Showing posts with label Liberal Party. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Party. Show all posts

September 21, 2008

Liberals back U.S. war resister's bid to stay in Canada

Last Updated: Thursday, September 18, 2008 | 6:44 PM ET

Former U.S. soldier Jeremy Hinzman, shown here in 2006, has less than a week before his deportation deadline Tuesday.

Former U.S. soldier Jeremy Hinzman, shown here in 2006, has less than a week before his deportation deadline Tuesday. (Aaron Harris/Canadian Press)

With less than a week before U.S. Iraq war resister Jeremy Hinzman and his family are to be deported, the Liberals have reaffirmed their support for his fight to stay in Canada.

The 29-year-old Hinzman, his wife, Nga Nguyen, and their children — six-year-old Liam and six-week-old Meghan — have been ordered to leave Canada by Sept. 23 or face deportation.

If Hinzman is sent back to the U.S., he faces imprisonment and a criminal record.

Fresh off the campaign trail, Liberal Bob Rae spoke at a Toronto news conference Thursday with Hinzman.

Rae said the Liberals are still committed to keeping American war deserters in Canada.

He urged the government to support a motion passed earlier this year by all parties, except the Conservatives, to let conscientious objectors take up permanent residence.

"I don't think we should be having a situation where we're dead set on deportation in every situation, which seems to be the position of the government," Rae said.

Hinzman and his family came to Canada in 2004 after his attempts to gain conscientious objector status in the U.S. army were turned down.

His troop was about to be deployed to Iraq at the time, and he did not want to participate in what he called an immoral war.

Hinzman, who has applied for a stay of removal, said he's not expecting it to be granted.

"The Conservatives are ahead and they're not sympathetic to us in the least," he said, referring to opinion polls in advance of the Oct. 14. election.

With files from Canadian Press

August 19, 2008

Canada judge warns judiciary on politicized public inquiries


Devin Montgomery at 12:05 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Richard Scott, head of the Canadian Judicial Council [official website] conduct committee [materials], warned on Sunday that judges should exercise caution in agreeing to head up extra-judicial public inquiries designed to address politically controversial issues. Scott, who is also the chief justice of the Manitoba Court of Appeal [official website], said that by straying too far from their normal duties as judges, members of the judiciary risked the appearance of being seen as partisan. Scott's comments come after the Federal Court of Canada [official website] ruled [JURIST report] in June that media comments by Quebec Justice John Gomery [CBC profile], who led the public inquiry into the sponsorship scandal [CBC backgrounder] involving the Liberal Party [party website] government of former prime minister Jean Chrétien [official profile], had demonstrated bias against Chrétien [judgment, PDF] and his chief of staff Jean Pelletier [judgment, PDF]. In October, another Manitoba judge is scheduled to lead a similar committee established to investigate money that former Conservative Party prime minister Brian Mulroney received without paying taxes [Globe and Mail report]. Canwest has more.


Gomery's first and second reports [text and materials], released in November 2005 and February 2006 [JURIST reports], outlined the results of his judicial commission of inquiry [official website] into the Canadian scandal and included recommendations for controlling prime-ministerial power. The investigation began after Liberal Party Prime Minister Paul Martin, Chretien's successor, acknowledged allegations [JURIST report] of money laundering and kickbacks and took full responsibility for the misuse of public funds. After the reports has been issued, Gomery criticized [JURIST report] the now ruling Conservative Party [party website] for ignoring his recommendations on limiting government corruption and abuse of power. In June 2007, a former Canadian advertising executive was sentenced to 42 months in prison [JURIST report] for misappropriating nearly $1.6 million in government funds as part of the scandal.

April 29, 2008

Former Prime Minister Paul Martin is too ashamed to show face in Parliament because of role in North American Union agenda


by Peter Tremblay
Paul Martin


Paul Martin needs to confess to Canadians about his role in a neo-colonial initative of the U.S. Bush administration to take-over Canada.

In the article titled "Martin should resign as MP, Layton says" by Elizabeth Thompson, that was published in the Montreal Gazette on 2 April 2008 "New Democratic Party leader Jack Layton, is calling on former Prime Minister Paul Martin to resign as a member of Parliament, saying residents of LaSalle-Émard deserve an MP who is going to actually show up in the House of Commons." But there is an apparent basic explanation why Paul Martin has not been in Parliament. If you were an Member of Parliament or even more so, a former Prime Minister, who signed an Agreement to sell out your country, without informing that nation, and if you felt guilty about it afterwards, how would you feel, after that, about taking your seat in Parliament? You would probably seek to stay as far away as possible from re-taking your seat in Parliament, and would busy yourself, as much as possible, with other issues that by help soothe your conscience. Indeed, this is exactly, what Mr. Martin seems to be doing.


http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/04/17/02332.html

March 18, 2008

Vancouver quadra politics .. lessons for Canadians!!

