Showing posts with label Net Neutrality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Net Neutrality. Show all posts

August 07, 2008

Activism: August TO events

08/07/2008 TorontoChange.com News and In Focus

Events:

Hiroshima & Nagasaki Photo Exhibit

August 6 -11

THDC is honoured to announce that the City of Toronto has been selected to host the Hiroshima & Nagasaki Photo Exhibit to be held concurrently with 101 cities across the United States. THDC is also very pleased to present Setsuko Thurlow, Member of the Order of Canada and Hibakusha (Hiroshima survivor), who will introduce the exhibition.


Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba of Hiroshima will also offer a personal video greeting to the citizens of Toronto in mutual respect for the decades of work done by the citizens of Toronto and Hiroshima on global peacebuilding and the Mayors for Peace campaign pressing together in solidarity for the abolition of nuclear weapons. "Our goal is to create awareness of the destructive power of nuclear weapons," says Setsuko Thurlow, "and the 25,000 armed nuclear weapons of which are still threatening humanity today."


The Hiroshima & Nagasaki Photo Exhibit features pictures and educational facts about the devastation of nuclear war. The exhibit also displays dramatic drawings and paintings from dozens of Hibakusha survivors of their painful memories during the first moments on the ground after the 1945 atomic bombings in Japan with the urgent message "never again".


The exhibit runs from August 6th -11th, 2008 in conjunction with the "Paths to Hope" Peace Commemoration and Lantern Ceremony on Saturday, August 9th, 2008 at the Toronto Peace Garden, Nathan Phillips Square beginning at 6:30 pm.

[RSVP]

Infodrop Sunday At Dundas Square

(ain't gonna be no SPP, NAU, the war criminals are going to the clink. As for Bill C-51, well, they can use it for toilet paper. Time activists get over the paranoia foisted on them by the internet and ignorant lamestream media.)

Sunday Aug 10 1:00 - 6:00 PM

Come out in support of international Truth Action Day.

We are committed to making every Sunday at Dundas Square a place to meet and hand out information. We will be handing out fliers and DVDs to educate about

911 Truth / The Unjust Detainment of the Toronto 18 /The War Resister Support Campaign / The SPP and NAU / Bill C51 and Codex

We will be handing out dissent dollars and flyers around the downtown core. Join us and inform others about the coming North American Union agenda, 9/11, the coming police state and how it effects Canadians. We will also have several petitions to sign including the March On Ottawa Petition.

Fliers will be provided however it is recommended that you bring DVD copies of Truth Rising and The Nations’s Deathbed.

Meet at Dundas square at 1 PM this Sunday!

Come out in support of international Truth Action Day.
We are committed to making every Sunday at Dundas Square a place to meet and hand out information. We will be handing out fliers and DVDs to educate people about 9/11 Truth.

[RSVP]


Fluoride Forums - Is it time to stop water fluoridation in Toronto?

Monday, Aug11 , 7:00 - 10:00 PM

The following two Fluoride Forums are free and open to the public. All presentations will be followed by questions from the public.

Based on new studies that indicate that fluoride can damage the brain and other tissues, a panel of international scientists, doctors and dentists will explore the following questions:

Is it time to stop water fluoridation in Toronto? Do the risks outweigh the benefits? Are there safer ways to protect children’s teeth?

An evening Fluoride Forum Monday, August 11, 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

25 Cecil Street at the United Steelworkers Union Hall (1 block south of College Street west and 3 blocks west of University Avenue) Walk, bike, take the TTC to Queen’s Park Station or drive. Free parking for first 50 cars.

The first major public presentation of new scientific evidence on:

FLUORIDE’S EFFECTS ON THE BRAIN

by Dr. Vyvyan Howard, MB CHB PhD FRCPath

Professor of Bioimaging, School of Biomedical Science, University of Ulster

President, International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE)

Dr. C. Vyvyan Howard is a medically-qualified pathologist interested in infant and fetal toxicology and, more recently, in researching the toxicological properties of nanoparticles.
The evening forum will conclude with short presentations from a panel of distinguished international scientists and researchers including Dr. A. K. Susheela and Dr. Jennifer Luke on

FLUORIDE'S OTHER HEALTH IMPACTS.

