Showing posts with label media spin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media spin. Show all posts

January 19, 2008

Some people will swallow any cod's swallop as we say

Here's the friggnin proof.

Man, I think Hank Paulson is SO low.

Too bad those of us who KNOW don't get the ink.

December 14, 2007

Geroge Washington warned us about media complicity in torture and war crimes in 2005!!

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Guilty of Protecting War Criminals

Dear owners, editors, and producers of America's largest media companies:

We, the people of the United States of America, have considered your coverage of the so-called weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, vote fraud, torture by U.S. soldiers, and 9/11, and have found you guilty of willfully failing to disseminate the real news of the day in order to protect those in power.

We have carefully examined pre-war evidence that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction, evidence widely disseminated at the time by knowledgeable people such as former weapons inspectors Scott Ritter and Hans Blix, and have found that this information was readily available to anyone open to seeing it. We have decided that you willfully ignored such evidence, and instead trumpeted the obvious propaganda of the king and his minions.

We have analyzed the many credible reports that the election of 2004 was stolen through vote fraud, including the recent report by the GAO, and found that this would be the conclusion of any thoughtful, non-partisan who spent the time to think through the issue. We thus find you have willfully attempted to consolidate the power of those who came to power through a coup.

We have thoughtfully reflected on the abundant evidence that U.S. troops violated the Geneva Conventions by torturing prisoners -- many of them innocent people -- in Afghanistan, Iraq, and around the world, and that such torture was ordered and condoned by George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and other top officials. We have concluded that you willfully ignored such evidence for years, so as to protect the wars of adventure undertaken for imperial purposes.

Finally, we have taken a long, sober look at what really happened on September 11, 2001, and concluded that you have consciously ignored the overwhelming evidence that certain elements of the U.S government were complicit in the attacks. You have thus aided and abetted the commission of the greatest crime against American citizens in modern history.

We, who are republicans, democrats, and independents, therefore find you guilty of using disinformation and censorship to protect those in power. When they fall, you also will fall. Admittedly, you must have realized this fact long ago, and made the conscious decision to "close ranks", so that the truth of the multiple criminal actions of the current administration would not come to light, since you realized that if such crimes see the light of day, your participation in covering them up would be apparent.

But please note that you are only making it WORSE for yourself by delaying the inevitable. There is a season for all things, and the season of this administration is rapidly ending.

If you tell these long-suppressed stories now, at this time, then the American people may mete out a degree of forgiveness for your failure to report the news. If not, you will be treated as all other war criminals. For wasn't Hitler's propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, guilty of war crimes? Were not his false statements responsible for causing untold death and misery, as much as the actions of any soldier or general?

We, the people of the United States of America, judge you guilty of protecting war criminals, and the door of leniency for your failure to tell the truth about those in power is quickly closing.

The War Crimes Act of 1996: Bush, Rumsfeld could be Indicted under US Law

The War Crimes Act of 1996, a federal statute set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 2441, makes it a federal crime for any U.S. national, whether military or civilian, to violate the Geneva Convention by engaging in murder, torture, or inhuman treatment.

The statute applies not only to those who carry out the acts, but also to those who ORDER IT, know about it, or fail to take steps to stop it. The statute applies to everyone, no matter how high and mighty.

18 U.S.C. § 2441 has no statute of limitations, which means that a war crimes complaint can be filed at any time.

The penalty may be life imprisonment or -- if a single prisoner dies due to torture -- death. Given that there are numerous, documented cases of prisoners being tortured to death by U.S. soldiers in both Iraq and Afghanistan (see for example this report), that means that the death penalty would be appropriate for anyone found guilty of carrying out, ordering, or sanctioning such conduct.

Here's where it gets interesting. The general in charge of the notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq stated this week that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and other top administration officials ORDERED that inhuman treatment and torture be conducted as part of a deliberate strategy. This confirms what the Pullitzer prize-winning reporter who uncovered the Iraq prison torture scandal and the Mai Lai massacre in Vietnam previously wrote.

Indeed, an FBI email declassified in December 2004 states that Bush signed an Executive Order authorizing torture (here is the list of documents obtained through a freedom of information act request, and take a close look, for example, at this one, which mentions the "executive order").

It has also recently come out that, even after the torture at Abu Ghraib hit the news, torture still continues at that prison and, indeed, the U.S. is still torturing people worldwide. Even to the casual observer, it is obvious that the administration has no plans to stop, but has instead been working tirelessly to make it easier to carry out torture in the future.

Let's recap. We now know that torture in Iraq was ordered by top officials, and that torture is continuing, notwithstanding the administration's claims that it was only "a couple of bad apples" that were responsible for Abu Ghraib. Making a potential prosecutor's job easier, U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales wrote a memo in January 2002 to President Bush saying that America should opt out of the Geneva Convention because top officials have to worry about prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2441. By attempting to sidestep the Geneva Convention, Gonzales created a document trail that can be used to prove that top administration officials knowingly created a policy of torturing prisoners, and that such a policy could reasonably have been expected to result in the death of some prisoners.

The U.S. did opt out of the Geneva Convention for the Afghanistan war, but we never opted out of the Geneva Convention for Iraq. Indeed, President Bush has repeatedly stated that Geneva applies in Iraq (although he has since claimed that foreign fighters captured in Iraq are not covered). Thus, there would be very little room for fancy footwork by defense lawyers in a prosecution against top officials concerning torture in Iraq.

And to the extent that claims that the U.S. has sent prisoners to other countries for the express purpose of being tortured are true, violation of the war crimes act by the highest officials of our country would be even clearer. For who else but Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and other top officials would have the ability to authorize such flights? How could such a program be undertaken without their knowledge? And how could such a program be anything but the intentional "ordering" of torture, or at least "knowing about it" and "failing to take steps to stop it"?

The Abu Ghraib general's recent statements about torture coming from the top and the existence of the "ghost flights" are important pieces of evidence for convicting Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, and a host of other top administration officials for violation of the War Crimes Act of 1996. Upon conviction, they could be sentenced to life in prison, or even death.

Additionally, violation of the war crimes act almost certainly constitutes a "high crime or misdemeanor" which would allow impeachment of such officials.

Postscript: Since this essay was written, new information has come out about torture and other potential violations of the Geneva Convention. The former director of the CIA accused Cheney of overseeing torture policies. Colin Powell's former chief of staff stated that Dick Cheney is guilty of war crimes. Some of the torturers themselves have come forward to confess their actions (see also this article; see also this article, this one, this one, and finally this one).

It was also revealed that the U.S. is holding prisoners at gulags in Europe.