Vancouver Quadra by-election: We almost became conservatives...

48 minutes ago by samanthaorwell
Ridiculous. I'm s ashamed of Vancouver Quadra. Voter Turnout: 28 121 out of 83 121. 33.9% voter turnout. What's the deal? You think it's the weather's fault? by-election politics vancouver vancouver quadra.

Urban Vancouver - Vancouver's community blog - http://www.urbanvancouver.com
Vancouver Quadra by-election: We almost became conservatives...
59 minutes ago by The Vancouver Manifesto
NDP 14.4% Green 13.5% Rhino 0.4% CAP 0.1% How did Liberals win by only 0.6%? Ridiculous. I'm s ashamed of Vancouver Quadra. Voter Turnout: 28 121 out of 83 121. 33.9% voter turnout. What's the deal? You think it's the weather's fault?

The Vancouver Manifesto - http://thevancouvermanifesto.blogspot.com/
Vancouver Quadra - StealthCon Gaining!!!!
2 hours ago by Gazetteer
Vancouver Quadra, Last updated: 00:22 ET. Party, Candidate, Votes, % Votes. NDP-New Democratic Party, Rebecca Coad, 3284, 15.1. CAP, Psamuel Frank, 29, 0.1. Green Party, Dan Grice, 3079, 14.1. Conservative, Deborah Meredith, 7224, 33.2 ...

The Gazetteer - http://pacificgazette.blogspot.com/
[ More results from The Gazetteer ]
That was Interesting — Now Comes the Aftermath
2 hours ago by bas1809
Which brings me to Vancouver Quadra, still a battleground at the time of writing (there are still 64 of the 237 polls to report, and although the Liberal Joyce Murray has been ahead often the lead has see-sawed). ...

Worth the Fee to Read It - http://worththefeetoreadit.wordpress.com
Reaction to federal by-election results; yea for Harper, nay for Dion
43 minutes ago by John Murney
The win in Desnethe-Missinippi-Churchill River and the very close 2nd place finish in Vancouver Quadra is a huge victory for Prime Minister Stephen Harper. In the same breath, these results are disastrous for Opposition Leader Stephane ...

Saskatchewan Liberty Train - http://sasklibertytrain.blogspot.com/
[ More results from Saskatchewan Liberty Train ]
Wow. Close!
1 hour ago by WillBlog
Well, with 237 of 237 polls reporting, the Liberals did win Vancouver Quadra, but by a tiny, TINY Margin of 151 votes, or 0.6%. The Conservatives showed tremendous growth in this riding - and any hope of Liberal momentum was shattered ...

Noise from the Right - http://noisefromtheright.blogspot.com/
No momentum for Liberals, and another Stephane Dion loss
2 hours ago by agwnblog@gmail.com
Amazingly, another safe Liberal seat, Vancouver-Quadra, is a bit too close to call, though right now Liberal Joyce Murray is starting to pull away. With 170 of 237 polls reporting, she leads Conservative Deborah Meredith by less than ...

Angry in the Great White North - http://stevejanke.com/index.php?utm_medium=RSS
The real by-election story: there is no (single) story
42 minutes ago by Idealistic Pragmatist
The Green vote stayed largely the same. Finally, we have Vancouver-Quadra, the surprise of the night. This is a wealthy urban/suburban riding, which until tonight counted as one of the safest Liberal seats in the country: ...

Idealistic Pragmatist - http://idealisticpragmatist.blogspot.com/
Stephane Dion wins 3 out of 4 ridings, Greens make gains, NDP ...
3 hours ago by Matt Guerin
VANCOUVER QUADRA Greens up from 5% to 15%. This accounts for the decrease in the Liberal support. Liberal support wins the day with 37%, not bad for a new candidate. Tories go from 29% to 31% - not much of an increase, considering the ...
Queer-Liberal - http://queer-liberal.blogspot.com/

Happy St. Patrick’s Day and other things1 hour ago by Beth
Happy byelection day, if you live in Vancouver Quadra or any of the other ridings holding byelections. I cast my vote early this morning, and as of the time of my writing this blog posting ( pm) Liberal candidate Joyce Murray is in the ...
Not To Be Trusted With Knives - http://drbethsnow.wordpress.com

December 29, 2007

The "face" of the new Canadian Liberal: Robert Ghiz of PEI

A conversation with Premier Robert Ghiz

WAYNE THIBODEAU
The Guardian

Q. First and foremost . . . how does it feel to be called premier of Prince Edward Island?
A. It was a very exciting year moving from the opposition, being able to have the privilege of forming government last May 28. It’s something that I take very seriously, but I thoroughly enjoy. There are challenges involved but there are also a lot of rewards involved.

