Showing posts sorted by relevance for query trauma. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query trauma. Sort by date Show all posts

October 21, 2010

Stating the obvious about ABUSE and its repercussions

ACG: GI Docs Should Ask About Abuse


By Kristina Fiore, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: October 20, 2010

SAN ANTONIO -- Gastroenterologists may want to be attuned to signs of possible abuse or trauma among their patients, a researcher suggested here.

Subtle signs -- a rectal exam that provokes tearfulness in a patient, for instance -- may indicate psychological issues that could complicate treatment for GI problems, said Douglas Drossman, MD, of the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

Drossman has been studying the link between abuse and GI disease for the last 20 years and summarized his work at the annual meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Delivering the American Journal of Gastroenterology lecture at the meeting, Drossman also offered advice on how fellow clinicians can address the issue of prior abuse and trauma to get patients the help they need to improve outcomes.

"Being a gastroenterologist, it's not our responsibility to ask about abuse history in someone coming in with GERD, a GI bleed, or liver disease," he commented. "We're asking about it when we think that information would make a meaningful difference in outcome by identifying and treating it."

Researchers have long known of an association between stress and gastrointestinal symptoms, but have only recently begun to understand the mechanisms at work between stressful life events like abuse or trauma and more serious GI problems.

Drossman said the first line of evidence linking the two came from epidemiologic studies that found a higher-than-expected association of abuse history in patients with GI symptoms.

Other epidemiological data have found an association between a history of abuse and poor health status in general, and that patients with prior trauma had more pain and a higher number of doctor visits.

Over the past 10 years, researchers have been able to get a more profound understanding of this association with the help of brain imaging, Drossman said.

He and his colleagues have been able to show that irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients who had a history of abuse had greater activation of the cingulate cortex, an area associated with pain processing. These IBS patients indeed reported greater pain, Drossman said.

Other data from an Institute of Medicine report on Gulf War veterans also found an association between war trauma and the development of IBS, he added. "IBS may be facilitated by psychological stress," he commented.

The question, Drossman said, is how to translate knowledge of this link into clinical practice -- acknowledging that asking patients about past abuse and trauma is not easy.

However, he has identified factors that may reveal abuse, making it easier for clinicians to broach the subject.

One clue, he said, may be a GI patient who presents with trust issues or feelings of vulnerability, shame, or loss of control during a visit.

"Those kinds of feelings, the more you see of them, the more you think about it," he said, referring to a potential history or abuse.

Other hints of past abuse or trauma may manifest themselves in physical problems, including chronic abdominal pain, morbid obesity, or eating disorders.

Patients troubled by past traumas may also have a record of multiple procedures and hospitalizations for their symptoms, he added.

But one of the biggest clues to past abuse may come from patient reactions to procedures like rectal exams or colonoscopy.

"If we see an unusual response like tearfulness or agitation, we really should think about the link," he said.

He cautioned that the greatest problem is figuring out how to break the ice and ask the tough questions.

"It's easy to do that if you're doing a colonoscopy and the patient has an emotional and dramatic response," he said. "Then it's easy to say, 'I see you don't feel comfortable, has something like this happened before?'"

Physicians can emphasize that evidence has shown that these issues can affect the way they manage their conditions.

"It's about being gentle, and giving them the opportunity to tell you what they want to tell you," he said. "If they don't want to talk, you can register that information and say, 'If you want to talk about it, I'll be available.'"

Physicians should have a psychiatrist colleague for patient referrals.

Walter Coyle, MD, of the Scripps Clinic in La Jolla, Calif., said many gastroenterologists aren't doing a good job of asking about past abuse and trauma.

"If you do, you have to deal with the consequences of opening that door," he said. "It's not easy to ask, but I think you've got to, because there is so much abuse out there."

July 05, 2007

War trauma set to increase in the UK

These wars are illegal and immoral. Afghan to grow more heroin for WESTERN drug dealers - Iraq to suck out more ill-gotten oil.

There is no justified reason for murdering 1 million Iraqis. Veterans suffer for completely unreasonable "reasons."

And there is no  solution beside dealing with the cause of the problem - psychopaths in power. Hopefully this development will FINALLY make clear that none of us can live in an era of perpetual war, wars that are only happening to divvy up the last of the world's material resources.  PEOPLE are the most invaluable resource and they having their souls DESTROYED.


Health & Wellness

Disturbing! War trauma set to increase in the UK

The University of Nottingham
2007-07-03 14:42:00

The number of UK veterans suffering the debilitating effects of war trauma is set to increase, according to a University of Nottingham academic.

Research by Dr Nigel Hunt, Associate Professor in the Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, shows that, with no end in sight for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, more and more veterans will return home suffering the effects of war trauma. The condition covers a variety of problems relating to stress and emotion, and memory, social, work and family difficulties.

Comment: Of course. Because normal people can't be forced to kill or witness atrocities without facing their conscience. You know... this thing that their leaders lack.


But by looking at the varying ways that different countries cope with their afflicted veterans, Dr Hunt hopes to identify the most effective ways of treating the condition. He has already visited Finland to examine the country's well-established infrastructure for supporting veterans. And after speaking at Tehran's First Annual Congress of Social Security and Justice in May, Dr Hunt hopes to further explore support networks in Iran.

War trauma is a psychological condition caused by experiencing a traumatic event during conflict. The memory of the event triggers strong emotions, causing any number of reactions - from depression and self-harm to anger, violence and drug addiction. Often, the symptoms will be so extreme that the veteran will be unable to live a normal life. Work prospects, family life and other relationships may be affected, exacerbating the symptoms and leading to an ever-increasing sense of isolation and worthlessness.


Technorati Tags: , , ,

October 19, 2007

Most PTSD Treatments Not Proven Effective
Scientists Find That One Therapy Is Shown to Help Disorder; Evidence of Drugs' Benefits Inconclusive

By Shankar Vedantam
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 19, 2007; A03

The majority of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder that are used to treat hundreds of thousands of veterans lack rigorous scientific evidence that they are effective, according to a report issued yesterday by a panel of the federal government's top scientists.

The report by the National Academies emphasized that the therapies might not be useless. Rather, it said, the evidence is weak when it comes to drawing any kind of conclusion about most of them. The findings of the panel, widely considered the nation's most influential scientific arbiter, will have far-reaching consequences. The report comes when awareness of PTSD has risen as a result of its incidence among veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"If a treatment that is not shown to be efficacious is nevertheless delivered to veterans, and if the treatment is relatively inert, even if it does not harm the veterans, it may demoralize the veteran," said Richard McNally, a Harvard University psychologist and PTSD expert. "Providing treatments that do not have a good basis in evidence can result in people not improving, therefore getting demoralized and therefore not seeking treatment that can actually help them."

The report did find strong evidence that one particular treatment known as exposure therapy was effective; the technique asks patients to repeatedly reimagine traumatic events as a way to make the events lose their potency. In a statement, the Department of Veterans Affairs said it was ramping up its ability to provide this therapy to patients.

But the panel failed to find evidence that any medication was effective in treating PTSD -- this included the drugs Paxil and Zoloft, which have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat the disorder.

"A very high percentage of people who have been diagnosed with PTSD are on medications," said Larry Scott, the founder of the advocacy group VA Watchdog dot Org, which serves as an information clearinghouse for veterans.

Most of the evidence supporting the use of medications and psychological therapies for PTSD has been assembled by pharmaceutical companies that make the drugs or by researchers with conflicts of interest in the outcome of the studies, and lack independent and rigorous proof, the report said.

The researchers also found there was insufficient evidence to support the use of a range of psychotherapies known as cognitive restructuring, coping skills training, eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, and group therapy. Cognitive restructuring is a technique that trains patients to reinterpret a traumatic event from a different perspective. In the eye-movement therapy, patients are asked to think about traumatic memories while tracking quick movements of a therapist's finger.

A host of complicated political, economic and medical issues swirl around the issue of PTSD in a time of war. Many veterans advocacy groups are convinced that the government is trying to limit the spiraling costs of treating the flashbacks, anxieties and co-occurring psychiatric disorders that mark PTSD.

"I see the IOM report and the VA's acceptance as an indication that the agency will continue to move away from pharmaceutical-based therapies and group therapy for veterans with PTSD and continue to push their agenda of cognitive processing therapy as a 'cure,' as stated by former VA Secretary Jim Nicholson," Scott added. "If VA declares a veteran 'cured' of PTSD, this will mean the reduction or loss of disability compensation."

In the new report, scientists said evidence for many issues besides treatment efficacy was also limited. It is not clear, for example, how early treatment for PTSD should be started or how long such therapy should be offered.

"We found much of the research on PTSD to have major limitations when judged against contemporary standards for conducting trials," said Alfred O. Berg, professor of family medicine at the University of Washington, who chaired the panel that conducted a comprehensive review of the evidence for PTSD treatments.