In addition, before attacking Falluja, the marines allegedly stopped men "of fighting age" from leaving. The marines also levelled thousands of buildings, illegally denied access to the Iraqi Red Crescent and, according to the UN's special rapporteur, used "hunger and deprivation of water as a weapon of war against the civilian population".

And the U.S. military's use of white phosphorus and also napalm as weapons in Iraq has been exposed (see also this essay).

These facts further strengthen the case that high level officials committed war crimes. Indeed, even the lawyers and other people who aided in the effort may be war criminals; see also this article.
posted by George Washington
Comments:
said...

How could we begin a campaign for impeachment about this info?

6:27 PM
Anonymous 2 if by sea said...

How can we begin a campaign of HANGINGS for this?

9:14 PM
Blogger ~ FluxRostrum said...

Let's get George Sr. & Clinton while we're at it. Depleted Uranium IS an international war crime AND standard operating procedure.

Watch Beyond Treason

9:53 PM
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The issue of depleted uranium is a big one. The GI's now in Iraq are coming up with DU in their semen. DU is not only highly carcinogenic but a proven deformed baby maker.

The costs of this war will still be coming in long after the last GI comes home.

4.5 billion year half life for DU means DUbya babies will be being born for a long time to come.

1:25 AM
Anonymous cabil65 said...

America is not worried how many people these guys get killed, but god help them if they get caught with a girl going down on them.....

3:31 AM
Anonymous said...

The American Political structure itself is cleverly designed fraud to begin with. This criminal design is useful to the criminal classes to continue to defraud the people from one Administration to the next.
You mention Clinton, notice how he and Bush senior seem to be great pals today. With no statute of limitations for War crimes and murder, he must be real concerned that when the current war criminal falls, the population may take a look at his mass murder and terrorist bombings in Kosovo,

The business community wanted those bombings so that they could get the working class running for their lives, and then the victims could come to America to "Pump up the labor resource.

War, along with being the most depraved form of human behavior, produces great wealth by ripping off labor, the creator of all wealth.

Our criminal classes knew that we would figure this all out someday, so they went ahead with a nuclear build-up to kill us all, and indeed they have tried repeatedly to launch nuclear weapons on us. This is why they keep mum about the visitation by the Extraterrestrials.

ET has physically defeated our war criminal classes, now we need to merely drop them into our little bag for their trials. With new courts, not their phony group of Winkin, Blinkin and Nod. They, that is, our human criminal classes are finished. Period.

http://politicsofet.com

7:43 AM
Anonymous Anonymous said...

TALK TALK TALK WHATS THE POINT OF THIS BLOG OR ANY OTHER FREAKIN BLOG NO BODY TAKES ANY ACTION ABOUT THIS STUFF ITS ALL BITCHING AND WHINING NO ACTION WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH US?

8:16 AM
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe that this current presidency is what we Americans deserve now because as a people we've lost our purpose of direction and our national identity. We've lost our integrity as a nation, a nation that once stood for liberty and justice for all, through the manipulating leadership of this current administration that has shown us and the whole world that nothing will stop them from obtaining their goals. Not lying, not war, not torture or even the treasonous act in giving our enemies the names of the very people who fight the battles everyday to ensure our freedom like Plame and the many others like her. We've allowed individuals and groups hungry for power and money take control of our country by rewarding them for pandering to the wants of the majority rather than the needs of all. While at the same time they indulge the rich to gain more wealth at our expense in outsourcing their industries (our industries) to other countries to make an extra buck or two.

11:17 AM
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I certainly hope that something in the near future will happen to these criminals, sooner or later. Because if justice is not sent to do its work, then there will be a FINAL solution for all of them come judgement day when someone is seeking retrobution for all those murders. And if justice doesn't , May God help them find justice come revenge. And you you know about revenge, a dish best served cold! And it's a cold day for a bullet to sink in for the revenge of John F. Kennedy all the way to today. HEY BUSH! It's judgement day!

December 05, 2007

DC Madame case exposes breakdown in XIV, VI Amendments

Well, folks here ya have it! What happens under a politicized Federal judicial process, brought to you by Bill Clinton. ( One wants to say, slammed in yer face by William Jefferson Rockefeller, er, Clinton ... as in "William Jefferson Winthrop Rockefeller", google that!)

So much for a return to the RULE OF LAW this far. But we'll get there, eh?

There are so many issues in the Debra Jean, "D.C. Madame"/hookergate case it is unbelievable and the outcome is important to YOU if in the United States. Man, did I get an eyeful reading the indictment papers and following this.

Here's today's spelling lesson, can you spell

"C O V E R U P B I G T I M E"

as well as

"R O T T I N G E L I T E"

as well as

"B E L T W A Y H A N K I E P A N K Y A T T A X P A Y E R E X P E N S E"

and

"N A T I O N A L S E C U R I T Y R I S K S B E I N G I G N O R E D"

while no one seems to focus on the

"R E A L H I G H C R I M E S A N D M I S D E M E A N O R S"

being committed over all over

"T H E B E L T W A Y"

and just that bit over??

Keep your eyes ever on The Ball, keep the focus. The RULE OF LAW is in real bad shape my friends, it really is. Two-tiered justice, as they planned for such a long time has come to HAUNT America, while the killing goes on .......

Veeger

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Breaking News: Federal District Judge Gladys Kessler Removed from Palfrey Case

SIXTH AMENDMENT - "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence."

Washington D.C.--In an extremely belated administrative move, Judge Gladys Kessler has been removed from hearing the case of the accused Deborah Jeane Palfrey. This is likely due to a recent order by the jurist that was not only improper, but out-of-character based on the previous arc of the case. Also contingent is the fact that Judge Kessler was contributing greatly to an overlong pretrial process, while placing the blame almost solely on the defendant.

This would be a peculiar denial of due process (as guaranteed under section 1 of the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution) if it weren't for the obstructionism and shenanigans of the prosecution and Palfrey's previous court appointed criminal counsel that has been damaging to the defendant. What's interesting is that many of the rulings of Kessler and the behaviors of her former criminal counsel played-into-the-hands of the prosecution. Presumably, the removal and replacement ('transferred') of Kessler with fellow District of Columbia Federal Judge James Robertson is from a motion by the defendant and her counsel regarding both the criminal and civil cases.

A new trial date will be set at a scheduled December 14th hearing by Judge Robertson, and will also cover other aspects of the proceedings. These could include motions for removing injunctions by Kessler and the prosecution regarding public release of information on former clients of Pamela Martin & Associates. The action begins at 10:00 am EST in federal courtroom 23A in the District of Columbia. Unlike Judge Kessler, Judge Robertson ruled that the Guantanamo Bay tribunals were illegal as constituted back in November 8th of 2004 in 'Salim Ahmed Hamdan v. Donald H. Rumsfeld.'