Q. Were there times when you were sitting in the Opposition that you thought . . . “I may never be premier”. . . because there were some tough days for the Liberal Party?
A. That always goes through your thought process, of course. But your goal, when you’re in opposition, is to make sure you hold the government accountable. I know when I was in opposition — it’s a very difficult job. You’re number one job is to criticize. Usually people tell you all the time, ‘Why are you so critical? Why aren’t you more positive?’
Your job, when you are in opposition is to oppose government. But I knew that if we did our job correctly, and ran a very good campaign, that there would be a good chance that we would be able to form the next government.

Q. I remember interviewing you in November 2002 and you said at that time that you were not interested in the leadership of the Liberal Party . . . saying ‘no, but maybe someday.’ By spring, you were the new leader of the Liberal Party. Was it a difficult decision to make?
A. If people had of asked me five or six years ago whether or not I’d be sitting in the premier’s chair today, I probably would have told them they were crazy. I did have a tremendous respect for public office and was definitely interested in it at some point in my life.
In 2002, there was a little bit of a draft put on. After some long and hard reflection I decided to take a chance. Here I am four years later, and no regrets.

Q. As you look back on it now, how would you describe the year 2007 for Prince Edward Island?
A. Obviously the year has been a pretty good year for Prince Edward Island. Of course, we have our challenges taking place in agriculture, taking place in some other industries because of the high Canadian dollar.
But at the same time, if you look at the economy, it's still growing at two per cent per year. Just recently, we actually hit our lowest unemployment rate since 1978. That is still on an economy where our three largest industries are agriculture, fisheries and tourism. They’re seasonal. For us to be able to have an unemployment rate at 8.8 per cent is pretty good.
Should we do better? Absolutely.

Q. What was one of the biggest challenges you faced when you took office?
A. One of the biggest challenges that we were faced with right off the bat was the beef plant. To be able to put together a deal with the three Maritime provinces and the federal government was something probably when I made the initial announcement that the provincial government was done unless we could get the other provinces on side. At the beginning, I thought the chances of us putting together a deal were probably 25 per cent. But through a lot of hard work, a lot of lobbying, we were able to accomplish something that I think will be beneficial for the people of Prince Edward Island.

Q. That deal to save the beef plant, do you see that as one of your greatest personal achievements of the year?
A. Absolutely. Through hard work and the dedication of our minister of agriculture, Neil LeClair, we were able to deliver on something that we haven’t seen in a long time and that is the Maritime provinces working together with the federal government.

Q. And with highs come lows . . . do you see a low point for your province as you look back on the past seven months that you were premier?
A. One of the lows would probably be our exporting industry here in Prince Edward Island — the challenges that they are facing with regard to the high Canadian dollar. Those are industries that drive our economy here in Prince Edward Island, create a lot of meaningful employment. Our aerospace industry, that does a lot of work in the U.S. — these are some things that we are going to have to re-evaluate our approach in terms of doing business.
There were business models set up for a Canadian dollar around 75 to 80 cents US. Here we are now with a dollar that’s almost at parity. Those are some of the major challenges that we are facing, but I truly believe that Islanders are resilient and we’re going to overcome those challenges.

Q. There were some who looked to the last session of the legislature and expected a bit more substance. Will we see more from your government over the winter and in the spring session that’s yet to come that gives us a bit more information about your vision for the province?
A. I think so far what we’ve done, if you look at the last six months, we’ve delivered on numerous, numerous campaign promises. Most governments, after they form a government, they actually take the next session off. But because we had a budget that was not passed in the spring session, we had to come in with a special session of the legislature.

Q. What are some of those campaign promises you feel you delivered on?
A. If I look though some of the things that we’ve done already, you’ve got the beef plant, you’ve got the residency program, you’ve got seats at Memorial, you’ve got increases in the doctor recruitment budget, you’ve got a new office set up for doctor recruitment, you’ve got an office of energy efficient, you’ve got the seniors home repair program, we’ve got disability support increasing and you’ve got a new review taking place.
These are thing we’ve done already, within our first six months.

Q. Where do we go from here?
A. Right off the bat, I was able to recruit over from the National Research Council Dr. Michael Mayne to come into government as a deputy minister of bioscience and economic innovation. We’re creating a framework for growing our economy, in terms of the IT sector, bioscience sector, aerospace — these are jobs that are year-round, high-paying and high-skills and that can really drive our economy for a long time to come.
We’re working on a long-term vision for the province. What I want to do is really stay out of the political cycles. Too often, you see governments come in, make commitments where it'’s going to make a difference right away. But usually they are just for short-term political gain because we’re on a four-year political cycle.
What I want to do is look at a cycle that is not political. I want to look at a cycle that takes into account 10 years down the road, 20 years down the road, 30 years down the road.

