October 13, 2006
Here's something you may want to save in case you need it someday!
Here's excerpts from the article that can be found at...
On May 12, 2006 in Peoria, Illinois, the attorney for the U.S.Department of Justice (DOJ) begged the court to dismiss all chargesagainst IRS victim Robert Lawrence in federal District Court.The motion for dismissal came on the heels of a surprise tactic by Lawrence's defense attorney Oscar Stilley.
The tactic threatened exposure of IRS?s on-going efforts to defraud the public. The move put DOJ attorneys in a state of panic that left them with only one alternative: beg for dismissal, with prejudice.
Stilley?s tactic paid off. Sixty days earlier, the DOJ had indicted Lawrence on three counts of willful failure to file a 1040 form,and three felony counts of income tax evasion. The federal Judge dismissed all charges with prejudice, meaning the DOJ cannot charge Lawrence with those crimes again.
The trial was to have started on Monday morning, May 15th.
On Wednesday, May 10, Stilley mailed a set of documents to the DOJ in response to DOJ?s discovery demands. The documents revealed to DOJ for the first time that Lawrence was basing his entire defense on an act of Congress, 44 U.S.C. 3500 ? 3520, also known as the"Paperwork Reduction Act" (PRA).
In Section 3512 of the Act, titled "Public Protection," it says that no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing tocomply with an agency?s collection of information request (such asa 1040 form), if the request does not display a valid controlnumber assigned by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) inaccordance with the requirements of the Act, or if the agency failsto inform the person who is to respond to the collection ofinformation that he is not required to respond to the collectionof information request unless it displays a valid control number.
In Section 3512 Congress went on to authorize that the protection provided by Section 3512 may be raised in the form of a complete defense at any time during an agency?s administrative process (such as an IRS Tax Court or Collection and Due Process Hearing) or during a judicial proceeding (such as Lawrence's criminal trial).
In sum, the PRA requires that all government agencies display valid OMB control numbers and certain disclosures directly on all information collection forms that the public is requested to file.
Lawrence's sole defense was he was not required to file an IRSForm 1040 because it displays an invalid OMB control number.
Government officials knew that if the case went to trial, it would expose the fraudulent, counterfeit 1040. They also must have known that a trial would expose the ongoing conspiracy between OMB and IRS to publish 1040 forms each year that those agencies knew were in violation of the PRA. That would raise the issue that the Form 1040, with its invalid control number, is being used by the Government to cover up the underlying constitutional tort -- that is, the enforcement of a direct, unapportioned tax on the labor of every working man, women and child in America .--
Prosperous regards,
Don
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
SUBTITLE A - INCOME TAXES
Chapter 1. - NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES
Subchapter A. - Determination of Tax Liability
PART 1. - Tax On Individuals
§ 1. Tax Imposed.
This won't be easy to show, but I am going to try. If you pay special attention to the numerals (1) there are THREE of them. Codified would be 1.1-1 most do not know this is the beginning code section for the Income tax law.
Title 26 is a title of ALL tax law.. Subtitle A is {Income Tax} it starts at code section 1.1-1, Now here is the The IRS Deception, Most have filled out 1040 forms most of there lives never noticing the OMB control number on that form.
usually blocked in upper right corner you will see a prefix of 1545-0074 which by law is INVALID.
PART 602 - OMB CONTROL NUMBERS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
Section 602.101. OMB Control numbers.
(a) Purpose.. This part collects and displays the control numbers assigned to collections of information in Internal Revenue Service regulations by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980. The Internal Revenue Service intends that this part comply with the requirements of .... (OMB regulations implementing the Paperwork Reduction Act), for the display of control numbers assigned by OMB to collections of information in Internal Revenue Service regulations....
26 CFR (4-1-94 Edition)
CFR part or section where Current
identified and described OMB Control
1.1-1 ..... 1545-0067
1.23-5 ..... 1545-0074
Take notice 1.1-1 is where the income tax is imposed the OMB control number for the Tax Form to be used is 1545-0067, But most Americans have always used a 1040 form and its OMB control number carries 1545-0074.
Now most will ask how is this invalid here is why. Remember the first stran of information at the top, I am going to repost the entire law.
SUBTITLE A - INCOME TAXES
Chapter 1. - NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES
Subchapter A. - Determination of Tax Liability
PART 1. - Tax On Individuals
§ 1. Tax Imposed.
(a) Married individuals filing joint returns and surviving spouses. There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of -
(1) every married individual (as defined in Section 7703) who makes a single return jointly with his spouse under Section 6013, and
(2) every surviving spouse (as defined in Section 2(a)), a tax determined in accordance with the following table:
If taxable income is: The tax is:
Not over 32,450 15% of taxable income
Over 32,450 but not
over 78,400 4,867.50, plus 28% of
the excess over 32,450
Over 78,400 17,733.50, plus 31% of
the excess over 78,400
(b) Heads of households. There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every head of a household (as defined in section 2(b)) a tax determined in accordance with the following table:
If taxable income is: The tax is:
Not over 26,050 15% of taxable income
Over 26,050 but not
over 67,200 3,907.50, plus 28% of
the excess over 26,500
Over 67,200 15,429.50, plus 31% of
the excess over 67,200
(c) Unmarried individuals (other than surviving spouses and heads of households). There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual ( other than a surviving spouse as defined in section 2(a) of the head of a household as defined in section 2(b)) who is not a married individual (as defined in section 7703) a tax determined in accordance with the following table:
Most people have seen a Portion of this in Any 1040 booklet set by the IRS. THINKING and BELIEVING That this Law Pertained to AMERICANS in America.
Lets go see what 1.1-1 and its OMB control number are and ON WHAT FORM
Form 2555 Foreign Earned Income |OMB No. 1545-0067
__________________________________________________________________________________
For Use by U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Only 1993
And now the 1040
Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Form 1040 U.S. Individual Income Tax Return 1993 | Reserved for IRS Use Only.
For the year Jan 1-Dec 31, 1993, or other tax year beginning , 1993 ending ,19 | OMB No. 1545-0074
Now you can see 1.1-1 is the Law that IMPOSES income tax on FOREIGN EARNED Income
Lets see what the INVALID OMB control on a 1040 brings up in terms of a code section.
1.23-5 is the matching code section to the 1040 OMB of 1545-0074
26 CFR 1.23-5 Certification Procedures.
(a) Certification that an item meets the definition of an energy-conserving component or renewable energy source property. Upon request of a manufacturer of an item....the Assistant Commissioner shall certify ... that :
(1) the item meets the definition of insulation
Post a Comment