Showing posts with label Air India bombing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Air India bombing. Show all posts

January 07, 2008

former US diplomat comments on future world ..

The world is a changing place. The argument that Canada MUST side with America is rapidly being "blown to smithereens". Even with the neocons going out of power in the United States in about 370 days, bits of its INSANE Policies on war, dollar hegemony and it's vain and arrogant pursuit of wishing to have the world at its feet (heels planted firmly over those they torture) by having an imperial presidency without legal accountability of any kind .. just might have the Canadian reassessing their "strategic policy".

To that end, I try to drop by John Brown's great blog on US diplomacy as I can, to see what is being written and what is going on. The essay below was written for the San Francisco Gate by a former US diplomat (can you say spy??) who read some Canadian writing on Canada's present position.

Obviously, with the kind of multicultural society that has been set up in Canada, an open rich versus poor political agenda is NOT going to work!! There is no way for Canada to continue to pursue trade options with other countries IF it doesn't start clearing its own path far more effectively.

New world order, part 1: The U.S. faces a new reality

As the new year begins, the United States finds itself deeper than ever in debt, with its currency losing ground against the euro. It is bogged down in failed, costly wars that have no ends in sight. Millions of Americans are reeling from the still-unfolding real-estate crisis. Meanwhile, in America's corridors of power, there is growing unease about the booming economies and runaway growth of countries like China and India, the demise of the United States' own auto-manufacturing sector and other industries, and Americans' dependence on Chinese-made everything.

A bank-repossessed property for sale in California last August: Effects of the real-estate crisis could be felt for years to come

Tom Stathis/AP

A bank-repossessed property for sale in California last August: Effects of the real-estate crisis could be felt for years to come

While Washington has been sleeping, China has been investing deeply in Africa, Latin America and other parts of Asia. Once-stalwart allies like Australia are acknowledging that, from now on, it's policy-makers in Beijing whom they'll be aiming to please. Washington worrywarts fret about China's (and Russia's) unstoppable rise to superpower status, but has the huge, industrialized, post-communist, totalitarian state already become a superpower?

Those are some of the concerns on the minds of news commentators, economic analysts and policy-makers in Washington these days. Against this backdrop, what might 2008 have in store?

» Robert Shiller, an economics professor at Yale University who is recognized as one of the leading experts in his field, has "predicted that there [is] a very real possibility that the U.S. [will] be plunged into a [1990s-like,] Japan-style slump, with house prices declining for years....Shiller, co-founder of the respected S&P Case/Shiller house-price index, said: 'American real-estate values have already lost around $1 trillion....That could easily increase threefold over the next few years. This is a much bigger issue than subprime [mortgages]. We are talking trillions of dollars' worth of losses.'" (Times, U.K.)

Symbol of China's boom: Model of Beijing International Airport's new, $3.6-billion terminal, designed by British architect Sir Norman Foster, which might open in time for the start of the 2008 Olympic Games in the Chinese capital in August; the city is already planning a second international airport to open in 2015

Alfred Cheng Jin/Reuters

Symbol of China's boom: Model of Beijing International Airport's new, $3.6-billion terminal, designed by British architect Sir Norman Foster, which might open in time for the start of the 2008 Olympic Games in the Chinese capital in August; the city is already planning a second international airport to open in 2015

» A news-analysis article in the Toronto Star notes that, at last month's international summit on global warming in Bali, a delegate from Papua New Guinea addressed the "U.S. delegation that tried to thwart reforms agreed to by the other 185 nations present." He told the American representatives: "We seek your leadership. But if for some reason you are not willing to lead, leave it to the rest of us. Please get out of our way."

The Canadian newspaper notes of 2007: "It became more apparent than ever this year that the U.S. is no longer the world's lone superpower. Instead, there are five superpowers that will define the world for at least the next half-century: the U.S., China, India, Russia and a united Europe." This news "came home to Americans on Main St. from tainted Chinese products to the fact that practically every toy sold in America comes from Red China. [sic] Boston seniors on group tours of the great capitals of Europe were humbled to discover that their greenbacks had shriveled in value to 60 per cent of the local currency....[C]ascading defaults on U.S. subprime mortgages had so weakened the balance sheets of leading financial institutions...that the likes of Citigroup and Merrill Lynch had sought bailouts from state-owned investment funds in Singapore and the United Arab Emirates." Canadians felt the shifting balance of power, too, "in a 15-percent gain against the greenback."

