July 31, 2007

Another sad tale of EMPIRE

AxisofLogic/ Critical Analysis
http://axisoflogic. com/artman/ publish/article_ 24944.shtml

Critical Analysis
Two Island Tales: the Use and Abuse of Power
By Brian McAfee
Jul 20, 2007, 08:37

The idyllic lives of two island based populations were inexorably changed and came close to annihilation just to accommodate U.S. supposed protection of democracy. Both Bikini Atoll in the Pacific and the Indian Ocean's Diego Garcia island were populated by thriving, self sufficient, fishing based population until coming under the radar screen of British and U.S. hegemonic interests. The disregard and callus indifference towards the effected populations show the true nature of U.S. "values."

Both Bikini and Diego Garcia resurfaced as issues earlier this year when survivors of the hydrogen bomb tests in the Pacific and Chagos islanders (Diego Garcia) won court cases recognizing the injustices forced upon them by the U.S. in the case of Bikinians and by the British in the case of the Chagos islanders. The Bikinians were awarded $1 billion in damages for the impact and effect of U.S. nuclear and hydrogen tests. They will likely never see a cent of it as the bank reserve designated for awarding payment is said to have no funds to accommodate the ruling. The obvious irony here is that the funding to continue the Iraq war is seemingly boundless and unending but to rectify an earlier injustice is economically unfeasible.

From 1946 through 1958 the U.S. had carried out 23 atomic and hydrogen bomb tests with the 1954 Bravo test the most significant one. The Bikinians were first moved to Rongeric, where they nearly starved to death, then they were shipped to Kwajalein and finally to tiny Kili where now their population is more then fifteen times bigger than the original 167 that were forcibly removed in 1946. The health effect of being down wind and contamination of the food supply of the resettled Bikini Islanders continue to be a factor in the health and food supply of Pacific islands of the Marshall Island Region.

The Chagos islanders won a hollow victory that they would be allowed to return to their islands, with the exception of Diego Garcia, the largest and main island in the archipelago, and the primary home of the exiled islanders. The U.S. which has a naval and air base on the island remains unwilling to give back the stolen island. In the case of Diego Garcia, Britain and the U.S. both were culprits in the theft of the island. While the U.S. media has, for the most part, not covered the issue of Diego Garcia two journalists have made a point of keeping it alive as an issue. Both William Blum and John Pilger have kept the story and issue alive over the years. Diego Garcia is an example of an ongoing injustice with elements of imperialism, racism and ongoing abuse of power in the name of "democracy."

Blum, in his recent book "Rogue State", described what happened in the Chagos Islands: "A few thousand inhabitants of the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean were summarily uprooted by Great Britain and shipped against their will to Mauritius and the Seychelles, each more than a thousand miles away.

No one helped them resettle or paid for the homes they lost. They simply were forced to become squatters in foreign lands. The reason for this was to make room for a U.S. military base on the biggest of the Chagos Islands, Diego Garcis."

John Pilger's new book, "Freedom Next Time", goes into more details of what happened with the Chagos Islands and Diego Garcia with updated information.

In both cases, the apparent righting of wrongs were deceptive. In the case of the Bikinian legal victory of $1 billion the funds, according to the U.S., no longer exists to pay them despite the current ruling, how convenient. In the case of Diego Garcia, the main goal in the native pursuit of justice, the Island of Diego Garcia itself, remains off limits to its rightful owners, the Chagossian people. The U.S. continues to scoff at the legal and moral basis for injustice, for simply doing the right things.

© Copyright 2007 by AxisofLogic. com

Indigenous Rights
http://www.threeame ricas.org/ indigenous_ rights.html

Let the Bloody Truth Be Told: A Chronology of U.S. Imperialism
http://www.neravt. com/left/ invade.htm

BP gets OK to dump mercury into Lake Michigan
The permit exempts the BP plant at Whiting, Ind., 3 miles southeast of Chicago, from a 1995 federal regulation limiting mercury discharges into the Great Lakes to 1.3 ounces per year.The permit was issued July 21 in connection with the plant's $3.8 billion expansion, but only late last week began to generate public controversy. It gives the company until at least 2012 to meet the federal standard.

Posted Jul 31, 2007 08:16 AM PST
Category: SCIENCE/HEALTH

Unflipping believable

Important quote .. stolen, shamelessly from Hard-boiled Dreams of the World ...

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

~David Rockefeller address to Trilateral Commission meeting, June 1991.

Help get explosive NY Times bestseller on North American Union into hands of clueless presidential candidates

WND Books
(WebWire) 7/30/2007 3:48:09 PM

Judicial Watch expresses an interest in the Montebello summit ...

Well, folks!  Here we go! The first really BIG assault on SPP secrecy and the henchmen for the 3 amigos.

Today, the Canadians have put out the calls to APPROVE the media "contracts" that they will approve.  Carpooling is to be a necessity, but details on that will come at a later date.  Hmm . .. umhmmmmmmmmm.

Now why would Judicial Watch be concerned when two unelected Presidents and a minority Prime Minister (who is very iron-fisted and prone to have his Ministers say nothing at all) meet with 30 handpicked corporate types in secrecy ....?

SOURCE: Judicial Watch

Jul 31, 2007 12:30 ET

Judicial Watch Seeks Access to North

 American Competitiveness Council

 Meetings Under Federal Open

 Meetings Law

Commerce
Secretary Gutierrez Urged to Comply
 With Federal Open Meetings Law
During August
 20 and 21 Security & Prosperity Partnership
 Meetings
in Montebello, Quebec

http://www.judicialwatch.org

WASHINGTON, DC--(Marketwire - July 31, 2007) - Judicial Watch, the public interest group
that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today filed a
notice with Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez that it is seeking access
to the meetings and records of the North American Competitiveness Council
(NACC) under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) --
the federal open meetings law (5 U.S.C App. 2 §3(2)). Specifically,
Judicial Watch seeks to attend and/or participate in meetings of the NACC
and its U.S. component subcommittees, the next meeting of which is
reportedly scheduled for August 20, 2007 in Montebello, Quebec, Canada.