Fluoride Action Network: www.fluoridealert.org

[RSVP]

Headlines:

Save the Internet

Net Neutrality in Canada is the principle that consumers should be in control of what content, services and applications they use on the public Internet.


It's a simple concept that has wide-ranging implications on how the Internet operates.
"When I invented the Web, I didn't have to ask anyone's permission. Now, hundreds of millions of people are using it freely. I am worried that that is going end" - Sir Tim Berners Lee.


It is our belief that the Internet is more than just the physical infrastructure over which it operates. It is a vibrant marketplace and an entirely new format for free expression, even a political landscape and a tool for free organization. Some ISPs in Canada however, are overstepping their role and cannot separate their participation in this network from their component ownership and commercial interests.


In order to protect the Internet from these increasingly invasive corporate interests, we are asking that the government define the rules for which ISPs may participate on the Internet and mandate the application and content neutrality of Internet access providers.


By protecting Net Neutrality, we guarantee that pro-union sites do not get blocked, that ISPs do not charge anti-competitive 'preference' fees and that independent media can compete based on content, not pocketbook, with the largest of publishers.

It's time for the Canadian government to stand up and protect the future of the Canadian Internet.

[LINK]

Scientist Suicided as Anthrax Investigation Closes In

Bruce Ivins, a microbiologist at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, reportedly committed suicide after ingesting prescription-strength Tylenol and codeine, as the FBI prepared to charge him in the anthrax attacks weeks after the 9/11 attack in 2001.

Ivins was part of the FBI team that investigated the anthrax sent in letters to the Senate's Democratic leadership.

In March of this year, Fox News reported: ""The FBI has narrowed its focus to 'about four' suspects in the 6 1/2-year investigation of the deadly anthrax attacks of 2001, and at least three of those suspects are linked to the Army'™s bio-weapons research facility at Fort Detrick in Maryland . . . Among the pool of suspects are three scientists '” a former deputy commander, a leading anthrax scientist and a microbiologist '” linked to the research facility, known as USAMRIID. The FBI has collected writing samples from the three scientists in an effort to match them to the writer of anthrax-laced letters that were mailed to two U.S. senators and at least two news outlets in the fall of 2001, a law enforcement source confirmed." It is now believed that the microbiologist in question was Ivins. The other suspects have not yet been identified. Although the FBI said the four Fort Detrick personnel were suspects, WMR previously reported that some Fort Detrick personnel were in a whistleblower status concerning knowledge of the perpetrators of the anthrax attacks.

[LINK]


(ps. Ivins did NOT do it!! He was framed and got tired of being harassed by the FBI.)

Forged Letters: More Evidence of False Ties Between Iraq and 911

Bestselling journalist Ron Suskind has revealed that the White House ordered the CIA to forge and backdate a document falsely linking Iraq with Muslim terrorists and 9/11 . . . and that the CIA complied with those instructions and in fact created the forgery, which was then used to justify war against Iraq.

Suskind also revealed that "Bush administration had information from a top Iraqi intelligence official 'that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq – intelligence they received in plenty of time to stop an invasion.' ”

This is a stunning revelation in its own right. But what does it say about the government's claims that 9/11 was an attack by Muslim extremists which the U.S. government could not have anticipated?

Well, if the White House ordered the CIA to forge documents falsely implicating the people against which they wanted to wage war (Iraqis), and falsely linking supposed Al Qaeda terrorists with someone they had no connection with (Saddam Hussein), is it possible that a similar thing occurred as to who carried out 9/11?

[LINK]

TORONTOCHANGE EXCLUSIVE: VIDEO PROTEST FOOTAGE, JULY 26 @ US CONSULATE TO BRING HOME OMAR KHADR

TORONTO — Omar Khadr's family joined a crowd of supporters willing to brave thunderstorms and blustering wind at a rally on Saturday to press for the youngest Guantanamo Bay detainee to be transferred to Canada.

Members of the Khadr family, including younger brother Karim, 19, and older sister Zaynab, 28, endured the inclement weather along with the more than 200 supporters outside the U.S. Consulate in Toronto.

