Showing posts with label Jason Call. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jason Call. Show all posts

June 29, 2008

Jason Call calls for CITIZEN'S ARRESTS

I'm casting a wide net with this email. Some of you have much more professional experience with legal issues and procedural matters than I do. I've been reading Bugliosi's book The Prosection of George Bush for Murder. The case is clear, as most of us have known for years, but it has now been organized and is ready and waiting for someone to pick it up and move forward.
Can we count on the various state and federal attorneys general to file suit? At one point I may have thought so, but look at what the Democratic leadership is doing to actively thwart the will of their constituents to hold impeachment hearings.
So how does a citizen group use what Bugliosi has proferred? I don't know if the case has to be taken up by a representative of the government, or if it can be done by a private citizen (or citizens) as a class action type suit, being that Bush's assault on the Constitution (resulting in the deaths of 4000 Americans) has done injury to us all.
Here's what I know though - if these bastards are going to be held legally accountable, and it can be done by a citizen or citizen group - I want to be a part of it.
Peace
Jason
Lynnwood, WA

February 10, 2008

Get out your checkbooks for Jason Call if you're not in N Mexico

I say that because it would be far better to put in some time helping him out. But if you're not there a nice fat cheque would do quite nicely.

Jason will be working on all our behalf, that is certain.

Veeger

Friends,

This message comes to you with a sense of urgency, simply because of the time frame remaining to accomplish the goal of signature collection. I am now officially entering the primary race for Senate Seat #20, currently held by Republican William Payne, who has held the seat for 10 years. Senator Payne ran unopposed in 2004, and to the best of my knowledge from Bernalillo County records and State Democratic Party information, no other Democrat has moved to run for the primary nomination.

I am attaching a .pdf map of Senate District #20, as well as a .pdf of my nominating petition. If you live in Senate #20, or know any Democrats who live in this district, please contact me, or put those Democrats in touch with me. I only need 52 valid Democratic signatures to get on the ballot, but there is a lot of groundwork to do in this traditionally conservative district.

I would like to start a list of people who are willing to help me walk this district and doorbell over the next few weeks, but for now I am still waiting until the State party finishes qualifying and counting the provisional ballots from the caucuses (please volunteer for this effort – democracy in action!) Once I have those lists (hopefully by the end of the coming week) I am going to hit the streets and start talking to people. This window will give me an opportunity to have some literature printed up by FocusInk.

Let’s take this opportunity and take advantage of the amazing progressive momentum in this election cycle – now is the time to present the voters of Senate District #20 with a real alternative to destructive Republican politics, the politics that have just squashed HB 9, the Domestic partner Rights and Responsibilities Act.

My website will be undergoing some changes over the next few days to reflect my bid for this office, but if you haven’t read my positions on some major issues, I encourage you to read the Issues pages at www.Call4Democracy.org

Sincerely, and in Peace

Jason Call


www.Call4Democracy.org


December 02, 2007

UPDATE: Military recruitment in US high schools

Friends,

This is a follow-up to the piece I just posted and the letter I sent to the APS administrators, school board, and high school principals.

The assembly given to the students of Albuquerque High School (and we find out that it was also given to Rio Grande students), was presented by a US Army sponsored organization called ‘Planning For Life.’ This organization has a website www.planningforlife.com .

An email response to a parent inquiry from the Albuquerque HS Activities Director claimed that no recruiting took place. I am currently withholding the name of the parent. I am a Highland HS teacher, and I am unaware that this PFL presentation was given to HS students, but I will get confirmation on that.

Mr. XXXXX,

Thank you for your concern regarding Wednesday's presentation. Retired Lt. Col. Consuelo Castillo Kickbush is a nationally known motivational speaker who focused on assisting students in establishing goals after graduation. More specifically, she focused on the: mind (education), body (nutrition), and spirit (making good decisions). Absolutely no recruiting took place. Standard practice is that any speaker be approved by the APS Communications Office before they are allowed into our schools. This was the case in this regard. This program was given (free of charge) to students at Highland and Rio Grande High Schools.

If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 362-9147.

Thank you,

G. Antonio Gonzales

Activities Director

A thorough review of Planning For Life’s website, especially the Videos page, and the link to the site March2Success, reveal that Planning For Life is most certainly a recruiting tool for the US Army.

In the posted Videos, and on the photos page (and firsthand testimony from the Albuquerque HS assembly), many of the presenters are uniformed servicemen. This is advertising for the Army in and of itself, regardless of the content of the presentation. Watching the videos, you will also see that the military is referenced frequently in the fitness portion of the presentation, and part of this portion is also ‘boot camp’ style drills of situps and pushups. You will see that the presentations are rife with visuals of Army advertising and merchandise such as T-shirts.