Q. That’s great to think long-term but are you saying four years from now we’re not going to see a flurry of announcements from your government in an effort to get re-elected?
A. Absolutely, because we have to deliver on our platform. But if you look at our platform, we’ve delivered on a lot of the big, substantive issues.
We’re going to continue to deliver on our platform, leading up to the next general election in four years time, but we’re also going to look at how we can improve our economy for a long time to come.

Q. There has been a lot of talk about political patronage under your leadership . . . it began with your decision to turf one of your candidates — Larry McGuire — for what some viewed as a pro-patronage speech. Why take such a strong stand against patronage?
A. No longer is it acceptable to basically come in and tell people ‘you’re fired because you didn’t vote for me’ and ‘you’re hired because you did vote for me.’
If you look at the previous government, when they came into power in 1996, there was over 800 political discrimination claims. If you read through some of the testimony, it’s almost like a witch hunt that took place through the public service.
The days of firing people are over. First of all, it’s the wrong thing to do. Second of all, it’s very expensive for government to go out and fire someone based on political belief.
Here we are the first government to come in ever in the history of the province that did not commit a large purge on the provincial bureaucracy.

Q. Do you think Islanders were surprised that there wasn’t a major purge of the public service after you were elected?
A. Absolutely. I hear from different people all the time — people who indicate that certain people should be fired because they were hired there only because they were a Conservative. But what we have to understand is if we go out and get rid of those people because they were hired for such-and-such a reason, we’re liable.

Q. But you know, there are Liberals reading this interview right now who believe they should be working for the provincial government now . . . because they worked on your behalf . . . to get you elected. What do you tell those Liberals?
A. I tell them to apply for the jobs. If jobs open up, everyone’s going to have a fair chance at them. The difference is 800 jobs are not opening up immediately.

Q. Will your tough stand on political patronage hurt the Liberal Party?
A. I think in the long run it will pay dividends. People will see that we are a party of inclusiveness, we are a party that’s looking towards the future, we’re the party that’s going to make sure we have the professional bureaucracy in place to deliver the services that Islanders need.
There could be some growing pains but at the end of the day I believe we’re making the right decision. If I’m not, I’m sure I'll find out in four years time.

Q. There are a handful of political discrimination cases outstanding from the 1996 provincial election campaign . . . Liberals who say they were fired by the Tories . . . will you finally put their political discrimination cases to rest?
A. It’s something that we want to deal with, but we want to do it in a fair manner. I understand that there’s currently negotiations going on. We want to make sure we’re respectful of those people that have been discriminated against but also respectful of the taxpayers’ dollars.
At the end of the day, though, it’s not a problem that I created.

Q. As we look back on 2007, there was hardly a day went by that we didn’t hear something about the crisis facing Island farmers. How bad is it for Island farmers?
A. It’s not a good situation. There are a lot of farmers out there that are going through difficult times right now. Their cost of production, they are not even meeting that.
We have to try and find ways to help bridge our farmers into the good times, or we have to find ways to do agriculture differently. Some of this will have to come from the federal government. Provincially, we’re doing everything we can to help out our farmers.
There’s no easy answers. Is Robert Ghiz or the Liberal government going to solve the agriculture problems tomorrow or the next day? Absolutely not.
But what we’re going to do is we’re going to work with our farming community to find ways to help them out as much as possible.

Q. Can agriculture as we know it be sustained in Prince Edward Island?
A. Is it going to change? Absolutely. But can we sustain agriculture in this province? That’s what my goal is. I do want to see agriculture do well again and as a government we will do everything in our power to see that happen.

Q. Is the P.E.I. government doing its part, or is it spending too much time looking to Ottawa for help?
A. I would say that if you look at the amount of dollars that have been put into the agriculture industry by the provincial government on a per capita basis . . . a lot of money has gone into agriculture.
Is it sustainable to keep supporting something that is not working? No. Sometimes you have to look at new ways of doing things.

Q. Earlier this month your government said it was no longer going to financially support the Island’s hog plant in Charlottetown? Why take such a hard line on the hog plant after pouring another $2 million into the beef plant?
A. We did give the hog plant additional dollars — up to $2 million — since taking office. Unfortunately, they came back to us again and said ‘we need more money.’
This is a company that is controlled by the private sector.
In 2006 when the former government signed the deal with them they were suppose to deliver on $2.7 million themselves. That $2.7 million has never materialized. They keep telling us ‘there’s money coming, there’s money coming, there’s money coming.’ We’ve got to a point now where we were asked for $2 million to keep this plant going until February.
We said enough is enough.