The Toronto-born Omar Khadr, now 21, was arrested as a 15-year-old after a firefight with U.S. Special Forces in Afghanistan in 2002. He is accused of throwing a grenade that killed a medic and has spent nearly six years in custody.

[LINK]

Khadr’s Lawyer: Dismiss Charges

A lawyer for Canada's only inmate at the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay said Monday he has filed three motions to dismiss war crimes charges against his client on the grounds the U.S. government has illegally influenced the case.

Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler argues that "unlawful influence" exerted by the United States government has tainted the military commission charged with investigating Omar Khadr's case.

Khadr, a Canadian citizen, was only 15 when he was captured in a bloody firefight with U.S. troops in Afghanistan in July 2002. He was accused of throwing a grenade that killed a U.S. medic during the firefight. Now 21, Khadr is the only Western foreigner still being held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and is awaiting trial before the commission, scheduled to begin in October.

A spokeswoman with the Pentagon on Monday refused to comment on the motions, saying it would be inappropriate to do so because the motions are pending before the court.

In an e-mail sent to reporters, Kuebler said he is accusing Pentagon attorneys of interfering in the commission's disclosure process, alleging the U.S. defence headquarters pressured interrogators at the American naval base in Cuba to destroy their handwritten notes in case they were asked to testify about the treatment of detainees there.

He said Khadr's defence team has also filed a motion to dismiss charges against their client based on allegations that U.S. Air Force Brig.-Gen. Thomas Hartmann, the legal adviser to the military commissions, has applied "excessive interference" in the prosecution of his cases.

In May, Hartmann was barred by a military judge from participating in the first Guantanamo war crimes trial because he aligned himself too closely with prosecutors. That case, against Osama bin Laden's former driver, Salim Hamdan, went to jury Monday.

[LINK]

Security in Doubt after Edmonton Tragedy

Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day, speaking in Quebec City, said the issue of safety on buses may need to be examined more closely once the legal process of this case is over.

"We're never closed to looking at how Canadians can be more safe and more secure," Day told reporters in Quebec Thursday. "This particular incident, as horrific as it is, is obviously extremely rare."

Witnesses described a nightmarish scene inside the bus.

[LINK]

In Focus

The Military Vs The Internet

Amazing revelations have emerged concerning already existing government plans to overhaul the way the internet functions in order to apply much greater restrictions and control over the web.

Lessig also revealed there is already in existence a cyber equivalent of the Patriot Act waiting for a cyber terrorism event in order to implement its provisions.

Lawrence Lessig, a respected Law Professor from Stanford University told an audience at this years Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference in Half Moon Bay, California, that “There’s going to be an i-9/11 event” which will act as a catalyst for a radical reworking of the law pertaining to the internet.

Lessig also revealed that he had learned, during a dinner with former government Counter Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke, that there is already in existence a cyber equivalent of the Patriot Act, an “i-Patriot Act” if you will, and that the Justice Department is waiting for a cyber terrorism event in order to implement its provisions.

During a group panel segment titled “2018: Life on the Net”, Lessig stated:

There’s going to be an i-9/11 event. Which doesn’t necessarily mean an Al Qaeda attack, it means an event where the instability or the insecurity of the internet becomes manifest during a malicious event which then inspires the government into a response. You’ve got to remember that after 9/11 the government drew up the Patriot Act within 20 days and it was passed.

The Patriot Act is huge and I remember someone asking a Justice Department official how did they write such a large statute so quickly, and of course the answer was that it has been sitting in the drawers of the Justice Department for the last 20 years waiting for the event where they would pull it out.

Of course, the Patriot Act is filled with all sorts of insanity about changing the way civil rights are protected, or not protected in this instance. So I was having dinner with Richard Clarke and I asked him if there is an equivalent, is there an i-Patriot Act just sitting waiting for some substantial event as an excuse to radically change the way the internet works. He said “of course there is”.

[LINK]

The Death of a Scientist and the Bio War Mystery

It is Saturday morning, and as the skies darken, and the rains threaten, I am reading about biowar investigator Bruce E. Ivins who is said to have taken his life with a fatal cocktail of codeine and other drugs just as he was about to be arrested and charged with five cases of murder in connection with the still fully unsolved anthrax attacks of 2001.

