Showing posts with label Winter Soldier hearings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Winter Soldier hearings. Show all posts

October 13, 2008

Racism in the military: Winter soldier testimony

How the U.S. Military Turned Me into a Terrorist

By Aaron Glantz, Haymarket Books.

Posted October 10, 2008.



A powerful excerpt from 'Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan' lays bare the racism at the core of the Iraq occupation.

michaelprysner

Corporal Michael Prysner, Aerial Intelligence Specialist, U.S. Army Reserve

In March of this year, a courageous group of veterans brought the war home, at a historic event held in Silver Spring, Md., inspired by Vietnam veterans a generation before. "Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan" convened more than 200 soldiers who have served in the so-called "War on Terror;" like their fellow soldiers before them, who shared stories that laid bare the nightmare of Vietnam, these veterans bore witness to the crimes that have been committed in Americans' names during the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. The hearings lasted four days; in their testimony, soldiers described how the discarding of the military's rules of engagement and its systematic dehumanization of Iraqi and Afghan civilians has led to horrible acts of violence against innocent men, women and children. "These are not isolated incidents," was a common refrain, even as the episodes they described seemed exceptionally brutal. For many of the veterans, it was the first time they had told their stories.

Now, the searing testimony has been compiled in an important new book: Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan: Eyewitness Accounts of the Occupation, edited by Aaron Glantz and published by Haymarket Books. I strongly encourage you to buy the book, preferably though the Web site of Iraq Veterans Against the War, which organized the Winter Soldier hearings and continues to hold similar events in cities across the country. All proceeds of books purchased through IVAW will go to support its crucial work.

The following excerpt comes from Michael Prysner, a corporal in the Army Reserve who came home in February 2004.

-- Liliana Segura, Editor, War on Iraq Special Coverage

When I first joined the army, I was told that racism no longer existed in the military. A legacy of inequality and discrimination was suddenly washed away by something called the Equal Opportunity Program. We would sit through mandatory classes, and every unit had an EO representative to ensure that no elements of racism could resurface. The army seemed fir\rmly dedicated to smashing any hint of racism.

Then September 11 happened, and I began to hear new words like "towel-head," and "camel jockey," and the most disturbing, "sand nigger." These words did not initially come from my fellow lower-enlisted soldiers, but from my superiors: my platoon sergeant, my ï¬ rst sergeant, my battalion commander. All the way up the chain of command, these viciously racist terms were suddenly acceptable.

When I got to Iraq in 2003, I learned a new word, "haji." Haji was the enemy. Haji was every Iraqi. He was not a person, a father, a teacher, or a worker. It's important to understand where this word came from. To Muslims, the most important thing is to take a pilgrimage to Mecca, the Hajj. Someone who has taken this pilgrimage is a haji. It's something that, in traditional Islam, is the highest calling in the religion. We took the best thing from Islam and made it into the worst thing.

Since the creation of this country, racism has been used to justify expansion and oppression. Native Americans were called "savages," the Africans were called all sorts of things to excuse slavery, and Vietnam veterans know the multitude of words used to justify that imperialist war.

So haji was the word we used. It was the word we used on this particular mission I'm going to talk about. We've heard a lot about raids and kicking down the doors of people's houses and ransacking their houses, but this was a different kind of raid.

We never got any explanation for our orders. We were only told that a group of ï¬ ve or six houses was now property of the U.S. military, and we had to go in and make those families leave their houses.

We went to these houses and informed the families that their homes were no longer theirs. We provided them no alternative, nowhere to go, no compensation. They were very confused and very scared. They did not know what to do and would not leave, so we had to remove them.

One family in particular, a woman with two small girls, a very elderly man, and two middle-aged men; we dragged them from their house and threw them onto the street. We arrested the men because they refused to leave, and we sent them off to prison.

A few months later I found out, as we were short interrogators and I was given that assignment. I oversaw and participated in hundreds of interrogations. I remember one in particular that I'm going to share with you. It was the moment that really showed me the nature of this occupation.