Secretary Gutierrez launched the NACC, with his Mexican and Canadian
counterparts, in June 2006. The NACC met on August 15, 2006 in Washington
and again on February 23, 2007 in Ottawa, Canada. The NACC has provided
over fifty (50) recommendations for action to Secretary Gutierrez and the
Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP).

To further its public interest mission, Judicial Watch previously submitted
a request to attend NACC meeting with the organization designated by the
Commerce Department as the "Secretariat" of the NACC comprised of the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce (jointly with the Council of the Americas). The
Secretariat informed Judicial Watch that as a not-for-profit educational
foundation, it was not eligible to participate in NACC meetings.

Judicial Watch's notice to Secretary Gutierrez stresses the legal
requirement for the NACC, and any U.S. component subcommittee(s), to obey
the federal open meetings law and file a charter, publish timely notice of
meetings in the Federal Register, allow interested parties to attend and
participate in meetings, and provide access to committee records. Judicial
Watch believes the NACC has failed to satisfy any of these statutory
requirements.

Judicial Watch has also requested that Secretary Gutierrez make all records
of the NACC -- reports, transcripts, minutes, appendixes, working papers,
drafts, studies, agenda, etc. -- available to Judicial Watch in accordance
with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. §552).

"Our goal is to open up this entire SPP process to the American public.
The North American Competitiveness Council is a federal advisory group that
cannot operate in secret -- especially during the important Quebec SPP
summit
next month," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Contact:
Jill Farrell
202-646-5188

Technorati:
SPP   NACC   FACA   North American Competitiveness Council    Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez

Technorati Tags: SOO, NACC, FACA, North American Compeitiveness Council, Coomerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez

Please forward widely.

GEORGE BUSH IS COMING to Montebello, Quebec
to talk FEAR, MONEY and FORTRESSES
with STEPHEN HARPER and Mexican President FELIPE CALDERÓN

GIVE THEM THE WELCOME THEY DESERVE!
SECURITY AND PROSPERITY FOR WHOM?

PUBLIC FORUM
Building an opposition to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America

Featuring:

Linda McQuaig

Author, Holding the Bully's Coat: Canada and the US Empire

Paloma Villegas

Organizer, No One Is Illegal - Toronto

Rogelio Fuentes

Mexican activist and member, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty

Hassan Yussuff

Secretary-Treasurer, Canadian Labour Congress

Wednesday, August 1
7:00pm
Steelworkers' Hall
25 Cecil Street
(south of College, east of Spadina)
Toronto

By donation!

Toronto Stop the SPP Committee: a coalition of groups and individuals working together to raise awareness and to oppose the SPP summit in August 2007.

For more information, please e-mail: torontostopthespp@riseup.net.

The public forum is a space in which Toronto residents can learn more about the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) and its implications. The event is part of the mobilization against the SPP leading up to the tri-state summit in Montebello, Quebec on August 20-21.

OPPOSE THE SPP!
August 19 and 20, 2007
Ottawa, Montebello, and locally

Get on the bus!

Option 1: Same-day trip
Toronto - Ottawa - Toronto (August 19)
- OR -
Option 2: Three-day trip
Toronto - Ottawa - Montebello - Ottawa - Toronto (August 19 to 21)

Cost: $60-$90 sliding scale (with donations, we hope to offer subsidies soon)

To book a ticket, please e-mail your name, phone number and e-mail address to
bushbus2007@gmail.com.

Please also indicate which option you prefer: same-day trip (#1) or three-day trip (#2).

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT OPPOSITION TO THE SPP:

Overview of the SPP
http://www.psp-spp.com

Toronto Coalition to Stop the War
http://www.nowar.ca

Council of Canadians
http://www.canadians.org/integratethis/

No One Is Illegal - Vancouver
http://noii-van.resist.ca/

Toronto Coalition to Stop the War

TCSW is Toronto's city-wide anti-war coalition,
comprised of more than fifty labour, faith and community organisations,
and a member of the Canadian Peace Alliance.
www.nowar.ca stopthewar@sympatico.ca 416-795-5863

From a comment on the digg site regarding Peter MacKay ..

"The Gentlemen who recorded this stream of lies coming from Mr. MacKay's mouth should be held in the highest esteem by those of us who have Minds, Eyes and Ears open instead of our hands and mouths. I applaud both the interviewer and the camera man for their fine work and balls to get right out there and get down to the truth... oh as for the whole "Private Family BBQ".... it was a Conservative Party 'Meet and Greet' open to party members and THE GENERAL PUBLIC. Even on a small scale he's a lying sack of meat."

The comments calling Canadian politician$, crook$ and liar$ is now in full swing.

Canada's MacKay: SPP a "Great Organization," Denies Free Speech Ban: VIDEO

Peter MacKay, the Foreign Affairs Minister of Canada, told Canadian activists that the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP.gov) is a "Great Organization." He did, however, deny reports that the upcoming meeting would be guarded heavily by international security, including a "Free Speech" ban inside a 25 KM perimeter around the meeting. VIDEO

read more | digg story

U.S. Congress blocks key transport initiative

Warns trilateral plan would open borders to 'alien invaders'

Kelly Patterson, The Ottawa Citizen

Published: Monday, July 30, 2007

Just weeks before the Canadian, U.S. and Mexican leaders meet in Montebello, Que., to discuss the Security and Prosperity Partnership, U.S. legislators moved to block a key part of the trilateral trade initiative.

The U.S. House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly last week to cut off funding for talks on all transportation issues related to the SPP, a controversial effort to harmonize the countries' economic and security protocols.

