Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Putin. Show all posts

December 21, 2007

Putin, The Kremlin power struggle and the $40bn fortune

This is truly an IMPORTANT ARTICLE!! In fact the entire Guardian special file is a MUST READ at this point, imho. If Putin has anything like this amount of POWER, we must be sure he has the good of the PLANET on his mind, as the Russians are notorious for destroying the environment.

Veeger


Luke Harding in Moscow
Friday December 21, 2007
The Guardian


Vladimir Putin
Russian president Vladimir Putin, whose alleged accumulated wealth of $40bn would make him Europe's richest man. Photograph: Maxim Marmur/AP


An unprecedented battle is taking place inside the Kremlin in advance of Vladimir Putin's departure from office, the Guardian has learned, with claims that the president presides over a secret multibillion-dollar fortune.

Rival clans inside the Kremlin are embroiled in a struggle for the control of assets as Putin prepares to transfer power to his hand-picked successor, Dmitry Medvedev, in May, well-placed political observers and other sources have revealed.

At stake are billions of dollars in assets belonging to Russian state-run corporations. Additionally, details of Putin's own personal fortune, reportedly hidden in Switzerland and Liechtenstein, are being discussed for the first time.

The claims over the president's assets surfaced last month when the Russian political expert Stanislav Belkovsky gave an interview to the German newspaper Die Welt. They have since been repeated in the Washington Post and the Moscow Times, with speculation over the fortune appearing on the internet.

Citing sources inside the president's administration, Belkovsky claims that after eight years in power Putin has secretly accumulated more than $40bn (£20bn). The sum would make him Russia's - and Europe's - richest man.

In an interview with the Guardian, Belkovsky repeated his claims that Putin owns vast holdings in three Russian oil and gas companies, concealed behind a "non-transparent network of offshore trusts".

Putin "effectively" controls 37% of the shares of Surgutneftegaz, an oil exploration company and Russia's third biggest oil producer, worth $20bn, he says. He also owns 4.5% of Gazprom, and "at least 75%" of Gunvor, a mysterious Swiss-based oil trader, founded by Gennady Timchenko, a friend of the president's, Belkovsky alleges.

Asked how much Putin was worth, Belkovsky said: "At least $40bn. Maximum we cannot know. I suspect there are some businesses I know nothing about." He added: "It may be more. It may be much more.

"Putin's name doesn't appear on any shareholders' register, of course. There is a non-transparent scheme of successive ownership of offshore companies and funds. The final point is in Zug [in Switzerland] and Liechtenstein. Vladimir Putin should be the beneficiary owner."

Putin has not commented on Belkovsky's claims. The Guardian put the allegations to the Kremlin but was told Putin's chief spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, was not available.

Discussion of Putin's wealth has previously been taboo. But the claims have leaked out against the backdrop of a fight inside the Kremlin between a group led by Igor Sechin, Putin's influential deputy chief of staff, and a "liberal" clan that includes Medvedev.

The Sechin group is made up of siloviki - Kremlin officials with security/military backgrounds. It is said to include Nikolai Patrushev, the head of the Federal Security Service (FSB), Russia's KGB successor agency, his deputy Alexander Bortnikov, and Putin's aide Viktor Ivanov.

Those associated with the liberal camp include Roman Abramovich, the Russian oligarch and owner of Chelsea football club who is close to Putin and the Yeltsin family. Other members are Viktor Cherkesov, the head of the federal drug control service, and Alisher Usmanov, an Uzbek-born billionaire.

Insiders say the struggle has little to do with ideology. They characterise it as a war between business competitors. Putin's decision to endorse as president Medvedev - who has no links with the secret services - dealt a severe blow to the hardline Sechin clan, they add.

Some analysts have said Putin would like to retire but has been forced to carry on to shield Medvedev from siloviki plotting. Others disagree and say Putin wants to stay in power. On Monday Putin confirmed he intends next year to become Russia's prime minister.

"The siloviki are not at all nice,"
Yulia Latynina, a Russian political commentator said. Latynina, who hosts a political talkshow on the liberal radio station Ekho Moskvy, was one of the first journalists to draw attention last month to Putin's reported links with Gunvor.