This particular detainee was already stripped down to his underwear, hands behind his back and a sandbag on his head. I never saw this man's face. My job was to take a metal folding chair and smash it against the wall next to his head -- he was faced against the wall with his nose touching it -- while a fellow soldier screamed the same question over and over again. No matter what his answer, my job was to slam the chair against the wall. We did this until we got tired.

I was told to make sure he kept standing up, but something was wrong with his leg. He was injured, and he kept falling to the ground. The sergeant in charge would come and tell me to get him up on his feet, so I'd have to pick him up and put him against the wall. He kept going down. I kept pulling him up and putting him against the wall. My sergeant was upset with me for not making him continue to stand. He picked him up and slammed him against the wall several times. Then he left. When the man went down on the ground again, I noticed blood pouring down from under the sandbag. I let him sit, and when I noticed my sergeant coming again, I would tell him quickly to stand up. Instead of guarding my unit from this detainee, I realized I was guarding the detainee from my unit.

I tried hard to be proud of my service, but all I could feel was shame. Racism could no longer mask the reality of the occupation. These are human beings. I've since been plagued by guilt. I feel guilt any time I see an elderly man, like the one who couldn't walk who we rolled onto a stretcher and told the Iraqi police to take him away. I feel guilt any time I see a mother with her children, like the one who cried hysterically and screamed that we were worse than Saddam as we forced her from her home. I feel guilt any time I see a young girl, like the one I grabbed by the arm and dragged into the street.

We were told we were fighting terrorists; the real terrorist was me, and the real terrorism is this occupation. Racism within the military has long been an important tool to justify the destruction and occupation of another country. Without racism, soldiers would realize that they have more in common with the Iraqi people than they do with the billionaires who send us to war.

I threw families onto the street in Iraq, only to come home and and families thrown onto the street in this country, in this tragic and unnecessary foreclosure crisis. Our enemies are not five thousand miles away, they are right here at home, and if we organize and fight, we can stop this war, we can stop this government, and we can create a better world.

June 14, 2008

America First Party supports Matthis Chiroux 

Boulder, CO - Soldiers who object to the Iraq war on constitutional grounds, and yet are ordered to deploy there, are quickly confronted with the reality that being true to their conscience could lead to their arrest, imprisonment, and dishonorable discharge. This is, in some respects, difficult to face. Many admire people who are willing to not compromise principle for principle’s sake, but when faced with the stark consequences, it is easy to buckle.


Recently, a young soldier did not buckle. Sergeant Matthis Chiroux, a 4-year veteran from Alabama, who served in Afghanistan as a photojournalist, made his announcement at the capitol: He would not report for Iraq duty for constitutional reasons, and he would remain in the U.S. and face any charges the government would make against him. Bolstered by support from fellow veterans, he made a statement which should inspire all who value the constitution and principles of our nation’s founders.

“This occupation is unconstitutional and illegal,” stated Chiroux, “and I hereby lawfully refuse to participate as I will surely be a party to war crimes. Furthermore, deployment in support of illegal war violates all of my core values as a human being, but in keeping with those values, I choose to remain in the United States to defend myself from charges brought by the Army if they so wish to pursue them. I refuse to participate in the occupation of Iraq.”

National Chairman Jonathan Hill stated, “Sgt. Chiroux is upholding the highest standards of patriotism and is a great credit to our nation. The reality that many so-called conservatives fail to see is that continuing this war helps perpetuate unconstitutional practices at the federal level — the Iraq War Resolution is beyond doubt unconstitutional. Chiroux is truly defending our nation by his refusal to disobey our nation’s basic law.”

The America First Party condemns the Iraq War as “unnecessary, improper, illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral” and the party Platform calls for the United States military to be used only “to protect U.S. citizens, U.S. property and U.S. border integrity,” and for no other purpose.

WAR CRIMES DOSSIER: America First Party supports Matthis Chiroux

Boulder, CO - Soldiers who object to the Iraq war on constitutional grounds, and yet are ordered to deploy there, are quickly confronted with the reality that being true to their conscience could lead to their arrest, imprisonment, and dishonorable discharge. This is, in some respects, difficult to face. Many admire people who are willing to not compromise principle for principle’s sake, but when faced with the stark consequences, it is easy to buckle.

