Unresolved questions for ME ..
Who supplied Henry Paul with the presciptions?
How easy was it to fix the accelerator pedal in the car?
What happened to the white car and who was in it?
How does an independent inquest get away with NOT calling back in lieing witnesses and holding them accountable?
How can the leader of the inquest be both judge and jury?
Does no one really care what happened to Princess Diana nor her legacy?
How long does the whitewash continue? Another decade? Two?
Why doesn't the mainstream media pursue an independent investigation?
What changes to world consciousness might Diana have made if she were still alive?
Does anyone believe the lieing royal family - Prince Philip, Prince (blackmailed) Henry .. .. ?
Why do people pay taxes to give SOCIALISM FOR THE RICH in 2007 - they share the profit$ and we share their losses?
Okay, folks who don't read .. like Barak Obama and Gordon Brown and the royals are REALLY going to ensure a human rights first agenda really get pursued .. and you BELIEVE THAT?
Virginia
CORONER ACTS AS JUDGE AND JURY AS HE REFUSES TO ALLOW THE ‘REAL’ JURY EVEN TO CONSIDER A MURDER VERDICT AT THE PRINCESS DIANA ‘INQUEST’
Establishment puppet ‘Lord’ Justice Scott-Baker has dedicated his life to the Royal
Establishment and no one should be surprised by his blatant bias
- SCOTT-BAKER PROVES THAT THE INQUEST DID NOT NEED A JURY AFTER ALL BECAUSE HE IS BOTH JUDGE AND JURY!
The coroner at the inquest into the death of Princess Diana has prevented the jury from even considering a murder verdict and today Lord Justice Scott-Baker’s beloved Royal Establishment is safe from collapse for the time being….
In a transparent move which surprised no one with a functioning brain cell he ruled out any possibility that the Inquest jury could arrive at a murder verdict and in so doing bring down the entire Monarchy.
The stakes were simply too high and a murder verdict would have destroyed the House of Windsor leaving Britain to become a fully-fledged democratic Republic. Had there have been a murder verdict, the public uproar would have forced the House of Windsor into collapse and possible evacuation to safer climes but this is only a temporary reprieve….
Several weeks ago I was telephoned by the BBC’s News and Current Affairs assistant producer Kathrine Bancroft with a view to commenting on the BBC’s latest anti-Conspiracy Files ‘documentary’. We both agreed during our final conversation that a murder verdict at the Diana Inquest would be “the end of the Monarchy” and this is what was at stake from the very outset.
‘Lord’ Justice Scott-Baker, a lifelong Establishmentarian and Royal lackey, knew only too well what would happen if the real jury at the Inquest delivered a murder verdict and the stakes were simply too high for him to allow any such verdict to be delivered. Instead, he acted as I predicted he would in September 2008 when he banned me from attending the Inquest.
And from the opening day of the Inquest Scott-Baker demonstrated his prejudice against any possibility that Diana and Diana were murdered. He even had the audacity to state that he did not believe that Diana and Dodi were in a real relationship and the famous engagement ring was not an engagement ring at all. By so doing he showed the world that he was dead set against any notion or evidence to prove Diana was murdered.
But in an equally transparent act he ruled that the widely discredited Paget Report be removed from the Inquest’s website and that the jury should not be allowed to consider it. Attentive readers will remember that the Paget ‘investigation’ determined that Diana and Dodi were killed in a tragic accident caused by a drunk, speeding Henri Paul.
Scott-Baker realised that 80 per cent of the British public believed the Paget report was a whitewash designed to deliver an accident record into the history books. And in evidence submitted to the Inquest it was proved that Diana and Dodi’s relationship was real and genuine and the engagement ring was just that. But no apology has been forthcoming from Scott-Baker because in common with all judges and lawyers (overpaid professional liars and parasites on the public purse) he could not be seen to be wrong. This proves again the maxim: “No lawyer will ever go to heaven while there is room for one more in Hell.”
And so the jury, who it is clear were not needed at all because Scott-Baker has taken over the function of judge and jury, are left with five possible ‘verdicts’ of which one is open verdict. Even an open verdict would be a calamity for the Royal Establishment leaving a huge question mark hanging over the House of Windsor and its small army of professional parasites paid for by the long-suffering public….
Therefore, and without any surprise at all, Scott-Baker will now use the last few days of the Diana ‘Inquest’ to guide the jury towards arriving at an accident verdict and the odds are four-to-one in favour. He has stacked the odds in favour of an accident verdict and will do everything within his considerable power to help the tame and irrelevant jury return the verdict the Royal and Political Establishment want.
Princess Diana was the most potent thorn in the side of the
Royal Establishment since Wallis-Simpson
In the same way that the Royal and Political Establishment wanted Diana out of the way because she was a potent threat their to their ongoing gravy train, those same flunkies want it to be recorded in history that her death was a terrible ‘accident’. And we are asked to believe that the Royal Family and its personal security aka British intelligence, who did everything within their power to destroy the princess while she lived, simply stopped short of murdering her - very considerate of them!
It is a “bridge too far” to accept their vainglorious demands and expectations because in the ten years it took for this ‘inquest’ or grotesque theatre to take place, 80 per cent of the British people came to believe that Princess Diana, their princess who reached out to them, the “People’s Princess” was murdered to ensure her silence. Not just on the landmines issue or the Muslim relative to the heir of the throne routine but actually to ensure the devastating secrets in her box tricks held at Kensington Palace did not fall into the hands of a vengeful Mohamed Al Fayed and then enter the public domain with historic ramifications.
