November 28, 2007

STATE PROCLAMATION for removal of Pelosi

Forward this to your friends, and to your State Legislators for debate; and here are important back-up links to support the following [Precedents from the House in re Speaker Removal, State Proclamations]:
http://www.haloscan.com/ comments...a=36529#2692020
- - - - - - - -
State Proclamation Calling For Removal of Nancy Pelosi As Speaker of the United States House of Representatives

Whereas House Rules Prohibit conduct by any member which may bring discredit upon the House; or engage in any conduct which would allegedly violate the law;

Whereas House Rule 603 permits any State Legislature to pass a resolution calling for a change in leadership, including Constitutional officers; and that this resolution is privileged;

Whereas House Rules Recognize that a Speaker may be removed after the House Members vote on a privileged resolution removing the Member of Congress from their role as Speaker;

Whereas Nancy Pelosi took an oath to the United States Constitution, 5 USC 3331, where she promised to have no mental reservation in defending the Constitution against domestic enemies;

Whereas Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others have allegedly conspired to block review, investigation, and discussion by the United States House of Representatives, their Members, and Committees of impeachable offenses of President and Vice President of the united States;

Whereas Speaker Pelosi and others have allegedly brough discredit upon the House by refusing to fully assert her oath of office, has demonstrated mental reservations about her 5 USC 3331 oath of office requirements;

Whereas there is ample evidence supporting allegations against the President and Vice President which the Speaker and others have said they are not interested in reviewing because of lesser, non-constitutional goals, allegedly in breach of her oath of office, and in contravention with the House Rules requiring conduct to fully support the Constitution as the Supreme Law;

We the Legislature/Assembly of the State of ________ do pass this resolution calling for the United States House of Representatives to remove Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the United States House; and the House of Representatives Vote to Start Immediately an investigation into the impeachable offenses of the President and Vice President of the United States.

Brilliant. Now you have the big clue. Complicity with war crimes is a serious issue.

It's the big thing Pelosi doesn't want to admit she has a problem

>>>>>-<<<<<>>>>>-<<<<<

Brilliant. Now you have the big clue. Complicity with war crimes is a serious issue.

Darls, I've had a clue for a long time. I'd loan you mine, but you haven't shown you can care and feed for it.

And while you're at it, consider your own complicity, as well as the notion of "degree." Then think about stabbing your eyes with a knitting needle since you clearly don't need them to read.


GravatarHere's the issue the Americna legal community will have to face, unless Pelosi wakes up:

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/.../ Alstoetter.htm

- Alleged frivolous excuses by Ameican legal counsein DoJ, Congress, and other areas for alleged breach of oath in re Geneva.

These are war crimes issues, counselor. Get. A. Clue.

if we don't confront Pelosi and get this investigation going; then other nationsn can lawfully use combat to compel.

IS. THIS. SINKING. INTO. YOUR. MIND?


GravatarYou. Keep. Asserting. This. But. Don't. Provide. A. Citation. In. Geneva.
NTodd, Powersupplyless | Homepage | 11.27.07 - 7:51 pm | # [kill]​


Nice. Try.

But.

You.

Are.

NOT.

BEING.

EMPHATIC.

ENOUGH.


GravatarNTodd, Powersupplyless | Homepage | 11.27.07 - 7:53 pm |

The Grand jury can decide who's been doing their job; or not.


Gravatarmer - yes, dear. Damn you. I'm just of a mood, but I'll stop feeding it.


Gravatari think two practical steps Congress can take is
1. impeach chimp
2. prosecute war profiteers
3. withdraw from Iraq. 100%


Gravatar
These are war crimes issues, counselor. Get. A. Clue.

if we don't confront Pelosi and get this investigation going; then other nationsn can lawfully use combat to compel.


I'm late to the show but I assume you can explain briefly why we're going after Pelosi before Bush and Cheney?


>>>>>-<<<<<

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Here is a response which NTodd requested in the thread: Citation: US Army Manual, Consistent With Geneva:

497. Reprisals
a. Definition. Reprisals are acts of retaliation in the form of conduct which would otherwise be unlawful

- If the US Congress refuses to enforce laws of war against troops, leadership, or policy makers in the Executive Branch, other nations may do the same.

- - - -

Precedent: Tokyo War Crimes trial found civilian policy makers liable for acts which policy makers had a duty to investigate, oversee, and had an ability to influence.

This would permit retalation for illegal acts, which Congress (as policy makers, providing funding) refuse to regulate, oversee, or limit in re illegal war crimes; or by refusing to impeach.

ladybroadoak said...

The entire WORLD is waiting for CONgress to STOP the killing.

Perhaps there IS a news blackout that doesn't quite get across the extent of the human damage being caused by these wars.

The US has NO ALLIES at all in the Middle East, save Israel and Pakistan (we can debate whether the populations there are pro these wars, but ..) and it is tottering on disaster unless it ups its commitment to kill via airstrikes and nukes! Things are certainly BAD and I don't think there is a thinking person who doesn't know this.

The window dressing of Anapolis has NOT raised the Bushistas respectibility. And there can be no reason to have a "go" at those sitting in political jobs.

I am of the opinion, we should be really getting in contact with EUROPEANS who have some idea HOW to proceed with this, pronto.

This would put MORE Pressure on States' legislators.

The more we get our "ducks in a row", the better things will be AFTER a pullout in the Middle East, and I have NO DOUBT there will be one. I do not believe in the hundred year war scenario NOR do I believe it has to come to a nuclear confligration and WWIII.

It's up to US.

ShareThis