Recently, a young soldier did not buckle. Sergeant Matthis Chiroux, a 4-year veteran from Alabama, who served in Afghanistan as a photojournalist, made his announcement at the capitol: He would not report for Iraq duty for constitutional reasons, and he would remain in the U.S. and face any charges the government would make against him. Bolstered by support from fellow veterans, he made a statement which should inspire all who value the constitution and principles of our nation’s founders.

“This occupation is unconstitutional and illegal,” stated Chiroux, “and I hereby lawfully refuse to participate as I will surely be a party to war crimes. Furthermore, deployment in support of illegal war violates all of my core values as a human being, but in keeping with those values, I choose to remain in the United States to defend myself from charges brought by the Army if they so wish to pursue them. I refuse to participate in the occupation of Iraq.”

National Chairman Jonathan Hill stated, “Sgt. Chiroux is upholding the highest standards of patriotism and is a great credit to our nation. The reality that many so-called conservatives fail to see is that continuing this war helps perpetuate unconstitutional practices at the federal level — the Iraq War Resolution is beyond doubt unconstitutional. Chiroux is truly defending our nation by his refusal to disobey our nation’s basic law.”

The America First Party condemns the Iraq War as “unnecessary, improper, illegal, unconstitutional, and immoral” and the party Platform calls for the United States military to be used only “to protect U.S. citizens, U.S. property and U.S. border integrity,” and for no other purpose.

March 19, 2008

ACTIVISM; WINTER SOLDIER

I went through the weekend on a thread over at ICH.

I have put many digg items and oped articles on this blog about it, but only ONE of them shows up on a google search, so I suspect that isn't the greatest place to go look for links.

I've noticed two things - any mainstream media articles are only now beginning to trickle in and secondly many of the best reports about it are coming from women.

Hmm.

The link to the amazing process I went through at ICH is posted just below and you are welcome to go have a look at it. Hard going doing that thread AND hearing the testimonies, both. But the battle to have this heard will continue .. that was one great lesson taken away from my experience.

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/tf2777/article19536_htm/?src=hsn

The killing and indoctrination must stop!

Veeger



Winter soldiers
Baltimore Sun, United States - 1 hour ago
They called the event Winter Soldier, after an event by the same name organized decades ago by Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). ...
Credibility of Anti-War 'Winter Soldiers' Questioned
Crosswalk.com, VA - 22 minutes ago
The anti-war soldiers were speaking at the Veterans Against the Iraq War Winter Soldier Conference, held at the National Labor College in Washington, DC, ...

In These Times
Winter Soldiers tell their story
Socialist Worker Online, IL - 4 hours ago
ERIC RUDER reports from on the testimony of antiwar veterans and active-duty soldiers at Winter Soldier in Washington. FOR THREE days, a steady stream of US ...
The War That Never Ends In These Times
Protests mark fifth year of the occupation Socialist Worker Online
all 3 news articles »

Javno.hr
Winter Soldiers Gather to Share Stories of War
PoliticalLore.com, Hampton Falls - 57 minutes ago
... DC at Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan to share their first hand experiences from the occupations with each other and with the media. ...
Defeat: British Journalist Jonathan Steele on Why America and ... Democracy Now
Commentary: End Iraq War Now The Northeastern News (subscription)
all 149 news articles »

Chicago Daily Herald
5 years on, US soldiers recall Iraq war horrors
Inquirer.net, Philippines - Mar 18, 2008
... on the eve of the fifth anniversary of the US-led invasion of Iraq, delved into wounded memories and gave testimony at "Winter Soldier" about what they ...
The Last Soldier to Die for Mistake: A Lesson After 5 years in Iraq Huffington Post
'It's not so much about the mission anymore' Guardian
all 54 news articles »