Legislators are concerned that crucial decisions affecting cross-border security, immigration and product safety are being made without congressional consultation.

"The (Bush) administration refuses to report back to Congress," Democrat Marcy Kaptur told the House. "They have been intransigent, they have been unresponsive and, frankly, they've been secretive."

But Republican Congressman Joe Knollenberg warned that cutting SPP funding would "put all of the U.S.-Canada transportation initiatives to an end," including years of improvements to the critical Detroit-Windsor border crossing.

Representatives voted 362-63 in favour of the budget amendment, put forward jointly by Ms. Kaptur and Republican Duncan Hunter. The amendment will now go to the U.S. Senate for debate.

NDP MP Peter Julian warns that similar debates are arising north of the border.

"This is a real wake-up call for (Prime Minister) Stephen Harper," he said. "The SPP is an unacceptable, closed-door process. ... There is a need for a real public consultation."

Transportation talks have become a hot-button issue in the U.S., where critics fear secret negotiations are aimed at building a "NAFTA Superhighway" linking the three nations.

Many on the extreme right fear such a highway would spell the end of the U.S., as "alien invaders" swarm across the border from Mexico. But moderates have also expressed concerns such a transport corridor would overwhelm customs and immigration staff.

In a statement this week, Ms. Kaptur said the 12-lane highway "is already under construction in Texas." The network would divert incoming Asian goods from bustling California ports to Mexican ports, jeopardizing American jobs, she warned. It would also fast-track overseas products into the U.S. "without adequate safety provisions and inspection," she charges.

While some private ventures and state governments have described ongoing projects as "NAFTA Corridors," the federal government is not involved, according to the U.S. government website on the SPP.

"The NAFTA Superhighway simply does not exist," says Frank Conde of North America's SuperCorridor Coalition (NASCO), a U.S.-based non-profit group that aims to improve an already existing network of highways that link the three countries.

But Ms. Kaptur and other critics dismiss that argument as semantics, arguing that ongoing plans for the rapid expansion of many parts of that network amount to a superhighway.

One NASCO member, Kansas Southern Railway, also sits on the North American Competitiveness Council, an elite group of corporations formed to advise the three governments on the SPP.

Mr. Conde says the railroad, which operates in the U.S. and Mexico, does not share information on the SPP with NASCO. (Railroad officials were not available for comment at press time).

He adds that some SPP initiatives have made the border crossings safer. He points to the little-known e-manifest program, under which transport firms submit detailed information about their cargo, drivers and routes to a government database before approaching the border.

Cargoes or companies that may pose a risk are flagged in the system, so officials can zero in on trucks or drivers that may pose a risk; low-risk vehicles can pass through quickly.

Canada’s Largest Bookstore Retailer Bans Book Which Reveals

North American Union Agenda to Canadians

http://stopspp.com/stopspp/?p=152

By Peter Tremblay

Are you a concerned Canadian who is seeking a copy of the book entitled Traitors Among Us: The Betrayers of Canada in a Canadian bookstore. Well, you will not find a copy at Indigo Books. The ownership of Indigo books is associated with Canada’s largest corporations, that in turn, have reportedly sought to conceal information from Canadians about the North American Union (NAU) agenda.

The book entitled Traitors Among Us: The Betrayers of Canada features a compilation of articles from The Canadian National Newspaper. These articles both expose and also challenge an apparent assumption by many of Canada’s corporate and political elites. This apparent assumption, championed by large mass-media conglomerates in Canada like CanWest Global, is that the only “rational” course for Canadian society, is to assimilate itself into the U.S. political-military-industrial complex.

Canada, has been championed as an alternative society to “America” since time immoral. As Canada has evolved, since its cultural-political inception since 1535, the essence of its society has taken a distinctively socially progressive national identity. Jean Talon, Canada’s first Intendant in the “ancien regime” of New France, envisioned Canada as a Great and Powerful State, that was critically inspired by the Old World aboriginal civilizations of Canada, in synergy with “Old World” values of Europe. Prime Ministers of Canada before Brian Mulroney had all rejected so-called “Free Trade”, out of a now further substantiated concern that Canada’s vital social fabric and independence from the United States would be destroyed. Tommy Douglas’ championing of universal medicare vitally further affirmed Canada’s distinctively progressive social fabric. Former Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, sought to further embrace the progressive identity of Canada, by seeking to champion the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He did that, in his efforts, as a Great Canadian, to fulfill Canada’s destiny as a Just Society, which would operate as a role model for the rest of the world.

In sharp contrast, current Prime Minister Harper cannot see any role for Canada other than that of participating in international affairs as a puppet of American Empire via “Globalization”.

Historically, the American Revolution had sought to destroy a connection to “Old World” values, symbolized by cultural-political ties with Britain. America’s elites sought to create an assimilating “melting pot”, which would be created by the idolizing of a gun culture of violence associated with the American Revolution, which has further embraced militaristic jingoism.

Canada’s political leadership, sought in response to the American Revolutionary context, to cultivate a society of “Peace, Order and Good Government” which would inspire a society that recognized the ideal of ‘civility’ in the development of our cities as communities; and where there was a positive constructive role for government in societal development. That sought role fundamentally embraces further adopted tenets of appreciating for example, multiculturalism, and ‘universality’ in relation to a comprehensive one-tier public healthcare system, within social justice, in general. That socially responsible role of government has vitally contributed to a reputed much better quality-of-life in Canada, as compared to the United States, which is plagued by horrific segregated poverty alongside elite affluence, and by accompanying prevalent violent crime in its cities.

Many of Canada’s corporate and political elites under the clandestine agenda of efforts to create a so-called “North American Union”, (apparently by any means necessary), seek to destroy Canada.

