Showing posts with label SIVs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SIVs. Show all posts

March 15, 2008

Mathew Maavak: We are in a Bad Fix

WE ARE IN A BAD FIX

By Mathew Maavak

This is a planet in denial. While the existential question gets a red hot "apocalypse now" for an answer, our stock markets seem to have regained paradise lost.

We are witnessing nothing less than history's first confluence of unsustainable "peaks."

Perhaps, we are incapable of piecing them all, for when crude oil reached an all-time intra-day high of $84.10 per barrel on Sept 20, its entitlement to a front pager screamer was conceded to the tale of a few thousand empty -- or emptying -- American homes.

It was like the Butterfly Effect, with a twist. The flapping rooftops of confiscated homes were now whipping up an economic tsunami worldwide.

Here is how it works.

US mortgage lenders, voracious as ever for "more," had extended loans to the default-income group, who, were in turn hit by bad economic management. Credit card issuers followed suit to bloat consumer fantasies, and banks tightened the noose with additional loans for cars, tuition and businesses.

In the world of finance, debt is ironically regarded as an "asset." Think of the rock-solid house that can be repossessed in the event of a default.

Debts, with the outward promise of a steady cash flow, are regularly pooled, "securitized" and converted into a bewildering array of financial products along an upward chain, where, they are hawked off by fund managers to the global market

This money buys up commodities, stocks, and yes, more "securities and derivatives," along with junk bonds and blue chips.

It was easy come, easy go, wherever the money takes you...a 24/7 electronic casino...a Las Vegas without borders.

London bankers were toasting to the dawn of "the haves and the have yachts" at cocktail parties where sauvé qui peut was the vintage.

One of the greatest scams in recent memory was unfolding, exposing a pyramid scheme of epic proportions.

When this reached the point of metastasis, stock markets began to collapse.

The bottom feeders could not pay up anymore. Even the middle class were finding it difficult to pass the buck upwards.

This is called a liquidity crisis, and it happens when the laws of gravity finally exert a pull on the cash flow.

Still the champagne flowed. Lip-smacking advertorials continued to gush over "securities," "derivatives," and "comprehensive financial suites," set in a Jacuzzi lilting to Ponzi's version of "money for nothing and chicks for free."

The pyramids may come crashing down, but the missing capstones are free to roam, investing in gold here, financial products there and junk bonds everywhere.

To avert a panic run though, central banks worldwide pumped $400 billion to maintain liquidity's equilibrium.

Stock markets were no longer in the bearish or bullish mode; rather they were cancroidal, allowing fund managers to sidewheel from one market to another in search of profits, suckers, and a subtle pullout before the big bang.

It was the dawn of the crab, of cancer in stock market terminology, if one was needed. Suspicions were mounting. European banks were facing insolvency.

For three days beginning Sept. 14, savers across the United Kingdom removed £2 billion ($4 billion) from Northern Rock, Britain's fifth largest lender. The Bank of England had to step in to guarantee all deposits in all banks – a move with little or no precedence.

However, the banks were not convinced either. Inter-bank lending, which profitably cycled cash from one bank to another as demand dictated, was now deemed an inter-bank debt trap. Available cash was hoarded up.

The Bank of England's cash auction of £10bn -- at a rate of 6.75% over three-months -- has been shunned for the third consecutive week.

Either the "have yachts" have sailed away, or banks may actually find it difficult to repay the Bank of England.

Worldwide, the full weight of the "asset-backed" collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and structured investment vehicles (SIVs) may run into more than the $400 billion which central banks coughed up to keep the system afloat.

CDOs and SIVs are the sleek-sounding trillion-dollar apexes built on loans taken from simple homeowners.

Banks are still tallying what is real and redeemable, and what was created from, and whirling in thin air. Their best bet now is for a deux ex machina.

Bull in the China Shop

The biggest economic success story of our times was the product of Western consumerism. It created a real supply and demand situation, which forced the relocation of factories to the Third World of cheap labor.

China was the champion recipient. Demand for toys, screws, machinery, computers and cellphones could never ebb, whether it came leaded or unleaded. Beijing's policymakers decided that the perennial flow of greenbacks demanded a domestic infrastructural revolution dictated by the export market -- a first in history if there was one.

Factories, coal-fired plants, superhighways, skyscrapers were springing up at breakneck speed to fulfill the export craze. Excessive pollution and the plight of "unregistered" migrant workers from rural China mattered little.

What mattered were prestige, kickbacks and $1.2tr in hard currency-based reserves. It did not matter that China's domestic consumption vis a vis its GDP was actually decreasing; it was more a matter of consumer opiates, of who was boss in the center of the universe.

It did not matter that Chinese cities were shrouded in toxic gray, where "only 1 percent of the country's 560 million city dwellers breathe air considered safe by the European Union." [1]

The Chinese may cough but the "days when the world caught a cold whenever Uncle Sam sneezed was over." Or so it seemed.

Uncle Sam sneezed.

Global finance began hemorrhaging, and it had to be resuscitated through an intravenous flow of taxpayer money.

Western consumers finally realized that girths had to be tightened, and what better way than to curb spending, and let a market correction take place in the import sector.

An entire supply chain leading to China's factories are in danger of folding up. Mineral resources from Africa, semiconductor plants in Malaysia, raw textile products elsewhere, now face acute market uncertainty.

China is in a bad fix. However, this is not deterring factories from coming online next year to meet the projected "global demand." If Western consumers are scaling down their purchases, Africans are not in a position to be the replacement buyers, and without a market, they will not be able to sell their raw products either.

In such circumstances, moods can shift. When

"Beijing rolled out the red carpet for more than 40 African heads of state last November, billboards depicting Africans clad in leopard skin underwear, and an indigenous man from Papua New Guinea, plastered the city." [2]

It is no wonder that China's list of "allies" is getting shorter by the day.

Events in Myanmar are not proving helpful. China enjoys a near monopoly over Myanmar's estimated 2.46 trillion cubic meters of gas and 3.2 billion barrels of crude oil. Beijing had plans to develop two parallel oil and gas pipelines stretching 2,380-km to link the deepwater port of Sittwe to Kunming, in the Chinese province of Yunnan. Upon completion, a good portion of Middle Eastern oil and gas is expected to bypass the Straits of Malacca.

The quid pro quo was arms supply and support at the UN for Myanmar's military junta. Any new government might negate all existing deals, and pull Yangon into the US orbit. This is a timely revolution from Washington's perspective.

North Korea too is seeking rapprochement. There is enough operational space now to tackle Tehran, Damascus and the Hezbollah.

China can of course play the spoiler by providing arms to these regimes via a proxy. It is still a bad idea as the Israelis are just itching for war.

The IAF recently destroyed a Syrian installation that was purportedly an embryonic nuclear facility, but may well turn out to be a Kolchuga-type passive radar system, ideal for downing B2 stealth bombers. Coincidentally, the Russians have pledged to upgrade Syrian radar defenses after the attack.

If a wider conflagration breaks out in the Middle East, there will be no oil flowing from the Straits of Hormuz to China, either through Sitte, or through the Straits of Malacca.

The best option for Beijing will be to lock its oil and gas grid to the Russian Far East at a breakneck speed, and clean up some level of air pollution in time for the 2008 Olympics.

