Showing posts with label Electronic Frontier Foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electronic Frontier Foundation. Show all posts

June 15, 2008

Some notes about information warfare

Why security matters

Every email takes a perilous journey. A typical email might travel across twenty networks and be stored on five computers from the time it is composed to the time it is read. At every step of the way, the contents of the email might be monitored, archived, cataloged, and indexed. However, it is not the content of your email which is most interesting: typically, a spying organization is moEre concerned by whom you communicate with. There are many ways in which this kind of mapping of people's associations and habits is far worse than traditional eavesdropping. By cataloging our associations, a spying organization has an intimate picture of how our social movements are organized--a more detailed picture than even the social movements themselves are aware of. This is bad. Really bad. The US government, among others, has a long track record of doing whatever it can to subvert, imprison, kill, or squash social movements which it sees as a threat (black power, anti-war, civil
rights, anti-slavery, native rights, organized labor, and so on). And now they have all the tools they need to do this with blinding precision. We believe that communication free of eavesdropping and association mapping is necessary for a democratic society (should one ever happen to take root in the US). We must defend the right to free speech, but it is just as necessary to defend the right to private speech. Unfortunately, private communication is not possible if only a few people practice it: they will stand out and open themselves up to greater scrutiny. Therefore, we believe it is important for everyone to incorporate as many security measures in your email life as you are able.

Email is not secure

You should think of normal email as a postcard: anyone can read it, your letter carrier, your nosy neighbor, your house mates. All email, unless encrypted, is completely insecure. Email is actually much less secure than a postcard, because at least with a postcard you have a chance of recognizing the sender's handwriting. With email, anyone can pretend to be anyone else. There is another way in which email is even less private than a postcard: the government does not have enough labor to read everyone's postscards, but they probably have the capacity and ability to scan most email. Based on current research in datamining, it is likely that the government does not search email for particular words but rather looks for patterns of association and activity. In the three cases below, evidence is well established that the government conducts widespread and sweeping electronic survillence.

full-pipe monitoring

According to a former Justice Department attorney, it is common practice for the FBI to practice "full-pipe monitoring". The process involves vacuuming up all traffic of an ISP and then later mining that data for whatever the FBI might find interesting. The story was first reported on January 30, 2007 by Declan McCullagh of CNET News.com.

AT&T

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (F) filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T on January 31, 2006, accusing the telecom giant of violating the law and the privacy of its customers by collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in its massive and illegal program to wiretap and data-mine Americans' communications.
Because AT&T is one of the few providers of the internet backbone (a so called Tier 1 provider), even if you are not an AT&T customer is is likely that AT&T is the carrier for much of your interent traffic. It is very likely that other large internet and email providers have also worked out deals with the government. We only know about this one because of an internal whistleblower.

Carnivore

For legal domestic wiretaps, the U.S. government runs a program called Carnivore (also called DCS1000).
Carnivore is a 'black box' which some ISPs are required to install which allows law enforcement to do 'legal' wiretaps. However, no one knows how they work, they effectively give the government total control over monitoring anything on the ISP's network, and there is much evidence that the government uses carnivore to gather more information than is legal.


As of January 2005, the FBI announced they are no longer using Carnivore/DCS1000 and are replacing it with a product developed by a third party. The purpose of the new system is exactly the same.

ECHELON

ECHELON is a spy program operated cooperatively with the governments of the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. The goal is to monitor and analyze internet traffic on a wide scale. The EU Parliament has accused the U.S. of using Echelon for industrial espionage.

Call database

On May 10, USAToday broke the story that the NSA has a database designed to track every phone call ever made in the US. Although this applies to phone conversations, the fact that the government believes that this is legal means that they almost certainly think it is legal to track all the email communication within the US as well. And we know from the AT&T case that they have the capability to do so.

You can do something about it!

What a gloomy picture! Happily, there are many things you can do. These security pages will help outline some of the simple and not-so-simple changes you can make to your email behavior.
  • Secure Connections: by using secure connections, you protect your login information and your data while is in transport to riseup.net.
  • Secure Providers: when you send mail to and from secure email providers, you can protect the content of your communication and also the pattern of your associations.
  • Public Key Encryption: although it is a little more work, public key encryption is the best way to keep the content of your communication private.
See the next page, Security Measures, for tips on these and other steps you can take. Remember: even if you don't personally need privacy, practicing secure communication will ensure that others have the ability to freely organize and agitate.

<<:>> <<:>> <<:>>

Americans are asking for Political Asylum...Why don't we hear about it?

There is no country in the world that understands propaganda more than the United States. Billions are spent at the Pentagon on what you hear and repeat. The mainstream news is a psychotronic parade as the democrats bumble and the reporters comment as though they are on the Bush administration payroll.

The truth is not reported. The public responds as a story of importance makes breaking news only to see it squahed in the next 72 hours. Americans are asking for political asylum and you are not hearing about it.