Canada’s corporate and political elites used to be among the greatest defenders of the need to defend Canada’s sovereignty. The elites had recognized that their institutions were the very creatures of the aggressive defence of Canadian institutions. These recognition among institutions included representatives of wealthy financial institutions, to smaller community-oriented initiatives and public agencies. However, thanks to former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney’s successful proselytizing of greed and venality, to once politically loyal elites, via the “benefits” of “Free Trade” with the United States, much of these elites now elect to sell Canada out.

Prime Minister Brain Mulroney had dysfunctionally inspired a new generation of greed-driven mercenaries who operate in the mass-media, in the likes of CanWest Global owners (who help fund the Conservative Party), TorStar, Quebecor Sun Media, and other such neo-conservative public relations outlets. Only BellGlobe Media, inclusive of the Globe and Mail, CTV, and CHUM, (as well as in particular, a handful of community and campus media outlets) have maintained any semblance of journalistic integrity, in the present sea of elite-managed propaganda.

Canada’s corporate and political elites now linked to the U.S. religious-political-military-industrial complex, which is operating in overtime, is trying to convince Canadians to accept the dysfunctional polices of the Harper neo-conservative minority government toward an elite sought right-wing majority government.

Dysfunctional policies which are supported by current Prime Minister Harper’s allies, include presiding over the sabotage of Canada’s universal public healthcare system to destroying treasured Canadian institutions like the well renown Wheat Board, so as to cause Canadian farmers to be ruled by U.S. agri-business privatization agenda. Additional policies include ignoring the plight of growing poor communities in Canada which include women, homeless peoples, immigrants, and aboriginal peoples, and also reckless pro-Global Warming policies.

The ‘Canadian Dream’ refers to the evolved collective aspirations of Canadians, as inspired by such recognized Great Canadians as Tommy Douglas and Pierre Elliot Trudeau, to fulfill the national destiny of Canada, as a socially independent society, that is independent from the United States. The prevailing systematized efforts to sabotage the achievement of the ‘Canadian Dream’, is the apparent betrayal of Canada to a traitorous agenda.

Source: AgoraCosmopolitan.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Reisman

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onex_Corporation

Thank You, Indigo Books

Canada’s Largest Bookstore Retailer Bans Book Which Reveals North American Union Agenda to Canadians

By Peter Tremblay

Are you a concerned Canadian who is seeking a copy of the book entitled Traitors Among Us: The Betrayers of Canada in a Canadian bookstore. Well, you will not find a copy at Indigo Books. The ownership of Indigo books is associated with Canada’s largest corporations, that in turn, have reportedly sought to conceal information from Canadians about the North American Union (NAU) agenda.

The book entitled Traitors Among Us: The Betrayers of Canada features a compilation of articles from The Canadian National Newspaper. These articles both expose and also challenge an apparent assumption by many of Canada’s corporate and political elites. This apparent assumption, championed by large mass-media conglomerates in Canada like CanWest Global, is that the only “rational” course for Canadian society, is to assimilate itself into the U.S. political-military-industrial complex.

http://stopspp.com/stopspp/?p=152

Heather Reisman is an SPP meetings attendee. She is, as most of you all know, a globalist.
Just look at how she smirks in this you-tube video when confronted by activists: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-f_iKKIBUQ

Story: http://toronto.tao.ca/node/9204

A Citizens day of Action



	Email campaign to our Members of parliament on the SPP / NAU

T


Start Time:	Friday, July 25, 2008 at 11:00am
End Time:	Saturday, August 11, 2007 at 11:00pm
Location:	At Home on your own PC
City/Town:	Your Town

Description

A Day devoted to holding our elected officials accountable.

Please find the time from now to August 11th of 2007, to complete a mass mail effort on behalf of the citizens of Canada, Mexico, and The U.S. Please DO NOT copy and paste this generic letter into the email adresses of each of the 304 M.P. 's of canada but rewrite it in your own words and send. This letter is a guide only, and each letter needs to be different for maximum effect. This effort should take approximately 1 hour in total if you use the mass mail list that i have compiled for you all and emailed to you.

From: Citizens For Real Change
To: Elected Official of Canada
Re: SPP Summit, Montebello, Québec, at the Fairmont Le Château Montebello resort.

To Our Democraticly Elected Official

We, the Citizens for Change group are very concerned about the lack of transparency, lack of Parliamentary debate, and lack of Media coverage associated with this meeting between the elected representatives of our member countries concerning this summit and the secrecy surrounding it.

Can you please explain what your position is concerning this summit, what you know about the agreements that are being made, and whether your position reflects those of the constituants whom elected you.

I look forward to your preompt reply on this very important matter.

Citizens For Real Change
(Your return Email)

All 304 Members of Parliament with email adresses listed on this link.
http://webinfo.parl.gc.ca/MembersOfParliament/MainMPsCompleteList.aspx?TimePeriod=Current&Language=E

Compiled email list ready to go.
Copy and Paste into your Recipients Email Tab.

Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca, Ablonczy.D@parl.gc.ca, Albrecht.H@parl.gc.ca, Alghabra.O@parl.gc.ca,
Allen.M@parl.gc.ca, Allison.D@parl.gc.ca, Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca, Anders.R@parl.gc.ca,
Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca, Andre.G@parl.gc.ca, Angus.C@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,
Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca, Atamanenko.A@parl.gc.ca, Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca, Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca,
Bains.N@parl.gc.ca, Baird.J@parl.gc.ca, Barbot.V@parl.gc.ca, Barnes.S@parl.gc.ca,
Batters.D@parl.gc.ca, Beaumier.C@parl.gc.ca, Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca, Bell.C@parl.gc.ca,
Bell.D@parl.gc.ca, Bellavance.A@parl.gc.ca, Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca, Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca,
Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca, Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca, Bevington.D@parl.gc.ca, Bezan.J@parl.gc.ca,
Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca, Black.D@parl.gc.ca, Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca, Blaikie.B@parl.gc.ca,
Blais.R@parl.gc.ca, Blaney.S@parl.gc.ca, Bonin.R@parl.gc.ca, Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca,
Boshcoff.K@parl.gc.ca, Bouchard.R@parl.gc.ca, Boucher.S@parl.gc.ca, Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca,
Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca, Brown.B@parl.gc.ca, Brown.G@parl.gc.ca,
BrownPa@parl.gc.ca, Bruinooge.R@parl.gc.ca, Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca, Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca,
Calkins.B@parl.gc.ca, Cannan.R@parl.gc.ca, Cannis.J@parl.gc.ca, Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca,
Cardin.S@parl.gc.ca, Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca, Carrier.R@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
Casson.R@parl.gc.ca, Chamberlain.B@parl.gc.ca, Chan.R@parl.gc.ca, Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca,
Chong.M@parl.gc.ca, Chow.O@parl.gc.ca, Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca, Clement.T@parl.gc.ca,
Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca, comartin.j@parl.gc.ca, Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca, cotler.i@parl.gc.ca,
Crete.P@parl.gc.ca, CrowdJ@parl.gc.ca, Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca, Cullen.R@parl.gc.ca,
Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca, Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca, Damours.J@parl.gc.ca, Davidson.P@parl.gc.ca,
Davies.L@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca, DeBellefeuille.C@parl.gc.ca, DelMastro.D@parl.gc.ca,
Demers.N@parl.gc.ca, Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca, Devolin.B@parl.gc.ca, Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca,
Dhaliwal.S@parl.gc.ca, Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,
Doyle.N@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca,
Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca, Epp.K@parl.gc.ca, Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca,
Faille.M@parl.gc.ca, Fast.E@parl.gc.ca, Finley.D@parl.gc.ca, Fitzpatrick.B@parl.gc.ca,
Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca, Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca, Folco.R@parl.gc.ca, Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca,
Fry.H@parl.gc.ca, Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca, Galipeau.R@parl.gc.ca, Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca,
Gaudet.Ro@parl.gc.ca, Gauthier.M@parl.gc.ca, Godfrey.J@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca,
Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca, Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca, Goodyear.G@parl.gc.ca, Gourde.J@parl.gc.ca,
Gravel.R@parl.gc.ca, Grewal.N@parl.gc.ca, Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca, Guay.M@parl.gc.ca,
Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca, Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca, Hanger.A@parl.gc.ca, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
Harris.R@parl.gc.ca, Harvey.L@parl.gc.ca, Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca, Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca,
Hiebert.R@parl.gc.ca, Hill.J@parl.gc.ca, Hinton.B@parl.gc.ca, Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,
Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, Jaffer.R@parl.gc.ca, Jean.B@parl.gc.ca,
Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca, Julian.P@parl.gc.ca, Kadis.S@parl.gc.ca, Kamp.R@parl.gc.ca,
Karetak-Lindell.N@parl.gc.ca, Jim @ karygiannismp.com, Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca, Keeper.T@parl.gc.ca,
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca, Khan.W@parl.gc.ca, Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca, Kotto.M@parl.gc.ca,
Kramp.D@parl.gc.ca, Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca, Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca, Lake.M@parl.gc.ca,
Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca, Lauzon.G@parl.gc.ca, Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca, Lee.D@parl.gc.ca, Lemay.M@parl.gc.ca, Lemieux.P@parl.gc.ca,
Lessard.Y@parl.gc.ca, Levesque.Y@parl.gc.ca, Lukiwski.T@parl.gc.ca, Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca,
Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca, Lussier.M@parl.gc.ca, MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca, MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca,
MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca, Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca, Malo.L@parl.gc.ca, Maloney.J@parl.gc.ca,
Manning.F@parl.gc.ca, Mark.I@parl.gc.ca, Marleau.D@parl.gc.ca, Marston.W@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.K@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Pat@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca, Martin.T@parl.gc.ca,
Masse.B@parl.gc.ca, Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, Mayes.C@parl.gc.ca,
McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca, McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca,
McKay.J@parl.gc.ca, McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca, Menard.R@parl.gc.ca, Menard.S@parl.gc.ca,
Menzies.T@parl.gc.ca, Merasty.G@parl.gc.ca, Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca, Miller.L@parl.gc.ca,
Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, Mills.B@parl.gc.ca, Minna.M@parl.gc.ca, Moore.J@parl.gc.ca,
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, Mourani.Ma@parl.gc.ca, Murphy.B@parl.gc.ca, Murphy.S@parl.gc.ca,
Nadeau.R@parl.gc.ca, Nash.P@parl.gc.ca, Neville.A@parl.gc.ca, Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca,
Norlock.R@parl.gc.ca, Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca, OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
Ouellet.C@parl.gc.ca, Owen.S@parl.gc.ca, Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca, Pallister.B@parl.gc.ca,
Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca, Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca, Patry.B@parl.gc.ca, Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca,
Perron.G-A@parl.gc.ca, Petit.D@parl.gc.ca, Picard.P@parl.gc.ca, Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca,
PoiliP@parl.gc.ca, Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca, Preston.J@parl.gc.ca, Priddy.P@parl.gc.ca,
Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca, Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca, Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca, Redman.K@parl.gc.ca,
Regan.G@parl.gc.ca, Reid.S@parl.gc.ca, Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca, Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca,
Robillard.L@parl.gc.ca, Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca, Rota.A@parl.gc.ca, Roy.J@parl.gc.ca,
Russell.T@parl.gc.ca, Savage.M@parl.gc.ca, Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca, Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca,
Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca, Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca, Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca,
Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca, Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca, Silva.M@parl.gc.ca, Simard.R@parl.gc.ca,
Simms.S@parl.gc.ca, Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca, Smith.J@parl.gc.ca, Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca,
Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca, St.Amand.L@parl.gc.ca, St.Denis.B@parl.gc.ca, Stanton.B@parl.gc.ca,
St-Cyr.T@parl.gc.ca, Steckle.P@parl.gc.ca, St-Hilaire.C@parl.gc.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
Storseth.B@parl.gc.ca, Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Sweet.D@parl.gc.ca,
Szabo.P@parl.gc.ca, Telegdi.A@parl.gc.ca, Temelkovski.L@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca,
Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca, Thompson.M@parl.gc.ca, Tilson.D@parl.gc.ca,
Toews.V@parl.gc.ca, Tonks.A@parl.gc.ca, Trost.B@parl.gc.ca, Turner.G@parl.gc.ca,
Tweed.M@parl.gc.ca, Valley.R@parl.gc.ca, VanKesteren.D@parl.gc.ca, VanLoan.P@parl.gc.ca,
Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca, Verner.J@parl.gc.ca, Vincent.R@parl.gc.ca, Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wallace.M@parl.gc.ca, Wappel.T@parl.gc.ca, Warawa.M@parl.gc.ca, Warkentin.C@parl.gc.ca,
Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca, Watson.J@parl.gc.ca, Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca, Williams.J@parl.gc.ca,
Wilson.B@parl.gc.ca, Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca, Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca, Zed.P@parl.gc.ca