If an all-out war in the Middle East is our worst nightmare, think of the following unfolding crises...

The Peak Crises and its plural

Peak Oil: Fossil fuels, compressed and formed over aeons in subterranean geological layers are now releasing the telltale sibilant whispers of a punctured gas tank –- low as it was on petrol in the first place. With crude oil hovering above $80 per barrel, the various subsidies built into national economies are bound to burst at the seams, and precipitate price increases for basic necessities.

There is however a unique solution -- falling consumer demand worldwide. That would crimp industrial demand for fossil fuel. It is no wonder oil majors were reluctant to build new refineries when profits seemed guaranteed in the era of "peak oil." This day would surely come!

Peak oil is also tied to the current dollar crises. With the US dollar dipping against other major currencies, crude oil should come cheaper for Washington.

Oil and other commodities are traded in dollars, and dollar-denominated assets outnumber assets weighed in other currencies. Beijing can dump its hundreds of billions in dollar reserves for euros, only to trade them back into dollars to buy crude oil, gold and other assets.

The dollar blackmail will not work, especially with the US Army entrenched in the oil-rich Middle East.

Doomsday theorists are however predicting another Great Depression ahead, where the value of the dollar may mean little in the event of a global financial meltdown.

If this occurs, a global depression will have to deal with the following phenomena that was absent in the 30s.

Peak Urbanization: More than half of the world's population will live in urban areas in just... a few months, according to a United Nations Population Fund report. That translates to 3.3 billion people in an urban concentration camp of shantytowns and high-rise pigeonholes.

Children are growing up in a peculiarly boxed-in environment, removed from the soil that births their identity. They do not wake up to the sound of a crowing rooster, which is nature's way of sowing repentance and a turning of mindsets outside the conventional thinking box.

They wake up to beastly clangor instead. It is either the alarm clock or the barking dog, installed as "pets" to yelp any perceived intruder during the morning rush hour. The urban jungle is an industrialized Ziggurat, which pecks out a hierarchy from childhood. The ones right at the bottom will be the ones shouldering more concrete, or the biggest debt burden.

Close human proximity also leads to petty competitiveness and conflict. That is why "civilization" is held at gunpoint; by the police, by the army and by "treaties."

The urban life is delicate and vulnerable to all sorts of hazards, from plagues to a breakdown in the utilities, communications and transportation services. And political upheavals. A disaster will grind down traffic to a gridlock, far from the escapist countryside.

What if an energy warfare broke out? What if a global depression hits us? Can three billion people grow a patch of greens on their balconies?

When it comes to greens, the outlook is not at all verdant...

Peak Grain: Global grain stockpiles are down to their tightest levels in three decades after two years of unusual weather patterns. Heatwaves have wilted crops in the granaries of the world while floods and other environmental scourges have devastated some of the poorer "self-sustaining" regions.

Global wheat stockpiles will fall to a 34-year low by June 2008, according to the International Grains Council. U.S. stockpiles will fall to lowest level since 1951-52. Wheat futures in Chicago reached $9.3925 a bushel late September when major supplier Ukraine slashed exports.

The price of a bushel has more than doubled in the past year.

The bushel of woes includes rice, barley, soybeans, sorghum, oats and lentils as well, and they are all sagging under record prices. The grapes of wrath have gone on to stalk eggs, cheese, milk, meat and the a la carte menu.

There may come a point when the industrial food chain has little choice but to pass the rising costs to consumers in a dramatic fashion.

Creeping upticks in the price of milk and bread are turning Europeans livid. Milk is now dubbed as the "new white gold."

It is not just bad weather to blame. Rising demand from China is pushing up prices, despite the fact that only half of its urban population has basic health insurance. Tragically, processed food re-exported through Beijing's food chain is causing a global health nightmare.

But why pick on China? The current biodiesel craze is inducing farms to purpose-plant their crops for the profitable bioenergy industry, according to the Hamburg-based Oil World.

"It is high time to realise that the world community is approaching a food crisis in 2008 unless usage of agricultural products forwat biofuels is curbed or ideal weather conditions and sharply higher crop yields are achieved in 2008," it added

Bad news gets worse.

Peak Water: There is not enough freshwater around to sustain the planet's inland ecosystem and its human population. Rivers that help supply drinking water are laden with toxic industrial wastes. Population growth is already straining the capacities of water treatment plants worldwide while desalination plants remain the prerogative of wealthy nations.

According to the Pacific Institute: "Over 1 billion people don't have access to clean drinking water; more than 2 billion lack access to adequate sanitation; and millions die every year due to preventable water-related diseases. Water resources around the globe are threatened by climate change, misuse, and pollution." It estimates that "over 34 million people might perish in the next 20 years fromL water-related disease -- even if the United Nations 'Millennium Development Goals,' which aim to cut the proportion of those without safe access by half, are met." [3]

Lots of water will be diverted to industries and agriculture, or the highest bidder as privatization of water supply gains currency. In some regions, the situation is so acute that water diversion in one country may precipitate conflict with a neighbor. As early as 1974, Iraq reportedly mobilized its army to target Syria's al-Thawra dam on the Euphrates. Israel has cast its own eyes on Lebanon's Litani River.

According to Former UN Secretary General Boutros Boutros-Ghali, "The next war in the Near (Middle) East will not be about politics, but over water."

If this watery grave is not enough, think of the next one...

Peak Fish: There is some fishy business going on in our oceans. Like oil and water, we are trawling deeper and deeper for our fish supplies. Such piscatorial adventures have led to a global decline in fish stocks. "Ecologists worry that entire fisheries will collapse as... 'junk fish' are used up." Aquaculture, which substitutes marine catches to an extent, comes with its own environmental problems. [4]

The Times of London paints a similar gloomy scenario. According to some experts, 90% of fish around British waters "will disappear within 20 years" in the absence of an immediate intervention.

With 75% of fish stocks fully exploited, declining numbers across species worldwide hint at a collapse point by 2048, beyond which replenishment is not possible.

Peak Fish "comes at a time when their nutritional value is recognized more than ever."

"World Health Organisation officials recommend a weekly intake of 200 to 300 grams of fish each week but today's catches can only just meet this target. Since the 1950s an estimated 60 per cent of stocks in British waters have collapsed..."

The Times invokes the paradox that "measures proposed to limit fishing to a sustainable level will only place a cap on the nutritional flow for the coming decades." [5]

The full circle

What began as sub-prime woes in the US housing sector may ripple into something we cannot yet imagine. Will there be a severe global recession, or worse? If wars are yet contained, bidding wars will yet emerge over wheat, water, fish, medicines and oil. What will the future hold in this ecology of crises?

Here is a refrain from the book of Hosea (4:3):

Because of this the land mourns,
and all who live in it waste away;
the beasts of the field and the birds of the air
and the fish of the sea are dying.
Kuala Lumpur, Oct 9, 2007

Copyright 2007@Mathew Maavak

Reference:

[1] As China Roars, Pollution Reaches Deadly Extremes, NYT, Aug 26, 2007

[2] Beijing police round up and beat African expats Guardian, September 26, 2007

[3] Global Water Crisis Pacific Institute.