Part of the problem, Berg said, is that studies for PTSD have been conducted over a long period of time. The modern standards the panel sought to apply simply happened to be much higher.

"Our report certainly must raise questions about treatments and whether they are effective or not, but our assessment of inadequate evidence does not mean the treatments are ineffective," Berg said. "It could mean some of the therapies are more effective than the exposure therapy, where we did find proof of effectiveness" but only that the other therapies lack evidence to show that this is the case.

Berg and another author, David Matchar, a professor of medicine at Duke University Medical Center, said a sustained national effort for high-quality research on PTSD, with a special focus on veterans and minority groups, was needed.

Edna B. Foa, a professor of clinical psychology in the department of psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, and one of the pioneers in developing exposure therapy as a PTSD treatment said the technique was based on the insight that many victims of trauma do all they can to avoid being reminded of traumatic events.

A rape victim might avoid going out in the evenings, while someone injured in an auto accident might avoid getting into any kind of vehicle. Soldiers might avoid movies or TV shows about war.

Two things happen in this process, Foa said. Patients come to replace actual recollections of trauma with other perceptions -- taking on blame and guilt, for example, for being afraid. Second, by avoiding situations, patients can fail to see that much of life is not dangerous -- the movie is only fiction.

Foa said she has patients recount traumatic events aloud with their eyes closed. She records the patient, and then has the patient listen to the tape repeatedly.

"People don't recover because they avoid thinking about the trauma," Foa said. "Every time the trauma comes to the mind, they push it away. They don't allow themselves to process and digest the memory, so it keeps on haunting them with nightmares, flashbacks."

Foa also has patients make lists of situations that trigger anxiety and encourages them to deliberately expose themselves to the least-frightening situation. As people realize that many situations are harmless, Foa said they replace images of self-doubt and helplessness with a more healthy outlook.

July 21, 2006

MIDDLE EAST MADNESS

by Paul Levy

The other night I was watching Dan Gillerman, the Israeli ambassador to the U. N. being interviewed on t. v. by Charlie Rose. Gillerman was incredibly articulate, and very brilliant. He spoke with the utmost authority and confidence. Here was someone who seemed truly empowered, I thought. Flawless in his logic, it seemed like no one had a chance to win the slightest point in any argument with him. And then, something revealing happened. At one point, Rose asked him whether Israel preferred a military or a political victory. The ambassador answered, “We prefer a MILITARY victory over a military victory.’ Rose immediately corrected him, saying he meant that Israel preferred a POLITICAL victory over a military victory. Gillerman responded by saying “yes, a political victory over a military victory,” as if that’s exactly what he had said. He had no idea that he had mis-spoken, and that his Freudian slip may have unwittingly revealed a deeper process that was playing out through his, andby extension, Israel’s unconscious. A Freudian slip is the voice of the unconscious. In his slip of the tongue, Gillerman unknowingly may have revealed what is going on inside the unconscious, whose intentions are the polar opposite of what he imagines or represents them to be (both to himself and to the world) at that moment.
In his Freudian slip, Gillerman may have been unwittingly revealing what he was unconsciously dissociated from and hiding from himself, and hence, unconsciously enacting in the world. When we are not in conscious relationship with a part of ourselves, we are doomed to unconsciously give shape and form to it by acting it out in the world.
Once I began contemplating the ambassador’s Freudian slip, I wondered what it could have been revealing about his (and Israel’s) unconscious. If that was the voice of the unconscious, it is expressing the shadow, the darker part, of what Israel is playing out on the global stage. If it was a genuine Freudian slip, Gillerman is unknowingly revealing that Israel prefers a victory by force over anything negotiated via diplomacy. It is as if this voice that wanted a military victory was thirsting to assert its power and domination over its enemies. It goes without saying that this is the absolute polar opposite of the representatives of peace that Gillerman and Israel like to think of themselves as being. This unconscious dark side that the Israeli ambassador is revealing is none other than the underlying, un-integrated collective shadow of his nation which is being brutally acted out on the world stage. Gillerman’s Freudian slip seems to be revealing an urge on the part of Israel for revenge, an impulse to want to punish their adversaries. Wanting to destroy the “other,” Israel is unconsciously acting out the part of itself that has been abused. Israel’s knee-jerk, vengeful reaction is coming out of a deep hurt, a deep wound. Israel’s unconscious reaction to want to hurt and destroy the other is an _expression of the part of it that has been traumatized by its enemies attempting to destroy it.
And yet, Israel’s desire for revenge is what transforms it from being the victim of terror to itself becoming the terrorist.The ambassador’s Freudian slip may be revealing that Israel, under the guise of being the victim, is actually playing the role of the victimizer disguised as the victim. By acting out of its wound and unconsciously acting out its trauma, Israel is actually doing the very thing it is accusing its enemies of doing. Accusing its enemies of perpetrating violence, Israel is perpetrating violence, thereby pouring fuel on the endless cycle of violence. Does Israel really think that enacting violence is going to make it safer? Doesn’t Israel realize that perpetrating violence is just going to inspire and create more enemies than it will destroy? Of course, I can’t help but notice the similarity between Israel’s (ultimately self-defeating) attitude and that of my own country, the United States.
Israel’s argument that Hezbollah or Hamas “started” the violence, though seemingly accurate on a superficial level of reality, is profoundly untrue. Israel and its enemies “reciprocally co-arise” together, which is to say that we can’t pinpoint in linear time where the violence actually started. Hezbollah or Hamas didn’t react out of a void, but could just as easily point to a previous violence that Israel had perpetrated onto them that they were just reacting to. Israel and its enemies are both unconsciously acting out a deeper process that is beginingless in time (atemporal) and acausal, which is to say that it is a conflict which cannot be traced back to a “first cause,” as no one “started it.” Although there are deep, historical roots to this conflict, no matter who is to blame for what has been done in the past, the fact is the only place we have the power to make a genuine difference is in the present moment. Thus, the present situation is the place wherein effective action can be taken to resolve this crisis. From the point of view of the present moment, no one “started” the conflict.
Either side, at any moment, can step out of the vicious cycle which is nothing other than an infinite regression and simply refuse to continue to feed the endless, self-reinforcing cycle of violence. Either side of the conflict can simply refuse to participate in perpetuating the cycle of reactive and retributive violence and the self-perpetuating cycle will be broken. This is the deeper meaning of Christ’s urging to “turn the other cheek.” This is the underlying meaning of both Gandhi and Rev. Martin Luther King’s teachings on non-violence. Only by not striking back can we become agents of peace.
There is an incredible “edge” or resistance around criticizing Israel, as many people will immediately accuse me of being anti-Semitic. Being of Jewish heritage myself, it breaks my heart to see the abuse that Israel is unconsciously acting out against its neighbors. It is as if the Jewish people have not learned the deeper lesson of the very Holocaust that almost destroyed us, which is that to project the shadow outside of ourselves is to become the very evil that we are trying to destroy in the outside world (Please see my article Shadow Projection: The Fuel of War, available on my website www.awakeninthedream.com ). And yet, for anyone to criticize what the nation of Israel is doing is to not only NOT be anti-Semitic, but is to be a true representative of what the Jewish people ultimately are supposed to stand for, which is peace.
This situation is analogous to when a family member in a position of power abuses their power, the other family members are enabling and complicit in theabuse if they remain silent (such as, in this case, other Jews who blindly support whatever Israel does, as well as the United States, who is giving tacit approval of Israel’s violent actions by its silence). The family member who speaks up and sheds light on the abuse, though at first quite unpopular and unwelcome, is the one who is the truly loving “patriot” of the family system. Of course, Israel’s enemies are doing to Israel exactly the same thing that I am pointing out that Israel is doing to them. Both Israel and its enemies are mutually projecting their own shadow onto and blaming each other, which creates a dark, but very intimate connection between them. Each party couldn’t project the shadow onto the other without its adversary’s secret collaboration in playing out and embodying the very shadow being projected. The violence that is happening between these two polarized agencies couldn’t happen without their unwitting, mutual co-operation. Israel and its enemies don’t exist in isolation from each other, but in co-relation with each other. A deeper process is revealing itself through their interplay. Israel and its adversaries are both mirroring back what the other is doing. They are enacting their trauma onto each other, and are simultaneously playing both roles of terrorized-victim/terrorist-victimizer.
Though the American mainstream media is propagandizing the conflict as being between Israel and the “terrorists” (similar to how they frame the Global War on Terror as being between the United States and the “terrorists”), the question arises “Who is the real terrorist? (The answer goes something like this: the terrorist is just a role in the field that is being played at different moments by all participants in the conflict).
Like a kitten looking in a mirror, Israel and its enemies are reacting to their mirrored reflection, thinking it is separate from themselves. They don’t recognize that they themselves are generating and calling forth the very behavior that they are reacting to. Reacting to their own reflection, they are compulsively acting out a collective form of the repetition compulsion, which is to be feeding into and off of each other’s madness. In my book The Madness of George W. Bush: A Reflection of our Collective Psychosis (available on my website, www.awakeninthedream.com), I name this psychic epidemic “malignant egophrenia,” or ME disease for short.
Falling prey to this psychic epidemic, we truly suffer from a case of mistaken identity, an erroneous sense of ME, of who we imagine we are. The essence of ME disease is a deep dissociative split in which we project out our own darker half outside of ourselves, becoming entranced in thinking that our own evil exists outside of ourselves. We then try to destroy our darker half as we meet it in the outside world, which is to act out and become possessed by the very darkness we are trying to destroy. The figure of George Bush embodies and is therefore a living symbol of this disease. Not being separate from ourselves, Bush is merely an embodied reflection of the mad part of all of us that dissociates from and projects out our own shadow, and then tries to destroy the reflectionof our own darkness as it shows up in the outside world. The “inner name” of ME disease is “Mad Emperor” disease, as it is what happens when an individual such as Bush, or a nation such as Israel, is in a position of power and abuses its power over others simply because it can.
Those who have fallen prey to ME disease identify with an illusory “separate self” (be it on the personal, or national scale) which is fear-ridden, while simultaneously generating fear in others by traumatizing anyone within its dominion. Instead of being in relationship to others and the environment, people (or nations) taken over by ME disease want to dictate, subjugate, dominate, and have power over others. They are tantrum-throwing bullies, who live by the rule of “might makes right.” I immediately associate to the archetypal and mythic figure of the negative father (Cronos/Saturn), who abuses his power over others simply because he can, a morally indefensible act. ME disease is a psycho-spiritual disease of the soul that non-locally pervades and is holographically enfolded throughout the entire field of consciousness. This is to say that ME disease exists, in unmanifest potential, deep within the collective unconscious of all humanity. ME disease in-forms and gives shape to the greater body politic of the world, and it is noteworthy that the Middle East is currently having an acute outbreak of ME disease. ME disease could just as easily stand for “Middle East disease,” as this is where the disease is currently having a localized inflammation and is thereby, in fully condensed and essentialized form, where this deeper, underlying non-local field disease is becoming visible in 3-D space and time for all who have eyes to see. This is to say that ME disease, an illness that exists deep within the entire unified field, is embodying, incarnating and revealing itself in, through and as events in the Middle East. We are simply asked to recognize whatis being revealed to us.
The ME epidemic that is playing out in the Middle East is a reflection of a deeper process going on within the collective unconscious of humanity, and is hence revealing something to us very important about ourselves. In the crisis in the Middle East there is an extremely valuable lesson for all of humanity hidden (veiled), while simultaneously being revealed for all who have eyes to see. Israel and its enemies are engaged in a ritualized dance of mutual shadow projection in which they are both doing the exact thing they are accusing the other of doing. Terrorized by the other, each side terrorizes in return. They are both looking in a mirror (whose inner meaning, etymologically speaking, is “holder of the shadow”), and trying to destroy their own shadow, which is not only a battle that can never be won, but is a form of insanity. Seen as a dreaming process, we have dreamed them up to objectify and show us these mad parts of ourselves. Israel and its adversaries are embodiedreflections of the part of ourselves that unconsciously enacts this same insane behavior, both within ourselves and outside in the world. Just like George Bush and the terrorists, Israel and its adversaries are acting out a form of collective madness in full-bodied form on the world stage. This is to say that a madness that exists deep inside the psyche of all humanity is being symbolically re-presented and played out in the Middle East. Something is being revealed to us about ourselves through this outer display of collective madness in the Middle East. The only genuine and lasting solution which will create true peace is for enough of us to realize what is being revealed by what I am calling ME disease as it unconsciously is being endlessly re-enacted in the Middle East. Acting out the unconscious on the world stage, we are a species possessed by a more powerful energy. Like Israel, we are a species in trauma, enacting our trauma as we traumatize others while simultaneously re-traumatizing ourselves in a diabolical self-reinforcing feedback loop with no exit strategy. We are a species gone mad, and yet, in unconsciously acting out our madness, something very important is being revealed to us. Events in the Middle East are both the literal as well as symbolic crystallization of this process. A deeper, mythic process that is taking place in the soul of humanity is playing itself out, both literally and symbolically, in extreme and exaggerated form in the Middle East. Encoded in these events are the key to its resolution.
Once we realize we are reacting to our own mirrored reflection, our relationship to our reflection, both within ourselves and as it appears in embodied form in the outside world, changes. Instead of trying to kill our reflected shadow, we recognize and embrace it as part of ourselves. Re-collecting our projected and split-off parts, we “re-member” ourselves (coming back to our “right mind”), which becomes instantaneously reflected in the outside world, as we remember who we are to each other. Instead of projecting our shadow outside of ourselves (which is to dis-associate and dis-member from a part of ourselves), we recognize, own and take responsibility for our own darkness. Integrating our shadow into the full-spectrum of our being literally “fleshes us out,” as we become more spiritually substantial, embracing the light and dark parts of ourselves, which is what genuine incarnation is all about.
Waking up to who WE are allows us to open up to including “others” as being inter-related, inter-connected, and inter-dependent parts of ourselves. We step out of a world in which we are alien, and recognize we are co-related with each other as well as the universe at-large, which is to say we are not separable from the universe as a whole. Stepping out of the illusory “separate self,” we heal our mistaken sense of ME (which is the cure for ME disease), as we simply recognize what has always been the case, which is that we are truly one.
Paul Levy is a spiritually-informed political co-activist. A pioneer in the field of spiritual awakening, he is a healer in private practice, assisting others who are awakening to the dream-like nature of reality. He is the author of The Madness of George Bush: A Reflection of Our Collective Psychosis, which is available at his website www.awakeninthedream.com. Please feel free to pass this article along to a friend if you feel so inspired. If you resonate with the message of this article and want to help Paul spread his work, please contact him at paul@awakeninthedream.com, as he needs all the help he can get. He is very interested in hearing any reflections you have to offer. © Copyright 2006
.................................................................
This email should only be sent to those who have asked to receive it.To unsubscribe, return to the web form where you first subscribed, enter your name and email address and click the "unsubscribe" button, or contact paul@awakeninthedream.com

