Showing posts with label Iraqi war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraqi war. Show all posts

November 09, 2007

Oldie but "goodie"

Iraq's war reaches the arts world

By Patrick Jackson
23 May 2007

BBC News

Take a tour of the Memorial to the Iraq War exhibition at London's ICA.

A multi-media exhibition opening in London brings together the reflections of 25 international artists on Iraq, asking them to imagine an eventual memorial to the ongoing conflict.

Entering the elegant, sunlit upstairs room, tastefully wallpapered with an Islamic tile pattern, you discover a child's jigsaw puzzle of Mesopotamia set out unfinished on a table.

A silent TV screen shows a fairy-tale vision of Baghdad complete with flying horse, before moving to a slideshow of the modern city in peacetime. The picture-postcard scenes are bathed in a toy-like air of unreality.

Linger awhile and the nursery effect begins to dissipate: the TV cuts to combat soldiers and destruction, the wallpaper tiles turn out to be rearranged US and British banknotes.

What on first sight looks like a matron's room across the corridor is, in the artist's imagination, a dispensary for inhaling human ashes.

Horror is suggested, rather than shouted out, at the exhibition in the Institute of Contemporary Arts (ICA) but does the gravity of the subject demand something stronger?

Lost voices

Iraqi artist Rashad Selim, who is based in Europe, liked most of what he saw when he visited for the BBC News website, yet came away with the feeling he had seen only aspects of the war.

Yael Davids adjusts one of her panels
Here you see all this energy directed at uttering a word, a sentence, but still there is the impossibility of talking or saying something
Yael Davids
Jerusalem-born artist exhibiting

"The artists catch the Western self in the mirror, they catch the absurdities but, while the pieces are very potent, I have not seen any work here that captures the magnitude," he says.

Most striking for Selim was a piece of performance art by Jerusalem-born artist Yael Davids.

Viewers are confronted by half a dozen two-metre (six-foot) foam panels, each of which is blank except for pre-cut holes. Through these, unseen performers push their lips for up to 20 minutes at a time.

The effect is of a row of living, dumb mouths entombed in a wall.

Davids had mixed feelings when she was asked to contribute to the exhibition, she told the BBC News website.

On the one hand, she liked the idea of a memorial to the war because it implied the conflict could have an end but, on the other, she had always been wary of judgmental "black-and-white" attitudes to the Middle East in the West.

She feels for Iraq, she says, because there is a "small parallel" with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict: "The armies should be withdrawn from Iraq with the same urgency that the settlements should be removed from Palestine."

One title for her piece at the ICA is A Line, A Sentence, A Word.

"Here you see all this energy directed at uttering a word, a sentence, but still there is the impossibility of talking or saying something," says Davids, as her performers huddle behind the screens, their drying lips clamped to foam.

Insult to injury?

Now adding the finishing touches to a London exhibition of his own, along with Baghdad artist Hana Mal Allah, Selim once thought of commemorating Iraq's war dead by flying kites in the city, bearing the names of the dead.

Rashad Selim at the exhibition
I wonder again with the reality of the destruction, the grief, the trauma, whether [the Van Lieshout video] might add insult to injury or whether it would just crack everybody up?
Rashad Selim
Europe-based Iraqi artist

The project in the post-invasion autumn of 2003 had to be scaled down, but he was still able to get the kite-making workshops up and running with the help of Baghdad artists. Some 500 people turned up to fly them from Saddam's old parade-ground, "reoccupying the sky with our dreams".

Creating a memorial for the war is a daunting task, he says. "You can read Iraq as a state of total dystopia: it is everybody's worst fears come true."

What interests him about the ICA show is how some of the artists involved seem to "deal with Iraq itself as a monument to folly".

After The Riot, a video by Eril Van Lieshout, which appears largely to be a road trip around the US by a couple of genial, foul-mouthed Dutchmen in pursuit of American values, means for Selim "the absurd, banal reality of the life lived that has cost us Iraq".

The Iraqi artist muses whether the Dutch film could work on big screens at Firdus Square, Baghdad.

"I wonder again with the reality of the destruction, the grief, the trauma, whether it might add insult to injury or whether it would just crack everybody up?" he says.

"Baghdadi humour is famous but now it's stretched mortally thin."

To the ziggurat

The exhibition's curator, Mark Sladen, says he is not in a position to comment on how the exhibition might be perceived in Baghdad.

Why is it we need memorials to remember the injustice of a war, are our memories so short?
MJ, Manchester
BBC News website reader

In any case, he adds, it was conceived primarily for a British audience "though it does have an international resonance". He said there were no plans to put it on tour after its run of barely five weeks in London.

Given that nothing on show would pass muster as a conventional, permanent memorial to a war, does he not think that the title Memorial To The Iraq War may be a bit misleading?

"It was never the intention to come up with a definitive memorial to the war," he replies.

"This exhibition is designed to make people think about the conflict."

Asked what kind of memorial he would propose, Rashad Selim suggests using the Coalition's military machine to build a ziggurat - a stepped pyramid - out of blast walls and barbed wire, then employing Iraq's orphans to create a hanging garden.

The irrigation and lighting of this monumental garden, he adds, should come about in celebration of the return of water, electricity and the other everyday things his country lost.

Memorial To The Iraq War runs at the ICA 23 May-27 June 2007. Selim's exhibition, Sophisticated Ways: Destruction Of An Ancient City, runs 6 June-6 September 2007 (see website for details).