The naming of Mr. Ivins, born in Lebanon (Ohio), not the Middle East, and a veteran employee at the U.S. Government's massive US Army bio weapons lab at Ft. Detrick, MD at least suggests, as many have long contended, that this was a domestic crime, not a foreign terrorist act.

The story, broken by the LA Times Friday got the full card monte coverage treatment by the New York Times on Saturday with acres of print. Is there any reason to conclude that we now know all the facts, or that the case is closed or even that Ivins was the guilty party?

The last man accused by the FBI Dr Stephen Hatfill went to Court and won a $4.6 million settlement in his suit against the FBI for violating his rights. His law suit against the NY Times reporting on the issue failed when the Judge ruled he could not prove the newspaper knowingly published false information. Clearly, the information was false then. How credible is the reporting now?

Ivins' lawyer Paul Kemp insists that it was FBI harassment and humiliation that led to the suicide. He also contends that Ivins would have been exonerated if his case went to trial. Obviously he was facing a long and costly legal ordeal contributing to his anxieties. One report said he did not have the money to properly defend himself.

The Washington Post reports that other scientists at the lab are skeptical about suggestions that Ivins is the man described in the NY Post as "DR DOOM."

Yet, colleagues and friends of the vaccine specialist remained convinced that Ivins was innocent: They contended that he had neither the motive nor the means to create the fine, lethal powder that was sent by mail to news outlets and congressional offices in the late summer and fall of 2001. Mindful of previous FBI mistakes in fingering others in the case, many are deeply skeptical that the bureau has gotten it right this time.

"I really don't think he's the guy. I say to the FBI, 'Show me your evidence,' " said Jeffrey J. Adamovicz, former director of the bacteriology division at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, or USAMRIID, on the grounds of the sprawling Army fort in Frederick. "A lot of the tactics they used were designed to isolate him from his support. The FBI just continued to push his buttons."

Investigators are so confident of Ivins's involvement that they have been debating since Friday whether and how to close the seven-year-old anthrax investigation. That would involve disbanding a grand jury in the District and unsealing scores of documents that form the basis of the government's case against Ivins.

Congressman Rush Holt does not trust the FBI either. In a statement buried at the end of the Times story on page A10, rather than in the lead on page l where it belonged, he said, "What we learn will not change the fact that this has been a poorly handled investigation that has lasted 6 years and already has resulted in a trail of embarrassment and personal tragedy."

According to another report, FBI investigators had conducted 9100 interviews, sent out 6000 grand jury subpoenas and conducted 67 searches. They also traveled to "many" unnamed countries. They would not disclose their case against the late Mr. Ivins. He saw himself as a fall guy or patsy. Was he? Who else and what else was behind this attack on news outlets, US Senators and the postal service employees who died.

[LINK]

Featured Films

The Fluoride Deception

In this video, Christopher Bryson, an award-winning journalist and former producer at the BBC, discusses the findings of his book The Fluoride Deception.

[LINK]

Iraq For Sale

Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers is the story of what happens to everyday Americans when corporations go to war. Acclaimed director Robert Greenwald (Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, Outfoxed and Uncovered) takes you inside the lives of soldiers, truck drivers, widows and children who have been changed forever as a result of profiteering in the reconstruction of Iraq. Iraq for Sale uncovers the connections between private corporations making a killing in Iraq and the decision makers who allow them to do so.

[LINK]

Terrorstorm

Alex Jones Documentary - Throughout history, criminal elements inside governments have carried out terror attacks against their own populations as a pretext to enslave them. TerrorStorm reveals how, in the last hundred years, Western leaders have repeatedly murdered their own citizens while posing as their saviors.

[LINK]

Endgame

Alex Jones Documentary - Never before has a documentary assembled all the pieces of the globalists' dark agenda. Endgame's compelling look at past atrocities committed by those attempting to steer the future delivers information that the controlling media has meticulously censored for over 60 years. It fully reveals the elite's program to dominate the earth and carry out the wicked plan in all of human history.

