global Banking: The World Bank


Created at Bretton Woods in 1944, the World Bank has been dominated by international bankers, members of the Council on Foreign Relations and later by the Trilateral Commission. Corruption and self-interest run amok as public funds are converted into private hands by the billions.
Read more...

More...

* Global Banking: The International Monetary Fund
* The Global Elite: Who are they?
* Global Banking: The Bank for International Settlements
* Globalization in Great Britain


Powered by ScribeFire.

ShareThis