What's been implicitly clear in the previous pretrial proceedings is an unwillingness to address the defendant's Fourteenth (and by inclusion) Sixth amendment rights to due process and the basic American right to confront one's accusers. Poorly-intentioned federal trial procedures-be-damned. It should be noted that Judge Roberston was also a FISA court judge, resigning from it in late-2005 once the New York Times ended its year-long suppression of the warrantless surveillance story. Some commenters believe that Judge Robertson is one of the primary leakers in the story of the Bush admimistration bypassing the FISA courts through a secret NSA program.

The leak concerning the illegal surveillance of the American public under the umbrella of the NSA by the White House is interesting as nobody knows who unmasked it, though the Justice Department began an investigation that appears to have gone nowhere. All of this is interesting since Palfrey's case could have begun under such illegal surveillance programs, possibly in-conjunction with SWIFT in Europe. December could be that month where a number of gifts to the American public are exchanged: a return of our embattled liberties. Kessler had scheduled the criminal trial of Palfrey for February 19th. It's unclear until the scheduled hearing this month when that date will be, and even then we may not know.


On Judge Robert's decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/08/politics/08cnd-gitm.html?ex=1257656400&en=c00930119f53c9ab&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland

December 04, 2007

U.S. Finds That Iran Halted Nuclear Arms Bid in 2003 MORE WAR CRIMES

Boys and Girls,

Today's news shows us what happens when someone, someone as yet unnamed gets frightened of The People. The polls are showing 90% favor for IMPEACHMENT. The forces are gathering, and CONgress is scared, that is for sure. Someone's whistling blowing on why the subpoenas weren't followed on the NIE on IRAN .. and now, we have the black on white on Iran.

Only it doesn't stop with the issuance of this item, it CONTINUES . it actually raises more speculation as to what NOW! They are still war criminals, they aren't absolved of what they did, someone just made sure it didn't get any worse than it already is. And we will never know why, though there will misinfo, disinfo, spin and historical speculation; many will take credit, but it is the you and I that made the difference. I surely would not want the upcoming impeachment demo on TV during the Rosebowl parade if I was sucking defense money up like water on a hot summer's day. But perhaps there is even more than that at work here.

But let's see, what's NEXT (we're all conditioned to think that way now, what IS Next ..??)

Now all await the BUSHISTAS efforts to blame the loss of the Irak "engagement" on CONgress, which MADE them all "rush" into Iraq and forcing them to beleagure the threat of WWWIII to help us win the war - with OUR enemies. Nothing to do with them.


We are all to blame for the defeat of American forces, too, for we did not support them. Every little demo, every petition, every blog was TO BLAME for the lack of moral and the will to "win" that little 3-day "exurcusion," the shock and awe campaign from HELL. We killed ALL those troops and all those Iraqis.

We are the ones who demanded attacks on Iran, not THEM.

You and CONgress and I are to blame that Osama is still at large (remember a tape is to be released this week ..)

Why do we need a missile defense shield if Iran and North Korea are now neutralized? Or are we to blame for that expensive boondoggle, too? WE insisted on it! Not THEM! We got the kickbacks from the defense contractors, right? We ran the budget into ruin.

Can you say DELUSIONAL? Can you see this PROVES it ? ?

Do you see what I am driving at? Can you?

And remember what I said, weeks back, ENTER JAY ROCKEFELLER! WOW! HERO!

It was time for the CIA to trot him soon. And here he IS!!

So be SURE To watch this administration spin, spin, spin --- see the CBS article after the WaPo article.

First one to bitch about my analyses, someone who thinks I don't get The Game, pays for my ISP for a year .. I am RIGHT, you'll see.

Again, the IRAN debacle is yet another war crime, folks, it really is. They KNEW for a year it was all lies, yet they lied about Iran, they treated the President of Iran in a despicable way when he visited the United States after issuing him a visa, they scared the Iranian people and all of us nearly to distraction. Sigh, when does it END??

This mess, this nightmare is far from over; as this definitely proves how intelligence "gets" manipulated to serve the President's and the Vice President's end; the buck stops with them.

And the media has had a hand in all this. Mark my words, or as I say, WATCH. People are going to be very angry seeing how they were duped in the media.

One LAST note: Mike McConnell is the freak bringing you telecom surveillance, nice, real nice.

Veeger

They now need a new enemy and YOU and I are IT.
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, December 4, 2007; Page A01

If Iran were to proceed with a weapons effort, it would not be carried out at known facilities, the officials said, adding that they do not believe Iran is enriching uranium at an undeclared facility.

Congressional leaders of both parties had been pressing the director of national intelligence, Mike McConnell, for the report for months, and some had worried that the delay was the result of the administration's efforts to influence the final result. Those concerns appeared to dissipate yesterday, when the report contradicted not only the administration's views but also the intelligence community's previous assessments -- evidence, to many observers, of the intelligence agencies' new willingness to question assumptions and assert their independence from policymakers.


"The key judgments show that the intelligence community has learned its lessons from the Iraq debacle," said Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), who chairs the Senate intelligence committee. He was referring to long-standing Democratic allegations that intelligence on Iraq was skewed to help promote the administration's desire for war.

In this case, Rockefeller said,

"it has issued judgments that break sharply with its own previous assessments, and they reflect a real difference from the views espoused by top administration officials."

While concluding that Iran's weapons program is now halted, the NIE presents a mixed view of Tehran's nuclear ambitions. It portrays Iran's ruling clerics as susceptible to international pressure, having abandoned an extensive and costly covert nuclear program in the face of threatened economic sanctions and global censure.

But the report also depicts Iran as cleverly preserving its options, by making steady strides toward a civilian nuclear energy capability that both complies with international law and puts the country on a course that will allow it to easily develop nuclear arms if it so chooses.

The report also states more confidently than in previous assessments that Iran's military had been actively seeking to build a bomb. Iranian armed forces were "working under government direction to develop nuclear weapons" until the fall of 2003, it says.

The assessment, under preparation for more than 18 months, was completed on Tuesday and President Bush and Vice President Cheney were briefed on Wednesday, intelligence officials said. Hadley said Bush first learned in August or September about intelligence indicating Iran had halted its weapons program and was advised it would take time to evaluate.

Several participants said there was strong debate among analysts during the process, but in the end they agreed on nearly every judgment. A majority of the intelligence agencies assessed, with high confidence, that the closure of the military program marks the end of the weapons effort. The Energy Department and the National Intelligence Council said gaps in what they know make them conclude only with "moderate confidence" that efforts remain on hold.

The State Department's bureau of intelligence and research judged Iran to be slightly further away from producing enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb.

Last year, Congress required that key judgments from the NIE be declassified. McConnell said in November that he had no plans to issue an unclassified version, but officials said the dramatic shift in the assessment convinced him otherwise.