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

~ What must be done next ~

Website: http://www.MoveToAmend.org Mission: We, the People of the United States of America, reject the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United, and move to amend our Constitution to: * Firmly establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are persons entitled to constitutional rights. * Guarantee the right to vote and to participate, and to have our votes and participation count. * Protect local communities, their economies, and democracies against illegitimate "preemption" actions by global, national, and state governments. Company Overview: On January 21, 2010, with its ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons, entitled by the U.S. Constitution to buy elections and run our government. Human beings are people; corporations are legal fictions. The Supreme Court is misguided in principle, and wrong on the law. In a democracy, The People rule.

Proposed change to the US Constitution

We the People

I. Powers and Rights Reserved To We the People, Never Delegated or Violated Without Consent

A. The People are expressly defined as human beings and does not refer to corporations or contractual relationships.

B. No contract, agreement, or promise may ever bind any human to refuse to enforce the law, or prohibit them from speaking on matters of public interest.

C. We the People may believe anything, including the possible belief that this Constitution must be discarded and replaced with a superior document which defends the People and protects their power to enforce this Constitution against the Government.

D. The People are educated to apply the lessons of history to ensure rights are preserved, power asserted, and this Constitution is protected from domestic and foreign enemies.

E. The People have the enforceable right and power to review any public document and access any public official.

F. The People have the enforceable right to engage in any speech, communication, or discussion on issues of war crimes, government incompetence, or allegations of reckless government planning and maladministration.

G. Government officials, agencies, departments may not invoke any power or right they have denied to the People.

H. The People have the right to affordable housing. Where none is available, the government is denied the power to prosecute anyone for not living in a home, or residing in a public park, open forest, or public lands.

I. The People have the enforceable right to freely travel, without questions, and without delay. Any law enforcement officer, agents, or contacted security official who uses any ruse, scheme, or deception to engage in pretextual stops shall be enforced as a violation of this Constitution.

J. The People have the enforceable right to compel govenment officials, contractors, and securty personnel to identify themselves, disclose their policies and procedures, and respond to complaints about violations of this Constitution, the Supreme Law, or laws of war.

K. The People may not be subject to any electronic surveillance except on probable cause and a warrant before a judicial tribunal. The President, Congress and others are expressly denied the power to enact, create, use, or rely on quasi-judicial tribunals to self-certify warrants to conduct surveillance.

L. All denied powers to the US Government in this Constitution are reserved to the People to be used to defend the Constitution.

II. Powers and Rights Reserved to States

A. States shall have authority to enforce any law within their jurisdiction. Failure to enforce the laws of war shall be prosecuted as a war crime.

B. States shall, when the Federal Government refuses to enforce the Constitution or Supreme Law, enforce the national and international law against contractors, legal counsel, state or US government officials.

C. Any state may start impeachment investigations or proceedings against the President, Member of Congress, or US government official on issues of international laws of war, domestic rebellion, or violations of the Supreme Law oath of office, or Geneva Conventions. The States shall, upon receipt of an impeachment investigation or conviction from any other state, shall within 10 days debate that resolution. If convicted by 2/3 of the States, that US government official shall be removed from office. Any effort to thwart State efforts to enforce the US Constitution through impeachment investigations or impeachment proceedings at the State level may be construed as a subsequent violation of this Constitution and laws of war.

D. The States may, without notice, organize themselves to collectively defend this Constitution from the domestic enemies in the United States government. The States Governors have the standing power, right, and authority to use deadly combat force to enforce this Constitution against US government officials.

E. A failure of any State official to enforce the laws of war shall be subject to a war crimes trial within 90 days of discovering that evidence. Where there are credible allegations of war crimes, a failure to investigate shall be construed as a subsequent war crime, punishable by the death penalty.

F. States have the power to enforce contract obligations between contractors and the US government which affect the rights of their State citizens. Failure to enforce these contractual obligations against the contractors or US government could be construed as a subsequent violation under the laws of war and US Constitution against legal counsel, state officials, or court officers.

III. Independent Branch

A. All US government, contractor-provided, and legal counsel data shall be retained in an independent branch.

B. The President, Congress, and Judicial branches have no power, right or claim to not fully fund this Independent Branch.

C. The Independent Branch conducts electronic surveillance of the US government, stores that data, and ensures there are independent, safe, retained records of all US government transaction, including conversations and memos between legal counsel and government officials. Once created for the government or connected with any legal or illegal activity, these records are public records.