The government is torturing American citizens who are Whistleblowers- myspace Darren Gelbard, youtube Monarch Katherine Moore, and DIA Topoff to see electronic warfare torturing a U.S. citizen in 2007. Or, for those of you who think these victims are conspiracy theorists, there are the ADS military tests on youtube, 60 Minutes, and CNN. People being hit out of thin air by a ray beam. For real!

Weapons that can harm or kill you from a distance, without leaving marks if the operator so desires, are being used on people in their homes. There are interviews with U.S. citizens who are victims and with a Baghdad surgeon in which he states there are bodies in Iraq he and his team of ten Doctors have seen that are being killed by..."No bullets, no shots..arms cut straight off...we don't know what kind of weapon it is." A Baghdad Orchestra player also stated he saw bodies where..."Only the face was burned, no eyes..and the teeth. The rest of the body was untouched.

The Washington Post released an article called Mind Games in which the victims of psychotronics and V2K described what it was like to have someone mentally and physically torture you using communications and electronic warfare from a distance. And Russia is trying to ban Space weapons after Congress changed the bill that would have banned psychotronics years ago. This is the most dangerous game. Weapons that no individual can defend themselves against. Weapons that manipulate people.

Tags: 60 minutes, 9/11, cnn, darren gelbard, holocaust, human rights, immigration, politics, space weapons, torture, washington post, white house

January 30, 2008

FISA: Electronic Frontier Foundation's FAQ

ATT-NSA FAQ

What is EFF's Lawsuit Against AT&T About?

FISA: Electronic Frontier Foundation's FAQ

ATT-NSA FAQ

What is EFF's Lawsuit Against AT&T About?

January 24, 2008

Guest blogger!! Cheney to Congress: "Make warrantless wiretapping permanent", Matt Janovic

My comment: Bear in mind when you read this that everything Hitler did was perfectly LEGAL.
And muchas gracias, Matt! I spent the day researching what to say on FISA and the Protect America Act - after watching Cheney and his nazi supporters on c-span I dissociated and couldn't put the article together that I wished to write.
It's make or break time, America!! Harry Reid says that he is forcing this to fillibuster to get the democrats attention - this is NO TIME for partisan politics. And this entire issues should been part of a serious impeachment process, handled by parties not subject to maipulation by the telecoms. Now isn't everyone subject to manipulation by telecoms? Guess so!!
Way to go Congress!! Wade through the muck you've already created. Smelll the stench as you wade, get used to it - as there will be PLENTY more.
Veeger

Cheney to Congress: "Make warrantless wiretapping permanent", by Matt Janovic

"While EFF appreciates the attempt by Senator Specter to craft a compromise to save the litigation, the bill contains serious flaws that undermine the goal of allowing the courts to decide whether the carriers and the president broke the law when they engaged in over five years of warrantless surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans." --Electronic Frontier Foundation press release, December 5th, 2007.

Washington D.C.
--Today's rare glimpse of the vice president all appears to have begun over a letter written by Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nv.) urging the White House to allow for more time to consider provisions of a bill to extend the government's abilities to wiretap domestically. Reid and others want oversight provisions and more. In an unsurprising move, the ever reclusive Vice President crawled-out of his secret bunker and issued an ultimatum to Congress today demanding that spying on American citizens--as well as foreigners--be made permanent. What the vice president and president want is the addition of a feature in the sunsetting "Protect America Act" (Public Law 110-55), a bill that was rashly passed by the 110th Congress at the end of August of 2007, and against the will of the public.

The White House has vowed to veto any version of the renewed act that doesn't include specific provisions. What does Cheney want? The Bush administration (Cheney) wants a provision that gives retroactive immunity to the telecoms (all-but-one complied without warrants) over aiding in perhaps thousands of FISA violations under an illegal NSA wiretapping program that failed to obtain warrants from the oversight court. Blah-blah-blah, "9/11," blah-blah-blah, "war on terrorism," and more blah-blah-blahs, were the reasons given to offer law-breaking communications corporations like AT&T, Verizon, Southern Bell (SBC), MCI, and many others (some unknown at this writing). Does haste make waste? My Grandmother always said it did:

"We're reminding Congress that they must act now," Cheney told the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. The law, which authorizes the administration to eavesdrop on phone calls and see the e-mail to and from suspected terrorists, expires on Feb. 1. Congress is bickering over terms of its extension. On Tuesday, Senate Republicans blocked an effort by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to extend the stopgap Protect America Act without expanding it, raising stakes for an expected showdown in the Senate later this week on a new version of the law. (AP, 01.23.2008)
And so, we've established that Richard Cheney didn't have such a great Grandma and that it actually does appear that Democrats in the Senate are trying to kill the Protect America Act (or make it reasonable). Sunsetting the PAA would be the traditionally American thing to do when a law threatens the liberties of its citizens and so clearly violates the Constitution of the United States, but Congress appears to be taking-its-time. This is acceptable. At least the Democrats are finally beginning to understand what a threat this all poses to them and the rest of us. Yet, somehow, Cheney seems to think he can operate without any mandate--he should, he's been doing so for almost eight-years now.

