Showing posts with label steven harper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label steven harper. Show all posts

July 08, 2008

Mediascout's roundup on the G8

8 Talks Big, Achieves Little

Western leaders pretended to occupy the moral high ground yesterday at the start of the annual G8 summit, this year in Rusutsu, Japan. The heads of seven African nations, attending a supposedly goodwill meeting with the richest countries in the world, were summarily chewed out by “the rich-man’s club” for not censuring Zimbabwean tyrant Robert Mugabe after he rigged his own re-election. Prime Minister Stephen Harper joined the chorus of disappointment with African nations, using some of the strongest language of all G8 leaders in his condemnation of Mugabe. But the supposed world leaders were quickly humbled by a persistent media and a corps of non-governmental organizations that also made the trip to Japan, and immediately took to criticizing the G8 for its lack of action on major issues. A leaked memo that contained a draft of the summit’s final communique suggested that discussions about a G8 move to increase aid to Africa would be tabled until a later meeting, and action on emissions reductions would be deferred to a later meeting of the United Nations. Later reports confirmed that the leaders have agreed to long-term targets on reductions, but that agreement is already being criticized by environmental groups as being vague.

The most-reported sound bites of the day come not from the most powerful politicians in the world, but from Oxfam. Spokesman Max Lawson blasted the G8 - and Canada in particular, and Harper specifically - for failing to keep a promise to double aid to Africa over the past five years. Harper said that the $2.1 billion in aid Canada currently sends to Africa is effectively a doubling of aid, while critics say it falls hundreds of millions of dollars short of the target. International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda didn’t provide much insight to reporters, but she did say that issues of governance are tied to issues of aid; Canada would not give money to nations with tyrannical leaders. African leaders suggested that insufficient aid was the root of the problem in countries like Zimbabwe. In the midst of what was quickly becoming a do-nothing summit for leaders, the Citizen and the Post (neither available online) published the most damning - and awkward - indictment of the G8 leaders’ potential insincerity. It chronicled the lavish, eight-course dinner of caviar, smoked salmon, and Kyoto beef that leaders enjoyed while they debated solutions to the world food crisis. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown had told reporters on the way to Japan that the world should reduce “unnecessary demand” for food. Right. If the G8 continues to embarrass itself at its own summits, the world will simply stop listening to anything its leaders have to say.


January 29, 2008

Canada: Detainee fallout: take few, free quickly

THE AFGHAN MISSION: HILLIER 'ABSOLUTELY LIVID' AT PMO'S INITIAL RESPONSE

Detainee fallout: take few, free quickly

Details of new policy - and top soldier's outrage - emerge as government ministers refuse comment, citing operational secrecy

The Canadian Forces are holding insurgent detainees at their Kandahar Air Force base rather than turning them over to Afghan authorities, are taking fewer prisoners and are quickly releasing some of them.

The information, provided to The Globe and Mail by sources, answers questions about Canada's new policy for handling detainees that Prime Minister Stephen Harper and other ministers repeatedly refused to provide yesterday, citing the need for combat operational secrecy.

Reports have also emerged that General Rick Hillier, Chief of the Defence Staff, was furious with the Prime Minister's Office's handling of the military's new policy and angrily telephoned Mr. Harper Friday night after letting it be known he was "tired of being used" in political controversy.

After the revelation last week that Canadians ceased turning detainees over to the Afghan authorities in early November after discovering credible evidence of torture, the Prime Minister's Office initially said it hadn't been informed of this by senior officers.

Gen. Hillier was said to be "absolutely livid" when he learned of this.

Mr. Harper's chief spokeswoman, Sandra Buckler, retracted the statement the next day but refused to say where the detainees were being held.

Mr. Harper told the House of Commons yesterday that his government will "never" answer questions about how many prisoners Canadian troops take or where they are kept. He also said the bilateral agreement governing the transfer of prisoners to Afghan authorities is still in place.

However, on Nov. 14, Germany's international broadcaster Deutsche Welle quoted German General Egon Ramms as saying NATO was aware that transferred detainees were being abused by Afghan authorities and that Canadian troops in Kandahar had stopped handing over prisoners until their safety and human rights could be guaranteed.

The presence of a detention facility at Kandahar Air Force base (KAF) has long been known. Prior to Nov. 5, detainees were held at the facility until they either were turned over to Afghan authorities or released. Now sources say either their detention is continued at KAF or they are released - reports Mr. Harper will not confirm.

One well-placed source who spoke to The Globe and Mail yesterday on condition of anonymity said that, in addition to being told that Canadian detainees were being held at Kandahar Air Force base, he understood some insurgents detained in joint Canadian Forces-Afghan National Army combat operations were being turned over to the Afghan military in a "grey zone" action.

He said he has been told that Canadians have been content in some cases to allow operations to be labelled as Afghan-led military proceedings. Thus, detainees passed into Afghan military hands with no records kept.

Since the Canadian military's decision to stop transferring detainees became known, there has been rife speculation on what is being done with them, with three options being mentioned: that Canadians were holding detainees at KAF; that Canadians were transferring detainees to the Americans; and that Canadians had simply stopped detaining people.

Transferring detainees to the Americans would be, in the words of one federal politician, "the red-hot issue" because of the harsh interrogation techniques the U.S. military uses.

Janice Gross Stein, director of University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies and co-author of a widely lauded book on Canada's military engagement in Afghanistan, said,

"I would be astonished if the Canadian Forces were transferring detainees to the Americans, absolutely astonished."

She also said she had not heard of any "grey zone" transfers but commented: "That would be a very dangerous thing to do."

When Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion and deputy leader Michael Ignatieff visited Afghanistan earlier this month they were briefed on the policy change but did not see detainees, Mr. Ignatieff said yesterday. He said they were given few details and he could not confirm or deny whether detainees were being interned at KAF.

ShareThis