Since our understanding of Iran's nuclear capabilities has changed, we felt it was important to release this information to ensure that an accurate presentation is available,
Donald Kerr, principal deputy director of national intelligence, said in a statement.

Staff writers Walter Pincus, Peter Baker and Robin Wright and staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.


Why Was The NIE Released?

By Kevin Drum

Answers.com

(Political Animal) WHY WAS THE NIE RELEASED?....A couple of random thoughts on the newly released NIE concluding that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003:
  • This NIE was apparently finished a year ago, and its basic parameters were almost certainly common knowledge in the White House well before that. This means that all the leaks, all the World War III stuff, all the blustering about the IAEA — all of it was approved for public consumption after Cheney/Bush/Rice/etc. knew perfectly well it was mostly baseless.

  • Why were the key judgments finally released? Cheney didn't want them released, Bush surely didn't want them released, and DNI Mike McConnell told Congress a few weeks ago that he didn't want them released. So who did?
All I've got is speculation on the second question, but here it is: it was congressional pressure. Democratic members of the various intelligence committees saw the NIE (or a summary or a verbal report or something) and went ballistic. Footnotes and dissents are one thing, but withholding a report whose primary conclusion is 180 degrees contrary to years of administration innuendo produced a rebellion. Somebody who got briefed must has threatened something pretty serious if the NIE didn't see the light of day.

Like I said, just a guess. But who else has the clout to force Bush, Cheney, and McConnell to change course?

By the way, Stephen Hadley will be on TV furiously providing the Bush administration's spin on all this at 3:15 Eastern time. Should be good for some laughs.
More on washingtonpost.com
Iran Welcomes Report, Says Atomic Plans Peaceful

» Related Topics & Web Content


CTV.ca

Analysis: Iran nuclear report reveals US knows very little
Ha'aretz, Israel - 4 hours ago
The unclassified document that director of National Intelligence, Adm. Mike McConnell published, titled "Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities," as a ...
Iran Hawks Down? Mother Jones
Iran Stopped Nuke Program In 2003 U.S. News & World Report
Report: Iran Stopped Weapons Program in 2003 NPR
Baltimore Sun - The Associated Press
all 1,238 news articles »

Mike McConnell

From SourceWatch

Jump to: navigation, search

Retired Admiral John Michael "Mike" McConnell was confirmed February 6, 2007, by the U.S. Senate as Director of National Intelligence (DNI).[1]

On February 20, 2007, McConnell was sworn in to office.[2]

Prior to his nomination[3] by President George W. Bush, he was a Vice President and Director of Booz Allen Hamilton's Infrastructure Assurance Center of Excellence.[4]

McConnell served as director of the National Security Agency from 1992 to 1996. He was Intelligence Officer (J-2) for the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS-J2) during the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Operation DESERT STORM under former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell.[5]

"During his tenure at the Pentagon and as director of the National Security Agency, Admiral McConnell worked closely" with now Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates "during Mr. Gates’s time as deputy national security adviser and as director of central intelligence, and with Dick Cheney while he was defense secretary during the first Persian Gulf war."[6]

At Booz Allen Hamilton, McConnell supported the National Communications Systems, a joint industry and federal agency group that focuses on telecommunications, national security and emergency procedures issues.[7]

McConnell is a former Chairman of the Board at the Intelligence and National Security Alliance (INSA), of which Booz Allen Hamilton is a founding member.[8]



October 27, 2007

Highly questionable article in the Washington Post on rendition, terror suspects and the CIA

Why don't they say that Hayden spoke to the Council on Foreign Relations? for heaven's sake! Makes me doubt the entire article. V

From CIA Jails, Inmates Fade Into Obscurity

Dozens of 'Ghost Prisoners' Not Publicly Accounted For

Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, October 27, 2007; Page A01

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- On Sept. 6, 2006, President Bush announced that the CIA's overseas secret prisons had been temporarily emptied and 14 al-Qaeda leaders taken to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But since then, there has been no official accounting of what happened to about 30 other "ghost prisoners" who spent extended time in the custody of the CIA.

Some have been secretly transferred to their home countries, where they remain in detention and out of public view, according to interviews in Pakistan and Europe with government officials, human rights groups and lawyers for the detainees. Others have disappeared without a trace and may or may not still be under CIA control.

The bulk of the ghost prisoners were captured in Pakistan, where they scattered after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

Among them is Mustafa Setmariam Nasar, a dual citizen of Syria and Spain and an influential al-Qaeda ideologue who was last seen two years ago. On Oct. 31, 2005, the red-bearded radical with a $5 million U.S. bounty on his head arrived in the Pakistani border city of Quetta, unaware he was being followed.

Nasar was cornered by police as he and a small group of followers stopped for dinner. Soon after, according to Pakistani officials, he was handed over to U.S. spies and vanished into the CIA's prison network. Since then, various reports have placed him in Syria, Afghanistan and India, though nobody has been able to confirm his whereabouts.

Nearly all the Arab members of al-Qaeda caught in Pakistan were given to the CIA, Pakistani security officials said. But the fate of several Pakistani al-Qaeda operatives who were also captured remains murky; the Pakistani government has ignored a number of lawsuits filed by relatives seeking information.

"You just don't know -- either these people are in the custody of the Pakistanis or the Americans," said Zafarullah Khan, human rights coordinator for the Pakistan Muslim League, an opposition political party.

Others have been handed over to governments that have kept their presence a secret.

Since 2004, for example, the CIA has handed five Libyan fighters to authorities in Tripoli. Two had been covertly nabbed by the CIA in China and Thailand, while the others were caught in Pakistan and held in CIA prisons in Afghanistan, Eastern Europe and other locations, according to Libyan sources.

The Libyan government has kept silent about the cases. But Libyan political exiles said the men are kept in isolation with no prospect of an open trial.

Other ghost prisoners are believed to remain in U.S. custody after passing into and out of the CIA's hands, according to human rights groups.

Relatives of a Tunisian al-Qaeda suspect known as Retha al-Tunisi, captured in Karachi, Pakistan, in 2002, received notice recently from the International Committee of the Red Cross that he is detained at a U.S. military prison in Afghanistan, said Clara Gutteridge, an investigator for Reprieve, a London-based legal rights group that represents many inmates at the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay. Other prisoners, since released, had previously reported seeing Tunisi at a secret CIA "black site" in Afghanistan.


At least one former CIA prisoner has been quietly freed. Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani, an Iraqi intelligence agent captured after the invasion of Iraq in 2003, was detained at a secret location until he was released last year.