Think Progress
Winter Soldier CONT’D: US Vets, Active-Duty Soldiers from Iraq and ...
Democracy Now, NY - 19 hours ago
For four days, soldiers convened at the National Labor College in Silver Spring, Maryland for Winter Soldier—an eyewitness indictment of atrocities ...
Stop the Next My Lai Now Yahoo! News
March Madness Begins (And So Does a Sixth Year of Occupation) OpEdNews
Bremer: Iraq War Architects Are ‘Running Away From Their Building’ Think Progress
all 11 news articles »
Viewing Iraq 'Winter Soldier' Testimony
Middle East Online, UK - 23 hours ago
Winter Soldier II shows that it’s not enough to criticize corporate media and its coverage of the Iraq war. Even more important is to take advantage of new ...
WINTER SOLDIER BLACKOUT CONTINUES: Look in the Mirror America!!!!!
OpEdNews, PA - 21 hours ago
The man did everything he could to stay out of Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s—ie when the original WINTER SOLDIER hearings took place.
Veterans Decry Institutional Sexism in Military AlterNet
all 2 news articles »
Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan
Real News Network, NY - 13 hours ago
Of the thousands of RSS feeds out there, we've picked the ones we find the most useful. If you think we've missed an outstanding source of information, ...
US Soldiers Bring Home Stories, Videos of Atrocities
uruknet.info, Italy - 11 hours ago
Their harrowing stories were captured in a film, Winter Soldier, that, due to its explosive nature, never reached theaters or TV. ...

March 17, 2008

Viewing Iraq Winter Soldier testimony; Jeff Cohen



Editor’s Note: Nearing the fifth anniversary of the Iraq War, veterans from that conflict -- as well as the one in Afghanistan -- gathered to give first-hand testimony of the routine brutality that is being inflicted on the people of those two countries.

These new "Winter Soldier" hearings -- like their predecessors during the Vietnam War -- were shunned by the mainstream U.S. news media. But, as media critic Jeff Cohen notes in this guest essay, there were independent ways for Americans to get the story:

In 1971 at age 19, I had a life-changing experience when I met dozens of Vietnam veterans who’d descended on my hometown of Detroit to testify at the “Winter Soldier” hearings organized by Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

In anguished presentations, the vets painstakingly described the horrors against Vietnamese they’d seen or taken part in. And the attitudes of racism and bloodlust that motored the war.

Many vets blamed the lies in mainstream media for convincing them to go to Vietnam in the first place.

Virtually every soul in that Detroit hotel banquet hall wept openly at the heartfelt, bone-chilling revelations pouring out of the Vietnam vets struggling with bloody memories and post-traumatic stress.

But no one outside that hall could see or hear the proceedings. No TV or radio networks covered the event.

This weekend at the National Labor College near Washington D.C., a new generation of vets convened by Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) presented powerful hearings – “Winter Soldier: Iraq & Afghanistan” – that were more extensive and perhaps even more emotional.

Thirty-seven years later, I again found myself sobbing at testimony from solemn young Americans returned from needless war, grappling with shattered lives over brutalities against civilians and prisoners they’d witnessed or participated in.

But I was nowhere near D.C.

This time, I watched the dramatic testimony – often buttressed by photographic and video evidence – live online at www.IVAW.org.

This time, I caught hours of coverage on [http://www.freespeech.org Free Speech TV], the national satellite network that broadcast the panels of testimony and featured interviews with vets and their families in between panels.

This time, I received regular video news feeds in my email inbox from [http://therealnews.com The Real News Network]. (The hearings were also televised on 20 public access channels from Fayetteville to Palo Alto, and in public gatherings from Florida to Alaska.)

On my car radio, I listened to the proceedings live on [http://www.pacifica.org/ the Pacifica network,] which broadcast the hearings to affiliates nationwide – along with call-ins and e-mail from listeners, including Iraq vets and soldiers not as critical of the war.

The four days of vets’ testimony revealed the struggle these young Americans are waging to regain their humanity and morality after having been transformed into callous war-fighters who largely dehumanized Iraqis as a people – not just “the enemy” or combatants.