Q. Speaking of the beef plant, you recently celebrated a deal that pumped $12 million into the Albany beef plant — money that was contributed by the federal and Maritime governments. How difficult was it to strike that deal?
A. Our minister of agriculture, Neil LeClair, worked extremely hard on this. It was a roller-coaster ride. When I first made the announcement, I had no idea what the outcome was going to be. That was something that was a little scary at the time.
But at the same time, as a province, we couldn’t continue to pick up the tab for the beef plant losing $600,000 a month. I just wasn’t willing to do it.

Q. Half of that $12 million came from the federal government. Speaking of federal-provincial relations, you’re a Liberal premier in P.E.I., Stephen Harper and his Conservatives are in power in Ottawa, what does that mean for relations between Prince Edward Island and the nation’s capital?
A. We have great relations with the federal government. Are we going to agree on everything? Absolutely not. If it was a Liberal government in power in Ottawa, would we agree on everything? Absolutely not.

Q. Wouldn’t it be easier for Prince Edward Island if there was a Conservative MP representing the province in the House of Commons?
A. Right now we have four very strong Liberal MPs. We have Peter MacKay, who is responsible for Prince Edward Island.
You also have to remember that we have a Senate seat open. There is a senator now who is in cabinet. The prime minister can go and appoint someone to the Senate tomorrow, if he wants to, he has done it in Quebec.
I personally think he should appoint someone from Prince Edward Island who can sit in the Senate and be our representative in
his government. I have echoed that to the prime minister.

Q. This being the holiday season . . . and because this interview is being done before the Christmas holidays . . . maybe I can ask you a bit about your Christmas holiday plans. How will you be spending the holidays?
A. I’m definitely looking forward to the holidays. It will be the first time since the election that I am taking some time to lay low, so to speak. My wife will be home over the holidays. She’ll be home for a month.
Between Christmas and New Year’s we plan on spending quite a bit of time together. It’s usually a good time for us to spend a lot of time with our family. So Christmas Eve we’ll go to church with my mother, and my mother’s-side of the family, and then after that we’ll go out to my wife’s grandparents homestead out in Stanhope — the Ellis — for a Christmas dinner on Christmas Eve.
Christmas Day we’ll probably have a turkey or two.

Q. Dr. Kate Ellis, your wife, is she still in her residency training?
A. She is. She’s actually been in Saint John for the last month. She’ll be back here over the holidays, probably working some shifts here in P.E.I., and then she’s back in Moncton for the final stretch of her residency. She’ll be back here practising medicine next June.

Q. If I could get you to look into that crystal ball of yours what do you see as one of the greatest challenges facing Prince Edward Island in 2008, and beyond?
A. Obviously we’ll be starting off the New Year still trying to deal with the problems facing agriculture. That’s why we’re going to be having a First Ministers meeting Jan. 11 in Ottawa with the prime minister to look at solutions on how we can help out those industries that are struggling.
Canada is a family. If one area is doing well, and another area is not doing as well, the federal government has to be there.

Q. Now if I can get you to look a bit further into the future, how long will you be Premier of Prince Edward Island?
A. I've always indicated that a 10-year time frame would be the right time to be in office. So right now, I’m going to say 10 years. If we’re sitting here in 10 years time, and I’m saying how I am going to run for a fourth majority, I want you to tell me to go in and put in my resignation.
Of course, I’ll only be around as long as Islanders give me the privilege of serving as premier of P.E.I.


Q. If I do the math - you're 33 now - so that means you'll be in your mid-40s ... a bit too young for retirement ... have you thought at all about what you'll do afterwards?
A. I've always told my wife I wanted to be the high school basketball coach at Colonel Gray high school (in Charlottetown.) That job is currently taken now.
I'm not sure. I enjoy what I am doing now and that's what I am going to concentrate on.


See Online Extras for more of our interview with Premier Robert Ghiz
29/12/07

Comments:
This Conversation is Semi-Moderated. What is moderation?
What does moderation mean?
The Guardian is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.

This is a semi-moderated or reactively moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes directly to the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.

All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
(Post a comment)

JOE from PEI writes: http://www.mulchblog.com/2007/06/full_disclosure_who_really_ben.php

I have provided this web site to all the people of PEI, and their farming community, to see for themselves how Canadians and their farmers have been placed in a losing position; with their governments poorly thought out and poorly negotiated trade agreements bringing about our total loss in farming communities and lack of control of our Canadian food stocks. This was all done without the people of Canada's approval. All our government mistakes can be corrected by us, so that we can protect both quality, sovereignty and cost of our agricultural products. and also to change the way we pay twice for our agricultural products first paying for them through agricultural tax subsidies and then paying for them at our food store cash registers .
knowledge a building block for change do ya really care???
Posted 29/12/2007 at 1:38 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment



Why has Ghiz rewarded so many 7.5% rollback types from the 1990's with plum jobs, Allan Rankin, Rory Beck.. writes: A long list of appointments by Ghiz for those who axed the wages of ordinary, honest Islanders...Nancy Guptill to WCB, Alan Buchanan to HC, Alan Rankin to ECO, Rory Beck to DM (rehab) and Matt MacLure to the circle.