D. The data may be seen only upon a showing of reasonable belief or suspicion by the United States Congress, Court, or Executive Branch that the information may be useful in enforcing the Constitution, Supreme Law, or Geneva Conventions.

E. Private citizens may view any data, unless the US government provides sufficient, detailed evidence why that request for information should not be met for bonafide, lawful secrets. Any effort to hide evidence behind a claim of "state secrets," where that claim is linked with an effort to bypass the Constitution, oath of office, Supreme Law, or laws of war may be punishable by the death penalty.

F. All government data belongs to the People. Any legal counsel working for the US government shall ensure that the People's right to reliable information is protected. A failure to protect this information could be construed as a war crime.

IV. Prosecutorial Branch

A. All prosecutorial options are denied of the President.

B. The Prosecutorial branch has the power to raise independent combat power, support them, and may lawfully use that deadly combat force to confront Members of Congress, the Judicial Branch Officers, or the Presidents upon showing of probable cause for war crimes.

C. The prosecutorial power is the exclusive power of the prosecution branch. However, anyone may make a claim of illegal activity, and enforce the laws of the United States and States respectively. Any effort to block anyone from unilaterally attempting to enforce the laws of war through discovery, investigation, and open discussion of those alleged war crimes shall be construed as a possible subsequent offense under the laws of war.

D. Legal counsel are subject to public review, audit, and can be required, with fair notice, of a requirement to demonstrate before any court their compliance with the laws of war.

E. Legal counsel may be denied authority to conduct discovery during any investigation when that discovery is linked with efforts that would thwart war crimes investigation, enforcement of the Supreme law or Geneva Conventions.

V. Judicial Branch

A. The Judicial Branch is above the Legislative Branch and Executive Branch only in order of precedence. The Judicial Branch is a co-equal branch, and closest to the People and Constitution. It is least responsive, and most slow to the People's daily interests to enforce the Constitution and Supreme Law or Geneva Conventions.

B. Where the Judicial Branch does not timely enforce the Constitution, Supreme Law, or laws of war, the States and People retain the power and right to investigate and prosecute allegations of US government illegal activity, war crimes, or violations of the Supreme law.

C. All precedents under the laws of war are binding on the Judicial Branch, US government, and the People through enforcement actions.

D. Any decision by any judicial officer not to fully enforce the laws of war, Supreme Law, or this Constitution may be construed as a war crime, subject to the death penalty.

VI. Legislative Branch

A. The Legislative Branch is listed after the Judicial Branch because it is less responsive to the People.

B. The Members of Congress may be stopped between sessions and held to account for their failure to enforce the laws of war.

C. Refusing to investigate or impeach the President, Judicial Officers, or any current or former US government official for alleged war crimes, maladministration, illegal warfare, or other crimes against the People, States, or US Government shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to not fully assert ones oath of office, and punishable by the death penalty under the laws of war.

D. There are three chambers to the Congress. The Senate and House have a legal duty to fully enforce the laws. Any decision to not timely review evidence of impeachable offenses, or not investigate war crimes or maladministration could be construed as subsequent offenses under the laws of war.

E. The Superior Chamber shall decide, before any debate, whether the proposed bill is or is not Constitutional. This determination is subject to approval, challenge, and rejection by the People, States, and Judicial Branch.

F. The Congress is denied the exclusive power to make rules. Any rule which prohibits any investigation into alleged malfeasance in re the laws of war, Supreme Law, or oath of office is illegal, and may be construed as a subsequent offense under the laws of war.

G. The Congress shall comply with public audits, and timely provide within 45 days of an audit report a statement of remedy, and outline a plan within 90 days to fully comply with all legal obligations under the Statute, Supreme Law, oath of office, and laws of war.

H. The Congress may raise and support an army, and independently order that army only against the President when the President refuses to enforce the laws of war, or comply with his legal obligations under this Constitution.

VII. Executive Branch

A. The Executive Branch is led by three Presidents, co-equal with non-overlapping jurisdictions. The Executive Branch has one power: Executive Power. All actions taken under that one power are lesser authorities not powers. The Executive Branch has no power to create new powers or assign itself broader power.

B. The Executive Branch is listed last because it is the least responsive to the People, and the greatest threat of tyranny to this Constitution. The President is a clerk, not a King or Emperor. The President only manages programs. The President has no power to ignore, rewrite, or refuse to enforce the law. Each of the three Presidents shall have an ongoing requirement to demonstrate to the People and States and Congress and Courts compliance with the Constitution, Supreme Law, oath of office, and laws of war.

C. The Domestic Affairs President is responsive to the States and US Government on internal affairs.

D. The Foreign Affairs President shall have exclusive power to interact with foreign powers. The Foreign Affairs President is denied any power to violate the laws of war, or use covert activity against American citizens.

E. The Executive Branch, Congress, Judiciary, and Foreign Affairs President are denied the power to thwart any lawful State action to organize with foreign powers and agents to defend the US Constitution, enforce the laws of war, or protect the rights and powers of the People and States against domestic encroachments by the US government, legal counsel, or other US government officials.

F. The Commander in Chief shall only have power to lead combat operations during war time. Congress shall conduct ongoing, public reviews whether the Commander in Chief is or is not competent in managing combat operations. The Presidents and Commander in Chief are denied the power to prohibit Congress from using electronic surveillance or use separately raised and supported armies to conduct this oversight during wartime and peacetime.

G. The Executive Branch is denied the power to block anyone from getting access to illegal activity related to the laws of war.

H. During Peacetime, the Commander in Chief shall periodically cooperate with ongoing Oversight of US combat forces to ensure they are combat ready, fully trained on the laws of war, and prepared to lawfully be used to defend the Constitution against foreign and domestic enemies.