An objective observer hearing the testimony would have good reason to wonder if U.S. troops – given the often gratuitous and racist brutality, and the mistreatment of women, children and the elderly – can ever be a solution in Iraq.

On panel after panel, the veterans offered heartfelt “apologies to the Iraqi people” for what our country has done to their country.

I saw a vet rip up the commendation he’d received from Gen. David Petraeus, denouncing the general as a cheerleader who put his own ambitions above his duty to the troops and to the truth.

Many vets called for rapid withdrawal from Iraq and criticized Democratic leaders for prolonging and funding the endless occupation.

Ex-Marine Jon Turner, who served two tours in Iraq, ripped his medals from his shirt and threw them on the ground, concluding: “I’m sorry for the hate and destruction I and others have inflicted upon innocent people… Until people hear what is going on, this is going to continue. I am no longer the monster that I once was.”

Such powerful first-hand accounts – if heard by the American public – would threaten continued funding of the Iraq occupation. But national mainstream outlets in our country, unlike big foreign outlets, largely ignored this weekend’s proceedings.

Not surprisingly, these Iraq veterans had little but scorn for U.S. corporate media whose journalistic failures helped sell the war five years ago, and whose sanitized coverage helps sell the troop “surge” today.

But thanks to the Internet and the growing capacity of independent TV, radio and Web outlets, a significant minority of Americans had access to these proceedings. And the archived hearings are now available to anyone anytime with computer access.

In Detroit in 1971, I remember what happened when one of the rare mainstream camera crews showed up at Winter Soldier. . .and then abruptly packed up to leave in the middle of particularly gripping testimony.

A roomful of Vietnam vets booed and jeered. It was the moment I became a media critic.

Winter Soldier II shows that it’s not enough to criticize corporate media. Even more important is to take advantage of new technologies to keep building independent media.

Jeff Cohen is the founding director of Ithaca College’s new center for independent media. He founded the media watch group [http://www.fair.org FAIR] in 1986.

To comment at Consortiumblog, click here. (To make a blog comment about this or other stories, you can use your normal e-mail address and password. Ignore the prompt for a Google account.) To comment to us by e-mail, click here. To donate so we can continue reporting and publishing stories like the one you just read, click here.

March 16, 2008

ACTIVISM: Winter soldier in Boston

Testimony from vets in D.C. fires up local protesters
By Renee Nadeau | Sunday, March 16, 2008 |
Photo
Photo by Faith Ninivaggi

A dozen Massachusetts veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars piled into a van bound for Washington, D.C., on Friday or traveled by other means to spend the weekend testifying about their experiences overseas and to protest the five-year war in Iraq.

A portion of the four-day “Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan” public testimony at the National Labor College, just outside the capital in Silver Springs, Md., was shown at the First Parish Church in Harvard Square yesterday.

“I feel it’s not just something we should be against but we should actively work to end,” said Liam Madden, a Northeastern University sophomore and ex-Marine sergeant. “Our presence there could not fix the harm we had done.”

Madden served in Haditha, Iraq, from September 2004 to February 2005. He is on the board of directors of Iraq Veterans Against the War and helped organize the events. He did not give testimony.

“Over the last five years, many peole have expressed that they want to support the troops. This gives an opportunity to listen to the troops,” said Angela Kelly, outreach coordinator of Massachusetts Peace Action, one of the groups that sponsored the Cambridge event under the name New England United.

“Hearing the testimonies puts a real human face on the experience that has gone on for the last five years.”

Some 250 people packed the Cambridge church for the eight-hour live broadcast. Kelly said more and more chairs had to be brought in to accommodate viewers.

The term “winter soldier” pays homage to the similar event held by Veterans of Vietnam Against the War, at which Sen. John Kerry spoke, and a play on the words of Thomas Paine.

The Founding Father stated that winter soldiers will stand up for the soul of their country, even in its darkest hours, while summer soldiers will turn their backs, according to IVAW.

The group plans to release a documentary in the coming months.