Others who were instrumental include Wayne Cheverie on the bench. A sad day when those who so ruthlessly purged the honest wages of Islanders are being so handsomley and undeservingly rewarded.

Shame on Mr. Ghiz for suporting those who supported the 7.5% illegal wage rollback.
Posted 29/12/2007 at 2:08 PM |

JOE from PEI writes: Developed new successful market brand for Prince Edward Island.

New brand Prince Edward Island economically beautiful.


Marketing brand strategy number one.

Free gas Come to Prince Edward Island where your gas is fee!!

This ad campaign was used to stimulate new car sales , can be reworked to develop Prince Edward Island as a preferred vacation destination.
This will be done through all participating businesses signing on to this program for the purpose of stimulating greater revenue and tourist volume adding the greatest financial benefit to our local tourist business economy. A gas Bucks tourist rebate At point of purchase; example tourist spends $100 receives instant gas Bucks rebate off his bill
Tourist receipt will read $100 -$10 gas Bucks rebate for a final total of $90 this rebate program can be priced in on all product s of all participating businesses throughout PEI. Spend $1500 while vacationing Receive instantly $150 in gas bucks savings. That's $150 towards your gas while vacationing on Prince Edward Island .
Added synergy PR and ad campaign will readily be picked up by all media; radio , newsprint, and television at no cost this PR and ad campaign will give us millions of dollars of high quality vacation consumer brand market exposure no government participation required and a great start to freely establish our Prince Edward Island economically beautiful brand!! win win



Marketing brand strategy number two

Everybody has roots in Prince Edward Island campaign.

Chief benefits of this ad campaign , to help a fellow Prince Edward Islander Gary Snyder
with his dream of restoration of our forests to their original forest mixture and natural Acadian state.
This campaign will be a world PR broadcast allowing schoolchildren worldwide to get involved in Prince Edward Island 's New fun environmental endeavor by running fund raising campaigns in their local community . To help provide Acadian forest material and funds and plant their roots in Prince Edward Island too . Educational benefits include but not limited to providing a unique teaching educational tool expanding our world children's knowledge of environmentally, geographically, social economic issues through their participation; gaining a greater knowledge of collective and personal empowerment the cornerstone for their future and our social and democratic welfare ;our world is getting smaller every day issues. Together we can change our world type of thing.

Beneficial synergy low-cost / no cost further expanding our product brand Prince Edward Island economically beautiful Worldwide!! Also developing our carbon forest commodity as a new export revenue source through newly established world carbon commodity trade markets. This program will do a number of things first it starts to address and reverse environmental degradation that have occurred over many many years of our local governments and businesses mono culture commodity paradigms. debasing our beautiful island of its economic and environmental value. This complementary environmental addition adds strongly to our Prince Edward Island economically beautiful brand. No government participation required win-win

November 20, 2007

Be one of the first 300 to see this youtube video .. postmodern politics?

And the PLAN Is ..??

But it surely beats swiftboating Stephane Dion!! That is for sure. EH??


November 09, 2007

Dion: a radical departure from OTHER candidates

on POVERTY

(about bloody time
and the time to act is NOW
not waiting until an ELECTION!!)


Allison Hanes , CanWest News Service; Ottawa Citizen

TORONTO - Liberal Leader Stephane Dion on Friday declared "war on poverty" in a major campaign-style policy announcement he vowed will create a "greener, richer, fairer" Canada.

Tearing a page from the playbook of former British prime minister Tony Blair's New Labour - and laying out his priorities for the next election - he promised to cut the number of Canadians living below the poverty line by 30 per cent and the number of impoverished children by 50 per cent over the course of a Liberal mandate.

"Today we aim high," Dion said in a speech to the Learning Enrichment Foundation in Toronto. "In five or six years, I want all of you to say you were there when Canada's next prime minister set out his 30/50 plan."

Canadian Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion (REUTERS/Mark Blinch)

Canadian Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion (REUTERS/Mark Blinch)

Calling it "the strongest government action in a generation," Dion said this is but the first plank in a Liberal platform that aims to share Canada's prosperity with seniors, children, single mothers, the working poor and First Nations.

He vowed to:

  • . create a benefit that will make work pay and "lower the welfare wall" that acts as a disincentive to recipients getting off social assistance;
  • . expand the child tax benefit and make it a refundable credit;
  • . ensure widowed seniors are not pushed below the poverty line when their spouse dies due to a reduction in their pension;
  • . and resuscitate the shelved Kelowna accord for First Nations.

    "This is the right thing to do, the smart thing to do, the fair thing to do," Dion said of the commitment to lift 788,000 children out of poverty, adding: "The cost of doing nothing, which is the Harper plan, is far, far greater than the cost of investing in aboriginal Canadians."