May 29, 2007

Denial the 51st state

>DENIAL: The 51st State




By Paul Levy



What the underlying military-industrial-financial crime syndicate that

controls our government is doing, both domestically and

internationally, is so horrifying (please see my article Homeland Insecurity

http://www.awakeninthedream.com/insecurity.html) that it is literally

traumatizing to consciously bear witness to it, to experience it. When

we become traumatized, we become stuck, literally “frozen in time,” as

our ability to creatively respond and mobilize ourselves in the present

moment into effective action in the world becomes in-operative. When we

become overwhelmed by trauma, we are not able to creatively express our

internal experience in a way that dis-charges what has been triggered

in us. We feel impotent. We are unable to give voice to our experience,

as our power to be ourselves has become foreign to us. We become mute.

When we become traumatized, we lose touch with our inner voice, which

is our guiding spirit, our true genius.



Bush and his regime could only be getting away with the atrocities they

are perpetrating not only because there are an insufficient number of

people who see what they are doing, but because there are enough people

who see what is happening and remain silent (please see my article

Breaking the Vow of Silence http://www.awakeninthedream.com/vow.html). To

quote Judith Herman, author of Trauma and Abuse, “The ordinary response

to atrocities is to banish them from consciousness. Certain violations

of the social compact are too terrible to utter aloud: this is the

meaning of the word unspeakable.” When our nation is seen as a family

system composed of interrelated roles that do not exist in isolation from

each other but rather in co-relation to one another, the people in the

role of the abuser, Bush and his regime, depend upon the tendency for

most people to split-off from and deny the horror of the atrocities they

are perpetrating to be able to get away with them. When we deny what

is

happening, we are not able to speak about it, for to speak about what

is happening is to invest our experience with a living reality, which is

the very thing our denial ensures doesn’t happen.



As perpetrators of the abuse, the Bush regime will do everything in

their power to promote our denial, pretense, and silence. Our becoming

silent is the very thing which allows them to literally get away with

murder. They need to induce our denial, which is an internal cover-up, as a

necessary requirement for them to act out their role as “perpetraitor.”

Denial is an integral dynamic which sustains the pathology of the

victim-perpetrator collusion.





The abuser’s refusal to hear the voices of those they are exploiting is crucial to their continued domination.




When the abuse is so horrific, it forcibly overwhelms the human psyche

so as to split the psyche from itself and shatter its wholeness, which

is the very root of trauma. When the atrocity is so inhumane, we

dis-associate from the experience, creating a self-protective amnesia for

ourselves. An (arche)typical response to trauma is to simply “forget about

it” and try to go on with our life. Like Bush himself counseled us

after 9/11, we should just continue shopping. It is the strangest

experience to walk around town and see so many people just going about their day, drinking their cup of coffee in their favorite café and reading the

sports page as if nothing out of the ordinary is happening, while in the

same moment on another part of the planet bombs are being dropped on

innocent people with our names on them. A more perfect image of

collective denial is hard to imagine. “Hey, did you hear the Yankees took two

yesterday?”