Related Articles:

Staunch Iraq posture illuminates McCain’s views
/news/national/politics/2008/view.bg?articleid=1080348

Severed fingers of Americans captured in Iraq reportedly sent to US officials
/news/international/middle_east/view.bg?articleid=1080075

Adm. William Fallon, Middle East Central Command chief, resigns under fire
/news/international/middle_east/view.bg?articleid=1079558



March 03, 2008

Iraq vets to testify on radio against war crimes, March 14-16


Iraq Vets Come Out In Force Against War Crimes

Diary Entry by Professor Emeritus Peter Bagnolo



Tell A Friend
Afghanistan and Iraq have one thing other than death in common. A group of veterans of the wars are heading Washington and they are not going there to praise the behavior of many troops-they are about to pop the lid off a subject which up to now has been out-of-bounds because on March 13-16 they will testify about war crimes some of them committed and/or witnessed many more.

::::::::

One veteran said that the war in Iraq was not properly covered because too many journalists had been killed. Those who were imbedded seemed more pro-war than those not, and many of those not pro-war, were allegedly killed or wounded at a much higher ratio than those in WW II which numbers of troops and enemies were in the range of 40 million in uniform and 40 million killed compared to this war of some 250,000 in uniform on both sides and some 1.5 million killed. How many dead American troops who were once strongly in favor of the war, which then turned against it and died, like Pat Tillman? (Was Pat Tillman Killed By Friendly Fire Or Assassinated Because of His Changed Views On The War?)

Were they targeted by Bushites? Some of the veterans feel that many "imbedded" reporters were bought off with perks if they played the party line. Amazing how little it takes to buy the souls of some people, isn't it?

The Iraq Veterans against the War group insists that the stories coming from the administration and to level military, that the atrocities committed in Iraq were rare and by a few rogue soldiers, was a myth. They said that the massacre of an entire family of Iraqis in the town of Haditha was not the isolated incident, politicians, would have the public think. The abuses were, they say, part of a pattern of "an increasingly bloody war," and, for some, intentionally so.

June 5, 2007 at 17:41:45

Guantánamo Trials End In Unequivocal Defeat For Bushites

As I wrote long ago right here on OEN, were the stories of the alleged abuses by the mercenaries, the lack of discipline, the attitude of winking at alleged atrocities, the sporting shooting and strafing, bombing and the stories of Americans and Brits disguised as Arabs trying to set off bombs in residential neighborhoods, apparent attempts to provoke more violence so that violent crackdowns would appear justified in order to keep the troops there so the oil could be stolen from the Iraqi's.
June 17, 2007 at 06:58:54
Americans and Brits Disguised As Arabs Caught Seeking to Detonate Bomb In Baghdad Residential Area?

An old story with new questions, of a Journalist killed and another wounded in an escape from kidnapping, but by American National Guardsmen and with a report from the Military which whitewashes the event, with a story witnesses say are lies.

November 20, 2007 at 10:48:34
Journalist's Rescue Amidst The Killing of Italian Hero, Revisited

October 28, 2007 at 14:31:59
Is State Department Cover-up a Criminal Obstruction of Justice?

The following statement was too often heard and scoffed at to be taken seriously though made the night of the shooting: "Vehicle traveling at high speed refused to stop at a check point." [soldiers] "attempted to warn the driver to stop by hand and arm signals, flashing white lights, and firing warning shots...when the driver didn't stop the soldiers shot into the engine block which stopped the vehicle," and Pentagon declined to talk with 60 Minutes Wednesday. Eye witnesses allegedly unanimously disagreed with that "statement."

Now we kill people for alleged traffic violations? Oh, yes, car bombs, many of which can be detected by sophisticate electronic equipment and dogs and which could have been warded off by proper armor, which was lacking in the phony "War on Terrorism" which is a euphemism for fascist oil grabbing under the cover of mass murder and liars about why we went into war in the first place. Why did we? Evil Republicans and gutless Democrats, too cowardly to say no to the fascist elements which forced the invasion, that is why.