Photo of an American assembly-line worker: The Institute for Supply Management has just reported that U.S. factory activity contracted in December to its weakest level since April 2003

Reuters file photo

Photo of an American assembly-line worker: The Institute for Supply Management has just reported that U.S. factory activity contracted in December to its weakest level since April 2003

About the countries that are posing challenges to the U.S. today: All are nuclear powers and "[a]ll but one, India, have veto power at the United Nations. Collectively, the four non-U.S. superpowers have 10 times the population of the U.S. The European economy has eclipsed that of the U.S., and those of China and India will do so by mid-century." The common aims of these emerging superpowers: "to unleash, under the banner of patriotism, the potential economic prowess of a nation or region, and in doing so to claim a role on the world stage equal to that of the U.S." As former British Prime Minister stated in 2005: "A single-power world is inherently unstable....That's the rationale for Europe to unite....We are building a new superpower. The European Union is about the projection of collective power, wealth and influence. When we work together, the European Union can stand on par as a superpower and a partner with the U.S."

One of the biggest trends many observers of the U.S. routinely cite, with alarm, is the fact that "America now is the world's largest borrower, and China the biggest creditor nation. As everyone but the White House acknowledges, it's difficult to have much impact in pressuring China on its undervalued currency, its military build-up and its human-rights record when that country is also your biggest banker."

Proud of China's rising profile: last September, in Xi'an, a pregnant woman had her stomach painted with an image of Fuwa, the mascot of the forthcoming 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing

Reuters

Proud of China's rising profile: last September, in Xi'an, a pregnant woman had her stomach painted with an image of Fuwa, the mascot of the forthcoming 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing

The Toronto Star analysis adds: "Even in a world without budding rivals, the American superpower would still be jeopardized by its 'unsustainable' disregard for tackling rundown schools and inner-city neighborhoods, a yawning gap between rich and poor, and a route to citizenship for the country's estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. Even superpowers are fragile once the rot of complacency sets in."

(To be continued... To come: Australia realigns; challenges for the next U.S. president)

Posted By: Edward M. Gomez (Email)

November 18, 2007

Shades of 9/11; Dropping the investigations that MATTER

CSIS dropped ball on Sikh extremist mole — ex-officer



OTTAWA — A former intelligence officer says he thought he had a source who could help Canada’s spy agency penetrate the Sikh extremist movement in the wake of the 1985 Air India bombing.

But Neil Eshleman told a public inquiry Wednesday that his superiors at the Canadian Security Intelligence Service ordered him to cut off contact and turn his source over to the RCMP — who promptly concluded the man was of no use to them.

"It was a lost opportunity that shouldn’t have occurred, and it was detrimental to both organizations," said Eshleman.

"CSIS lives through sources of information. It’s pretty exasperating when you develop sources and then are directed to relinquish them."

It was the latest case — though far from the only one — in which the inquiry has heard of investigative tensions and confused lines of communication between CSIS and the RCMP in the aftermath of the bombing that took 329 lives.

The blast was blamed on the militant Sikh separatist group Babbar Khalsa, but only one man has ever been convicted. Another was shot dead by police in India and two more were acquitted at trial in Vancouver.

Eshleman acknowledged that his source, identified only as Mr. A., was egotistical and self-centred and made demands of Canadian authorities in exchange for collaborating with CSIS.

He wanted government assistance in resolving certain personal "difficulties" that weren’t explained in the heavily censored record of the case made public Wednesday. Details were withheld at the insistence of federal lawyers on national security grounds.

But for all his failings, said Eshleman, Mr. A. was potentially the best source CSIS had discovered, at that point, in its effort to get inside the Sikh extremist groups operating in British Columbia.

He termed it "pretty tragic" that the source was never fully exploited. "I think that he would have moved this investigation forward significantly."

Eshleman said that when he first made contact with Mr. A. the man told him he feared for his safety, needed an iron-clad assurance of anonymity and insisted he would never testify in court.

ShareThis