Ani gained notoriety before the Iraq war when Bush administration officials said he had met in Prague with Sept. 11, 2001, hijacker Mohamed Atta. Some officials, including Vice President Cheney, cited the rendezvous as evidence of an alliance between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. The theory was later debunked by U.S. intelligence agencies and the Sept. 11 commission, which revealed in 2004 that Ani was in U.S. custody.



The Iraqi spy resurfaced two months ago when Czech officials revealed that he had filed a multimillion-dollar compensation claim. His complaint: that unfounded Czech intelligence reports had prompted his imprisonment by the CIA.

Guantanamo Newcomers


When Bush confirmed the existence of the CIA's prisons in September 2006, he said they had been vacated for the time being. But he said the U.S. government would use them again, if necessary.

The CIA has resumed its detention program. Since March, five new terrorism suspects have been transferred to Guantanamo. Although the Pentagon has not disclosed details about how or precisely when they were captured, officials have said one of the prisoners, Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi, had spent months in CIA custody overseas.

Details of the secret detention program remain classified. U.S. officials have offered only vague descriptions of its reach and scope.

Last month, in a speech in New York, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden said "fewer than 100 people" had been detained in the CIA's overseas prison network since the program's inception in early 2002.

In June, a coalition of human rights groups identified 39 people who may have been in CIA custody but are still missing. Many of those on the list, however, were identified by partial names or noms de guerre, such as one man described only as Mohammed the Afghan.

Joanne Mariner, director of terrorism and counterterrorism research for Human Rights Watch, said the CIA has moved many prisoners from country to country and relied on other spy services to take custody of suspects, sometimes temporarily and sometimes for good.

"The large majority have gone to their countries of origin," she said. "But that doesn't mean all of them. There could be some that are still in proxy detention."

In a footnote to its 2004 report, the Sept. 11 commission named nine al-Qaeda suspects who were in U.S. custody at black sites. Seven were later transferred to Guantanamo.

Still missing is Hassan Ghul, a Pakistani national captured in northern Iraq in January 2004. U.S. officials have described him as a high-level emissary between al-Qaeda's core command in Pakistan and its affiliates in Iraq.

Another prisoner on the commission's list was Ali Abd al-Rahman al-Faqasi al-Ghamdi, a Saudi accused of planning attacks in the Arabian Peninsula. He surrendered to Saudi authorities in June 2003.

Although the Sept. 11 commission reported that Ghamdi was in U.S. custody, Saudi officials said that was not the case. They said he remains in prison in Saudi Arabia and has never left the country.

"He was never, under no condition, in U.S. custody," said a Saudi security source who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Officials with the International Committee of the Red Cross said they have failed to find dozens of people once believed to have been in CIA custody, despite repeated queries to the U.S. government and other countries.

"The ICRC remains gravely concerned by the fate of the persons previously held in the CIA detention program who remain unaccounted for," said Simon Schorno, a Red Cross spokesman in Washington. "The ICRC is concerned about any type of secret detention."

The CIA declined to comment on whether certain individuals were ever in its custody.

"Apart from detainees transferred to Guantanamo, the CIA does not, as a rule, comment publicly on lists of people alleged to have been in its custody -- even though those lists are often flawed," said Paul Gimigliano, a CIA spokesman.

Out in the Cold


When the Bush administration disclosed last year that 14 senior al-Qaeda leaders had been transferred to Guantanamo -- leaving the CIA prisons temporarily vacant -- some conspicuous names were missing from the list.

One was an al-Qaeda training camp leader known as Ibn al-Sheikh al-Libi. He was arrested in the Pakistani border town of Kohat in late 2001 and eventually taken to Cairo, where the CIA enlisted Egyptian intelligence agents to help with the interrogation.

Libi began to talk. Among his claims: that the Iraqi regime had provided training in poisons and mustard gas to al-Qaeda operatives.

His statements were cited by the Bush administration as part of the rationale for invading Iraq in 2003. He recanted after the war began, however, and his continued detention became a political liability for the CIA.

Although the CIA has since acknowledged that Libi was one of its prisoners, U.S. officials have not disclosed what happened to him. In interviews, however, political exiles from Libya said he was flown by the CIA to Tripoli in early 2006 and imprisoned by the Libyan government.


Libi reported that the CIA had taken him from Egypt to several other covert sites, including in Jordan, Morocco and Afghanistan, according to a Libyan security source.

He also claimed that he had been kept someplace very cold and that his CIA captors had told him he was in Alaska, the source said. Human rights groups have suggested that Libi was part of a small group of senior al-Qaeda figures held in a CIA prison in northern Poland.

In Tripoli, Libi joined several other Libyans who had spent time in the CIA's penal system. All were members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, a network that had plotted for years from exile to overthrow Moammar Gaddafi.

After the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, members of the Libyan network who had been staying there dispersed. The CIA helped Libya's spy agencies track down some of the leaders.

One of them, Abdallah al-Sadeq, was apprehended in a covert CIA operation in Thailand in the spring of 2004, according to Noman Benotman, a former member of the Libyan militant network.

Another, Abu Munder al-Saadi, the group's spiritual leader, was caught in the Hong Kong airport. In both cases, Benotman said, the Libyans were held briefly by the CIA before U.S. agents flew them to Tripoli.

"They realized very quickly that these guys had nothing to do with al-Qaeda," Benotman said in an interview in London. "They kept them for a few weeks, and that's it."

Benotman said he confirmed details of the CIA operations when he was allowed to see the men during a visit to a Tripoli prison this year. The trip was arranged by the Libyan government as part of an effort to persuade the Libyan prisoners to reconcile with the Gaddafi regime.

The CIA has transferred at least two other Libyans to Tripoli, Benotman said. Khaled al-Sharif and another Libyan known only as Rabai were captured in Peshawar, Pakistan, in 2003 and spent time in a CIA prison in Afghanistan, he said.

The Libyan Embassy in Washington did not respond to a faxed letter seeking comment.

A Missing 'Gold Mine'


In Spain, prosecutors have been searching for Nasar, the redheaded al-Qaeda ideologue, for four years.

In 2003, he was indicted by an investigative magistrate in Madrid, accused of helping to build sleeper cells in Spain. A prolific writer and theoretician in the jihadi movement, Nasar had lived in several European countries as well as Afghanistan.


Spain has filed requests for information about Nasar with the Pakistani government, to no avail. Spanish Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos also raised the issue during a visit to Islamabad last year.

"We don't have any indication of where he is," said a source in the Spanish Foreign Ministry, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Brynjar Lia, a Norwegian terrorism analyst and the author of a new book on Nasar, "Architect of Global Jihad," said the radical would know valuable details about the inner workings of al-Qaeda.