[LINK]

Disclaimer:

FAIR USE/DEALING NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues.

May 17, 2008

US antifascist victory !! BIG MEDIA stopped

STOPBIGMEDIA.com

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Just moments ago, by a near-unanimous vote, the Senate stood up to Big
Media. They voted to throw out the FCC decision to let the largest
media companies swallow up even more local media.

This is simply an astounding victory, and it would not have happened
without the massive grassroots effort by you and thousands of others
who called their senators, sent more than a quarter million letters,
posted thousands of pictures and stories on StopBigMedia.com, and
testified at public hearings held by the FCC.
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=nJKeAb88l4fQVYY32q1dOg..

It was your dedication that made today's Senate win possible.

Today was a huge step forward, but there is still much to do. The
fight against the FCC now moves to the House, where our elected
representatives need to hear from us.

President Bush has promised that he will try to veto this bill. But
tonight the Senate and the American people have spoken with one voice.
This historic vote sends a clear message that the only people who
support more media consolidation are Big Media lobbyists and the White
House.

We are in this struggle to bring more minority ownership, diverse
perspectives and independent voices to the media. We need to make
media consolidation an election-year issue. And we need to start
talking about how to break up the giant conglomerates.

Corporate news today -- with its propaganda pundits, horse-race
election coverage, and celebrity gossip -- undermines our democracy.
We must continue to speak out and demand that the public airwaves be
used to actually serve the public.

In just three weeks, thousands of people will be gathering together in
Minnesota to build the movement for better media. You can join them at
the National Conference for Media Reform, just visit
www.freepress.net/conference.
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=hJZbw5x801uJPfVkA4IZ5A..

For today, know that you played a key role in the fight for better
media for all.

Thank you,

Josh Silver
Executive Director
Free Press Action Fund

Media Reform Daily

News of the movement for May 16, 2008

--STOP BIG MEDIA--

HISTORIC SENATE VOTE REJECTS FCC'S RULES In a near-unanimous voice
vote, the Senate passed a "resolution of disapproval" that would
nullify the FCC's latest attempt to dismantle longstanding media
ownership limits.

StopBigMedia.com http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=a5KX0OpF-expjSAFRIaqMA..

SENATE VOTES TO REVERSE FCC DECISION ALLOWING MEDIA CONSOLIDATION
The Senate vote to turn back the FCC's relaxation of media ownership
rules sends a clear message to media executives and the FCC that
further media consolidation will not be tolerated. But the fight
is far from over.

Josh Silver, Huffington Post
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=4k2ymBgByHxJBbqResjFsQ..

FCC COMMISSIONER JONATHAN ADELSTEIN RESPONDS TO SENATE RESOLUTION
ON MEDIA OWNERSHIP FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelestein applauded
the Senate decision to overturn the agency's ruling on media
ownership, saying, "The FCC veered dangerously off-course from the
American mainstream, so our elected representatives are trying to
steer us back."

Jonathan Adelstein, Federal Communications Commission
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=9kiOZKActne2rHODuq-S3g..

SENATE SLAMS FCC NEWSPAPER-TV CROSS-OWNERSHIP RULE Just two senators
expressed opposition to the resolution of disapproval of the FCC's
relaxation of media ownership rules. What a difference a presidential
election makes.

Matthew Lasar, Ars technica
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=aaPamU8sfFZC1agcluG2NQ..

SENATE VOTES TO BLOCK FCC'S CROSS-OWNERSHIP RULE CHANGE The Senate
voted, without debate, to invalidate the FCC's decision to loosen
the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rule. Among the co-sponsors
of the resolution are senators and presidential candidates Hillary
Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

John Eggerton, Broadcasting & Cable
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=XXxTLfPwOuAAdBIQP_sogg..

OBAMA, BUSH AT ODDS OVER MEDIA-OWNERSHIP VOTE Sen. Barack Obama
(D-Ill.) urged the House to follow the Senate's lead and pass a
resolution of disapproval that would invalidate the FCC's decision
to allow a single company to own TV and radio stations and newspapers
in the top 20 markets.

John Eggerton, Broadcasting & Cable
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=L6ccAIr2hr6bR5eFwKmDfg..