[4] Water shortages will leave world in dire straits USA Today, 26th Jan 2003

[5] Fish will vanish from British waters in 20 years, says author Times Online, Sept 15, 2007

Most of Mathew Maavak's commentaries can be read here or visit the Panoptic World homepage.


December 21, 2007

SIVs - hording ca$h, praying for miracle$

New SIV Liquidity Problems to Hit Starting in January

The Financial Times' Paul Davies, citing Dresdner Kleinwort research, tells us that many structured investment vehicles face acute financial demands beginning in January when their medium term notes, the subordinated layer of their funding, come due. Note that this demand is a new source of stress. SIVs were already on the ropes due to their inability to roll maturing commercial paper, which was structured to be senior debt.


From the Financial Times:

The funding problems for the structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that have been at the centre of this year’s liquidity troubles are far from over in spite of a number of banks stepping in to support their vehicles.

January will bring the start of a second wave of liquidity problems for SIVs as the vast majority of medium-term funding starts to come due for repayment, according to a report from Dresdner Kleinwort analysts to be published on Wednesday.

SIVs rely on cheap, short-term debt to fund investments in longer-term, higher-yielding securities. They have been hurt as funding has dried up and asset values have declined.

This cheap debt has come from both the very short-term commercial paper (CP) markets and from the slightly longer maturity medium-term note (MTN) markets. CP funding has long dried up and much of what was sold has matured.

“So far SIVs have primarily felt the impact of collapsed CP issuance,” said Domenico Picone at DrK.

“Outstanding MTN for the 30 SIVs currently stands at $181bn, which will be the next liquidity challenge they face.”

This funding represents almost 65 per cent of the value of the SIV sector by the middle of October. Since then it is likely that SIVs have shrunk a great deal more and that that percentage is almost certainly higher.

According to the DrK analysts’ calculations, two-thirds of all MTN funding for SIVs comes due for repayment by the end of next September. Almost $40bn is to be repaid from January to March alone.

This second liquidity squeeze will affect some SIVs more than others.

Sigma Finance, run by Gordian Knot, accounts for 22.5 per cent of all outstanding MTNs issued by SIVs. It must repay about $22.5bn by the end of September and another $2.5bn in the final quarter.

Another heavy borrower in the MTN market is HSBC’s Cullinan Finance, which must repay $19bn by the end of September. DrK has to repay $13.4bn over the coming nine months and Citigroup $29.1bn.


December 10, 2007

Worth noting: Citicorp, and shuffling chairs on the Titanic

Due to this information below, given to you, don't act surprised as others will, when it suddenly merges with another bank! Banks will be increasingly go "global" as they struggle to find other currencies to keep the "liquid".


Ratings agencies are lowering their estimates of what the SIVs are worth (Citicorp 60%), but they are flying by by the seat of their pants trying to figure out just how much debt to write down when doing an assessment(s). While it seems "easier", no one ends up any closer to the TRUTH; the real assets ledger goes begging and the Enron-style accounting practices just continues. You either you know or you don't. Granted, the values of what bank holdings actually are is far less than what anyone's been told, but this guesstimate's business is part and parcel of the whole problem with lack of regulation of all sectors in the financial community which is ever so busy covering its less than professional ass. You see getting it right would entail doing something to change the "back offices" - rooting and pillaging the gamblers who've benefitted and employing competant staff who are diligent.

I can assure you that ain't gonna happen.

Instead, what there will be is tons of coming litagation that will keep people tied up for years, all making money off that - "hedging" their own personal incomes through activities related to fighting being charged with crimes and lack of diligence. Trust me on this!

Expect lots of changes on the deck of the Titanic, as executives/greedsos suddenly move from one "hat" to another. But essentially, the same old dross will be firmly in control. So the "accountant" suddenly ends of being the Human Resources guy: the head of the trading wing suddenly becomes "Compliance Officer". It's easy peesy to rewrite job descriptions, I know. I've done it when European banks came swanning into the US following deregulation and have a very fine idea how all the rearrangements are actually done. If you think the regulators care, guess again. There are actually PR firms (called consultants) who specialized in this very activity and charge a nice little buck for their services.

If nothing changes, nothing changes

~Ernie Larson


Veeger

Citigroup offloads assets from SIVs

By Paul J Davies in London, David Wighton in New York and Adam Jones in Paris

Published: December 10 2007 22:04 | Last updated: December 10 2007 22:04

Citigroup has slashed the size of its struggling off-balance-sheet investment funds by more than $15bn in two months through quiet side deals with some junior investors, according to people familiar with the business.

The news that the troubled US bank has been finding ways to offload assets from its structured investment vehicles (SIVs) without resorting to fire sales comes as Société Générale on Monday became the latest bank to announce a bail-out for its own $4.3bn vehicle. SocGen’s decision follows similar moves by HSBC, Standard Chartered and Rabobank in the past fortnight.

Previous article!!

Citigroup offloads assets from SIVs

By Paul J Davies in London, David Wighton in New York and,Adam Jones in Paris

Published: December 11 2007 02:00 | Last updated: December 11 2007 02:00

Citigroup has slashed the size of its struggling offbalance-sheet investment funds by more than $15bn in two months through quiet side deals with some junior investors, according to people familiar with the business.

The news that the troubled US bank has been finding ways to offload assets from its structured investment vehicles (SIVs) without resorting to fire sales comes as Société Générale yesterday became the latest in a string of banks to announce a bail-out for its own $4.3bn vehicle. Both moves appear likely to reduce the impetus behind plans for the so-called "super-SIV", conceived by Citigroup, Bank of America and JPMorgan with the backing of the US Treasury as a buyer of last resort for the industry that would prevent fire sales.

SIVs, which sell cheap, short-term debt to invest in higher-yielding, longer term assets, have been at the centre of the credit squeeze of recent months as all kinds of investors have ditched exposure to anything that could be tainted by exposure to US subprime mortgages.

Citi yesterday refused to comment on asset sales by its seven SIVs - all of which have been put on watch for downgrades by the rating agencies - but people familiar with the vehicles said their size had been cut from more than $80bn at the end of September to about $66bn.

Most of the cuts have come from selling portions of a SIV's portfolio of assets to investors in the most junior notes at market values.

In return for taking the loss in the value of their notes in such sales, which will be about 40 per cent in many of Citi's SIVs and putting in more money, the investors could reap greater profits later from any recovery in their value.

Meanwhile, SocGen's decision to absorb its sole SIV - which had been dubbed Pace, for 'Premier Asset Collateralised Entity' - follows similar moves by HSBC, Standard Chartered and Rabobank in the past fortnight.

The SIV industry's problems are causing headaches for US money market funds, which are big investors in their debt.

Money market fund managers have been supporting funds to ensure that their asset values do not fall below par - or "break the buck".

Bank of America yesterday said that it was winding down its $12bn Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio, after losses on holdings of paper sold by SIVs.

The fund is an "enhanced cash" fund, a riskier form of money market fund sold only to institutions and high-net worth individuals.

The net assets of the fund have fallen to 99.4 cents on the dollar.