Dion claimed his proposals were affordable, but that a full costing would not come until the next election campaign - whenever that may be.

Monte Solberg, minister of human resources and social development, took aim at the credibility of Dion's plan, sharply criticizing its lack of detail.

"We're glad that Mr. Dion also wants to tackle poverty - we all do - but saying what you want is very different from actually doing it," said Solberg. "He has failed to present a specific, detailed and credible, costed plan. Without costing, a plan to eradicate poverty is just talk."

The New Democratic Party's critic, Peggy Nash, also questioned the Liberal record on eradicating poverty when in office.

"Child poverty has increased in this country while we had Liberal majority governments and surplus budgets so I think Mr. Dion has a credibility gap on this," she said.

But leaders of community groups that strive to give the poor a hand up, were delighted a party leader has decided to put the issue front and centre on the national agenda.

Rupert Downing, executive director of the Canadian Community Economic Development Network, said his group asked all the political parties to come up with a strategy and Dion was the first to respond.

"I think this is groundbreaking for Canada, but we have seen it in other countries," Downing said.

National Post with files from Canwest News Service

© CanWest News Service 2007

October 08, 2007


Canada election in the making

From the wonderful koby.tblog.com/ blog

again, another post on the "I couldn't agree more" department (and have said so, frequently on Garth Turner's blog .. ) I don't "care for" the Liberals; why I would I? They made my life hell for EIGHT YEARS as my refugee case was flogged by them for eight long years. On the other hand, someone has to STOP! The Harper before it gets any worse; and under the radar it IS getting much, MUCH worse as the SPP business people line up to steal more goodies without any restraints - in fact, they get active encouragement from our lovely Minister of Trade. The active link between Israel and Canada grows daily, too. Do we need to be fueling Israeli jets and destabilizing the entire world?

And most importantly, do Canadian resources need to be used to make the worst weapons in the world? Again do a google of this blog on du, or nukes, or NATO.

WAKE UP, Canada! WAKE UP, Liberals! WAKE UP, NDP! WAKE UP, Green Party ..

Your kids are at RISK!! Do you care??

All over Toronto, young people are so upset about the global warming issue, they write away with permanent markers on every toilet stall they can find . who is speaking for THEM??


Dion's 7 Do's and Don'ts
10.03.07 (12:14 pm)
1) Dion’s Achilles heel is his English. He must continue to improve it if the Liberals are to have any chance.

2) Dion needs to introduce some new policy. Dion’s unwillingness to introduce new policy has meant the media have focused on the negatives when they have focused on the Liberals at all. Furthermore, Harper and crew have painted Mr. Dion as weak, indecisive and as “not a leader”. The Liberals lack of policy focus has played right into their hands.

3) The Liberals need to explore various hot button issues. Dion has chosen to focus on the big issues, global warming, the loss of the manufacturing jobs and poverty. However, there are no easy solutions to any of these problems and the public simply lacks the ability and more importantly time to tackle or understand the complexities involved. As the SSM debate and the debate over funding for faith based schools demonstrate, what galvanizes the public and the media alike are hot button issues. If the Liberals are to succeed they are going to have to tackle the big issues, but they are also going to have to push the envelope on various hot button issues. With regard to both they are going to have develop clear well thought out policy that is not watered down by political calculation. Good policy is good politics.

4) Dion has to break with the past both rhetorically and policy wise; this is vitally important when it comes to Quebec. Under his direction the party has too many of the hall marks of the Martin/Chrétien government. The Liberal government’s environmental record is bound the hurt his credibility during the next election. Dion is going to have to acknowledge the failures of some predecessors and promise to do better. Any such mea Culpa will have to attack Liberal’s previous reliance on an intensity based emission plan. This will then free the Liberals up to attack the Conservatives intensity based plan. Such admissions will help him put his stamp on the party.

5) Dion should under no circumstances try to appeal to soft separatists, or try to immolate Martin’s asymmetrical federalism. Rightly or wrongly Dion is viewed as a strong Federalist and the party lacks the resources, time and people to chance that perception. Besides, such a campaign would be dismissed as desperate pandering at this point. It would also undermine his appeal in English Canada. The Liberals only hope of breathing life into their flagging Quebec fortunes is to appeal to socially democratic and socially liberal strains in Quebec society.

6) The Liberals need to rediscover universality. Until they do, major policy initiatives, such as Liberals early childhood education plan, are bound to fall flat on their face. Indeed, as with early childhood education, the more the Liberals talk up the need for such a program the more inadequate and lackluster their proposal will appear and the more attractive the Conservatives thousand and one ways to dress up tax cut or rebate, a la the universal baby bonus, will seem. Access to affordable child care was certainly a more attractive option than anything the Conservatives were offering. However, many voters hedged their bets. They figured that a $1200 bird in their hand was better than 15% chance of nailing two in the bush.