I. The Executive Branch and Presidents and officers, agents, contractors, and personnel are denied the power, right, or authority to order anyone to ignore any statute, law, legal requirement, or obligation under the Constitution.

J. The Executive Branch has no power or authority to directly contact the Legislative Branch by name. The President may only request, not order other branches of government. All Communications between the Executive and Legislative Branch shall pass through the Prosecutorial Branch, and retained in the National Archives. Those records are available for public inspection at any time. The People have the enforceable right to compel the Executive Branch, Legislature, and Judicial Branch to produce documents.

K. The Executive Branch, Congress, Judicial Branch, and Prosecutorial Branch, and States are denied the power to wage warfare, information warfare, or harass American civilians through his agents, combat troops, or third parties in the United states or from overseas. Any funds used for this illegal purpose belong to the People and States. Contracts used to enforce, compel, or organize this illegal activity are not enforceable, and contrary to public policy.

L. The Presidents are denied a presumption of competence until proven. The President shall always have the burden of proof, and is expressly denied a presumption of good faith until demonstrated with overwhelming evidence in public. An election result is not proof of competence nor does it satisfy a presumption of good faith, only of mastery to win an election through legal or illegal methods and deception.

M. The Executive Branch and Presidents and subordinate agency head, contractor, and employees are expressly denied any assurance any conversation he has related to illegal activity, war crimes, unlawful acts, or other threats to the US Constitution shall remain secret behind any shield, scheme, agreement, or technology. Any order a President or anyone gives to anyone to hide, destroy,not provide, or conceal evidence of illegal activity may be construed as a subsequent war crime, punishable by the death penalty. This restriction against following illegal orders may not be bypassed by claiming the order was from a non-person, electronic device, or other non-Constitutionally recognized entity, database, policy, guide, or other document.

N. The Presidents are denied the power to use any combat force, technology, or other military weapon or plan against American civilians, except in cases of internal rebellion which only the Congress shall approve in writing. When the Congress fails to act, or abuses its authority, the State Governors may lawfully use deadly combat force to detain and enforce the laws of war prohibiting illegal use of force against American civilians.

O. The Presidents are denied the power to induce any civilian to take any action that might deny them on any Geneva protections as a civilian. Any order, ruse, scheme, propaganda, or unreliable information to induce anyone to wage war, information warfare, or any action to harass civilians is punishable by the death penalty, and may be enforced as a violation of the laws of war.

P. The President, when delegating any power to any agency head, agrees that that agency shall be organized as if it were a separate, lesser, and not coequal branch. Those agencies shall fully cooperate with the other branches of government to ensure power within the branch or department is divided. There is no single agency, division, or office in the Executive Branch that is beyond ongoing oversight by the other four branches.

Q. The President shall have no power to block the Congress, States, Judiciary, Prosecutorial, and Independent Branch from a having co-equal status to oversee, manage, and organize that lesser branch. If the President refuses to substantially comply with that requirement, Congress may not lawfully provide funding for that agency, and the funds return to the States and People.

LadyBroadoak Visionary Planetary Healing Tutorial

July 31, 2007

Judicial Watch expresses an interest in the Montebello summit ...

Judicial Watch Seeks Access to North

American Competitiveness Council

Meetings Under Federal Open

Meetings Law

Commerce
Secretary Gutierrez Urged to Comply
 With Federal Open Meetings Law
During August
 20 and 21 Security & Prosperity Partnership
 Meetings
in Montebello, Quebec

Linda McQuaig

Paloma Villegas

Rogelio Fuentes

Hassan Yussuff

Toronto Coalition to Stop the War

Canada's MacKay: SPP a "Great Organization," Denies Free Speech Ban: VIDEO

U.S. Congress blocks key transport initiative

Warns trilateral plan would open borders to 'alien invaders'

Kelly Patterson, The Ottawa Citizen

Description

ShareThis

~ What must be done next ~

~ Please sign and pass on ~

Search This Blog

Facebook Badge

Followers

BlogCatalog

Current information clusters

War crimes/Impeachment/arrest swicki then "Peak oil, peak dollar KlusterfucK swicki

Lady Broadoak

Translate Blog

Blog Archive

LINKS, real good stuff!

Proposed change to the US Constitution

sitemeter

About Me

Labels

LadyBroadoak Visionary Planetary Healing Tutorial

July 31, 2007

Judicial Watch expresses an interest in the Montebello summit ...

Judicial Watch Seeks Access to North

&nbsp;American Competitiveness Council

&nbsp;Meetings Under Federal Open

&nbsp;Meetings Law

CommerceSecretary Gutierrez Urged to Comply&nbsp;With Federal Open Meetings LawDuring August&nbsp;20 and 21 Security & Prosperity Partnership&nbsp;Meetingsin Montebello, Quebec

Linda McQuaig

Paloma Villegas

Rogelio Fuentes

Hassan Yussuff

Toronto Coalition to Stop the War

Canada's MacKay: SPP a "Great Organization," Denies Free Speech Ban: VIDEO

U.S. Congress blocks key transport initiative

Warns trilateral plan would open borders to 'alien invaders'

Kelly Patterson, The Ottawa Citizen

Description

ShareThis

~ What must be done next ~

~ Please sign and pass on ~

Search This Blog

Facebook Badge

Followers

BlogCatalog

Current information clusters

War crimes/Impeachment/arrest swicki then "Peak oil, peak dollar KlusterfucK swicki

Lady Broadoak

Translate Blog

Blog Archive

LINKS, real good stuff!

Proposed change to the US Constitution

sitemeter

About Me

Labels

American Competitiveness Council

Meetings Under Federal Open

Meetings Law

Commerce
Secretary Gutierrez Urged to Comply
With Federal Open Meetings Law
During August
20 and 21 Security & Prosperity Partnership
Meetings
in Montebello, Quebec