Your proposals for a memorial to the conflict in Iraq:

A cemetery!
Jounaidi TALEB, Bezons France

A child bringing a fish out of its bowl to liberate it, or smashing an egg to free the bird. I think this is a good analogy for the good intentions, the disastrous consequences, and how naive this endeavor was. Hopefully it will emphasize the need to think before acting.
Omar Ismail, Dubai, UAE

I made a christmas tree last year adorned with poppies and small gifts wraped with images of war. The tree has christmss crackers with images of war all over along with memorial poppies worn in Canada for remembrence day. The tree was thrown out of the show as being too violent and not in the spirit of Christmas! My presentation was called, Merry Christmas from Mesopotemaia... Lest we forget!...
asma arshad mahmood, Mississauga Ontario Canada

You take a piece of ground in America, that is pure beauty, and with fabulous views, And like the war cemetery in France over Omaha Beach (D Day) erect a memorial and grave stones and fill the graves with the deceased from Iraq. Then take Bush and Blair and make them visit it once a week.
David Langley, Stockport England

A statue of little child crying beside his father who is blindfolded and hand tied behind by the attacking army with barbed wire around them.
Tehsin Ullah Jan, Peshawar, Pakistan

Huge, massive portraits of Bush/Cheney constructed from photos of veterans torn bodies and bloody body parts. Make it hurt, to view these two arogant, selfish, defiant, yet weak men.
martin h. chilcutt, kalamazoo, michigan usa

I think that the memorial should be a little more respectful than what some have suggested. I think the memorial should be a US soldier in full gear bending down to help a poor Iraqi child on the ground. The setting on the soldier's side is a regular suburban street with his house behind him, and on the child's side is a Baghdad street with a burning building. Behind the soldier are his mother and a father in regular clothing, but behind the child (and in front of the soldier) there are a group people jeering at the soldier and throwing things at him. That would be a testament to the fact that, even though the American soldiers are trying to help the innocents in Iraq, many wish for us to leave. It also shows the conflicting backgrounds that each side comes from, and even though the soldier tries to carry the child to his idea of "freedom", the people behind the child rebel because the soldier has destroyed everything that was once their normal lives.
Sam Rosenfeld, Stamford, CT, U.S.A.

Oversized Depleted-Uranium statues (made from depleted uranium) that have tiny inscriptions on the bottom - 'Thankyou for viewing this piece of war art, enjoy your radiated lingering death'.
Byron Lawrie, Alexandra Heads, Australia

A fitting memorial to the ?ongoing? conflict in Iraq would be a grouping of heroic bronze sculptures depicting all of the great leaders who have had a hand in authoring Iraq's fate. Beginning with Iraq's creator, Winston Churchill and his puppet, King Faisal, and ending with Iraq?s despotic Saddam and his nemeses, George Bush and Tony Blair -- all will be depicted standing knee deep in large pool of quicksand. Viewers of the memorial gather around either transfixed by powerlessness, or indulged in cacophonic argument, all the while unaware that great mythological beasts are closing in from all sides, eager to feast on their distracted prey.
Gary Callahan, Long Beach, California, USA

An OIL painting of George Bush sitting at a roulette table in "Osama's Casino" in Baghdad with a stack of red chips (the color of blood) and a stack of green chips (the color of money).
Shirley Medwedeff, Friendswood, Texas, U.S.A.

On a large pedestal, a grouping of average Iraqi citizens: a man (possibly an oil worker, in a hard hat?), a woman (sans burka, possibly with a lab coat and stethoscope - a doctor?), a young man and woman reading a newspaper ("free press"), and some small children flying a kite or riding a bicycle. This FREEDOM Memorial would commemorate the new Iraqi self-government, their newfound voting rights, the freedom from tyranny, and a new hope for democracies in the MidEast. Wars are horrible, and no one "likes" war - but any freedoms purchased over centuries have come only as the result of those who have laid down their precious lives for even more-precious freedoms for their people.
Patricia Koenig, Rancho Park California United States of America

I would propose a large work, either a room-sized sculpture or a painting covering an entire wall. At the center would be the statue of liberty riding a horse with George Bush's face, dragging Saddam Hussein's head behind. They lead a column of American soldiers who look like they are attempting to ford a river, and yet, only one bank is visible, it could be the ocean or perhaps the Red Sea. But the sea is not made of water, rather of Iraqis. The soldiers all wear great packs that bow them over, and are weary but alert and fearful, with their weapons drawn. They point their weapons at the Iraqis who are so close to them and to each other as to be at point blank range, but the soldiers look past the Iraqis out over the ocean. The Iraqis close to the soldiers respond to their presence in various ways. Some are celebrating, others angry, some are attacking the soldiers, others have been killed by them. Still others are using the soldiers as a destraction to kill each other. The further they are from the soldiers the less the Iraqis notice them. The ones closest to us (and furthest from the horse) are simply going about their daily business.
Gabriel Heller, Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.

A gasoline pump with red fluid pouring out of the spigot.
Marion C. Medwedeff, Friendswood, Texas, U.S.A.