"The Americans are probably the ones who want him the most because he was prominently involved in al-Qaeda in the 1990s," said Lia, a senior researcher at the Norwegian Defense Research Establishment. "He must be a gold mine of information."

Some Spanish media have speculated that Nasar is being held in Syria, his place of birth. The CIA has transferred other terrorism suspects to Syria despite tense diplomatic relations between Washington and Damascus.

Other Spanish press reports have claimed that Nasar remains in U.S. custody. Another rumor is that he's being held in a CIA-run prison in India, said Manuel Tuero, a Madrid lawyer who represents Nasar's wife.

Though Nasar would go on trial if he was brought back to Spain, that would be preferable to indefinite detention in a secret prison, Tuero said.

"He's in a legal limbo," he said. "The Americans would never give him a fair trial. Spain would."

Special correspondents Munir Ladaa in Berlin and Cristina Mateo-Yanguas in Madrid contributed to this report.


More on oversight of BLACKWATER and its current PR campaign

Blackwater delivers supplies to wildfire victims in

California

By BILL SIZEMORE, The Virginian-Pilot
© October 26, 2007

The California wildfires have come within a quarter-mile of the property where Blackwater wants to build a West Coast training facility, but the company's on-site manager isn't worried. He says the fires won't deter Blackwater from moving ahead with its controversial plans.

Meanwhile, the company is helping deliver food and other supplies to burned-out residents of the rural community. Opponents of the Blackwater West project say they're grateful for the help, but it won't deter them from the fight.

<

Brian Bonfiglio, project manager for Blackwater West, said Friday the devastating fires haven't touched the site of the proposed project, and he doesn't expect that to happen.

"It's all grazed grassland," he said. "There are no trees or buildings. It won't burn."

Bonfiglio said the Moyock, N.C.-based security company remains on track to build a training center for military and law enforcement personnel on the 800-acre chicken and cattle ranch near Potrero, a hamlet 45 miles east of San Diego near the Mexican border.

The project has drawn vocal opposition from a coalition of rural residents, environmentalists and peace activists. Some have suggested that the proposed facility - which would include firing ranges with live ammunition - would pose an increased fire risk.

Not so, said Bonfiglio: "There will be no explosives training and no tracer ammunition. Lead bullets don't start fires."

On the contrary, he said, the proposed facility would benefit the community if it is threatened by fire again. He said it could be used as a "command center" with bunkhouses for evacuees and water tanks with a 35,000-gallon capacity.

Bonfiglio said Blackwater has made three deliveries of food, water, personal hygiene products and generator fuel to 300 area residents, many of whom have been trapped for days without supplies.

The fires came within 30 feet of Jan Hedlun's back door, flattening a chaparral forest. She said her property looks like a "moonscape."

Hedlun, a leading Blackwater opponent, said she still believes the proposed training facility poses an increased fire risk.

"It didn't take anything to set this one off," she said. "It only took one spark."

Nevertheless, she said, she is grateful for the company's relief efforts.

"We're in survival mode now," she said. "We'll get back to the political arena later."

In other Blackwater-related developments:

n Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who pledged this week to strengthen oversight of Blackwater and other private security providers in Iraq, says she didn't act earlier because she didn't want to "second-guess" State Department personnel on the ground in Iraq.

But newly revealed e-mails show that top officials were warned more than two years ago about repeated incidents of Blackwater guards killing Iraqi civilians.

"Do you think you made a mistake by taking so long to recognize that the oversight of Blackwater was woefully inadequate?" Rep. William Clay, D-Mo., asked Rice during a congressional committee hearing Thursday.

"These are decisions that were made on the ground by people who were reviewing the circumstances and I'm not going to second-guess them here on the spot," Rice replied.

Later Thursday, ABC News revealed State Department e-mails detailing a series of shootings by Blackwater convoys in May and June 2005 in which three Iraqis were killed.

In an e-mail to his superiors in Baghdad, Michael Bishop, a State Department security officer in Al Hillah, warned that failure to address the issue would come back to haunt the United States.

"Not resolving these situations in a quick and decisive manner is counterproductive in regards to accomplishing our foreign policy objectives, ensuring our safety (and)... maintaining the continued good will of the Iraqi people," he wrote.

n Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., called Friday for an expanded investigation into alleged tax evasion by Blackwater.

Earlier in the week, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., alleged that Blackwater has avoided paying millions of dollars in taxes by misclassifying its workers as independent contractors rather than employees.

In a response, Blackwater said it had relied on a ruling by the Small Business Administration. Kerry chairs a Senate committee that oversees the SBA.

In letters to Senate colleagues and Blackwater CEO Erik Prince, Kerry said SBA rulings have no applicability to questions of tax liability.

Now for the NON Mainstream media take .. from Huffington Post

Blackwater Wants To Build Live Fire Facility In Middle Of San Diego Fire Zone

October 26, 2007 11:02 AM


2007-10-22-blackwater.jpgWhile San Diego County has been lit up for days, Blackwater USA has been heavily involved in putting out fires of its own. The controversy provoked by the killing of 17 Iraqis in September and other violent incidents has prompted the company to send out an e-mail Wednesday to its supporters calling on them to "Tell the Blackwater story."

This note from Blackwater, perhaps ill timed, is provoking outrage among California activists who are trying to prevent the private security company from building an 824-acre training facility near Potrero, California in San Diego County. While the company is hoping to become a major part of the community with its giant military-style facility, one activist told the Huffington Post that Blackwater has not yet announced any donations to relief efforts or supplied resources to assist firefighting activities in the area.

"This is a simple demonstration that these people are interested in their own greed and have no concern for the local community," said Rick Jacobs who heads up the Courage Campaign, a group that is assisting local residents who are organizing to fight construction of the Blackwater facility.

Blackwater staff did not answer multiple phone calls requesting comment on whether or not they had donated to relief efforts or assisted firefighting in the area.

While Blackwater was calling on its supporters to help promote its work in Congress, it shut down a local effort to promote "Blackwater West." An announcement on Monday night at the blog Cafe San Diego showed that Blackwater Vice President Brian Bonfliglio had canceled a live blogging question and answer session scheduled for Tuesday because of the fires.

Jacobs and others charge that building the base in an area he described as a box canyon with only two exit points would only create more major fire hazards.

The Harris Fire in San Diego County has burned 81,000 acres, reportedly destroyed 155 homes, 2 commercial properties and 17 outbuildings, and caused one death and 25 civilian injuries. The fire burned buildings in Potrero, which is only a couple of miles from Blackwater's proposed site.

"The mere fact that there would be live fire exercises very often in this tinderbox is of great concern to people who live there," he warned. "If a spark can cause a wildfire, what about a bullet? And if you have stores of ammunition, and the fires were raging, you'd get a huge explosion."