To be in denial is both an unconscious, primitive, and magical defense,

as well as on some level also being a conscious choice. There is a

collective denial that most of us support by acting out our own personal

denial in our individual lives, which in turn simply feeds into our

collective madness. To the extent that we aren’t completely outraged with

what our government is doing, we are in denial, for what could we

possibly be thinking? To the degree we are in denial about the horror that is

playing out in our world, we are, to that extent, complicit.



When the abuse is so overwhelming, we become numbed, desensitized, and

anesthetized, as if a psychological “operation” (psy-ops) is being done

on us (please see my article The War on Consciousness

http://www.awakeninthedream.com/warconsc.html). Instead of being

enlivened by the abuse, we become “deadened,” as if we have become

dehumanized. Devalued, we become incapable of “feeling.” In this covert

operation, our ability to respond creatively and responsibly becomes disabled.

We can become incapacitated with inexpressible rage, hopeless despair

and a feeling of worthlessness. The worst of the abuse isn’t even so much

what the external abuse actually is, but what it creates in us

internally.



When we are overwhelmed by abuse, we are literally coerced to disavow

our perceptions, which is to betray ourselves. To quote the late Dr.

Martin Luther King Jr., “At some point, silence before a lie becomes

betrayal.” Betraying ourselves, we become a stranger to ourselves,

forgetting who we are. We become disoriented, as our bedrock connection between psyche and reality has been severed. Moment by moment we insist on building a wall between our inner selves and the outer world. Splitting off

from the abuse, we invariably internalize the abuser and police

ourselves. We lose our connection with our inner nature, as well as with

nature itself. Our sense of meaning, and our identity as sovereign

meaning-generators, becomes scrambled. When the nightmare that is playing out is so horrible, we marginalize and deny our very experience itself, as we

literally “split” (which means both “in two,” and “leave” – i.e., go

far away from the present, as well as from our true selves). A part

of us pretends that what is happening is not really happening.



A specific example of denial in our current day and age are people’s

reactions to 9/11. The most superficial inquiry into the facts reveals

that there is no doubt whatsoever that the government’s official story

about 9/11, a crazy conspiracy theory if there ever was one, is not only

not true, but is covering up what really happened. Who knows what

really happened on 9/11, but when the evidence is studied, it is beyond any

reasonable doubt that the same criminal enterprise that has infiltrated

the highest levels of our government also had its hands in creating

9/11. The underlying military-industrial-financial crime syndicate was the

only organization that had the motive and the ability to pull-off,

cover-up and capitalize on the “opportunity” of 9/11. To go down this

rabbit hole and see what the criminal forces that have taken over and

control our government are capable of is to unravel and shatter many of our naïve illusions, which is why many of us deny and simply refuse to

look at the evidence.




It is clear that the same underlying criminal syndicate that was

behind 9/11 is using 9/11 as a catapult to further expand its domination and

extend its tentacles to the furthest reaches of not just the planet,

but space itself. If you think I am exaggerating or being paranoid when I

point this out, I would respond by simply inviting you to open your

eyes and explore the ample evidence, which is readily available and

overwhelmingly convincing (see www.911truth.org). Besides being utterly

traumatic to realize, another reason the truth behind 9/11 is so hard to see

is because it is everywhere we look, literally staring us in the face.

If we don’t realize the truth behind 9/11, it is because we are in

denial.



When we realize that 9/11 was an “inside job” perpetrated by our own government against us, we step out of denying what deep down we know to be true.



9/11 was a wake up call for the American people and the world

at large, and it has the potentiality of snapping us out of our spell so

that we can begin to see what is actually happening in our world.

Looking beneath the superficial “official” explanation for 9/11 begins an

initiatory process of reconsidering the way the power structure of our

nation and the world operates. People who have woken up to the truth

behind 9/11 are very much like people who have had a kind of spiritual

awakening, in that having snapped out of the consensus trance, they are

recognizing a deeper, more fundamental process that is in-forming and

giving shape to events in our world. Like a person who has had a spiritual

awakening, people who have realized the truth about 9/11 have stepped

out of their denial and snapped out of an illusion.



When we are in denial, we avert our gaze, which is a reactive form of

psychic blindness. When we get stuck in and embody the madness of

denial, we become psychologically deaf, as we are not able to hear any

“informing” influences from the outside world which reflect back to us our

unconscious state. Falling into denial, we become psychologically deaf,

dumb and blind. We see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil.



When we are riddled by denial, we hold contradictory viewpoints

simultaneously, while splitting off from the underlying contradiction, which

is a self-induced, trance-like dissociated state, in which we have

fixated our attention, restricted our own awareness and hypnotized

ourselves. When groups of people (or a nation) collectively fall into a mass

en-trance-ment together, they reinforce each other’s unconscious denial,

which feeds the zombie-like madness of the group. The name of this

phenomenon is “collective psychosis,” and this is what is presently

happening in the United States of America (please see my book The Madness of George W. Bush: A Reflection of our Collective Psychosis, to read the

first chapter, click http://awakeninthedream.com/georgew.html).



The underlying culture and field in which and from which we dissociate

conspires with us in our betrayal of ourselves. We are in-formed by and

receive feedback from the abusive family system, in this case, our

nation, that it is not OK and actually quite dangerous to be ourselves,

which only reinforces the trauma, ad infinitum. Part of the abuse in our

country is that, like an unrestrained malignant narcissist, the

criminal enterprise that controls our government has let it be known that it

will destroy anyone who tries to stand up to it (please see my article

George Bush is a Malignant Narcissist

http://www.awakeninthedream.com/bushnarc.html). This threat itself is a

form of terrorism, as it creates terror in US. As a result, for the

ordinary person, the utter evil of what is playing out in our country is

better left unsaid, so as to not cause trouble or rock the boat, which,

Titanic-like, is sinking due to our passivity and silence.



When the horror is so overwhelming, we become alien to ourselves and

deny our own experience. We then deny our denial and fall into the

depraved state of lying and actually believing our own lies. This is a state

of complete and utter self-deception. When we are in denial, we are in

the perverse state of fooling ourselves, while pretending we are not

fooling ourselves. This is to have fallen into a diabolically

self-perpetuating feedback loop, an infinite regression in which we deny that we are denying and then we deny that, and on and on, ad infinitum. This is

called “the state of being in denial,” which is the 51st state in the

US.  [Virginia's note: THIS is called DELUSION, and is a mark of ADVANCED addiction .. in this case to an unsustainable way of "life" - read: empire]



Once we fall into the state of denial, we become invested in not only

keeping ourselves asleep but we also seek out others in the same state

of denial with whom to join forces. Once our mass unconsciousness gains

enough self-generating momentum, our denial has an inductive, magnetic

effect of entraining others into a similar state of unconsciousness as

our own. Our somnambulism has a bewitching effect on others, while at

the same time their unconsciousness strengthens our denial, in a

self-reinforcing web of mutual conditioning
. Falling into and supporting each other’s collective denial, we become infected by, while concurrently

infecting the field around us with a self-created, but very contagious,

psychological “virus.”



This is an immaterial, psychic “bug” that insinuates itself into and

operates through the psyche by distorting and manipulating our

perceptions so as to feed itself, while at the same time veiling that it is doing this so as to keep itself invisible. Jung never tired of warning us

that psychic epidemics such as this, which spread and replicate themselves

through our unconscious blind spots, were the greatest danger facing

humanity. In a crazy-making loop that both produces and is an expression

of madness, the denial in the underlying field feeds our denial, while

at the same time our denial feeds the denial in the underlying field.



When we live in the state of denial, we are investing all of our

psychic energy into a lie to protect ourselves from the awful shock of

stepping out of our denial and consciously experiencing both the lie that we have been living and the reality we have been avoiding.
Once our denial becomes invested with enough energy, a counter-incentive to step out of our denial arises, as we become highly motivated in sustaining the lie

that is fundamental to our denial, for the trauma of consciously

realizing the perverse state we have fallen into is too much for us to bear.

Once our denial solidifies its reign, it literally rules over us, as we

become obedient to it, as if we are its slaves and it is our master.

When we repress something from our consciousness, we unwittingly invest

it with power over us. Once we become sufficiently corrupted by our

denial, we become dedicated to preserving it at all costs. Once we become

tied, attached and bound to our denial, our entire modus operandi

is to do whatever it takes to continue the charade of hiding from ourselves.