On the Parent/Educator Resources page, a suggested Curriculum is given:

Suggested Program Structure/Curriculum (Interactive)

  • Welcome/PFL Overview (15 min.)
  • The Soul -- motivational speaker (1 hour)
  • Breakout Sessions (20-25 min. each, rotating after 5 min. break):
    • The Mind (education and career planning tools)
    • The Body/Diet and Nutrition, led by an Army nutrition expert
    • The Body/Physical Fitness, led by a local Army representative
  • Closing Session/The Soul (15 min.) -- Values, Character and Leadership, led by local ROTC representative if available
  • Meal provided

How can such a curriculum be implemented with the suggested personnel without a component of military recruitment? If it’s possible, I ‘m not seeing it. I have attached the PFL sample agenda, and at the very end, you will see “Students pick up PFL goodies.” This closing session can be seen on one of the videos, and those PFL goodies do not come in a PFL bag – they come in a US Army bag.

More disturbing than this, however, is the online SAT/Standardized Test Practice called March2Success. This website is maintained by the US Army and Kaplan, and is promoted in the Planning For Life presentation. While PFL claims that it is not recruiting students, this test preparation website requires that students provide personal contact information to be functional. Students who use this website can potentially be personally targeted as someone who has shown interest in a military career by recruiters. This website also contains the Army logo as a form of advertising. The recruiting disclaimer on the PFL website for March2Success is as follows:

Initial enrollment is for 45 days and students can request an extension. Anyone over the age of 13 may register. The Web site also includes links that students can use to find out more about college admissions and other helpful career planning links. There is no requirement or obligation to the student or the school to be contacted by an Army recruiter.

Anyone over the age of 13. No requirement to be contacted – but a requirement to dispense contact information. The website maintains in its FAQ that no one will be contacted by a recruiter unless they specifically requested. I tried to register on the site, but because I do not allow tracking cookies on my computer I was not able to do so.

And here are the “helpful career planning links” – that’s all, no others. I could not find ANYTHING about college admissions. Jason


This article by the Committee Opposed to Militarism and the Draft (COMD) exposes that March2Success is an admitted recruiting tool for the Army: http://www.comdsd.org/article_archive/CoverRecruiting.htm

An excerpt from the article reads:

The Army freely admits there are several advantages to providing this online service to students. First, it drives traffic to the Army’s recruiting Web site, www.goarmy.com, and generates leads for recruiters to pursue. Students are prompted to indicate if they want to be contacted by a recruiter; Army graphics and propaganda are omnipresent. March2Success offers a state-of-the-art product to schools and students who rarely have access to free online instruction. The program helps to strengthen the relationship between Army recruiters and school staff. After all, school "penetration" and "ownership" are cited in military manuals as tasks for all school-based recruiters.

As I stated in my letter to the APS ruling bodies yesterday, what we have here is a captive student audience being recruited, however covertly, by the US Army, with the full sanction of APS (as Mr. Gonzales wrote, PFL was approved by the APS Communications Office.) I am waiting to see what kind of response I get from my letter. APS does not have a history of kind disposition towards anti-military viewpoints.

I have been informed of a community meeting at Albuquerque HS, in the cafeteria, at 6pm on Tuesday Dec. 11th. This situation presents a unique opportunity to let APS know that the military presence on campus has overstepped its boundaries, and that APS has committed a serious lapse in judgment by allowing PFL on campus. PFL clearly is nothing but a marketing tool for the Army, at a time when the Army is in need of ‘fresh meat’ due to a general decline in new recruits, and also the increased rates of AWOL and suicide. Let us make a firm statement to APS that our community will not tolerate this, or further assaults on our children.

Sincerely, and in Peace

Jason Call


www.Call4Democracy.org



attachments:
https://www.march2success.com/view/help/images/goarmy.gif


GoArmy.com

https://www.march2success.com/view/help/images/rotc.gif



ROTC

https://www.march2success.com/view/help/images/jrotc.jpg




JROTC

https://www.march2success.com/view/help/images/USMA.jpg



USMA

https://www.march2success.com/view/help/images/boost.gif

November 28, 2007

An example of INTEGRITY: Jason Call

Jason Call's candidacy for Congress is an example -- a call to arms to speak truth to global rank injustice.

Here is the sort future leaders we need, Jason and Laurie Dobson.

Upholding (what's left) of the U.S. Constitution is not for amateur hour; and it's not too much to expect that those running for public office be able to speak UP loudly and clearly wherever they are with respect for America's republic and for the integrity of their offices in government.

Phew! We are seeing little of THAT these days.

If every person is to just roll over and let the psycopaths in power decide that we live in a lawless society, then there will MORE war, more CRIME, more TERRORISM, more hopeless and powerless sill continually be engendered. And let's face it - there's been enough of that.

I feel like making a money pitch for Jason, right here and right now. So I am going to. If you come by here and read this - if you have spare ca$h as yet (some do, some don't) send Jason the equivalent of a day's coffee -- what you would spend to buy lattes over the course of a month (just give them up) and send it to his campaign fund! WE NEED PEOPLE LIKE THIS RUNNING FOR OFFICE, speaking up, organizing people even IF they don't win. We need their voices in this terrible age speaking to out to our ability to pursue CHOICE and RESPONSIBILITY for our selves and for our fellow man rather than being servants of a DEATH MACHINE.