Citigroup SIVs Draw $7.6 Billion of Emergency Funds (Update2)

By Neil Unmack and Jody Shenn

Nov. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., the largest U.S. bank by assets, provided $7.6 billion of emergency financing to the seven structured investment vehicles it runs after they were unable to repay maturing debt.

The SIVs drew on the $10 billion of so-called committed liquidity provided by Citigroup, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing yesterday. Shares fell to the lowest since 2003.

Citigroup's disclosure came a day after it announced as much as $11 billion of debt writedowns linked to U.S. subprime mortgages, and the resignation of Chief Executive Officer Charles O. ``Chuck'' Prince III. The New York-based bank also said in the SEC filing that the amount of securities it owns that are considered hardest to value, known as Level 3 assets, rose 42 percent in the third quarter to $135 billion.

``This company, if it were any other company, would probably be considered to be operating in an unsafe and unsound condition,'' said Josh Rosner, managing director at New York- based investment research firm Graham Fisher & Co.

SIVs sell commercial paper to buy longer term assets such as mortgage or bank bonds. Citigroup SIVs have no direct investments in subprime assets and $70 million of ``indirect exposure'' through collateralized debt obligations, or bonds that package debt, according to the filing, based on figures as of Oct. 31.

Avoiding Fire Sale

Citigroup purchased the commercial paper from the SIVs it advises ``on arms' length commercial terms'' as part of its existing commercial paper programs, Jon Diat, a Citigroup spokesman in New York, said in an e-mailed statement today.

The bank won't consolidate the assets of the SIVs on its balance sheet, according to the filing.

Citigroup created the first SIV in 1988 and is the largest manager of the companies. The bank, along with JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp., agreed last month to start an $80 billion fund to help SIVs avoid dumping their $320 billion of holdings at fire sale prices and further roiling credit markets.

Citigroup fell $1.16, or 3.23 percent, to $34.74 at 12:30 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, after declining 4.9 percent yesterday. The stock had dropped more than 35 percent this year before today. Only National City Corp. and Washington Mutual Inc. had posted bigger losses of the 24 companies in the KBW Banks Index.

LTCM Experience

Credit-default swaps tied to Citigroup bonds traded at the highest level in at least five years yesterday, suggesting investor confidence is eroding. The contracts, used to speculate on a borrower's ability to repay debt, rise as the perception of credit quality deteriorates. The contracts fell 2 basis points to 70 basis points today, according to Phoenix Partners Group in New York.

Citigroup named Richard Stuckey, 51, to manage most of its $43 billion of subprime mortgage assets, the same executive who helped unwind hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management LP's bad bets nine years ago.

Investors are refusing to buy commercial paper, loans due in 270 days or less, from some SIVs because they are concerned about the value of the mortgage securities, asset-backed debt and finance company bonds they own.

U.S. asset-backed commercial paper shrank for 12 straight weeks to a seasonally adjusted $874.7 billion last week, the lowest since April 2006, according to the Federal Reserve in Washington.

`Backing Away'

``Citigroup has one of the more established bank-sponsored SIVs in the sector,'' said Priya Shah, a structured credit analyst at Dresdner Kleinwort in London. ``If they are drawing on their liquidity it shows that investors are backing away from the sector as a whole and they are not really differentiating.''

The largest of Citigroup's SIVs is Centauri Corp., with $20 billion of assets, according to the filing. The six other companies are Beta Finance Corp., Dorada Corp., Five Finance Corp., Sedna Finance Corp., Vetra Finance Corp. and Zela Finance Corp. All are based in the Cayman Islands.

Citigroup's SIVs sold $19 billion of assets between July and the end of September, reducing their assets to $83 billion from just over $100 billion, according to the filing. About 98 percent of the companies' assets are fully funded through the end of 2007, the filing said.

Citigroup said it doesn't own any of the SIVs' capital notes, which rank below the senior commercial paper and first in line for losses.

-- With reporting by Shannon D. Harrington. Editor: Reierson (grs/ajr)

See also: http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/10/business/siv.php

Why Citi May Need a Merger
BusinessWeek - 1 hour ago
One of the key problems a new Citi CEO will face is its exposure to sivs (structured investment vehicles), off-balance sheet investment funds that borrow in ...
Takeover or breakup for Citi FT Alphaville
In the Lead Barron's
New Citi leader will inherit sprawling mess Guardian Unlimited
all 20 news articles »
Citigroup's Mills says bank's reputation at risk on SIVs
MarketWatch - 4 Dec 2007
This protects the SIVs from being forced to sell assets at a loss to meet debt repayments. Meanwhile, the Citigroup SIVs could become even more reliant on ...

December 03, 2007

Bush administration intervenes to shield Wall Street from housing meltdown

My comment: This is a GREAT article. Very precise and lays it all out.


However, my instincts tell me that for CONgress to drop legislation securing mortgages for the vulnerable is way out of line. The Bushistas/ neocons/ Clintonistas are so good at manipulating markets I don't trust them on anything. Wallpapering over cracks is the name of one of their games.

This new ploy is just an attempt to keep the stock and currency markets from falling over the next couple of months, as most spending is during the Christmas season and DEBT is created. They want that consumer debt piling up to prop up the banks' liquidity problems. Only increased consumer debt can bail out the current market panic.

T
he banks' "liquidity problem" is way out of control; it can be exasperated by lack of debt being piled on through consumer purchases over the next two months - but the real underlying problem is going to come home to roost ANYWAY. There really is no way to avoid the long-term tanking out of the global financial system - the values created by the housing bubble's prop up of the global financial system are just too starkly out of line.

We can get into a discussion here of discussion of the creation of private property and the state ala Fredrick Engels, but I'll bypass that and spare you all. But the main point is, with this system of creating value, any and all NATURAL disasters wreck havoc on state and market created values of land. So, as these earthchanges proceed (and they will!) things are going to stay volatile, the banks be damned. They really are just a convenient place to stash money for those that have it. That is all. Helping them stay afloat and provide so-called liquidity is just pure rubbish to my mind, esepcially at a time when funding wars of aggresion on behalf of transnationals.

We are going to see a DEPRESSION, we are going to see folks have to come together in order to survive .. and if we aren't CAREFUL in the extreme, the woman and children are going to suffer even more than before as the values currently held in society are so messed up.

But this is a good "Read" of the current state of play, the hijinks of the Plunge Protection Team and the hysteria afloat. But to give Bush credit? Give me a break!! That's why I think people like Paul Krugman are the most awful deceivers of all.

What is actually happening is an attempt to bail out investors in banks so that the crisis is not so apparent; if they sell in mass, the market tanks ala 1987 and 1929. This has little to do with "being nice to homeowner X". Here's a number: So far BuZh and Ben Helicopter Bernake and Hank have bailed out only 80,000 mortgage holders with federal guarantees on their mortgages and ONLY those who never defaulted on their payments. this is as we say "diddly squat". So how many more are ACTUALLY going to get bailed out this round? Let's WATCH.

At least the economic discussions are going mainstream and that's the best I can say at this point. People are waking up.

Plan to freeze some subprime mortgage rates

Bush administration intervenes to shield Wall Street from housing meltdown

By Barry Grey
3 December 2007

Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

The Bush administration is seeking to obtain the agreement of major US banks, mortgage lenders and servicers, and financial institutions holding subprime mortgage-backed securities to freeze the interest rates on some subprime loans that are scheduled to reset at higher rates in the coming months.