The map of Iraq with the word DEMOCRACY written across it with blood and people carrying the Koran in one hand and a sword in the other hand killing each other and at the same time stabbing children, women, and others (non-believers) who are sitting on the side of them with no weapons
Jamal , phoenix, AZ, USA

A tower rising high to the clouds for those who want to get off this earth!
Pat, Pat

I think we should gather up the DU weapons that have been fired into Iraq by Britain and the US and build two deformed, stillborn babies, say 5 metres tall. One to be placed in London, the other in Washington, as a reminder of the long term impacts that these weapons will have on Iraq and its people.
Mark Wheeler, Planet Earth

I think a mixed bag of troops mired to the shoulders in a giant cow plop would fit the situation we have placed or troops in very well. For those who don¿t know a cow plop is a byproduct of bovine digestion.
Mad Sandy Almond, Orlando Florida USA

i think make statue shows that the world must help iraq and they must shut their mouths. And if they want to say something they say a truth and not selling story to world that shows iraq a bad country. we must begin with press... that shows the false news about iraq. we need statue shows that the world left iraq to live in peace and enough put the oil on fire and laughing. we need statue says to world stop enough to kill people in iraq and especially press. we want statue shows that iraqis are good people and what happened now is plan put by dirty hands. pls stop playing by blood of iraq.
ali, iraq, karbala

Well, it would be foolish to divert funds from post-war reconstruction efforts towards a memorial, so let's think of what we have on our hands... hmm... I guess we've got tons and tons of bodies. Let's also borrow the aforementioned idea of formaldehyde. Okay, so we unearth all the bodies of dead Iraqis and 18 year old US Soldiers and soak them in preservative. We also have to make sure we contort their faces into horrid displays of agonizing pain before they harden up. Then we hire a team of engineers to construct a giant pyramid of bodies in the middle of Washington, DC. It will be our final litmus strip. When not a single politician or citizen is impacted in the least by our towering pile of flesh, we will know that the United States is entirely soulless.
Adam, Washington, DC

A map of Iraq covered in blood. In the background there should be an orphan, a widow and a picture of an Iraqi man sweating to represent the typical hard working Iraqi man earning his living. Surrounding these characters are coalitions troops pointing their guns at them, religious scholars turning their backs to them to represent their ignorance and lack of allegiance to Iraq and politicians playing with american dollars. A final message in dark red bold letters at the bottom of the portrait reading: "The nation of Iraq will prevail"
Hussain, london,uk

A good memorial is to make a statue with the head of Saddam and Bin Laden under the shoes of iraqi childeren
ahmad, den haag - Netherlands

Bush and Blair with blood stained hands mingled together while a faded face of Saddam with children around him in disbelief. The message by Bush and Blair should be like "We can't find the oil but we have the blood"...
Y. Kakuntha, Lusaka, Zambia

A gigantic block of black marble, with a inscription on every side. Fist one would read: "We must kill for a better future.", second: "No one wanted this...", third: "Oh, my God!" and the fourth: "We bleed." And on the top side of the bloc, last inscription would read: "I am you. Forgive me."
Ivica Milaric, Novi Sad, Serbia

How about a big banner reading MISSION ACCOMPLISHED?
Paul, Dubai, UAE

The magnificent ruins of Persepolis, with a US Helipad built on top. Actually, that sounds familiar...I guess art imitates life.
Nick Ould, Peterborough, UK.

Two tanks of formaldehyde. One filled with Iraqis the other filled with soldiers. Cut them in half lengthwise for the "classic" touch.
Seán, Dublin, Ireland

A beautifully patinated larger than life bronze statue of three identical men turning in a circle each stabbing the other in the back and stomach. I think this would aptly express not just the Middle East, but belief-inspired aggression worldwide. It could be called "The Triumph of the Righteous".
Stephen Pusey, New York, NY

A statue of Saddam Hussein, the great leader that Europe loved to hate, but missed dearly after his death.
HaifaMan, Haifa, Israel

A block of glass, made up of many individual sheets of glass, each of which had been deliberately smashed and then painstakingly reconstructed. The war was started deliberately, but it shattered lives at random and unpredictably. With will and effort the pieces of the country can be put together again.
Mike, Wicklow, Ireland

Probably a group of small Iraqi children putting together a jigsaw-map of Iraq, but in the background there should be army-people with blood on their hands, pointing guns at the children whilst trying to destroy the jigsaw of Iraq to get at the oil in the box below. It would show the real reasons in which America and England whent to war in Iraq.
Hanan , London, England

Large statues of Blair and Dubya with their heads empty where their brains should have been with a Cross of Jesus behind them. In the background would be all the dead bodies we have created in this war. Below the art would be: "Muslims Die Because of Christian Ignorance"
George Dill, Escondido, CA, USA

A picture of one of the thousands of poor dead Iraqi children, killed since the invasion, displayed as prominently every day on the BBC news site as the poor and equally tragic, missing Madeleine McCann might be a good start. Or do we "throw away" disposable people now?
Chandra, London

I think the US and the UK has to start a brand new war TV channel as a memorial for the Iraqis, which would frequently update the future strategies, current fataIities and continuously cover 24X7 the various direct and proxy wars it has been fighting to gain world dominance at the expense of all those lives butchered worldwide
hanif thotathil, Bangladore, India

There are some nice and interesting suggestions, however, below. Nevertheless, rather than put all this mental energy into constructing a, practically speaking, useless memorial that might be built in the future, why not go and live in Iraq today and actively help in some way or put pressure on our ambitious and power-hungry politians at home to improve the situation in Iraq or get out, again today! I am offended by the perverse suggestion of 'Vidal' of "soaking" the Holy Qur'an. I don't fathom how you can think of such things as art at all. The aforementioned is simply an excuse to defame the holy book of Islam which I and every Muslim believes to be the literal Word of God. People seem to despair at not being able to halt the current suffering there, turn to art and then pretend they're helping Iraqis. I mean, who are you kidding?
Mohammed Tariq, Manchester,UK