7) If they Liberals are going to continue to paint Harper as the second coming of Bush, they better enact some polices that are going to leave Harper and Bush on the same side. Stephen Harper has long since become wise to such talking points and has gone out of his way to distance himself from Bush and the Americans have been helpful in this regard. Moreover, Harper has all but put a stop to nut bars, such as, Gallant waxing poetic on issues near and dear to social conservatives and he has not openly courted the social conservatives in the way that he did before becoming PM.


September 01, 2007

Future bomb

letterbombs.jpg

I drove into downtown Toronto Friday not long before cops shut half the city down to blow up some bombs they found in a loser’s car. Sadly, things were hardly so exciting in the cramped little CTV studio built into the ground floor of the Globe and Mail building.

I was there for what’s known in the trade as a double-ender. That means staring into a camera lens in a darkened room with a feed in your ear pretending you can see the host and the other guests who are hundreds of kilometres away. The tough thing about doing this is figuring out when it’s appropriate to speak, since you can’t see other people to gauge their body language or expressions. Occupational hazard.

The panel I was part of was all Libs - David McGuinty, the environment critic, Denis Coderre, the defense critic, and me. The topic was the recent caucus, a new poll showing a majorty of people like the way the country’s going, and the upcoming session of Parliament.

qp-ctv.jpg And how did it go? Well, that Coderre fella sure can talk a lot, so I probably did not make the point I intended. Fortunately, I have a narcisscistic blog, so I’ll do it here: The next election will not be fought on Afghanistan or even the environment, although both of those will cause much rolling thunder in the House of Commons. Instead, it will be the economy and the impact of events of the next year or so on Canadian families.

I have no doubt the US economy will cease growing and likely slide into recession as the Bush era comes to an end. The severity of the current situation was underscored Friday as the White House announced a package of new measures to keep Americans from walking away form their homes and mortgages. Such an action could not have been remotely contemplated two years ago. And there is more to come.

There will be implications for Canada. Even Alberta. And our current finance minister is quite unlikely to measure up to the challenge. Thus, when real estate equity starts to fade away, famly net worth declines and retirement plans are impacted, Canadian voters could be in an ugly mood. The political party with a realistic set of solutions will triumph. I have no doubt Mr. Harper will become an interesting Wikipedia entry.

CTV’s Question Period airs Sunday at noon.


The next election will not be fought on Afghanistan or even the environment, although both of those will cause much rolling thunder in the House of Commons. Instead, it will be the economy and the impact of events of the next year or so on Canadian families. ~ Garth

Oh, you are only TOO RIGHT. This is the issue that brings ALL Canadians together, which in my experience here shows me is no easy task.

IMHO, IF Canadian leadership could just get it together to see that people are tired of being torn apart while politicians waft around capitalizing on division and not bringing vision “to the table” then things here could be so much better.

It absolutelely saddens me (and angers me, too) to see that a country with this much resources (physical and human)go down the tube when it so easily could be The Leader in the world of How to Do Things in a visionary way.

It’s more than just do we have a nice banquet at the dinner table and do we have a non-rusty car (if we have one), it’s being able to point out to our kidz that they have so much to look forward to as examples of being decent Canadian human beings once again.

No one is reallly asking to be taken care of from cradle to grave, no one. They just want a chance to feel real pride in their accomplishments and work. And that sense of satisfaction has been lacking. I read the papers; tiime and time again, no matter where the quotes from citizens hail from (Finch/Jane, Oshawa, Forest Hill, the Lantic Provinces, Montreal, wherever!) the cry is the same: we want a fair break for our kids — which includes being able to show them we can all reach our potentials.

The first leader who grasps this will get overwhelming support across party lines.

People were truly horrified to see the $8 billion surplus paying down the debt; they wanted to see money spent on education, research & development, the social safety net - investment in Canada’s FUTURE. Nothing grows if you do not plant the seeds ….

C’mon, Garth, keep up the Good Focus . .and convince your new party that Canadian people are not sheeple, because they are not. It’s time for politicians (and one part of the common Canadian identity is that you NEVER trust a politician) to stop playing paternalistic with the reasonable citizens of this country and give everyone a chance to fulfil their potential ..

If only .. we could get politicians to see how much this matters to everyone.

There has to be a sense of common destiny created and there is no place better than to start than with the economy (scary things ahead!) and life’s effects on its citizens and future leaders. And my suggestion is to start with the most vulnerable first .. the First Nations peoples, the disabled, the recent immigrants, students and the unemployed. Nearly all of us has someone close to us in one of those groupings.

Rhetoric ain’t gonna cut it anymore.

Virginia

ShareThis