At a certain point, we literally become taken over, as if possessed, by

our compulsion to avoid relationship with ourselves. We are then not

able to help ourselves from compulsively acting out our unconscious

denial, a perverse state for which we are ultimately responsible. Being in

the state of denial, we are not in our right mind, and we are not even

home in our own bodies. In this state, we can be of no help to either

ourselves or to others, as we ourselves are the ones increasingly in need

of help. Having fallen into a truly pathological state, we have become

addicted to our denial, which we then embody and act out in our lives,

as our denial continually in-forms us. Once this pathological process

develops a sufficient inner sovereignty, it “colonizes” our psyche and

we fall into becoming an unwitting instrument for what is called “evil”

to act itself out in our world.



We have then attained what political philosopher Hannah Arendt saw as

the fundamental characteristic of evil: the incapacity for thought. When

we are in denial, the primary thought we can’t think about is

ourselves, which is to say we are incapable of self-reflection, as if we are not

able to bend around backwards and see our reflection in the mirror of

life. When we are in the state of denial, we are “not ourselves,” but

rather, are “beside ourselves.” Instead of associating with all of

our-selves, we imagine that we exist separately from the world out there, of

which we are desperately afraid. This is an outer reflection of the

inner process of being terrified of a part of ourselves, which is the

dynamic which precipitated our denial in the first place.



As this inner pathological state takes us over, it develops a seemingly

autonomous life of its own, animating and playing itself out in the

most unconscious, and hence, destructive of ways, creating violence,

abuse, and terror, whether it be within ourselves or in the outside world.

Anyone who points out or reflects back the pathology is demonized,

pathologized, criminalized, and seen as the enemy.



People in denial react violently when they see someone who does not share their denial, as it secretly reminds them of

how sick they are.




When we are in the state of denial, we lose our ability to discern what

is really going on. For example, when we are in denial, we are unable

to discern whether or not others are in denial. When other people are

actually in denial, it has a resonance with our own denial and, insanely,

we see them as expressing the truth and being enlightened. At the same

time, people who aren’t in denial we see as being crazy. When we are in

denial, we live in an inverted world, blindly imagining others to be

the ones who are blind. We project the face of our own unconscious onto

the world, which simply mirrors it back to us, confirming our delusion.



To step out of our denial is the scariest thing imaginable to the part

of us that is in denial. To snap out of our denial is a form of

“death,” as it is to “die” to the fantasy world in which we imagined we lived.

This is why people will “defend” their denial to the point of death,

often in the most aggressively “offensive” of ways. People in denial will

actually create “explosions” in the outside world as distractions so as

to protect themselves from inwardly “imploding” at the sight of

themselves. People cherish their illusions, which they hold dear to

themselves, as if their illusions are their most sacred possession
. To be in

denial is to live in an illusion, and the system which produced this

pathological state is only too happy to configure itself to support the abuse

by supplying all the evidence needed to strengthen the denial and

confirm the illusion. Our denial allows the abuse to continue to be

perpetrated and perpetuate itself, while at the same time the abuse

facilitates our denial in a reciprocally co-arising, circular (as compared to

linear) and self-generating feedback loop that is truly pathological.
When

we are in denial, the system which precipitated our denial gets dreamed

up to collude with, nourish, nurture and justify our denial, creating a

psychological black hole: a true dis-ease of the psyche, in which no

light escapes or is emitted.



DENIAL IS ITS OWN MEDICINE



When we are taken over by the pathological state of denial, we embody

and incarnate it, becoming agents by which it propagates itself, as we

collectively act out our inner, unconscious state of denial on the outer

stage of the world. This is to say that the inner state of our

unconsciousness is actually being dreamed up into full-bodied form and

reflex-ively played out in the theater of the outside world. Just like in a

dream – where the outer dreamscape is a reflection of the inner psyche –

our unconscious has spilled out from the boundaries of our skull and is

materializing itself in, as, and through the seemingly outside world.

Not limited by the conventional laws of time and space, our unconscious

has changed channels and is nonlocally giving shape and form to itself

by synchronistically arranging events in the outside world so as to

express and reveal itself to those that have the eyes to see. The fact

that there is a synchronistic correlation and correspondence between

the unconscious process going on inside of our psyche and what is playing

out in the outside world is not an accident, as this mirroring is

reflecting something back to us that is most important for us to know.


Encoded in the outer manifestation of our unconscious denial is the key to

its resolution.



Collective events in our world are the expressions of our inner state

of unconsciousness, while simultaneously being the revelation of the

very unconsciousness of which they themselves are an expression. What this

means is that events in our world, while being manifestations of our

unconscious, are at the same time potentially the liberator and

liberation of the very unconsciousness of which they themselves are a

manifestation.



The malevolent events that are literally being unconsciously acted out

on the world stage are at the same time speaking to us symbolically,

which is the language of dreams. Seen as symbols that unite the

opposites, these events reflect back to us our inner state of unconsciousness,

while simultaneously revealing to us, and hence potentially

transforming, the very unconsciousness of which they are an unmediated

manifestation. Recognizing what is being revealed instantaneously, in no time whatsoever, transforms our unconscious, our experience of our world, and

ourselves, which empowers us to be a genuine agent for positive change in

the world.



Seen symbolically,

events in our world are

simultaneously

the problem
and the solution

co-joined in

one phenomenon,

and how they manifest
depends

upon

how we dream them.




Our world crisis is the problem, while at the same time it is the revelation of the solution, as it unveils the unconscious part of ourselves, which is the source of our current world crisis. Once we recognize what is being revealed, our consciousness has expanded itself through this realization, thereby transforming both our unconscious and the world crisis simultaneously. Seen as symbols in a dream, the malevolent events in our world are potentially expanding our consciousness so as to heal the very pathology which is at the root of their malevolence. Something is revealing itself to us as it acts

itself out through our unconscious. Recognizing what is being revealed

changes everything, for then all bets are off, as anything becomes possible.

We only suffer from a failure of imagination.



The collective denial and madness

that is playing itself out

in our world

is

paradoxically

ts own medicine.




How the events in our world actually manifest and what effect they have

on us, either continuing to traumatize us, or wake us up, depends upon

whether or not we recognize what they are revealing to us about

ourselves. Events in our world are being dreamed up to reflect back to us that

we ourselves are responsible for how we moment by moment collectively

dream up our world.



All six and a half billion of us are moment by moment collaboratively

dreaming up this universe into materialization, as if we are co-creating

a mass, shared dream. Once we realize this, we literally snap out of

the illusion of thinking we exist separate from each other, and recognize

we are “relational beings,” interdependent parts of one another, which

is to say we are “related,” members of a greater family. We are a part

of the whole but not “a-part” from the whole. We are interconnected

aspects and unique expressions of the whole. To consciously realize our

wholeness is to heal our disassociation from each other as well as from

ourselves.




Once we snap out of the spell of imagining we are separate from each

other, we can get in sync with each other so as to awaken “eros,” which

has to do with being able to relate with each other through a deeply

shared feeling of the heart called love. Reciprocally co-inspiring each

other, we mutually help one another plug into and activate our collective

genius, as if collectively awakening a higher strand of our DNA. Once

our awakening attains a certain momentum, we become instruments through

which something greater than ourselves is able to inform and give shape

to our world. We are then able to nonlocally effect the entire

universe, which is to say we can literally make a positive difference in the

world.



Putting our lucid awareness together, we synergistically activate our

inherent God-given power of being able to consciously co-create reality

in a way that serves our highest, evolutionary unfoldment. We discover

that we can enter into an engaged, intimate, and conscious partnership

with each other, as well as with the universe as a whole. Once our

intention is to serve what is best for the whole, we become inspired by

something greater than our own ego. We become imbued with life, as we

become guided and animated by a creative, and whole-making spirit. As

compared to the spirit of division and destruction, this is the spirit of

integration and creation. This is the point where we are able to join

together and, not just in imagination, but in seemingly real time and

space, change the collective dream we are having. Instead of destroying

ourselves, we can actually create the world in which we want to live.



Recognizing what is being revealed, we become students of history, as

we become educated by our experience, learn from our mistakes, and

organically grow. Stepping out of our shared delusion that we exist separate

from each other, we discover that we can co-operatively help each other

to evolve to greater orders of freedom and ever-deepening degrees of

compassion. Cultivating our shared awakening, we naturally change the

world in the process.



Paul Levy is an artist and a spiritually-informed political activist. A

pioneer in the field of spiritual awakening, he is a healer in private

practice, assisting others who are also awakening to the dream-like

nature of reality. He is the author of The Madness of George Bush: A

Reflection of Our Collective Psychosis
, which is available on his website

www.awakeninthedream.com. Please feel free to pass this article along to

a friend if you feel so inspired. You can contact Paul at

paul@awakeninthedream.com; he looks forward to your reflections.

© Copyright 2007.



As I post this I have No. 100 of my hit parade playing in the background,

Metalica's ONE ...






Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

October 16, 2006

Another Look At Depression:

An Alternative Perspective

http://www.power2u. org/downloads/ Another%20Look% 20at%20Depressio n.pdf

BY: Debbie L. Whittle

What if depression was viewed not as an illness, but rather, a call; a call from your own soul? Is it possible there is a gift in depression? We are told that depression isan illness; one involving brain chemistry. Is it possible to view depression from another perspective? Is it possible that depression can be viewed as part of a largerlife cycle? Is it possible to see beyond appearances and perceive a higher vision, avision of meaning and purpose?

These are the questions I ponder as I look at my own cycles of life; cycles that includemany periods of transition; periods of visiting places of longing, loneliness, isolation,and despair. There have been many periods in my life when I felt the weight of loss,the imprint of trauma, the torment of failure, and the hopelessness of dreams.Yet, in the midst of it all, I keep asking the questions.

Rainer Maria Rilke says in

Letter to a young Poet:

" Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and. Try tolive the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books thatare written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the answers,which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. And the point is to Live everything. Live the questions now.Perhaps you will gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answers
"I have experienced trauma: sexual, emotional, physical, spiritual. I have experienced loss: relationships, jobs, home, possessions, and death of a child. I have accomplished some things I'm very proud of, and I have many regrets. There are many reasons that I've felt worthless, fatigued, hopeless, self critical, full of agony and despair.

These are some of the questions I live when I'm experiencing depression: "Why am I here?" "What is my purpose?" "Why can't I seem to get it right?" "Why can't I figure this out?" "What am I supposed to do?" "Why does this hurt so much?"

As I'm writing these words, I can feel the heaviness and pain in my body. What do you feel as you read the last paragraph? Someone once said to me, "You can never solve a problem on the level of the problem."

You must look at the problem from a different perspective. So to get some distance, come with me as we back away from depression.

Imagine that the movie camera has just backed up and is panning to a wider and higher perspective. Depression is lying down there on a couch, but we're perhaps sitting on a cloud viewing it from a much more detached perspective. What do you notice about depression?

Here is what I notice about depression in my life:. I notice there are a lot of things about life in general, and my life in particular, that are depressing.. I notice that depression really stops me.. I notice that depression seems to be part of a cycle for me.. I notice that as long as I judge and criticize myself and fight this experience, theexperience of depression expands and my pain increases.. I notice that my breathing is tight and shallow, like I'm holding my breath.. I notice I'm really scared.. I notice I'm trying to make myself do something and the words "I can't" keep coming up.. I notice I feel really sad.. I notice I feel really angry.. I notice I feel really alone.. I notice I feel really unacceptable.. I notice I feel like a failure.. I notice that I'm beating myself up because I should know better, and I should be able to just "choose" to be happy..

I notice that as I watch myself, my heart opens and I feel compassion for the pain I'm in.. I notice that as I begin to feel compassion for myself, my being eases up a little.. I notice that as my being eases a little, my breath deepens.. I notice that as I breather in a deeper, slower rhythm, my body begins to relaxand open a little.. I notice that as I tell myself it's ok to be here and it's ok to do nothing, it's ok to just be who I am in this moment, begin to cry.. I notice they are tears of release and acceptance.. I notice there is a small voice inside saying, "Are you sure it's ok to just be likethis. It doesn't feel ok. It hurts. And I feel so frustrated, and I feel so alone.". I notice that I can respond to myself, "Yes, dear one, it is absolutely ok. I know it hurts, and I know you're scared, and I will sit here with you. I will be with you, as long as it takes.".

I notice that I can tell myself all the things I wish someone would say to me.. I notice I can be with myself in a way I've always wanted someone to be.. I notice that I feel loving toward myself even though I feel unlovable.. I notice I feel calmer.

What we have witnessed here is the magic of perspective. We experienced moving to a different level from the problem. When we move to a different level or perspective,we move out of the experience. This gives us the ability to observe the experience rather than be caught in the emotion of the experience. When we become the observer, there is an opportunity to gain clarity and understanding.

With distance, it is also easier to access our own compassion. Whatever ourexperience, our ability to be compassionate with ourselves increases our ability to accept ourselves, wherever we are. I find this to be one of my greatest challenges: to accept myself as a fallible human being living in a world full of misery.We live in a world which conditions us to believe that we're all separate, that we have to find "our place" of belonging and worth, and that life is hard and full of pain. Weare taught what to believe, how to act, and what to think in order to fit in. In order to fit in, we have come to believe that much of what we feel, think, and do is unacceptable and to deny what is original, spontaneous, and natural in us.

So we have an experience of being unacceptable, of being rejected, of not fitting in.What we want more than anything else is a place of belonging. Yet, we feel a supreme sense of unworthiness. We keep getting the message if we try hard enough we will be happy. So we try harder. We try to be acceptable. We try to do it right.We deny what we know, what we feel, what we believe, and what we want. Until we are so confused we have no idea who we are, or what we want. We just know we aremiserable. Such is the cycle of despair. Does any of this sound familiar? Depressing isn't it?

And here in is the crux of depression, and all "mental illness." We are told the "truth"is one thing, and yet, we sense something very different is true. Somewhere deep inside, something is stirring. Something wants out. Something whispers to us at night, telling us there is something we are not seeing, something we are not remembering. We feel a vague something, unnamable, gnawing at us.

We try covering it up with food, activity, work, sex, recreational drugs and alcohol, or pharmaceutical drugs. We think it is pain. And to be sure, there is pain there. But this is something even deeper that will not be denied. This is the call of our very own soul. That call is being denied all around us. And that drives us crazy!

And here is the gift of depression: depression stops us long enough to provide an opportunity to listen.

Consider this: What would happen if instead of fighting depression we accepted the opportunity to stop awhile and listen beneath the pain?

Is it possible that our own soul would begin to talk to us? Is it possible we wouldlearn the truth of our essential being?

Is it possible that the death wish we feel, is about something more than desperately wanting the pain to end? Is it possible that the "job" of depressionis to give us the opportunity to die and be reborn metaphorically?

In all of life there is a birth-death- rebirth cycle. We see that most clearly in the
passage of the seasons through a calendar year. As humans, we are terrified of death because our only sense of rebirth is a vague religious notion of a life in thehereafter ... if we earn it.

What if we began to honor the birth-death- rebirth cycle as it manifests through our many transitions during our lifetime? Depression is an opportunity to honor the death of who we have known ourselves to be. I wonder if this metaphor of birth- death - rebirth were honored, would we still have a strong desire to kill ourselves to relieve our suffering?

When we spend time trying to fit in, trying to do everything right, and trying to be acceptable, we create a false self. We project the image of who we think will be acceptable. And even if it works, we are miserable because we know it's not real.

Our deepest pain is not that which has been done to us, even though most of us have experienced unspeakable trauma. Our deepest pain is the ways in which we deny our truth and leave ourselves. Is it possible that our soul is "dying" for us to wake up to that which is essential in ourselves, to stop pretending that we are less than we are?

Our deepest despair is that no matter how we try, we cannot run from ourselves. Depression is our opportunity to come face to face with ourselves.All the metaphors of transformation: the Phoenix, the snake, the butterfly, all contain a period of darkness or death before the transformation. This period of darkness feels like the end. And therein lies the power.

In order to experience the power of transformation, we must sink totally into the darkness and feel the power of the void.

It is in this void that all life begins. All seeds germinate in the darkness.

Shakti Gwaine says that we all resist the experience of "hitting bottom", whatever that means for us. But as we finally allow ourselves to hit bottom, we fall through a trap door into the light. I find this to be true.

The birth-death- rebirth cycle is never easy. Even though I've experienced it many times, it always feels like I can't do it. Death is never easy. Yet after days, or weeks or months of struggle, I finally surrender. Even though I know better, surrender always feels like giving up. It always feels like failure.

As I let go into acceptance, acceptance of the depression, acceptance of my failures, acceptance of my inability to understand, figure it out, or fix this, something begins to shift. Most of the time I only notice the shift in hindsight. I call this shift magic.

Some call it grace.

Depression is not a static event. It is part of a larger process, a process of life movingthrough us. Given the right support, it can move through us and bring a sense of rebirth. What is calling for your attention in your depression? What new life is germinating in the darkness? What wants to die? What is waiting to be reborn? I encourage you to find the support to use your depression as a process of transformation.

Debbie L. Whittle is a holistic counselor, consultant, writer, and motivational speaker.She conducts workshops and trainings, and private sessions
E-mail: Trueheart19@ netzero.com, Telephone: 413-455-6816

October 24, 2007

The 51st State in the Union: PTSD

Murder, madness, mayhem. Incest, child abuse, spouse abuse. Treason, perjury, malfeasance.

Americans are consuming an increasing diet of emotional toxic waste, which grows more poisonous with each new technological advance in communications. If the psychological damage on American citizens gets any worse, we'll have to add Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome as the 51st State in the Union.

More than ever, we are exposed to violence on a never before seen scale. Because of this overwhelming exposure to violence and mayhem, Americans are becoming twitchier than ever before. The result of this exposure to family violence, neighborhood violence, school and workplace violence, and now, the violence of war, is generating an increasing cycle of trauma, drug use, alcohol use, escapism, and, yes, more violence.