The company is based in Zug, a picturesque Swiss canton known as a bolthole for publicity-shy international businessmen. Gunvor has neither a website nor a Moscow office - but in 2007 posted profits of $8bn on a turnover of $43bn, an astronomic figure, according to industry experts. Like Putin, its reclusive owner, Timchenko, worked in the KGB's foreign affairs directorate. He is said to have met Russia's president in the late 1980s through KGB circles.

Gunvor, which has its head office in Geneva, failed to comment.

Critics say the wave of renationalisations under Putin has transformed Putin's associates into multimillionaires. The dilemma now facing the Kremlin's elite is how to hang on to its wealth if Putin leaves power, experts say. Most of its money is located in the west, they add. The pressing problem is how to protect these funds from any future administration that may seek to reclaim them.

"There's no point in having all this money if you can't travel to the Maldives or Paris and spend it,"
Elena Panfilova, the director of Transparency International in Russia said.

The first hints of the intra-clan warfare gripping the Kremlin emerged last month, when the FSB arrested General Alexander Bulbov, the deputy head of the federal drug agency, and part of the liberal group. His arrest saw a surreal standoff, with his bodyguards and FSB agents pointing machine guns at each other.

Earlier this month Russia's deputy finance minister, Sergei Storchak - another "liberal" - was also arrested and charged with embezzling $43.4m. He is currently in prison. His boss, Russia's finance minister, Alexei Kudrin, part of the liberal clan, says he is innocent.

But the liberal group - one of several competing factions inside the Kremlin - has struck back. Earlier this month Oleg Shvartsman, a previously obscure businessman, gave an interview to Kommersant newspaper claiming he secretly managed the finances of a group of FSB officers. Their assets were worth £1.6bn, he revealed.

The officers were involved in "velvet reprivatisations", Shvartsman, a fund manager, said - in effect forcibly acquiring private companies at below-market value and transforming them into state-owned firms. These assets were redistributed via offshore companies, he said.

According to Panfilova, the "randomised" corruption of the 1990s has given way to the "systemic and institutionalised corruption" of the Putin era. Members of Putin's cabinet personally control the most important sectors of the economy - oil, gas and defence. Medvedev is chairman of Gazprom; Sechin runs Rosneft; other ministers are chairmen of Russian railways, Aeroflot, a nuclear fuel giant and an energy transport enterprise.

Putin has created a new, more streamlined oligarchy, his critics say. "The crown jewels of the country's wealth have ended up in the hands of Putin's inner circle," Vladimir Rzyhkov - a former independent MP - wrote in Monday's Moscow Times.

Belkovsky - who published a book about Putin's finances last year, and who is the director of the National Strategic Institute, a Moscow thinktank - claims he is confident of his assessment of Putin's hidden wealth. "It's not a secret among the elites,' he said. "But please pay attention that Vladimir Vladimirovich [Putin] has never sued me."

Belkovsky adds that the west has misunderstood Putin and has been distracted by his "neo-Soviet" image. Putin, Belkovsky claims, is ultimately a "classic" businessman who believes money can solve any problem, and whose psychology was shaped by his experiences working in the St Petersburg mayor's office in Russia's crime-ridden early 1990s.

"He is quite sure of this. A problem that can't be resolved with $1bn can be resolved with $10bn, and if not with $10bn then $20bn, and so on,"
Belkovsky said.

In an interview on Wednesday with Time magazine, which named Putin its person of the year, the president vehemently denied that those inside the Kremlin were corrupt.

Asked whether "some of the people closest to you are getting rich", Putin said:

"Then you know who and how. Write to us, to the foreign ministry, if you are so confident. I presume you know the names, you know the systems and the tools.

"I can assure you and everyone who would listen to us, watch us and read us, that the reaction would be swift, immediate, [and] within the prevailing law."