The 2008 elections loom large on the horizon. Is Senator Reid just trying to give Democratic incumbents the appearance of an opposition party, or is this a real shift from their timid and co-conspiratorial behavior from 2000-on? Nonetheless, the vice president's speech is being heavily-hyped by our corporate media in an attempt to drown-out all other voices on the issue, just as they did to the run-up to the invasion of Iraq.

As usual, Cheney's speech was made on unconsecrated ground, where nobody with any sense would laugh or balk at the vice president's statements today: the Heritage Foundation, where expressing common sense and reason are career-liabilities. None of this matters, action speaks louder than words. Congress is likely to capitulate on this issue unless we nearly break-their-hands forcing them to let the Protect America Act sunset and die after February 1st, 2008. Will they, or won't they? Regardless of the desire to scratch the immunity provision on-the-part of the Democratic majority, they still want to extend the program of spying on Americans, just with oversight by Congress.

But is the threat that bad, is it real? How could you even prove it was until there was an attack? It's all about instilling fear, and most incumbents are thinking on the same level as the White House: milk the war on terrorism for political-points. In-addition, the public isn't taking Congress or the White House at their word as they did in the immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001, which a simple glance at the polls has made clear since as early as late-2004 (about the time that the NYT discovered the warrantless surveillance programs).

Economic woes are only going to exacerbate the dislike for incumbents, especially if they don't start delivering broad-based reforms. The next sweeping-out of Congress could very well mean an end to this political generation and the rise of a new one. Several interconnected DC-scandals could finish the job. The Democrats understand this dynamic of the mandate better than the GOP, and the pressures must be immense at this writing. Preserving Democratic-gains made from the 2006 midterms will require giving the public something, and something will have to go.

On this note, Senator Harry Reid seems to be leading-the-charge against the immunity provisions, so we must assume that it's becoming a mainstream issue within the Senate itself. The reality is that it's been senators like Russell Feingold (D-Wi.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), and Christopher Dodd (D-Ct.), who have been keeping this issue alive. Other than Arlen Specter, there have been no progressive voices coming from GOP incumbents on this issue. Surely, civil libertarians of all-stripes are pelting Congress with angry e-mails, phone calls, and letters as this is being written. If they aren't, they'd better start doing it immediately, criminals cannot reform themselves. For that matter, they cannot be trusted to investigate or arrest themselves. Going widely unreported by the mainstream press are the actions by Sen. Christopher Dodd who is threatening once again to filibuster the bill in the Senate. What are his chances of succeeding? Not bad:

Efforts to pass the Senate FISA bill stalled in December when Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) pledged to filibuster any measure that provided phone companies with immunity. Reid pulled the bill from the floor so the Senate could finish its other work. Dodd on Wednesday again said that he would work to defeat any efforts that included such protections. “I’m just not going to give them a free pass,” Dodd said. Before filibustering, he said he would support an amendment that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) plans to offer that would strengthen the FISA court and does not include immunity for the carriers. Leahy’s amendment is based on the bill passed by the Judiciary Committee, which he chairs. He would not say on Wednesday whether he would support a filibuster by Dodd. (theHill.com, 01.23.2008)
If the Democratic Party wishes to retain the Congress after this next election cycle, they must stand firm on this issue and block any attempts by the GOP to force passage of this legislation. As Republicans aren't in the majority, it will be the fault of the Democratic one if this legislation is renewed in a form acceptable to the White House. The rule of law has been thwarted long enough by the GOP and her operatives within the State. Predictably, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) is calling for a 'compromise' that replaces the telecom carriers as the defendant in all of the telecom lawsuits (nearly all alleging unlawful and unconstitutional violations of privacy) with the government. Ask any honest former-prosecutor if this is acceptable (meaning, 'not Arlen Specter, Rudolf Giuliani or Thomas DiBagio').

Retroactive immunity is like letting the primary accomplices to a major crime off-the-hook so that they can commit the same crimes again-and-again for a future administration, presumably Republican. Granting immunity will absolve this administration and her allies of an unknown number of high crimes, possibly even treason, and it will create dangerous precedents. It should be clear to anyone that Sen. Specter is acting-on-behalf of his party, doing his best to protect the GOP from a long-delayed justice. This is un-American in every respect.

Are Senator Reid and others in Congress starting to listen to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)? EFF's contention back on December 5th, 2007 was that Congress shouldn't rush things--exactly the opposite of what the White House is calling for. This mess has been ongoing since December of 2005 when the existence of the NSA's warrantless surveillance program was revealed in The New York Times. They had been sitting on it for a year. We can wait to pass this bill until it resembles something Americans can be proud of.

'EFF Calls on Senate Judiciary Committee and Full Senate to Take More Time and Not Let Telephone Companies Off the Hook: http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2007/12/05

The Hill (yes, the Hill) on the wiretapping battle, 01.24.2008: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/battle-over-wiretapping-is-heating-up-on-the-hill-2008-01-24.html

The sound of our liberties dying, 01.23.2008 (AP): http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jRICMUBI8QvePywA5BLklcJJApcAD8UBQAT80

ShareThis