My memorial as an artist living away from the conflict of war would be a wall of glass facing a wall of glass tongues and silence, all war situations and conflicts need more transparence hence glass as a material is my choice and the glass tongues would be all the unheard and untold unseen human elements of war. The images of war through the media of photojournalism and the glass screen of television are now too much like wall paper, too removed from the reality, much greater images cannot be found to give us the impact of war .Therefore artists can show more through association and memory which is only what we can try to imagine as one has to feel the situation in order to make a memorial to conflict.
mary veale, Grenoble, France

One of the great Buildings in the UK eg Buckingham Palace should be altered so that it stands as a lasting memorial to the greatest mistake the British have ever made. Obviously, it will need to bear the names of the Iraqi people who have died in the conflict and the people of that country should be allowed to stay free of charge at the Building as an apology to them from the British people.
Peter Coleman, Brighton England

Iraq's memorial should be an ancient treasure chest to represent, a 'Pandora's Box' opened by the West for the power, wealth and oil they hoped to find inside; the warlike and divisive religions that fail to agree, should be represented by the innocents (the future) worldwide, that are slaughtered in the name of Peace in the Middle East.
mary Rice,

The memorial should be a giant ziggurat that is hollow inside. Strategic windows would display the passing of time and leave the room only fairly lit. The walls should be a mural made of cloth from the clothes of those who have died, with the floor tiles that have individual pictures of victoms that make up a larger picture that is of a translucent sphere.
Jim, Chicago, USA

How about a WMD? Oh, sorry none were found... oops! I doubt any memorial is going to stop Iraqi people from suffering at the hands of this war and its not going to stop the war, so what's the point? Why is it we need memorials to remember the injustice of a war, are our memories so short?
MJ, Manchester

How about a blood-soaked koran? The daily suffering is not caused by the allies but by islamic militants, shia and sunni, slugging it out for dominance. This is endemic and will continue whether the allies stay or leave. The invasion gave Iraqis a perfect opportunity, power, time and money, to start from scratch; but the islamists prefer their daily carnage. I just pity the non-muslims in iraq who are increasingly victimised by the rest.
BB, Frankfurt, Germany

I think a giant "Peace" puzzle, that everybody could contribute to the putting together of would be symbolic. If we should see things we love as 'already broken', as in Eastern philosophy, then we knew that the 'peace' in Iraq would at some point be broken. I may be unclear here, but basically I think that we should attract and want peace more than anything else and the conflicts would lose momentum. So if everybody put a little effort into putting the "peace" puzzle together... they may unknowingly add to the bringing of more peace in the world.
Theresa, New York, USA

I think the disparity between what some of the non-Iraqi artists created and what is suggested for a memorial by Iraqi Rashad Selim speaks for itself. What is most evident is that Western artists are primarily satirizing the US/UK occupation of Iraq while it seems Iraqi artists might actually attempt to memorialize what has been lost in this war; lives and infrastructure.
N. Campbell, New Orleans, Louisiana

As oil is the pivot of the war in Iraq, it is hoped that manufacturers of energy-saving devices such as light bulbs, etc, could inscribe the names of as many of the Iraqis killed in the war, each name on each bulb, to depict that those who were killed in the war, soldiers or civilians, died as martyrs, to give a new light and a new hope to a new Iraq nation.
Ron Lim, Toronto, Canada

a perfect memorial for iraq would be to get the invading forces out!!! ...stop the violence, stop the suffering of innocents, america and all other forces get lost!! thats the true voice of the iraqi people
hi, london

i would propose the noise that produces the war, believe it's very shocking... in fact i am artist...
ever carvajal, caracas-venezuela

A mobile exhibit that travels between public and bureaucratic offices, set up on the lawns out front. Art that can't be forgotten because it's not restricted to a museum. A memorial that the government can hear outside its window.
Rebekah, NY, USA

I think that a bronze memorial of a Shiite & Sunni traditionaly garbed couple, facing each other arms outstretched holding one baby between them would be the initiation of healing which as community we all are responcible for... it is humanities war, and it might as well be humanities healing....
gregory Parascenzo, SALT LAKE CITY ,UT usa

A Memorial To Iraq, entitled: SHEKINAH / SHOCK 'N AWE (Shekinah = vengeful goddess; Shock 'n Awe = Blair-Bush geopolitical wars) Objects displayed: A urine-soaked koran; a blood-soaked bible; a plundered Iraqi antiquity plastered in Mickey Mouse stickers; naked mannequins piled one on top of another; Bush and Blair puppets mutually entangled in string and draped in stars, stripes and union jack... tattered children's clothes pegged onto a line, retrieved from dead Iraqi children.
Vidal, plett, south africa

Ishtar's Gate, half ruined. But that might require real talent.
Patrick Powell, San Jose, CA