As first reported in the November 30 Wall Street Journal, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, officials of the Federal Reserve Board and other US financial regulators met last Thursday with top Wall Street and home mortgage executives as well as housing counselors to discuss the plan. The newspaper said Paulson might speak publicly about the scheme at a housing conference today.

Calling itself the “Hope Now Alliance,” the government-Wall Street consortium is casting its deliberations as an altruistic effort to rescue homeowners overwhelmed by mortgage debt from foreclosure when their adjustable-rate loans reset upwards by as much as 30 percent. However, press reports make clear that, should the plan come to fruition, only a minority of the 2 million families whose subprime mortgages will reset over the next 18 months would get temporary relief in the form of a rate freeze or some other mortgage restructuring arrangement.

The motivation behind the discussions is the growing alarm on Wall Street and in Washington over the potentially catastrophic financial implications of the accelerating housing slump and related crisis on credit markets. The proposals under discussion are calibrated to avert—at the least possible cost to the banks and big investors—a collapse of major US banks and other financial institutions that could be triggered by spiraling home foreclosures and the implosion of hundreds of billions of dollars in speculative investments tied to the subprime housing boom of previous years.

In essence, the scheme is aimed at containing the home foreclosure epidemic sufficiently to shield the major financial institutions from the full consequences of years of rampant speculation, accompanied by accounting manipulations that concealed the immense levels of risk behind the soaring profits and gargantuan salaries reaped by Wall Street executives.

Were the plan implemented, it would allow holders of mortgage-backed securities to put off marking down their assets.

Most of those who stand to lose their homes —after having been lured into high-interest rate mortgages by predatory lenders, including some of the biggest US banks, when their “teaser” rates expire and their monthly payments shoot up by hundreds of dollars— will not benefit from the plans being thrashed out between the administration and Wall Street.

Among those involved in the negotiations are Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Washington Mutual and Countrywide Financial (the country’s largest home mortgage lender). Also at Thursday’s Washington meeting were representatives of the American Securitization Forum, whose members issue, buy and rate securities backed by bundles of mortgages.

According to the Wall Street Journal, key aspects of the plan have yet to be agreed upon, and some press reports suggest that the entire project could founder, primarily because some big holders of securities backed by subprime loans object to foregoing the increased profits they anticipate once the higher mortgage rates take effect. However, according to the Journal, the American Securitization Forum has come around to the position that the potential losses from foreclosed homes would be far greater than the losses from an interest rate freeze on some subprime loans.

Citigroup, the largest US bank, Wells Fargo, Washington Mutual and Countrywide Financial all face potentially disastrous losses from the accelerating housing and foreclosure crisis. Citigroup has already announced $13 billion in write-offs of securities linked to subprime mortgages, and may be forced to absorb another $65 billion in losses from off-balance-sheet speculative investments that are crashing.

Just last week Moody’s Investors Service announced it had downgraded or put on review $119 billion in debt issued by so-called “structured investment vehicles” (SIVs). This includes $64.9 billion in debt issued by six SIV’s set up by Citigroup.

According to some estimates, between $400 and $500 billion in assets of international banks, investment houses, insurance companies and hedge funds will be wiped out by the collapse of the US housing market and resulting credit crunch.

Among the issues still under discussion between the administration and financial houses, according to press reports, are the length of any temporary freeze on subprime interest rates and the criteria for deciding which subprime borrowers would be eligible.

The Journal wrote on Friday: “Treasury officials say financial institutions are likely to set criteria that divide up subprime borrowers into three groups: those who can continues to make their payments even if rates rise, those who can’t afford their mortgages even if rates stay steady, and those who could keep their homes if the maturity date of their mortgages were extended or the interest rates remained at the teaser rates. Only the third group would be eligible for help.”

The newspaper added that creditors would take into account whether the borrowers had equity in their homes, despite falling house prices, and whether their incomes were steady. Because of the precipitous decline in house prices, many subprime borrowers now owe more than the market value of their homes.

The criteria outlined above make it clear that the most distressed homeowners would be excluded from a temporary interest rate freeze and left to be thrown onto the street.

Harvey L. Pitt, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who is now working for some hedge funds with a stake in the negotiations on a possible subprime rate freeze, said that even a generous freeze would help only a minority of subprime borrowers. He said a freeze would do nothing to help people who took out a “no documentation” loan, overstated their incomes and borrowed more than they could repay. Nor would a freeze help those whose mortgage is higher than the market value of their homes.

The increasingly desperate state of the US financial system and the precarious position of some of the biggest banks, has led the administration to shift its previous position of a hands-off approach, aside from urging mortgage lenders to provide relief to mortgage borrowers on a one-by-one basis.

It is estimated that there are $1 trillion in US subprime loans. Interest rates are scheduled to reset next year on $362 billion worth of adjustable-rate subprime mortgages, and another $85 billion in these mortgages is resetting in the course of the current quarter. These include loans that are bundled into so-called “collateralized debt obligations” that are held in the portfolios of banks, hedge funds, mutual funds and insurance companies.

In recent months, the foreclosure rate on subprime loans has soared to 10 percent, and top Treasury officials fear that unless some relief is provided, the foreclosure rate could spiral even higher.

The announcement of the subprime negotiations was the second major step taken last week by government and finance officials to reassure the stock market and financial institutions in response to a raft of reports showing a deepening credit crunch, rapidly falling home sales and prices, soaring foreclosure rates, declining durable goods orders, rising unemployment claims and sagging personal incomes and consumer spending—all pointing to a sharp contraction in economic growth in the current quarter and the likelihood of a full-scale recession in 2008.

The vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Donald L. Kohn, and the chairman, Ben Bernanke, both delivered speeches broadly hinting at a further interest rate cut when Fed policy makers meet again on December 11. Financial interests are clamoring for a cut of at least 0.25 percent—the third since last August—to further open the credit spigot and forestall catastrophic losses on Wall Street.

The Fed officials’ remarks helped spark a two-day rally of 546 points Tuesday and Wednesday in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and similar sharp gains in the other major stock indexes, and further, more modest gains, on Thursday and Friday. Reports of the subprime negotiations led to large gains for the stocks of financial companies involved in the talks in Friday trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Shares in Citigroup rose 3.1 percent, Countrywide Financial shot up 16 percent, and Wells Fargo rose 6 percent.

Another factor driving the administration’s subprime initiative is a desire to preempt legislation being introduced by Democrats in the House of Representatives and the Senate to halt predatory lending and restrict some practices that are widespread among subprime lenders. Some Democrats are also seeking to pass a bill that would allow bankruptcy judges to change the terms of mortgages to help people retain their homes.

The initial response of prominent Democrats to news of the government-led negotiations indicates that they are more than willing to seize on the plan to drop any serious legislation to curb mortgage lending abuses. The liberal New York Times columnist Paul Krugman offered “kudos to the Bush administration” on his blog, and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank said he was “encouraged by reports of progress” in efforts to help borrowers facing foreclosure.