A mile across town, in the heart of the ‘Hood, an out of control crack head throws a tantrum in front of her teenaged relatives, and conducts a three way conversation with the imaginary people who live inside her head. She airs a litany of complaints, and blames her addiction and out of control lifestyle on everything from a purported rape attack in childhood by one her mother’s boyfriends, to a recent out of town pistol- whipping.

No one, but no one, she claims, can understand what she has gone through. Her situation is unique and her selfish family isn’t giving her proper attention. To punish them, she punishes herself. Or threatens to.

For years, she made allegations that one of her mother’s boyfriends raped her when she was a child. Her mother slid from the addiction of nightclubs, to the addiction of “the church”, with the ease of a seasoned emotional escape artist. A love affair with the powerful dynamics of the herd mentality in the nightclub soon transformed itself into a toxic addiction to "church".

After being left alone and ignored as small children now the addict and her brothers and sisters suffered the consequences of being the offspring of the ‘barfly cum church fly’, leaving her children to fend for themselves as children, and live with the consequences of her emotional abandonment as adults.

Some became sexually promiscuous. Others acted out, turned to both sex and drugs as escapes. And one, turned to promiscuity, drug use, theft, prostitution, emotional blackmail and attempted suicide.

For more than 20 years she has slid in and out of sobriety and dependency, building a nest of chaos and confusion in her wake. In many ways, her claim of rape is validated by her behavior. She’s almost a pattern card for post-rape Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD).

Psychiatric authorities point to a number of causes and consequences of PTSD, including rape, sexual and physical abuse, repeated trauma, lack of social and parental support, fires and being in a war zone. Consequences include disassociation, acting out, substance abuse, eating disorders and promiscuity. (Roy Lubit, MD, PhD, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Children). Lubit says another consequence of PTSD “is the multiple emotional and behavioral problems that can arise…substance abuse, aggression, eating disorders, sexual acting out…”

For children, the anxiety associated with PTSD often keeps them unable to adequately deal with normal childhood experiences such as school. Some authorities believe that PTSD symptom may often be confused with various types of attention deficit disorders. Hence, many children who are doped up on drugs for hyperactivity may be suffering from PTSD.

As is probably the case of the out of control crack head, whose relatives have gotten so many late night suicide prevention calls from the police that they no longer answer her calls. Relatives are raising her children as best as they can, trying to fend off her dangerous attempts at “motherhood” and “aunthood”, both ineffective attempts may be causing additional PTSD problems with her children, nieces and nephews.

Unable to sustain employment, other than selling sex on the street, she has stolen from family and friends, and isn’t shy about lifting the occasional item from a drug store or grocery, if she thinks she can get away with it. Degradation is in her bones, and she wears her madness like an unwashed second skin.

She courts death like a child playing with a favorite toy, intimately and with abandon. The only thing that annoys the snot out of her is that her family no longer wants to play the game. She lost her “control” over her relatives and long-gone friends a long time ago.

They simply got tired of being at the mercy of an emotional vampire, whose out of control street stories and tales of being gang raped, robbed and beaten brought the filth of the streets into their living rooms. The sympathy button has been turned off and her relatives have long since tired of the aborted attempts at detox, and the twitchy, out of control behavior, which takes far too much energy to deal with. They have their own lives and their own children—and they’ll kick her to the curb in a hot minute if it means protecting the children.


Her presence, her conversation, everything to do with her is toxic and is capable of contaminating others in its wake. Her family protects itself as much as possible but the entire situation is a prime example of the delayed effect of childhood sexual abuse.

A medical journal notes that “Studies of adults who were sexually or physically abused as children demonstrate significantly higher rates of emotional problems (72-100%)” than they do as children, leaving many to conclude that childhood abuse may present problems more in later life than in childhood. In short, the adult madness that the crack addict is displaying has exploded more in adulthood than in childhood.

Like this family, too many of today’s children and their care givers are caught up in a maelstrom of malicious events over which neither they have control. Farm children see their parents, grandparents and relatives hauled off their farms in chains. The children of crime suspects are given over to over-burdened Child Welfare Authorities, and are often abused more in the foster home than the “abusive” home from which they were taken. Little old ladies die of heart attacks when drug agents kick in the wrong apartment door—theirs. Children huddle against one another in classrooms, as another out of control child with an assault rifle mows down their fellow students and teaches. And, dangerously estranged boyfriends and husbands gun women down in their workplaces or right on the courthouse lawn.

We can run, but we cannot hide. The 24-hour news cycle won’t let us. Usually, there is enough madness in the US to keep the channels spewing fear and madness, but if the crazies in America go on vacation, there’s always the war to fall back on.

The old saying is still true. Violence begets violence. And madness, too. So, if your neurotic, alcoholic, crack head or meth freak relative is getting on your nerves, just turn on the television, or head to the computer and wallow in somebody else’s misery. It’s all there. And, best of all: it belongs to somebody else.

November 10, 2007

SHOCK DOCTRINE'S SHOCKING SHORT SHRIFT



In which Carolyn Baker is astounded by Naomi Klein's INABILITY to fathom what REAL trauma is - and how she was manipulated by her publisher to INCREASE sales. It is TRUTH that 9/11 wrecked every bit as much havoc on the human political health system as did the Cuban Missile crisis.

So much for progressive honesty, integrity and ability to discern TRUTH and let the masses decide to go with it, no matter what the cost.

I will reiterate MY problem with Naomi Klein (besides KNOWING where her thesis came from; it AIN't original) - is that she builds no ideas in to help people mobilize against the "sins" of organized globalISM and its perpetrators. I would guess Naomi does not REALLY know what a perpetrator IS, not to know the full weight of it. And I doubt she ever really lose her protective upper class armor to find out. Such is the sad state of CANADA, the truth do tell, when authentically hammered, traumatised people make up the BULK of the urbanized culture .. sigh.

by Carolyn Baker




I recently had the opportunity to view a lecture by Michael Parenti whom I consider a foremost expert on imperialism. Parenti began his lecture with the use of the word "stochasticism" which essentially means random, non-deterministic, based on conjecture or guess. A simpler way of summarizing it is, "stuff happens." It is, in fact, the polar opposite of "conspiratorial." In the lecture Parenti went on to criticize those who refuse to admit that the United States is imperialistic and who explain its imperial adventures around the world as something that "just happened." Generally, those in academia who rationalize U.S. imperialism are astute, incisive thinkers on other issues, so one is perplexed by the obtuseness they demonstrate around the topic of imperialism.

In the same way, I have been bewildered by a singular stochastic perspective of Naomi Klein in her brilliant, exhaustive, superbly-documented book The Shock Doctrine. In it Klein builds an intricate and convincing case for the use of various techniques of trauma applied to societies and individuals during the twentieth century and continuing into the current moment for the purpose of perpetrating what has become one of her hallmark phrases, "disaster capitalism" Yet two pages in the book left me aghast. The first is Pages 11-12 which refer to September 11, 2001 and state:

The Bush team seized the moment of collective vertigo with chilling speed-not, as some have claimed, because the administration deviously plotted the crisis but because the key figures of the administration, veterans of earlier disaster capitalism experiments in Latin America and Eastern Europe, were part of a movement that prays for crisis the way drought-struck farmers pray for rain, and the way Christian-Zionist end-timers pray for the Rapture.


After hearing endless interviews of Klein and reading numerous articles about the book when it first hit the stores in September, and being very familiar with the disaster capitalism thesis, the above quote from the book's first pages were astonishing in their inconsistency with nearly every other page of the book.

If you're wondering about that second quote that left me aghast, please bear with me. I will address it, but first things first.

Disaster Capitalism-Microcosm and Macrocosm

Disaster capitalism is according to Klein

"...orchestrated raids on the public sphere in the wake of catastrophic events, combined with the treatment of disasters as exciting market opportunities." (6)
It has its origins in the "Chicago School" of economics made famous and perpetuated for decades by University of Chicago economics professor, Milton Friedman, who actually coined the phrase "shock treatment" to describe the psychological pummeling of societies and individuals who might stand in the way of or could be made more useful to the advancement of corporate goals. One recent example was the dramatic use of shock and awe, including using those very words to describe it, against the nation of Iraq during the invasion by the U.S. in 2003. A more recent example to which Klein devotes a great deal of attention is the devastation of New Orleans during and after Hurricane Katrina.

The endgame of disaster capitalism is the total privatization of what have throughout American history been state services. Not surprisingly, the ultimate outcome of unbridled disaster capitalism will be the supplanting of government by corporations.

