Showing posts with label renewable energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label renewable energy. Show all posts

April 25, 2008

Books of note: NO War, No Warming

Global Warming and the Iraq War

March 19, 2008

In 2006. the US spent more on the war in Iraq than the whole world spent on investment in renewable energy.

On the fifth anniversary of the Iraq war, an advance edition of a new report from Oil Change International, entitled A Climate of War (pdf) quantifies both the greenhouse gas emissions of the Iraq War and the opportunity costs involved in fighting war rather than climate change.

Here’s some of what it says:

  • Projected total US spending on the Iraq war could cover all of the global investments in renewable power generation that are needed between now and 2030 in order to halt current warming trends.
  • The war is responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) since March 2003. To put this in perspective, CO2 released by the war to date equals the emissions from putting 25 million more cars on the road in the US this year.
  • Between March 2003 and October 2007 the US military in Iraq purchased more than 4 billion gallons of fuel from the Defense Energy Support Center, the agency responsible for procuring and supplying petroleum products to the Department of Defense. Burning these fuels has directly produced nearly 39 million metric tons of CO2 Just transporting 4 billion gallons of fuel to the military in Iraq consumed at least as much fuel as was delivered nearly doubling overall fuel-related emissions.
  • Emissions from the Iraq War to date are nearly two and a half times greater than what would be avoided between 2009 and 2016 were California to implement the auto emission regulations it has proposed, but that the Bush Administration has struck down.
  • If the war were ranked as a country in terms of annual emissions, it would emit more CO2 each year than 139 of the world’s nations do, more than 60% of all countries on the planet.
  • Just the $600 billion that Congress has allocated for military operations in Iraq to date could have built over 9000 wind farms (at 50 MW capacity each), with the overall capacity to meet a quarter of the country’s current electricity demand. If 25% of our power came from wind, rather than coal, it would reduce US GHG emissions by over 1 billion metric tons of CO2 per year – equivalent to approximately 1/6 of the country’s total CO2 emissions in 2006.
  • In 2006, the US spent more on the war in Iraq than the whole world spent on investment in renewable energy.
  • US presidential candidate Barack Obama has committed to spending “$150 billion over 10 years to advance the next generation of green energy technology and infrastructure.” The US spends nearly that much on the war in Iraq in just 10 months.

The emissions associated with the war in Iraq are literally unreported. Military emissions abroad are not captured in the national greenhouse gas inventories that all industrialized nations, including the United States, report under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It’s a loophole big enough to drive a tank through.

Comments

5 Responses to “Global Warming and the Iraq War”

  1. Johnson Hardy on March 20th, 2008 9:14 am

    Smart work about global warming.

  2. David Kennedy on March 22nd, 2008 8:09 pm

    These facts help to give a useful perspective on ‘everyday’ activities, such as war, in the context of global warming.

    It would be useful to have a similar breakdown on other ‘everyday’ activities such as logging, air transport, shipping and road freight, and their effects on global warming.

    Along the same lines, it would be nice to know what is happening to the oxygen content of the atmosphere, since the oxidation of hydrocarbons requires quite a lot of atmospheric oxygen to form carbon dioxide.

    Most of us have little idea of the relative effects of such ‘everyday’ activities and cannot trust the MSM to give an unbiased account.

  3. Ben on April 21st, 2008 12:12 pm

    You can tell a fake environmentalist by their silence about foreign policy.

  4. surat on April 21st, 2008 1:30 pm

    Greenpeace UK’s main campaign has been about banning the light bulb, yes greenIDIOTpeace UK is the most pathetic moronic group ever invented. When I wrote to them that many people including me have a problem with flourescents and that these have been shown to cause health problems they told me to see a doctor and use candles!! — in fact, they added, they would prefer it if people used no lighting at all!! Of course don’t ever talk to them about the war they will SHREIK and tell you you must be into the protocols of zion. How dare you mention the war, for it is a holy war.. Hmmm…

    GreenINSANEpeaceUK you are so very very stupid.