I agree with the reader who said the perfect memorial at this point would be to simply bring the soldiers back. However, the exhibit at the ICA--indeed, any discussion on a future memorial for that matter--is indicative of the people's desire to end the conflict and therefore a profound form of protest against the conflict. I just wish more politicians were art fans & had the sensitivity of spirit to see the truth in the artistic act. I'm just left thinking, whether you agree with a particular exhibit or not, the world would be a better place if more people expressed their thoughts and feelings through art. Alas, too many "artists" make the world their canvas, with blood their paint and guns their brushes. I'm also reminded of the performance art-style protests against the Vietnam War launched by John Lennon and Yoko Ono. Many people at the time felt they weren't making any significant contribution, in fact downplaying the seriousness of the issue and not proposing any concrete solutions. But it is the fact that they were acting on their beliefs, exploring ideas through a non-violent, artistic medium that was so powerful. All these years later, I don't see that any better solutions have been proposed. Hey, war IS over if you want it - it is so simple that humanity makes it impossible.
Mary, Butler, Pennsylvania USA

September 27, 2007

How to dessiminate propaganda during a war, Case: Iraq

By Sumedha Senanayake
Iraq -- Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki addresses reporters in Baghdad, 19Sep2007
Prime Minister al-Maliki may be powerless to deal with the Blackwater incident
(AFP)
September 26, 2007 (RFE/RL) -- The killing of 11 Iraqis in Al-Nusur Square in western Baghdad on September 16, allegedly by Blackwater USA security contractors has enraged Iraqis for more than a week.

Details of the incident remain unclear, but Iraqi officials and witnesses at the scene contend that the contractors, opened fire on unarmed civilians without provocation. This contradicts claims by the company and U.S. officials that a State Department convoy guarded by Blackwater contractors came under fire, and the contractors reacted in a defensive manner by returning fire

This item is appearing in Radio Free Europe.

No mention of the incriminating video is mentioned. There IS a video readily availabe to view. So do many other videos exist of Blackwater guards shooting on innocent civilians in other incident. They are not mentioned in this FEATURE report.

No responsibility is taken for them to find out themselves, although Radio Free Euorpe is paid for with US tax dollar$!!

Dig this misleading statement:

However, it is the issue of not holding Blackwater and other private security firms accountable for their actions that has truly roiled Iraqis and created the impression that Iraq's sovereignty is being undermined.
What IMPRESSION? Is it not TRUE??

While officials at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad indicated that Blackwater was carrying out only vital missions, this underscores the frustration expressed by many Iraqis that they do not have control over what goes on in their own country.

... Moreover, according to Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) Order No. 17, private contractors "shall be immune from the Iraqi legal process," essentially meaning there is no chance of the contractors allegedly involved in the Al-Nusur incident being prosecuted under Iraqi law. Iraqi officials have indicated that the recent shootings may prompt them to amend CPA Order 17 and create new guidelines for dealing with foreign contractors.

And of course, note that by NOT linking both paragraphs, people reading this are sadly mislead. The FRUSTRATION actually is that they have NO sovereignty.

Now to back up the Iraqi accustion is this tidbit (mostly censored in the US)

Furthermore, the issue of Iraq's sovereignty continues to be raised after the arrest of an Iranian national, Mahmud Farhadi, by U.S. forces in the northern Iraqi city of Al-Sulaymaniyah on September 20. The United States accused Farhadi of being an officer of the Al-Quds Force, a secret military wing of Iran's Islamic Revolution Guard Corps, who was trying to smuggle weapons into Iraq.

However, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani insisted Farhadi was a member of an Iranian trade delegation that was in the region "with the knowledge of the federal government in Baghdad and the government of Kurdistan." Both Talabani and al-Maliki condemned the arrest and demanded Farhadi's immediate release. The arrest prompted Iran to close its border with Iraq's Kurdish region in protest, and Kurdish officials have warned that the local economy would suffer as a result of the United States' unilateral actions.
And the reason it is included is that so many in Europe actually read Al Jazeera, which has fully reported on this incident.

So why bother with this report coming out at ALL? Here's a clue which indicates that one little peep of complaint by Iraqis will result in outster:

There have been also murmurings in the Iraqi media that former Prime Minister and Islamic Al-Da'wah Party member Ibrahim al-Ja'fari was set to announce the formation of a new political coalition, the National Reform Grouping, that would counter the moderates' front established by the UIA and the Kurdish Alliance in mid-August. If it is formed, the new coalition is expected to be the largest in parliament and al-Ja'fari may seek to replace al-Maliki as prime minister

You can visit the report yourself to visit the rest of the doublespeak - the gist of it is that Maliki set up the QUAMIRE in Iraq and it is hopeless for him to do ANYTHING. Blackwater got the upperhand ..

Why not just SAY so ...???

September 08, 2007

"The latest in a series

of mental health

surveys of troops in

Iraq, released in

May, says 45 percent

of the 1,320 soldiers

interviewed ranked

morale in their unit

as low or very low.

Seven percent

ranked it high or very

high,"

said the LA Times.

Peak Oil, Missing Oil Meters and an Inactive Pipeline:
The Real Reason for the Invasion of Iraq ?