See Also:
Credit crisis reveals widespread accounting manipulation by top US banks
[27 November 2007]
US recession fears grow as bank losses mount
[21 November 2007]
Near-panic atmosphere as US Federal Reserve chairman testifies before Congress
[9 November 2007]
Citigroup ousts CEO, warns of billions more in subprime losses
[6 November 2007]
Stock market gyrations fueled by credit, housing market crisis
[3 November 2007]

Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.




Plan to freeze some subprime mortgage rates

Bush administration intervenes to shield Wall Street from housing meltdown

By Barry Grey
3 December 2007

Use this version to print | Send this link by email | Email the author

The Bush administration is seeking to obtain the agreement of major US banks, mortgage lenders and servicers, and financial institutions holding subprime mortgage-backed securities to freeze the interest rates on some subprime loans that are scheduled to reset at higher rates in the coming months.

As first reported in the November 30 Wall Street Journal, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, officials of the Federal Reserve Board and other US financial regulators met last Thursday with top Wall Street and home mortgage executives as well as housing counselors to discuss the plan. The newspaper said Paulson might speak publicly about the scheme at a housing conference today.

Calling itself the “Hope Now Alliance,” the government-Wall Street consortium is casting its deliberations as an altruistic effort to rescue homeowners overwhelmed by mortgage debt from foreclosure when their adjustable-rate loans reset upwards by as much as 30 percent. However, press reports make clear that, should the plan come to fruition, only a minority of the 2 million families whose subprime mortgages will reset over the next 18 months would get temporary relief in the form of a rate freeze or some other mortgage restructuring arrangement.

The motivation behind the discussions is the growing alarm on Wall Street and in Washington over the potentially catastrophic financial implications of the accelerating housing slump and related crisis on credit markets. The proposals under discussion are calibrated to avert—at the least possible cost to the banks and big investors—a collapse of major US banks and other financial institutions that could be triggered by spiraling home foreclosures and the implosion of hundreds of billions of dollars in speculative investments tied to the subprime housing boom of previous years.

In essence, the scheme is aimed at containing the home foreclosure epidemic sufficiently to shield the major financial institutions from the full consequences of years of rampant speculation, accompanied by accounting manipulations that concealed the immense levels of risk behind the soaring profits and gargantuan salaries reaped by Wall Street executives.

Were the plan implemented, it would allow holders of mortgage-backed securities to put off marking down their assets.

Most of those who stand to lose their homes —after having been lured into high-interest rate mortgages by predatory lenders, including some of the biggest US banks, when their “teaser” rates expire and their monthly payments shoot up by hundreds of dollars— will not benefit from the plans being thrashed out between the administration and Wall Street.

Among those involved in the negotiations are Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Washington Mutual and Countrywide Financial (the country’s largest home mortgage lender). Also at Thursday’s Washington meeting were representatives of the American Securitization Forum, whose members issue, buy and rate securities backed by bundles of mortgages.

According to the Wall Street Journal, key aspects of the plan have yet to be agreed upon, and some press reports suggest that the entire project could founder, primarily because some big holders of securities backed by subprime loans object to foregoing the increased profits they anticipate once the higher mortgage rates take effect. However, according to the Journal, the American Securitization Forum has come around to the position that the potential losses from foreclosed homes would be far greater than the losses from an interest rate freeze on some subprime loans.

Citigroup, the largest US bank, Wells Fargo, Washington Mutual and Countrywide Financial all face potentially disastrous losses from the accelerating housing and foreclosure crisis. Citigroup has already announced $13 billion in write-offs of securities linked to subprime mortgages, and may be forced to absorb another $65 billion in losses from off-balance-sheet speculative investments that are crashing.

Just last week Moody’s Investors Service announced it had downgraded or put on review $119 billion in debt issued by so-called “structured investment vehicles” (SIVs). This includes $64.9 billion in debt issued by six SIV’s set up by Citigroup.

According to some estimates, between $400 and $500 billion in assets of international banks, investment houses, insurance companies and hedge funds will be wiped out by the collapse of the US housing market and resulting credit crunch.

Among the issues still under discussion between the administration and financial houses, according to press reports, are the length of any temporary freeze on subprime interest rates and the criteria for deciding which subprime borrowers would be eligible.

The Journal wrote on Friday: “Treasury officials say financial institutions are likely to set criteria that divide up subprime borrowers into three groups: those who can continues to make their payments even if rates rise, those who can’t afford their mortgages even if rates stay steady, and those who could keep their homes if the maturity date of their mortgages were extended or the interest rates remained at the teaser rates. Only the third group would be eligible for help.”

The newspaper added that creditors would take into account whether the borrowers had equity in their homes, despite falling house prices, and whether their incomes were steady. Because of the precipitous decline in house prices, many subprime borrowers now owe more than the market value of their homes.

The criteria outlined above make it clear that the most distressed homeowners would be excluded from a temporary interest rate freeze and left to be thrown onto the street.

Harvey L. Pitt, a former chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, who is now working for some hedge funds with a stake in the negotiations on a possible subprime rate freeze, said that even a generous freeze would help only a minority of subprime borrowers. He said a freeze would do nothing to help people who took out a “no documentation” loan, overstated their incomes and borrowed more than they could repay. Nor would a freeze help those whose mortgage is higher than the market value of their homes.

The increasingly desperate state of the US financial system and the precarious position of some of the biggest banks, has led the administration to shift its previous position of a hands-off approach, aside from urging mortgage lenders to provide relief to mortgage borrowers on a one-by-one basis.

It is estimated that there are $1 trillion in US subprime loans. Interest rates are scheduled to reset next year on $362 billion worth of adjustable-rate subprime mortgages, and another $85 billion in these mortgages is resetting in the course of the current quarter. These include loans that are bundled into so-called “collateralized debt obligations” that are held in the portfolios of banks, hedge funds, mutual funds and insurance companies.

In recent months, the foreclosure rate on subprime loans has soared to 10 percent, and top Treasury officials fear that unless some relief is provided, the foreclosure rate could spiral even higher.

The announcement of the subprime negotiations was the second major step taken last week by government and finance officials to reassure the stock market and financial institutions in response to a raft of reports showing a deepening credit crunch, rapidly falling home sales and prices, soaring foreclosure rates, declining durable goods orders, rising unemployment claims and sagging personal incomes and consumer spending—all pointing to a sharp contraction in economic growth in the current quarter and the likelihood of a full-scale recession in 2008.

The vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Donald L. Kohn, and the chairman, Ben Bernanke, both delivered speeches broadly hinting at a further interest rate cut when Fed policy makers meet again on December 11. Financial interests are clamoring for a cut of at least 0.25 percent—the third since last August—to further open the credit spigot and forestall catastrophic losses on Wall Street.

The Fed officials’ remarks helped spark a two-day rally of 546 points Tuesday and Wednesday in the Dow Jones Industrial Average and similar sharp gains in the other major stock indexes, and further, more modest gains, on Thursday and Friday. Reports of the subprime negotiations led to large gains for the stocks of financial companies involved in the talks in Friday trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Shares in Citigroup rose 3.1 percent, Countrywide Financial shot up 16 percent, and Wells Fargo rose 6 percent.