  5. tquigly on April 21st, 2008 11:33 pm

    It’s About Time !! that this subject started being covered. Al Bore NEVER mentions the insane amount of unnecessary, man-made pollution being generated by the 5+ years of U.S. illegal invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. Whenever an article applears on the Internet by these global-climate-tax-mongerers, every reader of this post should comment on this silent connection between the faux global-warming cultism and the (unfortunately) non-faux reality of perpetual war and resulting pollution created by the U.S.’s obscene ‘foreign policy.’

November 21, 2007

Google Hybrid Cars that plug into Solar Power. It don’t get cleaner than that.

Google’s got a car you can plug into the wall….. or into an outlet powered by solar power. It don’t get cleaner, man.

Paying for grid power makes it about a penny a mile. But you could also power the car from solar panels.. making it free….. actually, you can even have the car sell power back to the grid when you’re not using it. You could get paid to drive. Additionally, the power company doesn’t really have a system to store energy, but a distributed network of plug in cars, all with huge batteries…. BANG! no more brownouts. Here’s a video with a bunch of smart people explaining it a lot better than I can:


Google Hybrid Cars that plug into Solar Power. It don’t get cleaner than that.

Google’s got a car you can plug into the wall….. or into an outlet powered by solar power. It don’t get cleaner, man.

Paying for grid power makes it about a penny a mile. But you could also power the car from solar panels.. making it free….. actually, you can even have the car sell power back to the grid when you’re not using it. You could get paid to drive. Additionally, the power company doesn’t really have a system to store energy, but a distributed network of plug in cars, all with huge batteries…. BANG! no more brownouts. Here’s a video with a bunch of smart people explaining it a lot better than I can:


November 19, 2007

Your Meetup has an event tomorrow!
You still need to RSVP.

Event Description

Welcome Everyone!

Whether you are new or experienced to the Renewable Energy world, we encourage you to attend our next meeting. We meet to share our questions and knowledge about all renewable energy technologies, organizations, events, issues, etc.

Renewable energy and conservation measures will lead us to a more sustainable future. We encourage lively discussions on all aspects of Renewable Energy. (Wind, Solar, Waterpower, Ground Source Heating/Cooling Exchange, Co-Generation, Transportation, Standard Offer Contract, etc.)

"The only silly question is the one that is not asked."


Hi Everyone!

Let's get together to discuss some future Renewable Projects that you may be interested in. We'll also look at what "Klean" Energy Shows are coming to Toronto this year.

I will not be able to attend our next meeting, so I'm looking for someone to volunteer to "head up" the meeting. Please don't forget to let us know whether you are coming. RSVP "yes" for a great time!

~ Erik
KlnAir4U

We'll meet at Toby's Good Eats, Empress Walk, 5095 Yonge Street, North York. (One escalator level above the street, two escalator levels above the North York Centre subway station.)

Drivers: Yonge Street & Empress Ave. (North of Hwy. 401, between Finch and Sheppard)
Plenty of parking in the area. Side streets may offer limited free spots.

TTC: From the North York Centre subway station, turn right (East) after exiting through the turn-stiles, proceed through the "Empress Walk" doors, past Loblaws, and up the escalator. Turn left and walk to escalator leading up to the next level. Follow the floor to the left.

We will be in the left, front section of the restraunt, near the entrance.

See you there!

For more information, see http://maps.google.com/maps?q=5095+yonge+st+toronto+ontario&spn=0.022490,0.060991&t=h&iwloc=A&hl=en

What

Toronto Renewable Energy November Meetup

When
Tuesday, November 20 at 7:30PM

Where

Toby's Good Eats
5095 Yonge Street North York
Toronto ON M9R 3R4

RSVP Now
Yes Maybe No

November 15, 2007


Gwyn Don't Know Dyer

By Jeff Berg

15 November, 2007
Countercurrents.org

Richard Gwyn’s November 13, 2007 article “Pessimistic Fuel Report too Bright” comes tantalizingly close to understanding the full peril that the energy question presents to development, our collective wealth and the planet’s health. For this he deserves kudos. Though at this point in the energy and emissions narrative it is hardly news to say that if India and China were to consume like North America we would fry the planet.