Special reports
Russia
Chechnya

Useful links
Itar-Tass news agency
Moscow Times
Russia Today
St Petersburg Times
Caucasian Knot


Special report Russia

Go to...
Special report: Russia

Russia archived articles




In this section
Putin, the Kremlin power struggle and the $40bn fortune

Putin, scourge of the US, named person of the year by Time

Russia threatens academy's £1bn art show

New laws brought in to save academy's £1bn art show

Russia calls off major art loan as ties with UK worsen

Russia starts nuclear fuel deliveries to Iran

Surprise as Putin puts himself forward as PM

Letters: Too much at stake to put relations with Russia at risk

Litvinenko associate seeks political asylum in Britain

Iran receives nuclear fuel shipment from Russia

Putin's presidential favourite wins nomination

Europe's big four raise stakes on Kosovo

Kasparov says officials stopped presidential bid

EU leaders agree Kosovo mission

Russia orders British Council offices to be shut down

December 03, 2007

Russia update

Dec. 3, 2007, 4:58PM
Gazprom Says Pricing Drives Expansion

<>

WASHINGTON — Pricing concerns, not political ones, are the main challenges facing OAO Gazprom's international expansion plans, the deputy chairman of Russia's state-controlled gas monopoly said Monday.

Alexander Medvedev said Gazprom, like its global competitors, wants to deliver strong returns to investors in an "extremely competitive commodity market." He acknowledged the regulatory hurdles it faces in the U.S. and Europe, but said pricing, not politics, ultimately will make or break its plans.

"It's all about the money," Medvedev said during a panel discussion at Georgetown University, echoing comments he made last week.

Russia supplies up to 40 percent of the European Union's natural gas and Gazprom controls most of the nation's reserves, as well as some oil and electricity assets.

President Vladimir Putin's party won more than 60 percent of the vote in Russia's parliamentary election Sunday, and analysts say his popularity is due in part to the nation's recent economic turnaround. And that turnaround has been fueled by the country's abundant energy resources.

To further bolster its international business, Gazprom is offering many of its European customers "carbon neutral" packages of natural gas with emissions credits. Carbon dioxide is the primary culprit of climate change.

Russia has not yet sanctioned the credits within its borders so Gazprom, through its London office, is partnering with biofuel producers in Brazil and other companies in offerings that have proven to be "very attractive to our industrial and (other) customers," Medvedev said.

Speaking in New York last week, Medvedev said Gazprom plans to operate a natural-gas entity in the U.S. by 2014 as part of its global expansion strategy and embraces the idea of foreign partners in Russia as long as the state controls a majority stake in any venture.

But foreign oil companies operating in Russia have found themselves this year having to cede control of major projects, including Royal Dutch Shell Group PLC's sale of a controlling stake in the Sakhalin-2 project and BP PLC's sale of its stake in the Kovykta gas field, as the government consolidated control over its largest and most important fuel deposits.

August 16, 2007




Hoax or NOT Hoax?

The Canadian dollar has just about hit par

* * *

OF THE PETRODOLLAR IMPERIUM

By Adam George Ghaznavi

posted 3 July 2007

The entire USA political economic position is based on the Petrodollar

You know that secret agreement brokered by Kissinger (when the USA fell off the gold standard in 1971) in 1973 with the Saudis (as swing producer able to flood the market & destroy any state defying their policy) that ALL oil be sold in $. THIS preserved the $ status s global reserve currency & gave the USA an unlimited credit card, enabling it to pass off the costs of its institutionalised hyperinflation ($9Trillion nat debt, $60Trillion accumalated other liabilities as per brookings institute estimates & the $370Trillion derivatives pyrmaid) onto other states just by PRINTING $ & fund the army required to protect the petrodollar (costing more than the rest of the planet's put together) via the same printing press. THIS is how the cold war was ‘won’, by bankrupting the USSR, by bankrupting the world.

THIS is why old soviet central Asia, Iraq & Eastern Europe are ringed with an arc of USA bases. To keep the oil/ gas sold in $ & help subvert any govt (eg Putin's who sells his oil in Roubles) not complying.

THIS is why Saddam Hussein was deposed, because he sold his oil in Euros, making 17% more on his deals than his neighbours. This is why the Iranians are being targeted by USA naval nuclear build up, because they are opening up a non $ oil bourse. This is why even Chavez was subject to coup attempt in 2002, because he switched to Euros.