Another factor driving the administration’s subprime initiative is a desire to preempt legislation being introduced by Democrats in the House of Representatives and the Senate to halt predatory lending and restrict some practices that are widespread among subprime lenders. Some Democrats are also seeking to pass a bill that would allow bankruptcy judges to change the terms of mortgages to help people retain their homes.

The initial response of prominent Democrats to news of the government-led negotiations indicates that they are more than willing to seize on the plan to drop any serious legislation to curb mortgage lending abuses. The liberal New York Times columnist Paul Krugman offered “kudos to the Bush administration” on his blog, and House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank said he was “encouraged by reports of progress” in efforts to help borrowers facing foreclosure.

See Also:
Credit crisis reveals widespread accounting manipulation by top US banks
[27 November 2007]
US recession fears grow as bank losses mount
[21 November 2007]
Near-panic atmosphere as US Federal Reserve chairman testifies before Congress
[9 November 2007]
Citigroup ousts CEO, warns of billions more in subprime losses
[6 November 2007]
Stock market gyrations fueled by credit, housing market crisis
[3 November 2007]

Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.

October 22, 2007

Paulson’s $100 billion “Bankers Bankruptcy Fund” and the G-7 Fiasco

By Mike Whitney

10/22/07 "
ICH" -- - -Friday’s bloodbath on Wall Street proved that the troubles in the credit markets have not been relieved by the Fed’s rate cuts. The Dow Jones slipped 367 points on the 20th anniversary of Black Monday, the stock market’s biggest one-day loss in history. Since Friday, Asian markets have plunged; stocks are down sharply in Japan, Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan and South Korea. The global sell-off is a reaction to ongoing problems in the subprime market and deeper-rooted systemic issues related to the US’s structured-debt model.

The sudden downturn in the stock market provided a fitting backdrop for Treasury Secretary Paulson’s appearance at the G-7 meetings in Washington DC. Paulson has largely shrugged off the decline in housing and the growing volatility in the equities markets. As the representative for the world’s biggest economy, Paulson instructed the other nations on how best to adjust their currencies and on the dangers of “sovereign wealth funds”. No one was listening. Foreign ministers and central bankers are less receptive to the scolding of US officials. America needs to put its own house in order before it gives advice to anyone else.

What everyone at the meetings really wanted to know was why the United States destabilized the global economic system by selling hundreds of billions of dollars of worthless mortgage-backed securities to banks and pension funds around the world? Aren’t there any regulators in the US anymore?

And how Paulson going to make amends to the institutions and investors who lost their shirts in this massive mortgage-scheme?

Unfortunately, the Treasury Secretary didn’t address any of these questions. He offered no recommendations for fixing the problems in the credit markets and he refused to explain what he would do to shore up the faltering dollar. Instead, he reiterated the same lame mantra that the US follows a “strong dollar policy”.

Baloney. The Federal Reserve has been trashing the greenback for the last 7 years without pause. Paulson needs to rethink his approach and start telling the truth. Markets thrive on credibility and transparency; that’s what strengthens investor confidence. If Paulson thinks that the people are dupes; he’s in for a shock.

Last month’s net foreign inflows show how quickly capital can evaporate when confidence is lost. Foreign investors pulled $163 billion out of US securities and Treasuries in August alone. Net capital inflows have turned negative and that money won’t be returning until the United States shows that it’s “got its act together”.

Are you listening, Henry?

The multi-trillion dollar subprime swindle was the greatest financial fraud in history. Investors are looking for accountability. They want to hear someone in the Bush administration and at the Central Bank stand up, take responsibility, and offer concrete regulatory changes to fix the system.

Are you listening, Henry?

No one is interested in another scam like the new $100 billion “Bankers Bankruptcy Fund”. All that does is provide the over-extended and under-capitalized investment banks another chance to dump their poisonous Mortgage-backed slop on the gullible public. Forget about it. That plan needs to be tossed in the circular receptacle. If Paulson really wants to know what people think about his new Mega-fund he should listen to Nick Parsons, the head of markets strategy at National Australia Bank. Parsons summed up the fund’s goals saying:

``By insulating the junk from the sellers of junk, the holders of junk should be spared the problems of junk. The one flaw in this cunning plan, however, would be if investors took fright at being reminded just how much junk is still in the system.''

Parsons is right. Junk bonds are still junk whether they’re logged on an SIV’s debit-sheet or wrapped in Treasury Dept red-ribbon. What difference does it make? It’s still garbage. Write down the losses and get on with it.

It’s worth noting that Paulson—who felt vindicated in reproaching China for currency manipulation; also blasted Iran saying,

"We discussed ways to deal with Iran's pursuit of a nuclear capability and ballistic missiles, its vast financial support to lethal terrorist groups, and the deceptive financial tactics employed by Iran to evade sanctions and mask illicit transactions."

Give it a rest, Hank.

Apart from the fact that the United Nations nuclear-watchdog agency (IAEA) has found “no evidence” that Iran is conducting a nuclear weapons program; it’s none of Paulson’s business anyway. He needs to devote more time to cleaning up his own mess and less time criticizing others for their fabricated offenses.

The rest of the world is already fuming at the US for creating the problems that threaten to send the global economy into a prolonged tailspin.

Developing countries that joined the G-7 meetings lambasted the US for generating “serious problems of financial fragility” which are endangering the “prosperity of the world economy”. (Bloomberg)

The G-24 is demanding “increased surveillance of advanced economies, putting as much focus in evaluating their vulnerabilities as it does in emerging-market economies.''

Indeed. And yet Paulson and his colleagues at the Fed continue to blame everyone else. No one in China or Iran cooked up this “structured finance” rip-off which sent millions of homeowners into foreclosure, shuttered 160 mortgage lenders, and undermined the global banking system. That was the work of the Wall Street con-artists and their accomplices at the Fed.

Consider this article in Sunday’s UK Telegraph:

“Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland have lined up emergency funds of up to $30 billion from the US Federal Reserve to bail out American clients caught up in the global credit crunch.

The Fed's board of governors wrote to both banks 10 days ago, granting them access to funds for customers "in need of short-term liquidity"


The letter to RBS made particular reference to investors holding mortgage-backed securities -- which have been at the centre of the sub-prime crisis. (“Barclay’s, RBS prepare emergency credit with Fed”, UK Telegraph)

Great. Another humongous bail out for the victims of America’s deregulated mortgage-laundering racket. Is that China’s fault?

Another article appeared in yesterday’s New York Times by economics reporter Gretchen Morgenson, “Get Ready for the Big Squeeze”:

“Anyone who thinks that we have hit bottom in the increasingly scary lending world is paying little mind to the remarkably low levels of reserves that the big banks have set aside for loan losses. Indeed, loss provisions as a percentage of total loans held for investment plummeted to a historic low in the second quarter of 2007…. Part of the problem for banks is a result of an almost two-decade drop in loan loss reserves….. Now that a credit bust looms, banks have far fewer reserves on their balance sheets than they might have had in previous cycles. Leadership is critical in times of economic crisis. This isn’t the time for prevarication, obfuscation or public relations gimmicks. We need leaders who will tell the truth, make remedial policy recommendations, and forestall the growing probability of social disorder."

Still want to talk about China and Iran’s problems?