Introduction

In this article I will present research that supports a rather startling hypothesis: that the USA invaded Iraq primarily to enable the secret diversion of a portion of Iraq 's oil production to Saudi Arabia . This was done in order to disguise the fact that Saudi Arabia 's oil output has peaked, and may be in permanent decline. The evidence for this conclusion is circumstantial, but it does knit up many of the loose threads in the mystery of the American administration' s motivation for invasion.
To lay the groundwork we need to set out a couple of assumptions.
The primary assumption is that the world's oil production has been on a plateau for the last two years, and in fact we may be teetering on the brink of the production decline predicted by the Peak Oil theory. Such a decline could be dangerous to the world economy, both directly through the loss of economic capacity and indirectly (and perhaps more importantly) through the loss of investor confidence in the global economic structure.
The second assumption is that the oil production of Saudi Arabia is key to maintaining the global oil supply. Saudi Arabia supplies over 10% of the world's crude oil, with over half of that coming from one enormous field named Ghawar. There is a large and well-informed body of opinion that believes that if Saudi oil production goes into decline the world will follow because there is not the spare capacity anywhere else to make up for such a decline. Saudi Arabia is notoriously tight-lipped about the state of their oil fields, and in fact oil production information is considered to be a state secret. The only trustworthy information the world really has about Saudi Arabia 's oil are their aggregated production figures.
The conclusion that can be drawn from these two assumptions is that if Saudi Arabia's production began to decline and the world found out about it, there would be a significant risk of a world-wide economic panic that would destabilize markets and throw nations like the USA into a recession or depression that would be worse than the actual damage done by the loss of the oil. We can assume that the prevention or postponement of such a crisis would be an extremely high priority for the administrations of both the USA and Saudi Arabia .

The Evidence

Cheney's Energy Task Force Meetings

These meetings have long been a bone of contention with the Bush administration. They have gone to extraordinary lengths to keep the subject of the meetings absolutely secret. These efforts are documented by such sources as http://www.projectc ensored.org/ publications/ 2005/8.html and http://www.bushsecr ecy.org/page. cfm?PagesID= 27&ParentID=1&CategoryID=1
We do know the following:
  • The task force was created in the second week of the Bush administration to develop national energy policies. They met early in 2001 (well before September 11) to draft policy and develop plans.
  • TAsk force meetings were attended by executives of Exxon-Mobil Corp., Conoco, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Corp., and the American subsidiary of British Petroleum.
  • Among the meager product that has been made public are maps of Iraqi and Saudi Arabian oil fields and pipelines. On both these maps there is a pipeline called IPSA (the Iraq Petroleum Saudi Arabia pipeline) that is marked "closed". The maps are available at http://www.judicial watch.org/ IraqOilMap. pdf and http://www.judicial watch.org/ SAOilMap. pdf

The Iraqi Oil Ministry

It is well known that the Iraqi Oil Ministry was the only major government installation guarded by American troops following the fall of Baghdad . Indeed it was guarded extremely well: according to an April, 2003 news story at http://www.smh. com.au/articles/ 2003/04/16/ 1050172643895. html:
Since US forces rolled into central Baghdad a week ago, one of the sole public buildings untouched by looters has been Iraq 's massive oil ministry, which is under round-the-clock surveillance by troops.
The imposing building in the Al-Mustarisiya quarter is guarded by around 50 US tanks which block every entrance, while sharpshooters are positioned on the roof and in the windows.
The curious onlooker is clearly unwelcome. Any motorist who drifts within a few metres of the main entrance is told to leave immediately.
Baghdad residents have complained that US troops should do more to protect against the looters, most of them Shi'ite Muslims repressed by Saddam Hussein's Sunni-dominated regime who live in the vast slum known as Saddam City on the northern outskirts.
But while museums, banks, hotels and libraries have been ransacked, the oil ministry remains secure.
The ostensible reason for this extraordinary focus was to protect Iraq 's primary asset. Indeed an American captain is quoted in the article as saying, "Anyone who says we're protecting this ministry to steal Iraqi oil doesn't know what's really going on in this country."

The Mystery of the Oil Meters

On March 22, 2007, CorpWatch published an article entitled "Mystery of the Missing Meters: Accounting for Iraq 's Oil Revenue" (http://www.corpwatc h.org/article. php?id=14427). In it they make the following claims:
  • At the oil terminals of Al Basra (ABOT) and Khawr al Amaya (KAAOT), "smugglers are suspected to be diverting an estimated billions of dollars worth of crude onto tankers because the oil metering system that is supposed monitor how much crude flows into and out of ABOT and KAAOT - has not worked since the March 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq."
  • Officials blame the four-year delay in repairing the relatively simple system on "security problems." Others point to the failed efforts of the two U.S. companies hired to repair the southern oil fields, fix the two terminals, and the meters: Halliburton of Houston , Texas , and Parsons of Pasadena , California .
  • Rumors are rife among suspicious Iraqis about the failure to measure the oil flow. "Iraq is the victim of the biggest robbery of its oil production in modern history," blazed a March 2006 headline in Azzaman, Iraq's most widely read newspaper. A May 2006 study of oil production and export figures by Platt's Oilgram News, an industry magazine, showed that up to $3 billion a year is unaccounted for.
  • The kinds of meters they were supposed to repair or replace at ABOT are commonly found at hundreds of similar sites around the world. Because they are custom-built, shipped, then assembled and calibrated on site, the process can take up to a year. But the probelm has persisted for four years.
  • After the 2003 invasion, the meters appear to have been turned off and there have since been no reliable estimates of how much crude has been shipped from the southern oil fields.
  • "I would say probably between 200,000 and 500,000 barrels a day is probably unaccounted for in Iraq," Mikel Morris, who worked for the Iraq Reconstruction Management Organization (IRMO) at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, told KTVT, a Texas television station.