Jacobs was also angry that the company was claiming it would make Potrero safer.

"What they say here is the same as what they say in Iraq," the Courage Campaign director said. "They say they are making Iraq safer for America, but they've caused a lot of civil war. Now they like to say they'll make Potrero safer from fire. It's probably an analogous statement. They say what they have to say."


And all this from Wired's Noah Schactman ..


Blackwater = Fire-Fighter?

By Noah Shachtman EmailOctober 26, 2007 | 3:34:02 PMCategories: Homeland Security, Mercs

Firefighter_at_flames Blackwater guns-for-hire famously took over security on some New Orleans streets after Hurricane Katrina. Now, the company is saying that it wants to help fight California's forest fires.

Here's the background. Blackwater, as Salon notes, "is planning to build an 824-acre military-style training complex in Potrero, Calif., a rural hamlet 45 miles east of San Diego." If the private military contractor gets its way, it'll "turn a former chicken ranch into 'Blackwater West,' the company's second-largest facility in the country. It will include a multitude of weapons firing ranges, a tactical driving track, a helipad, a 33,000-square-foot urban simulation training area, an armory for storing guns and ammunition, and dorms and classrooms."

Local groups opposed to the complex said, before the latest conflagrations near San Diego, that Blackwater West's "regular detonation of firearms would be a risk both to the fire-prone landscape as well as to the wildlife that currently calls that area home, including the golden eagle and the California condor."

Au contraire, Blackwater execs answer. Brian Bonfiglio, vice president of Blackwater West, notes that the complex's proposal includes water tanks capable of holding 35,000 gallons. "I see a tactical operation center for East County fires," he says. "Can you imagine how much of a benefit it would be if we were operational now?"

Sounds to me like the company is going to need yet another logo.

On a semi-related note... The other day, we noted the many changes that Blackwater's web site has undergone, over the years. Reader PS reminds us that the Wayback Machine has archives of the company's online presence, all the way back to 2002.

(High five: Kris)

ALSO:

* Vote: Blackwater's New Logo
* Blackwater Goes Grass-Roots, Scrubs Site
* The Times' Blackwater-Air Force Conspiracy
* NATO Wants Outsourced Air Force
* Pentagon vs CIA over Blackwater
* Blackwater Ordered Out of Iraq?
* Blackwater's a Black Sheep?
* Blackwater: Whose Side Are They On?
* The Private Military Company Happy Meal
* Condi Can't Afford to Lose Blackwater
* Video: Blackwater's Ad Campaign
* Blackwater and Friends: America's Achilles' Heel?
* A Kinder, Gentler Blackwater?
* Blackwater Hits the High Seas
* Blackwater: Japan's Missile Defense Force
* Blackwater's Hired PR Guns: Hillary's Helpers
* Disaster Outsourcing
* Blackwater: It's the Money, Stupid
* Blackwater's X-Wing Fighters
* Blackwater Hearings Ain't No Superbad
*
Watch Blackwater Dig Its Own Grave
* Blackwater Author on Blackwater Shootings
* Addicted to Blackwater
* Black Days for Blackwater
* Blackwater: From Bad to Worse
* Top 10 PR Moves for Blackwater
* The Merc Cartoon
* Blackwater "Bitch Slap": Right Move?
* Blackwater Mess Fencing Diplos In
* The Blackwater Backlash
* Blackwater Ban "Inevitable"
* Blackwater: Banned in Iraq?
* Blackwater: The Vote
* Blackwater Goes Down the Rabbit Hole
* Blackwater Buying Counter-Insurgency Aircraft
* Blackwater Sprawl
* Inside the Belly of the Blackwater Beast
* Officers, Mercs Brawl
* Mercenary King, Revealed

October 21, 2007

Let's try this one more time: There isn't going to be any oversight in any type of market "trading" any time soon. The US Treasury Secretary will see to THAT. He's plenty of time to do something about it but doesn't. The US Treasury is at BEST a racket designed to keep money in the pockets of only those in the highest income brackets and at worst, playing the market to its own advantage.

The market on all levels is kaput; it's dominated by LARGE players; huge-profit billionaires and big time institutional investors including government agencies from the US and around the world. Many of these (take the Quebec Teacher's Pension Fund) are now bankrupt do to "bad paper" that were backed by liar loan mortgages - paper that could not be rated. Sure there are some Joe Potatoes investors shorting and the like (although that time has pretty much passed unless you can really justify the broker's fee to pay for your trades - or have a broker's license), but in the main the money which is NOT smart has gone into futures and commodity trading that THINKS the problem is oil and therefore wants to bet on commodities' prices going up due to the "inflation" of goods prices.

But the smart money has moved on, guys - the WaPo is misleading you (I sing with a caustic tone) ...

the truth is the MONEY is in copper as it leads to URANIUM. Super profits to be had! And no one, I assure you is going to regulate that money invested. In fact, the big funds are trading off shore, far away from REGULATION!!

The "energy" trading game is really being done in negotiating behind the scenes as to who is going to benefit from so-called carbon credits AND who can get the foot up on building new nuclear reactors. That's the REAL energy trading -- and that is only subliminally referred to in this article. Biodiesel fuels may LOOK like the future but they are NOT, people will notice that no solar, wind, water, air energy is being created. They will eventually notice that the earth cannot support dirty energy mining either. But meanwhile manipulation of the energy trading market will continue UNABATED - it's the red herring in the whole pile of utter .. um .. crap.

Everybody's been HAD; this article is an example of the "too little, too late" school of charm. Would that they had noticed all this during the post 9/11 market meltdown and profit taking in 2001, eh? What happened then boyz at the WaPo? How come nothing was said about regulation and oversight THEN?

You know a useful article might be one about sticking noses into the new NASDAQ trading .. and coming to grips with gambling addiction!! But I guess we'll just sit it out on the sidelines waiting for the "1929" type suicides to occur which have been remarkably slow to start .. YET.

Energy Traders Avoid Scrutiny

As Commodities Market Grows, Oversight Is Slight

Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 21, 2007; Page A01

One year ago, a 32-year-old trader at a giant hedge fund named Amaranth held huge sway over the price the country paid for natural gas. Trading on unregulated commodity exchanges, he made risky bets that led to the fund's collapse -- and, according to a congressional investigation, higher gas bills for homeowners.

But as another winter approaches, lawmakers and federal regulators have yet to set up a system to prevent another big fund from cornering a vital commodity market. Called by some insiders the Wild West of Wall Street, commodity trading is a world where many goods that are key to national security or public consumption, such as oil, pork bellies or uranium, are traded with almost no oversight.