While these are examples of societal decimation, the book's first chapter focuses on the origins of the current forms of torture used by the U.S. in the incipient, CIA-funded experiments of Ewen Cameron, a Canadian psychiatrist who

"believed that by inflicting an array of [electrical] shocks to the human brain, he could unmake and erase faulty minds, then rebuild new personalities" on what he believed would be a "clean slate." (29)
I was quite familiar with Cameron as a result of a History Channel documentary called "Mind Control: America's Secret War" which I frequently show in my classes, but for the most part, progressives have been loath to discuss many of the CIA's early torture escapades and have minimized them as perhaps "borderline conspiratorial"-until Klein published Shock Doctrine. As a result, her research is now currently quite fashionable in progressive circles, but ten years ago, it was a bit "fringy" for the left-liberal establishment as many of us were exposing the MK Ultra mind control agenda of the CIA, only to be labeled "whacky."

The grotesque details of Cameron's electroshock experiments are a matter of public record and gave birth to many strategic forms of torture subsequently used and sanctioned by the U.S. government. Klein specifically cites the CIA's Kubark Counterintelligence Interrogation manual authored by those who were profoundly impressed with Cameron and his focus on psychological regression. The principle idea was to deprive people of "their sense of who they are and where they are in time and space" and by so doing, converting them "into dependent children whose minds are a blank slate of suggestibility." (40) One desired outcome of this psychological battering was the manipulation of the subject in their regressed state to believe that someone or something (the torturers, the government) were in fact father figures who would eventually save them from further harm. In other words, the uncanny and diabolical intent was to cause the victim to unequivocally bond with his/her tormenters and experience them as saviors.

Disaster Capitalism Globalized

Those at the highest levels of government theorized that in the same way that Cameron achieved these objectives with countless individual patients, a similar result could be achieved with entire societies. Thus, writes Klein:

The terrorist attack on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon was a different kind of shock from the ones imagined in the pages of the Kubark manual, but its effects were remarkably similar: profound disorientation, extreme fear and anxiety, and collective regression. Like the Kubark interrogator posing as a ‘father figure', the Bush administration promptly used that fear to play the role of the all-protective parent, ready to defend ‘the homeland' and its vulnerable people by any means necessary. (42)

Klein goes on to point out that just as Ewen Cameron had a dream of taking people back to a state of "natural" health before human interactions created distorting patterns, that is to a "blank slate" status, Milton Friedman dreamed of de-patterning societies and returning them to a state of pure capitalism. Like Cameron, Friedman believed that in order to achieve this end, the deliberate inflicting of painful shocks (Friedman's words) in the form of economic adversity or natural disaster would provide the "bitter medicine" necessary to remove barriers to the desired result. (50)

Klein proceeds in Chapters 3-13 to explain how the shock doctrine was applied by the U.S. government around the world, but in Chapter 14, "Shock Therapy In The USA", she returns to 9/11 where she astutely notes that:

What happened in the period of mass disorientation after the attacks was in retrospect, a domestic form of economic shock therapy. The Bush team, Friedmanite to the core, quickly moved to exploit the shock that gripped the nation to push through its radical vision of a hollow government in which everything from war fighting to disaster response was a for-profit venture. (298)

Creating a whole new framework for its actions,

"the Bush team used the omnipresent sense of peril after 9/11 to increase dramatically the policing, surveillance, detention, and war-waging powers of the executive branch which some have called a ‘rolling coup'." (298)

Klein demonstrates that 9/11 resulted not only in the shredding of the U.S. Constitution and the launching of a permanent state of war that would reap unprecedented profits for the military industrial complex, not to mention the perpetual pursuit of fossil fuels, but also the creation of two burgeoning new industries, the security industry and the disaster industry, both of which have become as large and lucrative as the dot com phenomenon. Thus Klein documents and brilliantly defines corporatism as

"big business and big government contributing their formidable powers to regulate and control the citizenry." (307)
All of this, she argues, is a result of 9/11.

Throughout the book she posits that whether it is through the application of electroshock "therapy", military campaigns of shock and awe, or the pseudo-management of natural disasters such as Katrina to dramatically enhance corporate profits, individuals and populations are traumatized and manipulated to achieve the ends of disaster capitalism.

The Stochastic Steady Stream and 9/11

By the time one arrives at Page 300 of the book, one is riveted by the array of conspiracies-and I use that word intentionally, that Klein lays out. The genesis and evolution of disaster capitalism from her perspective are anything but stochastic. They are intentional, well-orchestrated, and brilliantly executed. It's almost like watching the 2001 film "Conspiracy" a "dramatic recreation of the Wannsee Conference where the Nazi Final Solution phase of the Holocaust was devised." Nothing is spontaneous, accidental, or left to chance. Consequently, disaster capitalism's escapades constitute in terms of lives lost and suffering perpetrated on humanity the most horrific holocaust in human history.

But what it seems that Klein hasn't quite grasped is that disaster capitalism is the mechanism for achieving the consummate agenda of organizations such as the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission, namely the dissolution of nation states which will ultimately be replaced by global corporatocracy. For most progressive intellectuals, the mere mention of these organizations suggests "conspiracy theory" since progressives tend to minimize their role in international and domestic affairs. Moreover, a number of left-liberal poster children are members of one or more of the ruling elite groups mentioned above-an inconvenient truth, so to speak, for true believers tethered to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party in search of salvation from all that they perceive as evil.

With respect to 9/11, Klein's incisive grasp of disaster capitalism's brilliantly devised, superbly-engineered machinations alongside her stochastic insistence that the administration did not deviously plot the catastrophe defies all logic. By Page 400, the reader has digested an encyclopedia of conspiracies carried out by a series of U.S. administrations of both political parties, but on Page 426 is nevertheless asked to believe that 9/11 "just happened".

On that page comes the most breathtaking statement of all-that quote to which I promised to return. Arguing that the U.S. government did not have a hand in the attacks, Klein states:

The truth is at once less sinister and more dangerous. An economic system that requires constant growth, while bucking almost all serious attempts at environmental regulation, generates a steady stream of disasters all on its own, whether military, ecological or financial.

I could not agree with Klein more in terms of economies based on growth generating a steady stream of disasters, but 9/11 is a bit more than a few molecules in a "steady stream." It was and is the defining moment in the history of disaster capitalism.

The truth of 9/11, says Klein is "less sinister, and more dangerous"? What could be more dangerous than the U.S. government orchestrating the attacks in order to achieve all of the motivations that Klein has so incisively and painstakingly explained? After 425 pages of unrelenting recitations of bona fide conspiracy, I am asked to swallow the stochastic non-analysis of a steady stream in which 9/11 just happened to rear its ugly head?

Progressive Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley recently noted that: "This administration was seeking a massive expansion of presidential power and national security powers before 9/11. 9/11 was highly convenient in that case," George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley told Keith Olbermann on Countdown. "I'm not saying that they welcomed it, but when it happened, it was a great opportunity to seize powers that they have long wanted at the FBI."

No Jonathan, you and the overwhelming majority of American liberal academia would not say they "welcomed it", but you're stepping right up to the line between "it just happened" and the U.S. government's orchestration of the attacks. Both you and Klein realize the cost to you in left-liberal circles if you were to actually cross the line.

I cannot recommend Shock Doctrine highly enough for a multi-layered understanding of the origin, evolution, and likely outcome of disaster capitalism. It offers an extraordinary economic and geopolitical map of historical and current events. Yet the book's treatment of 9/11 is disappointingly characteristic of the progressive response to the tragedy which belies once again its intellectual armoring against venturing into the territory of conspiracy. Yet nowhere in Shock Doctrine is the most absurd, incongruous, intellectually insulting conspiracy of all, the "official" story of 9/11, challenged.

While I have been on record for years arguing that the attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government, and while I have repeatedly supported the 9/11 truth movement, I no longer feel a sense of urgency in pursuit of 9/11 truth. The larger picture of the collapse of empire and civilization, of which 9/11 was only one piece, compel me to expand my horizon. Nevertheless, when otherwise perspicacious minds tenaciously embrace the official story, no doubt in fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist, I feel equally compelled to challenge the contradiction.

Shock Doctrine offers us priceless documentation of the lengths to which empire has gone and will go to achieve and maintain primacy; however, its one shocking and pivotal incongruity must be illuminated. Unless we are willing to cross the line into the forbidden domain of pre-meditated mass murder that was 9/11, we are adrift in a stochastic world of "stuff happens" while surrounded by a sea of intentional, well-orchestrated holocausts.

So What Does It Matter If Progressives Can't Go There?

With respect to a book like Shock Doctrine which plumbs the depths of malignancy that the United States has inflicted upon the world and on its own citizens, the inability of its author to allow herself to know the whole truth about 9/11 and speak it, is astounding. Not only does it reveal the intellectual constraints which the progressive movement has foisted upon itself, but it facilitates a tenacious clinging to endless layers of denial. Even worse, in so doing the liberal left perpetuates not only everyone else's denial but the false hopes and pseudo-solutions of the American political chimera, the corruption of which is consummate and which serves no other purposes than choreographing a caricature of democracy and ensuring massive social control.


ShareThis