The Pipeline

Now we'll look at that pipeline on those Energy Task force maps.
The Iraq Petroleum Saudi Arabia (IPSA) pipeline was built during the Iran-Iraq war to circumvent attacks by Iran on Iraqi tankers in the Gulf. It has a capacity of 1.7 million barrels per day and runs from Iraq's southern oil fields to the Saudi port of Yanbu, north of Jeddah. It later served both Iraq and Saudi Arabia , but has been closed by the Saudis since Iraq 's invasion of Kuwait . The Saudis claim ownership of the pipeline, though Iraq disagrees.
The pipeline was reported ready to resume operation in September, 2003 (http://www.ameinfo. com/28059. html ). One month later in October however, we heard this (from http://www.gasandoi l.com/goc/ news/ntm34663. htm ):
20-10-03 The 1.7 mm bpd crude pipeline which runs from Iraq across Saudi Arabia to the Red Sea is in no condition to be utilised for Iraqi exports. When asked about reports that Iraq was in discussions with Riyadh to re-open the line, a Saudi Aramco official said that the Iraqis "don't know what they are talking about. The pipeline is not in a state to be utilised."
So is it usable or isn't it? I can't find anything except this denial to indicate that it's unserviceable, though a State Department presentation (http://www.state. gov/documents/ organization/ 60011.pdf ) indicates that it's closed with no plans to re-open. I can find no evidence of insurgent attacks against it, so there is at least some possibility that it is running.

Saudi Arabia's Oil Production History

Saudi Arabia's oil production has been deliberately increased and decreased over the years in like with their role as the world's "swing producer" – a country with enough capacity to open the taps to keep prices from rising too high and the political discipline to restrict production if prices fell. In the period from 2001 to the end of 2003, this "price band" was set by OPEC at $22 to $28 per barrel. At the beginning of 2004 oil prices moved above this band, and have never returned to it. This seems to indicate that OPEC members, and particularly Saudi Arabia , don't have the excess capacity that would be required to bring the prices back within the traditional band. The suspension of the price band in 2005 seems to be in recognition of this new market reality.
Saudi Arabian Oil Production
This graph of Saudi oil production is very interesting. It clearly shows the fluctuations in supply during 2002 and 2003, presumably attributable to their role as a swing producer. At the beginning of 2004, however, something very curious happens. There is a very rapid rise in production of 1.3 million barrels per day over the course of two months. This production level is maintained with only one small dip (which may indicate the temporary influence of production from the new Haradh III oil field) until the beginning of 2006. At that point a decline sets in that has not yet been arrested, resulting in a fall of 8% over the last year. This decline has been validated by four independent sets of data, as described here: http://www.theoildr um.com/node/ 2331

Pulling it All Together

Existing Hypotheses

I have never been entirely satisfied with the unofficial explanations for the Iraq war. I do accept (as does this article) the idea that the war was somehow "about oil," yet none of the existing explanations for why that should be so are terribly convincing. The United States could have achieved significant influence over the disposition of Iraqi oil through standard diplomatic and commercial means, without the expenditure of so many lives and so much money.
One hypothesis advanced by Canadian journalist, Linda McQuaig, in her book "It's the Crude, Dude" argues that the US invaded to acquire the "carrot and stick" of oil ownership and sales rights in order to be better able to reward friends and punish its enemies, thereby shaping regional and global power structures. To me this seems a costly, indirect and ineffective mechanism, especially if the global oil supply is unconstrained and nations can buy from whomever they wish.
Then there is the hypothesis that invasion was staged to permit western oil companies (particularly those with close ties to the Bush administration) to take control of the fields and reap windfall profits. This speculation also comes up short in my opinion. Those oil companies were already doing very well. An invasion and occupation are very risky ventures, and are intrinsically unlikely to provide the stable environment required for a simple transfer of commercial control (neo-con dreams of flowers, candy and regime change notwithstanding) . The costs seem entirely out of proportion to the potential rewards.