August 12, 2007 at 10:22:57
Terror Part Un! The War on Terror Is A Faux Issue!

One soldier, Sergeant Logan Laituri, who served in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 became a conscientious objector and was thus discharged, said, "The problem that we face in Iraq is that policymakers in leadership have set a precedent of lawlessness where we don't abide by the rule of law, we don't respect international treaties." Laituri said that the precedent of lawlessness makes itself felt in the rules of engagement handed down by commanders to front line soldiers. When he was stationed in Samarra, he said one of his fellow soldiers shot an unarmed man while he walked down the street.

"The problem is that that soldier was not committing a crime as you might call it because the rules of engagement were very clear that no one was supposed to be walking down the street," he said. "But I have a problem with that. You cannot tell a family to leave everything they know so you can bomb the shit out of their house or their city. So while he definitely has protection
under the law, I don't think that legitimates that type of violence."

Iraq Veterans Against the War called the gathering "Winter Soldier," after a quote from Thomas Paine, who wrote in 1776: "These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."

April 21, 2007 at 09:35:45
The Wall, Which May Be Designed To Ignite a World War!

Organizers claim that video and photographic evidence will be displayed, and testimony given before and panels, which will then be broadcast, live on Satellite TV and streaming video on ivaw.org.

"Winter Soldier" was designed to resemble a similar "Outing of Evil," held by Vietnam Veterans nearly 40 years ago, where atrocities such as the My Lai massacre had fused popular opposition to the war, but even back then, as now, under a democratic presidency, politicians and military insisted that such crimes were isolated exceptions. In comparison/ratio to the numbers of troops and casualties, the proportion may be far greater now.


"Initially even the My Lai massacre was denied," said Gerald Nicosia, author of "Home to War" which brightly illuminates a detailed history of the Vietnam veterans' movement. "The U.S. military has traditionally denied these accusations based on the fact that 'this is a crazy soldier' or 'this is a malcontent' - that you can't trust this person. And that is the reason that Vietnam Veterans against the War did this unified presentation in Detroit in 1971."

"They brought together their bona fides, wore their medals, and showed it was more than one or two or three malcontents It was medal-winning, honored soldiers - veterans in a group verifying what each other said to try to convince people that these charges cannot be denied. That people are doing these things as a matter of policy."

He further states that the 1971 Winter Soldier was widely ignored by MSM then, as now, but that it made a measurable image retained those who fought then and there.

One of those, a hero, who fought, "then and there," was then a 27-year-old Navy Lieutenant John Kerry, who served on a Swift Boat in Vietnam, who Three months after the hearings, made his case to Congress and spoke before an overflow Senate Foreign Relations Committee, where media and Viet Nam veterans crowded in.


"Many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia," Kerry said to the committee back in 1971, describing the events of the Winter Soldier gathering.

"It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit - the emotions in the room, and the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do."

In one of the most famous antiwar speeches of the era, Kerry concluded: "Someone has to die so that President Nixon won't be - and these are his words - 'the first president to lose a
War'. We are asking Americans to think about that, because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

American veterans find themselves in a dejavu situation today.

Most Americans want to believe that the morality of those at the top if our military and our government is as perceptive as theirs, unfortunately, far too many are blinded by ambition and their souls bought off cheaply by better job and pay promises. Such are the vagaries of the weak minded, the soulless and the cowardly.

However, a few activated their own consciences in time to perhaps save their souls, but just a few.

Friday, June 8, 2007
Breaking Story! Marine General Peter W. Pace Resigns as Chairman of Joint Chiefs

POLITICS-US: Vets Break Silence on War Crimes
By Aaron Glantz"They brought together their bona fides and wore their medals and showed it was more than one or two or three malcontents. It was medal-winning, honored soldiers -- veterans in a group verifying what each other said to try to convince people that these charges cannot be denied. That people are doing these things as a matter of policy."
SAN FRANCISCO, Feb 28 (IPS) - U.S. veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are planning to descend on Washington from Mar. 13-16 to testify about war crimes they committed or personally witnessed in those countries.