The present gang of Wall Street warlords have transformed the world’s most transparent and resilient markets into an opaque galaxy of complex debt-instruments and shady “off-balance sheets” operations. It’s no better than a carnival shell-game. As the banks continue to get rocked from explosions in the housing industry; the unwinding derivatives and carry trades will precipitate a mass exodus from the equities markets. That rout will be matched by a corresponding downward slide in the real estate market which is expected to continue until 2010.

Crisis dynamics have returned to the credit markets. Surging oil and food prices are bearing down on maxed-out consumers and slowing retail spending. Discretionary income is vanishing from rising inflation and shrinking home equity. Wages have remained stagnant for over a decade while personal savings have dipped to minus digits. On top of it all, consumer debt is at record-highs and the danger of default has expanded beyond housing to every area of personal finance.

A report in Sunday’s Financial Times sheds light on this new and worrisome development:

“Poor quarterly results from banks across the US over the past two weeks suggest credit problems once confined to high-risk mortgage borrowers are spreading across the consumer landscape, posing new risks to the economy and weighing heavily on the markets.

US banks have raised reserves for loan losses by at least $6bn over the second quarter and by even larger amounts from last year, indicating financial executives believe consumers will be increasingly unable to make payments on a variety of loans.

Banks are adding to reserves not just for defaults on mortgages, but also on home equity loans, car loans and credit cards.

“What started out merely as a subprime problem has expanded more broadly in the mortgage space and problems are getting worse at a faster pace than many had expected,” said Michael Mayo, Deutsche Bank analyst.” (“US Loan Default problems Widen” Financial Times)


The aftershocks from Alan Greenspan’s “cheap credit” policies will be felt for decades. The American consumer is more over-leveraged and economically vulnerable than any time in history. Simply put; he owes money on everything----cars, mortgages, electronics, student loans, and credit cards. The path to indentured serfdom is paved with the Fed’s low interest green paper.

Record US trade imbalances coupled with a steadily-declining dollar, is negatively impacting European industry as well as the Euro. Further weakening is likely to trigger a stampede away from dollar-backed assets and securities. The plan to strangle the dollar to reduce US balance of payments is pure lunacy---an idea as zany as invading Iraq. No country has ever devalued its way to prosperity. (Steven Roach) Destroying the dollar will destroy the country.

Global credit markets are now facing unprecedented disruptions due to the mortgage-derivatives fraud which originated in the United States before spreading across the world. $400 billion in asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) has failed to roll over, the mortgage securitization process has stalled, the colossal leveraged buyout deals (LBOs) are DOA, and millions of bankrupt homeowners are being driven from their houses. The big investment banks have been forced to take $280 billion of new debt on their balance sheets since the middle of August. This is limiting their ability to issue new loans and generate profits. The banking system has already smashed into the iceberg and the decks are quickly filling with water.

Interest rates cuts will do nothing to slow the inexorable deterioration in the housing or stock markets. Cheap credit will not dispose of the toxic debt clogging the system or slow the pace of defaults. Trillions of dollars in market capitalization will be lost.

The system is blinking red. These problems cannot be ignored or swept under the rug any longer.

Click on "comments" below to read or post comments

Comments (18) Comment (0)



I noticed the post about posting "what is to be done" type items.

First off, GET EDUCATED! You are PURPOSELY not educated on financial matters. Only you can fix that. My blog is LOADED with great info and videos to help anyone "get" it . and quickly,too. Sort of like a friendly, multimedia junior college course in The Truth. Those who saw this coming have done a great job in making videos and many other kinds of "teaching" devices which I have posted. Then show them to folks you KNOW. Have a youtube party! Make sure the teens see them. I discuss what i know with my son's 22-year old friends and they love it. Pay strict attention to the peak oil (oil peak?) forums, they have many intelligent people on them.

I have over 1600 relevant items on that blog. more info can be found at

www.mparent7777-2.blogspot.com
and it isn't loaded with religiously overtoned comment.

For info on staying alive with tight money, visit www.peoplenomics.com. George Ure actually has a low cost book on "How to live on $10,000 years a year". For $40 a year you can find out all the lastest headlines IN CONTEXT from him, get special reports and learn what other people pass along to him (real great experts, military people, all sorts). There are more "surprises" in the form of earth changes to come and George has been con/subverted!! You'll get lots of leads of things to look at that will help you. George Ure recently pointed out that we are in a schizomanic period ...

The attempt to force people off SSI has ALREADY begun. FACE IT! I've had to; they tried to get me to get a public trustee although I've had it for 48 years without one! They keep sending me forms hoping I mess up. This is one place the US banking elite can still get funds to bail them out and they are going to take it away. That was the price for NOT making the US pay by lowering interest rates at the G7 summit, near as I can figure. Yes, it IS a terrible thing, but they cut me off all summer and I found that by belt tightening I COULD make it, more or less. You just find new resources for things or START THEM YOURSELF.

Join a freecycle group, but keep your eyes peeled for the cons amongst them. They are in there. Never give somone your phone number. You might find a similar group in your area with a slightly different name. Seek them all out.

I could post alot of links about coming civil unrest and what to do, but I'll spare you all that. Some of it is on my blog. Kucinich's economic adviser, Dr. Michael Hudson is fabulous and knows ALL about it. I have a podcast of his on my blog. He also is the best authority on the so-called housing bubble. Harper's ran his brilliant explanation ..

This is is a link I REALLY enjoy, you all probably will, too.

http://energybulletin.net/23259.html

Dmitri Orlof is right on the money and ONLY a spiritual revolution is going to get MURKANS and maybe Canadians to get through this with their souls intact. To LISTEN to Dmitri being read (well worth it! 2 palatable hours!)
http://http.dvlabs.com/radio4all/ug/ug285-hour1mix.mp3
http://http.dvlabs.com/radio4all/ug/ug285-hour2mix.mp3

Lastly FACE THIS! Canada is expected to bail out the US as it has oil, gas, plutonium, uranium and this is ALREADY the frontline as NDNs are being swarmed for their resources. The North American Union (the SPP at this point in time, that will change). So pay attention to the politics up here.

Only 30 companies are "allowed" into the planning in NA; they will not suffer too much; they are aware of THAT. Go and check out the FACTS on SPP sites and read up on the Competitiveness Council; the 30 new corporate leaders and what they are up to. And beware! the rise of the insane 3rd parties who think they have an answer! Most have divide and conquer methods attached.

rgf: The answer is Greenspan (now repudiating his part!), Milton Friedman, and now! pow! Hank Paulson! George HW BuZH! This has been in the making for a LONG time. It IS greed, and money addiction ... wherever there is money, property or pre$tige involved, there lies human ROT. see www.naomiklein.com or shockdoctrine.com.

As for Canada, the CAP, formed by Paul Hellyer calls for drastic measures to be taken as per Ron Paul. However, Hellyer is gone and I highly doubt that they can provide the necessary leadership. They would get out from under the central bankers ... Many many of tomorrow's leaders are "hiding" as women; don't discount what we have to say!

Lastly, RESIST with all your might the coming nuclear revival .. we are all toast if we don't do that. NUKES kill.

GET TOGETHER A PLAN. Do it now.

ShareThis