And we have heard how self-confessed liar Paul Burrell burned letters addressed to Princess Diana in his garden to ensure they did not leak out. There is also a similar tale from the Metropolitan Police regarding Prince Philip’s letters to Diana and apparently these were lost or ‘misplaced’ - conveniently beyond recovery!
Is there a single rational person in society who believes that there has not been a conspiracy between vested interests to destroy vital evidence so damning it could destroy several members of the Royal Family, particularly Prince Charles? If there is one person who believes this nonsense despite the wealth of evidence to prove this policy of deliberate and attempted eradication of evidence, I will gladly take them through the facts pro bono.
The 31 March 2008 will be remembered as the day when the British Royal Establishment finally concluded their Diana Theatre in Box 73 of the Royal Cinema of ‘Justice’ and in so doing hammered the final nail into their coffin. For within 20 years at current trends, new anti-Establishment socio-political forces will finally triumph over the Royal Establishment and its decadent three-party State.
There is no easy road to victory but through a series of battles with the old order in the public and political domains we will emerge victorious and then the real history of this time will be written by those who were denied their rights and were so compelled to join the socio-political forces of the emerging New Order.
In closing, I urge the great many people who have followed our coverage of what should have been an inquest into the deaths of Diana and Dodi not to despair. This is not a defeat, it is an illusion of ‘victory’ by the Royal Establishment and it is a mark of their sheer desperation to avoid their eventual collapse and total defeat. The wheels of history are turning unstoppably in our favour and in progressive motions grinding the old order into the dustbin of history.
March 21, 2008
http://publiceyes.wordpress.com/category/diana-inquest/PRINCESS DIANA INQUEST DRAWS TO A CLOSE AFTER AL FAYED’S JUDICIAL REVIEW IS TURNED DOWN
Halcyon days: Al Fayed with the Queen
The Princess Diana Inquest has drawn to a close with Mohamed Al Fayed’s bid to make the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh give evidence at the Diana inquest rejected by the High Court. There was little chance of his judicial review application succeeding given the fact that the so-called ‘impartial’ coroner had already blocked moves to make the Queen and Prince Philip testify.
Al Fayed’s legal team tried to get a judicial review of the ‘decision’ earlier this month that the Royal couple need not attend the Inquest. The application was rejected before the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, Sir Igor Judge, Mr Justice Walker and Mr Justice Cross. ‘Sir’ Igor said: “This application should be refused.”
And in a dramatic twist in another part of London’s Royal Courts of Justice, Mr Al Fayed was summoned back to the witness box at the Inquest to make it clear that he was wrong when he had earlier told the jury that he had won a decision in another court case. Clearly, the coroner who opened the Inquest by telling the jury that the ring Dodi bought for Diana was not for an engagement in his view, needed to clear up a few loose ends before he begins his week-long summing up to the jury he has already tried to guide against the Al Fayed camp.
Establishment puppet Scott-Baker
At the very outset of the Inquest in October last year Scott-Baker told the jury that he was not convinced that Diana and Dodi’s relationship was ‘genuine’ and he questioned the engagement ring actually being for an ‘engagement’. With his clear opinions expressed to the jury he had inadvertently admitted he was not impartial. It will be interesting to see the extent to which he may try to guide the jury towards a verdict of ‘accidental’ death because anything else will be a disaster for the British Monarchy.
Lord ‘Justice’ Scott-Baker is a lifelong supporter of the Establishment and a career parasite on the public purse from which he has made a small fortune. Any chance of his being impartial in his summing disappeared at the Inquest’s opening in October last year. And throughout he has demonstrated bias against the Al Fayed camp, demanding an apology from John McNamara for the serial liar Trevor Rees-Jones or Trevor Rees as he now calls himself.
Indeed Trevor Rees has changed his story so many times it is extremely difficult to understand on what grounds he deserves an apology of any description. In March 1998 he said that Henri Paul was not drunk and that he would not have allowed Paul to drive if he suspected the acting head of Hotel Ritz Paris security was drunk. But at the Inquest Trevor Rees again changed his tune and his new ’story/fable’ was ‘Henri Paul was drunk and it was all just a terrible accident’ which is pretty good going for a man who claims he cannot remember exactly what happened on 30/31 August 1997.
Rees-Jones spills the beans to the Daily Mirror, March 1998
And even more importantly was the confession of self-confessed liar Paul Burrell who admitted he lied to the Inquest and that Scott-Baker “still allowed me to get away with it.” The reason for this is Scott-Baker did not want to encourage Burrell to say too much about what he really knows regarding the Queen’s admission of “dark forces” at work in Britain.
The fact that the coroner had no power to summon Burrell back to the Inquest to ‘explain’ himself was a factor configured into the plans of the ‘people’ who protect Burrell, while he stays quiet about certain matters. For Burrell knows only too well what might happen to him if he does not stay silent and the firebomb attack on his Cheshire flower shop was a mere warning of what could follow….
So Burrell stays tucked away in the United States where he is safe from the British people who hate him and know him to be a traitor and serial liar, a misfit of the imagination for which he is so renowned. Not that this matters to the stupid Americans who buy into his fairy tales, no pun intended on his bi-sexuality, and spend large sums of money on his Royal Butler ‘collections’. It seems that at last in the land of make-believe Burrell has found his true home….
And Lord ‘Justice’ Scott-Baker allowed him to get away with it and this fact demonstrates exactly where both ‘men’ stand in relation to each other, the Monarchy and the result they are striving to achieve. History will not forget nor forgive them, the more so if the verdict is death by misadventure or most likely ‘open verdict’?
No comments:
Post a Comment