However what he has completely missed, and in his defence he is in the majority, is the fact that it is not demand that is the driver of the train we are all on. The conventional view that demand creates supply is a construct of economics that is not supported by the facts surrounding the Age of Oil. For it is in fact the exact reverse that is true. Ever since Spindletop in 1901, through to Ghawar in 1948, the North Sea in the early 60’s, and the North Slope in 1968, it is fossil fuel discovery and energy availability that has dictated consumption not vice versa.

Time and time again over the last 150 years it was discovery that drove prices both up and down. Great discoveries lowered them and lack of discovery raised them. Global demand meanwhile, excepting a couple of geopolitically generated anomalies, simply rose higher and higher year after year with total consumption rising every year notwithstanding every energy efficiency measure we’ve ever introduced.

Since 1999 the price of oil has quintupled. The single most important reason for this is that energy demand continues to do what it has always done only more so now that India and China have joined the fossil fuel party. Discovery on the other hand has so fallen that new discoveries are just barely keeping pace with the many fields so depleted that their production keeps falling year after year.

It has been 40 years since our last great discovery and the odds of our finding the Ghawar we “need” (like a hole in the head) are at this point according to geologists pretty much nil. These facts are well known in the oil industry as was nicely outlined in a recent Gwynne Dyer article about the Oil & Money conference held in London on October 30. These facts have also been freely available online through the ASPO, Global Public Media, Petroleum Review, and Oil Drum sites for years for anybody who cared to read them.

We are quite simply at or at least very near to the all-time historical high of global oil production and global production decline is just around the corner. And if the research institutes EWG & IFE & ASPO are to be believed (and they are) peak energy will soon be on us as well as natural gas in N.A. declines, and global coal and gas production peak around 2025.

Many view this as a problem. I would here like to suggest that this view is in fact an inversion of reality not dissimilar to the one that economists perpetrated about oil. For I ask you what else could ever have provided humanity with an “argument” powerful enough to slow the runaway train of demand? A train headed straight toward the ecological cliff so nicely described in Gwyn’s article.

Soon the fungibility of oil will "jump the shark" and this commodity and its distribution will change from a WAN to a LAN. As this occurs oil production will be increasingly “cannibalized” by its producers and less and less will be available for export. In this brave new oil and energy world N.A., Europe and the ROW (rest of the world) will increasingly have to rely on what they themselves can produce to satisfy their energy and economic needs.

This will of course mean that Renewable Energy capture will increasingly become the only growing energy source. That this fact is already “locked in” makes the recent decision by the U.S. Congress to jettison the Renewable Energy Provisions from their 2007 Energy Bill exceedingly at odds with the facts at hand. At this point the best that one can say of such a decision is that it is very short-sighted. At worst one would have to say that it is a decision that will be devastating to very many of the essential services that energy provides to these citizens. What it will mean to Canada is at least possibly best understood by listening to these words by Henry Groppe. Groppe has been in the oil and gas business for 55 years now and is a "grey eminence" to the National Petroleum Council and the Council on Foreign Relations. When speaking off the record to a Canadian journalist who must remain nameless about the Chinese attempt to invest in the tarsands he said: " There are two countries that don't understand that oil is ours: China & Canada."

What I say here and now is that for the forseeable future energy sovereignty is likely the only argument sufficiently powerful and practical enough to knit the Canadian federation into a fabric strong enough to withstand the strorm clouds that have now "lowered upon our house." (to quote the bard) That the argument about energy is also equally capable of tearing us apart is not very hard to see.


Jeff Berg
www.postcarbontoronto.org
www.pledgeTOgreen.ca

ShareThis