Part of the problem is that the regulator, the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission, has had a hard time keeping up with the sector it oversees. Commodity trading has exploded in complexity and popularity, growing six-fold in trading volume since 2000 -- the year that a handful of giant energy companies, including Enron, successfully lobbied to get Congress to exempt energy markets from government regulation.

Meanwhile CFTC's staffing has dropped to its lowest level in the agency's 33-year history. Its computer systems that monitor trades are outdated. Its leadership has seen frequent turnover.

"We are facing flat budgets and exponential growth in the industry," said CFTC Acting Chairman Walter Lukken. "Over the long term this type of budgetary situation is not sustainable."

The House Agriculture Committee is holding a hearing Wednesday on whether to expand the CFTC's authority and budget. In the Senate, Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.) has proposed a bill that would require all energy commodity exchanges to register with the agency and establish trading limits on investors. But similar efforts over the last few years have failed to make it out of committee. And this year, getting the House and Senate to vote on the matter may not be easy, given their busy agendas.

Some who work in the commodities markets question whether the CFTC, even if it got more money, would be an effective monitor because much of the trading occurs in private and is untraceable. Others criticized Levin's bill as overly broad, saying it could stifle markets that, Amaranth notwithstanding, have been working well.

Lawmakers acknowledged there are issues that have to be ironed out. But they are also concerned about time running out this year.

"We need to put a cop back on the beat in U.S. energy markets to stop excessive speculation and trading abuses," Levin said. "We have all seen what can happen if we don't act."

He was talking about Amaranth and its former star trader, Brian Hunter.

Hunter started trading energy commodities at age 24. After a tumultuous stint at Deutsche Bank, he was hired in 2004 by Amaranth Advisors, a hedge fund in Greenwich, Conn.

After making the fund $100 million in profits in natural gas in 2005, Hunter was promoted to head of energy trading. He began to take gigantic positions in natural gas on a regulated exchange called the New York Mercantile Exchange, or Nymex. Hunter largely traded highly volatile futures contracts, which allow investors to make complex bets on what price a commodity will fetch at various points in the future.


At one point in the summer of 2006, Hunter controlled up to 70 percent of natural gas commodities on Nymex that were scheduled to supply companies and homes in November of last year and more than 40 percent of contracts for the entire winter season, according to a report into Amaranth's activities by the Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations.

His positions were so big he could cause the price to move in the way he wanted by buying or selling massive amounts of his holdings in the last 30 minutes of trading on Nymex, a move known as "smashing the close," federal regulators say Nymex expressed concern over Hunter's activities and sent several warnings. Finally, in August 2006, Nymex ordered him to reduce his holdings. Hunter obeyed, but then simply replicated his positions on an unregulated commodity exchange run by Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), one of dozens in the industry, the congressional report said. And Hunter kept making trades.

Because ICE was not subject to any oversight, neither Nymex nor federal regulators could see what he was doing. Nevertheless, the volatility in gas prices that summer became so severe that even Hunter predicted it might draw official attention.

"Boy I bet you see some CFTC inquiries," Hunter wrote in an e-mail to another trader, according to the congressional report.

"Until they monitor [unregulated exchanges] no big deal," came the response.

In August, natural gas prices remained unusually high due to Amaranth's activity, according to the Senate investigation, even though adequate supplies combined with unusually warm forecasts made it apparent there would be plenty for the winter.

At the same time, many utilities across the country were locking in prices they would pay for the natural gas they would receive in the winter. They had no way of knowing what Amaranth was doing, said David Schryver, executive vice president of the American Public Gas Association.

But a few hedge funds became suspicious.

One of those, Centaurus, appeared to figure out the pattern behind Amaranth's investment strategy and positioned itself to make a profit at Amaranth's expense. On the last day of trading in August, Amaranth started selling off its gas contracts for September, but Centaurus countered by buying up Amaranth's positions. The two funds battled frantically over gas prices until the closing bell. Prices moved in the way that Centaurus had bet on.

Eventually Amaranth's losses totaled $6 billion. It lost the ability to pay back its debtors and closed its doors.

But homeowners lost out, too, because many utilities locked in prices for natural gas at just the wrong moment when gas prices were high. The ultimate cost nationwide has not been tallied, but one utility, the Municipal Gas Authority of Georgia, calculated that its 243,000 customers paid an extra $18 million in the 2006-07 winter season because of Amaranth. More than half of American homes are heated by natural gas. (and also half of those have no insulation, I'll betcha!!)

The CFTC filed a civil suit this summer accusing Hunter, who is still trading natural gas, of attempting to manipulate natural gas prices in 2006. Hunter, through his spokesman, denied the charge and said he would prove his innocence in court.

"It is worth asking whether the CFTC's sudden decision to file a headline-grabbing action against Brian Hunter was politically-motivated," Brian Maddox, Hunter's spokesman, wrote in an e-mail. "The CFTC's action came after several days of hearings conducted by the [Senate] criticizing the CFTC for ineffective regulation of natural gas."

Lawmakers and even some in the industry say more oversight of commodities is needed. ICE, the unregulated exchange that hosted the debacle, has begun to share some trading information with the CFTC. But there is little agreement on how far a new law should go, or whether commodity trading can be effectively monitored.

That's in part because a significant percentage of commodity trading doesn't happen on any organized exchanges, regulated or not. They take place in private, as over-the-counter trades. It is difficult to know how many of these are occurring.

Commodities markets also have become complex with many trading futures contracts as well as financial tools called derivatives and swaps, whose value is based on the risk of futures contracts. Gathering data on these products has been a challenge for the CFTC.

The evolution of the markets has led to some tension between the CFTC and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the agency that oversees the commercial use of energy resources, which is directly impacted by commodity trading. The two agencies have both gone after unscrupulous traders.

For now lawmakers are focusing on increasing the authority of the CFTC, which has a stronger relationship with the commodity exchanges.

Levin's bill would require unregulated exchanges to comply with some of the same standards that the CFTC requires of a regulated body such as Nymex. For instance, unregulated markets would have to set limits on trader positions and share trading information with the CFTC. Levin's proposal would not seek to regulate trades that occur in private. Levin hopes to attach the measure to a farm bill currently moving through the Senate.

Exchanges are wary of these moves, warning of unintended consequences. Jeff Sprecher, the chairman and chief executive of ICE, said active unregulated exchanges serve an important function in helping determine the price of a commodity. Over-regulating them could squash that activity and encourage traders to flee to the less transparent venue of over-the-counter trading.

"No one could have imagined that you would have a [commodity] energy market develop the way it did," added James Newsome, chief executive of Nymex. "The markets are changing so quickly that there is no way you could keep up with the changes from a rules standpoint."


But Dan Berkovitz, a top Levin aide, said
traders "hesitate when somebody's watching. And when nobody's watching, traders will go wild."

ShareThis