"The war in Iraq is not covered to its potential because of how dangerous it is for reporters to cover it,"
said Liam Madden, a former Marine and member of the group Iraq Veterans Against the War. "That's left a lot of misconceptions in the minds of the American public about what the true nature of military occupation looks like."

Iraq Veterans Against the War argues that well-publicised incidents of U.S. brutality like the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the massacre of an entire family of Iraqis in the town of Haditha are not the isolated incidents perpetrated by "a few bad apples", as many politicians and military leaders have claimed. They are part of a pattern, the group says, of "an increasingly bloody occupation".

"The problem that we face in Iraq is that policymakers in leadership have set a precedent of lawlessness where we don't abide by the rule of law, we don't respect international treaties, so when that atmosphere exists it lends itself to criminal activity,"
argues former U.S. Army Sergeant Logan Laituri, who served a tour in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 before being discharged as a conscientious objector.

Laituri told IPS that precedent of lawlessness makes itself felt in the rules of engagement handed down by commanders to soldiers on the front lines. When he was stationed in Samarra, for example, he said one of his fellow soldiers shot an unarmed man while he walked down the street.

"The problem is that that soldier was not committing a crime as you might call it because the rules of engagement were very clear that no one was supposed to be walking down the street," he said. "But I have a problem with that. You can't tell a family to leave everything they know so you can bomb the shit out of their house or their city. So while he definitely has protection under the law, I don't think that legitimates that type of violence."

Iraq Veterans Against the War is calling the gathering "Winter Soldier," after a quote from the U.S. revolutionary Thomas Paine, who wrote in 1776:
"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman."

Organisers say video and photographic evidence will also be presented, and the testimony and panels will be broadcast live on Satellite TV and streaming video on ivaw.org.

Winter Soldier is modeled on a similar event held by Vietnam Veterans 37 years ago.

In 1971, over 100 members of Vietnam Veterans Against the War gathered in Detroit to share their stories with fellow citizens. Atrocities like the My Lai massacre had ignited popular opposition to the war, but political and military leaders insisted that such crimes were isolated exceptions.
"Initially even the My Lai massacre was denied,"
notes Gerald Nicosia, whose book "Home to War" provides the most exhaustive history of the Vietnam veterans' movement.
"The U.S. military has traditionally denied these accusations based on the fact that 'this is a crazy soldier' or 'this is a malcontent' -- that you can't trust this person. And that is the reason that Vietnam Veterans Against the War did this unified presentation in Detriot in 1971."
Nicosia says the 1971 Winter Soldier was roundly ignored by the mainstream media, but that it made an indelible imprint on those who were there.

Among those in attendance was 27-year-old Navy Lieutenant John Kerry, who had served on a Swift Boat in Vietnam. Three months after the hearings, Nicosia notes, Kerry took his case to Congress and spoke before a jammed Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Television cameras lined the walls, and veterans packed the seats.

"Many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia,"
Kerry told the committee, describing the events of the Winter Soldier gathering.

"It is impossible to describe to you exactly what did happen in Detroit -- the emotions in the room, and the feelings of the men who were reliving their experiences in Vietnam. They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do."

In one of the most famous antiwar speeches of the era, Kerry concluded:
"Someone has to die so that President Nixon won't be -- and these are his words -- 'the first president to lose a war'. We are asking Americans to think about that, because how do you ask a man to be the last man to die in Vietnam? How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

Nicosia says U.S. citizens and veterans find themselves in a similar situation today.

"The majority of the American people are very dissatisfied with the Iraq war now and would be happy to get out of it. But Americans are bred deep into their psyches to think of America as a good country and, I think, much harder than just the hurdle of getting troops out of Iraq is to get Americans to realise the terrible things we do in the name of the United States."

*Aaron Glantz has reported extensively from Iraq and on the treatment of U.S. soldiers when they return home. He is editor of the website www.warcomeshome.org and will be co-hosting Pacifica Radio's live broadcast of the Winter Soldier hearings from Mar. 14-16.

(END/2008)

ShareThis