The "Purloined Letter" Hypothesis

The speculation of this article is that the real background of the Iraq war goes
  • The Bush administration is composed primarily of oilmen. They are well aware of the Peak Oil theory.
  • They are also aware of the risks that a decline in global oil production could pose to the world's political and economic stability, especially if it is generally perceived to be the result of irreversible geological conditions (i.e. we start to realize that the world is running out of oil and there's nothing we can do about it).
  • The Bush administration and the Saudis are also well aware of the role Saudi Arabia plays as the linchpin of world oil production.
  • The Bush administration and the Saudis are very good friends, and share intimate secrets like the actual state of Saudi oil production.
  • In early 2001 the Saudis tell George and Dick that Ghawar has started to "water out": the oil they are pumping up contains more and more of the water that they are using to force oil into the wells. This is a sure sign that the field is nearing the end of its useful life.
  • This news triggers very loud alarm bells in Washington and Riyadh, because if Ghawar and overall Saudi production are about to decline this brings the risk of global instability that much closer.
  • The two administrations decide they need to keep the imminence of Saudi oil decline out of the public consciousness for as long as possible. To do this they need to accomplish two things: mask the decline of Saudi Arabia, and make it appear as though any decline in Middle East production is due to above-ground factors.
  • Fortunately, they have a ready target in Iraq. Saddam is vulnerable, he has lots of oil, and Iraqi oil production has been in chaos since Gulf War 1. And he controls the input end of the IPSA pipeline.
  • At Cheney's Energy Task Force meetings the plan is developed and western oil companies are brought into the picture. This ensures they will be onside and will not start asking awkward questions later about the provenance of Saudi oil.
  • As a parallel effort, the Saudis agree to sponsor an attack on US soil to provide the Bush administration with the required "casus belli". The Saudis recruit 15 of their own citizens to form the core of the September 11 attack team.
  • Once the attack has taken place the march to war begins. It doesn't matter how flimsy the excuses are, all that matters is that the progress of the plan cannot be derailed under any circumstances. No penetration of the ruse, however small, will be permitted. This determination results in the Wilson/Plame reprisal, the killing of Dr. David Kelly and possibly other killings like that of State Department WMD analyst John Kokal (http://www.fromthew ilderness. com/free/ ww3/112003_ kokal.html ). The real reason for the invasion must never be discovered.
  • Iraq is duly invaded and Baghdad is captured. The Oil Ministry is the only facility to be secured because it's the only one that matters to the plan.
  • The meters in the southern oil fields are immediately shut off and sabotaged so nobody can tell how much oil is missing.
  • The un-metered oil is redirected into the perfectly functional IPSA pipeline and enters Saudi Arabia.
  • There are now two possibilities for what happens to the purloined oil:
  1. It arrives at the Saudi port of Yanbu where it is loaded onto tankers as legitimate Saudi oil, and shipped to international customers. There is a problem with this scenario, because the oil coming in from Iraq has a slightly different chemical signature from Saudi oil. This small difference would be noticed by customers, because the refineries need to know the characteristics of their feedstock very precisely.
  2. A more reasonable solution is that this oil is piped to refineries in Saudi Arabia and is used to satisfy domestic demand. The Saudi oil spared by this substitution is shipped out to customers, and no one is the wiser. This is both safer and easier than the first suggestion, because the stolen oil never leaves Saudi Arabia, and its disposition falls under the obscuring veil of Saudi secrecy. This also makes the case harder to prove, of course.
  • The 1.7 million barrel per day volume of the IPSA pipeline and the timing of the rise seen in Saudi oil production in early 2004 fit the scenario perfectly.
  • Any decline in overall Middle Eastern oil production can now be blamed on the civil war in Iraq, which has been either a blessing in disguise or a calculated part of the plan. The attacks on oil installations have also made it easy to disguise the disappearance of a full tanker-load- equivalent of oil every day.
  • It was all going well, except that the decline in Saudi oil production exceeded everyone's expectations. Even with the Iraqi subterfuge in place the decline of 800,000 barrels per day over the last year could not be masked.

Conclusion

There is as yet no smoking gun to support this hypothesis. This remains a work of pure speculation, based on a suggestive convergence of events and incidents. The one feature of this hypothesis that makes it attractive is the extent to which it can accommodate all the odd and otherwise inexplicable events of the last six years. On the other hand, it can be accused of suffering from the common failing of conspiracy theories: it would take too many people to implement. The argument against that is that these events have demonstrably occurred and the binding element of the hypothesis, the peaking of Saudi oil production, would not require that many people to be aware of it in order for it to provide sufficient motivation for such a devious scheme.
I would welcome any additional thoughts or suggestions of evidence on this scenario. I would especially like to hear of any evidence that would falsify the hypothesis – particularly evidence of the (in)operability of the IPSA pipeline.

© Copyright 2007, Paul Chefurka

This article may be reproduced in whole or in part for the purpose of research, education or other fair use, provided the nature and character of the work is maintained and credit is given to the author by the inclusion in the reproduction of his name and/or an electronic link to the article on the author's web site. The right of commercial reproduction is reserved.

June 10, 2007

Iraqis to U.S. Congress: Back off oil law

WASHINGTON, June 8 Iraqi union leaders met with a U.S. congressman they say is their biggest friend in Washington, urging a united front against Iraq's draft oil law.

Faleh Abood Umara, general secretary of the Iraq Federation of Oil Unions, and Hashmeya Muhsin Hussein, president of the Electrical Utility Workers Union, called the proposed law a theft of Iraq's oil.

"We believe this is a new invasion of our economy and especially to take over our oil fields," Umara told Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, in a private meeting Thursday in the congressman ' s inner office, which UPI was allowed to attend. Kucinich is a presidential candidate and Congress ' most vocal war opponent. The law, which is stuck in negotiations, is feared by the unions as giving foreign oil companies too much access to Iraq's oil.

Umara was one of 10 union leaders for whom arrest warrants were issued earlier this week as Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki responded to a strike of oil workers, who are demanding improved working conditions and a seat at the oil law negotiating table.

The unions began a strike Monday over the law, as well as working conditions, but the work stoppage has been temporarily halted as negotiations continue in Basra.



"Therefore we believe this is a very aggressive act to take over our resources," Umara said. "The oil law, in its current status, does not serve the Iraqi people." Umara said foreign companies were welcome to Iraq's oil sector, but warned it should be limited.

The unionists urged the United States, via Kucinich, to oppose the law. President Bush and the Democratic-led Congress have called on the Iraq parliament to pass the law soon, both in official speeches and as part of legislation funding the war through September.

"Mr. Kucinich, we see you as a friend of the Iraqi people and that is the general belief over there," Umara said. "We would hope that your government could put pressure on our government to not pass the oil law." Kucinich replied, "Unfortunately our government is putting pressure on your government to pass it." Ben Lando, UPI Energy Correspondent


Copyright 2007 by UPI

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

ShareThis