Now that's just my pitch. Trot on over and have a look at Jason't site and decide for yourself. He's an HONEST GUY. Try to help him out if you agree with his message.

If we support honest candidates they just might win and carry the day; if they don't at least we keep organizing ourselves in a healthy way.

And ditto for Laurie Dobson. When Cindy Sheehan starts looking for dimes, I'll post about that maybe then but that's how I am feeling today.

Virginia

- <<:>>- -<<:>>- -<<:>>-

Friends,

Alibi Editor Jim Scarantino writes on the field of Democrats, and when they came out publicly as opposing the war. http://alibi.com/index.php?story=21283&scn=news Read the article and you’ll find that only one of the candidates running for US Congress in New Mexico has a proven record of opposing the war and occupation of Iraq even from before the invasion in March 2003.

Sincerely, and in Peace

Jason Call

www.Call4Democracy.org

Candidate, US Congress, New Mexico CD 1


The Real Side

Democrats Against the War

Oh, yeah? Since when?

By Jim Scarantino

Every Democratic candidate for president on down is “against the war in Iraq.” But we wouldn’t be in Iraq if Democrats hadn’t surrendered Congress’ constitutional power to declare war. Then once the war got going, Democrats pretty much abandoned the peace movement. They’ve given Bush every dime he’s requested to get hundreds of thousands of people killed for no good reason.

What they say now is one thing. What did they say before the reality of the Iraq War set in?


Let’s start with the presidential candidates.


Hillary Clinton not only voted for the war, the speech she gave explaining her vote contained phrases echoing some of Bush’s favorite lines. John Edwards and Christopher Dodd voted for the war. Joe Biden still thinks he’s some kind of imperial viceroy, promoting plans to split apart a country he pushed hard to conquer. Bill Richardson initially supported the invasion even though as governor he never needed to say a thing.

Barack Obama opposed the Iraq War from the beginning, starting while he was running for the Illinois Senate seat previously held by a conservative Republican. Dennis Kucinich tried in vain to defeat the war resolution. They showed wisdom and courage at a critical moment in the nation’s history. Standing for peace when the winds of war were howling says something important about the character of these two men.


In the race to replace Heather Wilson in Congress,
only one Democrat, Jason Call, has any record of opposing the Iraq War more recently than this year. The other three candidates can’t point to anything they did to oppose the Iraq War before announcing they wanted to work on Capitol Hill.


Call and his wife, then eight months pregnant, marched in February 2003 with millions of Americans trying to avert war. He’s joined other public demonstrations every year since. He’s written letters to newspapers against the war. He showed me documentary and photographic evidence of his passionate opposition to the Iraq War spanning five years. He is a math teacher, and he expressed great disappointment that citizens like him were largely left to oppose the war without much help from career Democrats.


Martin Heinrich’s campaign says he has opposed the Iraq War “from the beginning.” In response to questions about when he first publicly opposed the war, he says he remembers “some kind of debate” about the Iraq War at a Democratic Party meeting in February 2003. He says the war also “came up” when he was going door-to-door campaigning for the Albuquerque City Council. He admits not writing members of Congress on the issue. I haven’t found any statement by Heinrich on the war that was issued until his plans for a congressional race materialized.


Jon Adams says, “I decided to run because of the Iraq war, when I learned that 23-year-old James Akin from Albuquerque had been killed in Iraq.” He says he gave money to anti-war Democrats but was otherwise busy practicing law. He did not write Congress or submit letters to the editor in opposition to the war.


Michelle Lujan Grisham told me I wouldn’t find any statements from her about the war until Oct. 11, 2007, when she announced her candidacy. At the time of the invasion, she was Secretary of the New Mexico Aging and Long Term Services Department. She then became New Mexico Secretary of Health until she resigned to run for Congress. She suggested she was not in the position to make statements on issues outside the purview of her office.


In the Senate primary, only one credible candidate has opposed the war from the beginning. Tom Udall voted against war authorization. He also voted against the PATRIOT Act. His courageous stands can’t be discounted as “easy” for a congressman from a safe seat. Other Democrats with safe seats folded when their country needed them to be strong (examples: Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Diane Feinstein). And, if you study its demographics, Udall’s district is not all that “safe.” Udall’s immediate predecessor in the job was a right-wing Republican.


Martin Chavez never spoke against the war until recently. He has explained he was preoccupied with running the city. But other big-city mayors opposed the war before the first bombs fell. The thousands of anti-war New Mexicans who marched down Central, between rows of Chavez’ police officers, also had other things to do. Back in those days, let’s not forget, Chavez was courting Republicans for his upcoming re-election.

Most likely every Democratic candidate who says they now oppose the Iraq War is sincere. For many, we can only take them at their word. But a few others have proven their opposition to America’s most idiotic war goes deeper than expedient words offered at campaign time.


ShareThis