THIS is why Putin is being subject to assassination plots & attempts to overthrow him (with Berezovsky as focal point of the plot - encompassing petrodollar fiends, dispossessed oligarchs, neo cons & shadowy finance, think Jacob Rothschild, friend of Mikhail Khordokhovsky who also purchased this so called 'political prisoner's' shares in Yukos http://washingtontimes.com/world/20031102-111400-3720r.htm ), becase Putin switched from $ to demanding payment in Roubles. THIS is WHY the $ is finally dying.

Even the notorious Council on Foreign Relations declared the $ to be an absurdity supported only by `faith' (direct quote). Which is a little unfair, given the PETRODOLLAR

http://cryptogon.com/?p=706

for the dissection...

...FULL article on:

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070501faessay86308-p0/benn-steil/the-end-of-national-currency.html

Indeed, the Dow itself, has actually been crashing since 2000, losing some 65% of its quoted value, its’ only risen in inflated $$ terms. See link below:

http://goldsilver.com/the_dow_is_crashing.php

Here's what Dick Cheney's personal banker Jeremy Grantham says about `the asset bubble covering ALL classes':

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_pesek&sid=axjQJ8._t2Dk

"The Bank for International Settlements, has warned that years of loose monetary policy has fuelled a dangerous credit bubble, leaving the global economy more vulnerable to another 1930s-style slump than generally understood."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/06/24/cnbis124.xml

Eg ONLY the oil/$$$ link has enabled this crash to be carried out, thus far, in a controlled fashion, enabling also a massive shift of wealth to the hyper-rich via inflation.

Correspondingly, if USA manufacturing did recover (to take advantage of the low $), a tsunami of USA treasury bonds/ $ would return, triggering instant visible (instead of INSTITUTIONALISED) hyperinflation. Therefore the imperium is trapped has to keep the exported fiat $$$ at bay, by offshoring USA jobs/ production.

Has no choice but to give away California for Anbar province to keep the psycho political focus of its own people divided to retain control of the geo strategic pol/econ agenda (hence the orthodox left in backing unrestrained migration functions as the tragic internal prop to hyperfascism).

As we have no choice but to effect a Controlled Demolition of the USA Petrodollar Imperium.

In order to make possible the Post Petrodollar settlement based on establishment of the Common Ownership of Information (every 3rd world peasant to have access to every book/ piece of technical info ever produced on a wind up wifi laptop from MIT) in exchange for the oil remaining on long enough to enable the switch to solar powered microgeneration (without the oil the info is lost, without the info the oil is worthless). The consequent substantive sovereignty of the individual can thence be pooled to effect control of our energy based (as gold is inherently deflationary & no one will trust fiat) currencies…

Meyer Rothschild: `
Give me control over a nations’ currency & I care not who writes its laws.’

…establishing a tough basic constitutional fabric able to martial locally & globally to repel in real time any cabal of banksters/ energy barons & secureaucrats bent on the plunder of private & public wealth.

As such leads ultimately to equality & (as Orwell understood) equality as an end in itself, is the most unviable of all systems (lacking the parochial social glue of the war/ finance nexus, leads inexorably to a nihilistic nitpicking), such needs a gigantic vision to gyrostabilise it. Based on the establishment of a written constitution designed to secure for humanity control over its own time, in order to comprehend/ gain mastery over the UNWRITTEN cosmological constitution of God’s time/ creation; become God/ our cosmic parents (a la Philip Larkin & visit the same crap on the next cosmic generation), in order to avoid being destroyed by our own creation, the 10,000 year war/ finance nexus.

If however, the USA Imperium is able to effect its nuclear war against Iran, then the conseqaunt desensitization of all humanity shall lead it to resign itself to the descent into oblivion without an intellectual or spiritual fight. Squandering 4 billion years of earth evolution & potential.

The critical division within the USA ruling class IS over immigration. They don’t know which way to jump. If they go for `amnesty’ (unrestrained migration/ defacto liquidation of the USA in favor of the North American Union) they will COMPLETELY delegitimise themselves. If they do anything to block such/ promote USA internal industrial recovery, they will trigger immediate hyperinflation.

Hence the core elite must retain control of the agenda – THIS is how/ why Bush MUST swallow his own bait over his own Kosovo gambit.

ShareThis