ACT NOW!

Tell the House to Follow the Senate's Lead
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=axgdPJzjkkNSs4Vl8P-OOw..

--SAVE THE INTERNET--

STUDY SAYS SOME FILE-SHARING UPLOADS HINDERED A new study reinforced
allegations that Comcast is hindering some file-sharing services,
such as BitTorrent, that distribute television shows, movies and
other large files over its network.

Peter Kaplan, Reuters
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=Uw0guMx4-LQ4agfzg6192w..

COX ABOUT TO FEEL WRATH OF NET NEUTRALITY ACTIVISTS Activists
concerned that Internet providers are secretly planning to muck
about with the Internet and violate Net Neutrality principles got
some good/bad news, when another report surfaced about cable companies
who are blocking traffic.

Amy Schatz, Wall Street Journal
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=3_Nxz74h8Up4Dy_XYC28hw..

COMCAST, COX SLOW BITTORRENT TRAFFIC AROUND THE CLOCK, STUDY FINDS
U.S. cable broadband providers Comcast and Cox Communications are
slowing BitTorrent traffic at all times of the day, not just during
peak traffic, according to a new study by a German computer research
group.

Grant Gross, IDG News Service
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=Lke22MmFBN8E3LvHQ96RSw..

COX, COMCAST ACCUSED OF MORE BITTORRENT BLOCKING A global study of
Internet traffic found widespread blocking of BitTorrent transfers
only in the United States and Singapore. And most of the U.S. hosts
observed blocking are located in Comcast and Cox networks.

Roy Mark, eWeek http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=MeYmbdO1YfTDabkTk40vUQ..

COX BLOCKS, TOO; WEB FIGHT GROWS Cox, the nation's fourth-largest
cable company, has been interfering with Internet traffic in the
same way as Comcast, the nation's largest cable company, according
to a new study being called the most authoritative of its kind to
date.

Sam Gustin, Portfolio
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=2eQQOS831VUweJKBGcMplw..

COX CAUGHT BLOCKING BITTORRENT Comcast has in the past defended its
Internet traffic management, stating that it would only interfere
with BitTorrent to minimize network congestion. But that's not true,
according to German researchers.

Janko Roettgers, NewTeeVee
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=Sxm17EQ4TzUjX9XXTJluiA..

ACT NOW!

Support the Internet Freedom Preservation Act
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=aWySezk8w7dK5JSYngSsDQ..

--FEATURE--

MEDIA MINUTES This week: As editor-in-chief of a publication for
African immigrants, Edwin Okong'o strives for journalistic excellence
to build a bridge between cultures. And the FCC made a couple of
ill-considered decisions that raised the hackles of public interest
groups.

http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=XtQQGCvU-yhTyjTjXf6nPQ..

http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=dE8aWABqNuLeAliil-5EYA..

FP ACTION NETWORK http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=I4FU7UKI9bRm8TmlCtneiA..

--IN OTHER NEWS--

FAMED WAR REPORTER CALLS PENTAGON/MEDIA 'PROPAGANDA' PROGRAM ILLEGAL
There's little doubt that the Pentagon pundit program violated the
laws against covert propaganda operations mounted against the
American public by their own government. This is why alarm bells
should be ringing all over Washington.

Joseph L. Galloway, Editor & Publisher
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=-VFmAUi5zz0ggHS4VpeRhg..

ICAHN'S BID MAY FORCE YAHOO BACK INTO MICROSOFT'S ARMS Carl Icahn's
audacious bid to overthrow Yahoo's board could bring Microsoft back
to the bargaining table and revive the tech megamerger.

Jon Swartz and Adam Shell, USA Today
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=XJRzbe9MW6uTZo8kBWFkGA..

WILL WIRELESS BROADBAND SUPPLANT FTTH?

Even if Sprint Nextel and Clearwire are successful in building their
nationwide WiMax network, they won't pose an immediate threat to
wireline broadband service growth, according to some experts.

Raymond McConville, Light Reading
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=3ctoGprRtmqAmxMIPE1dlQ..

NAB WANTS EYES ON WILMINGTON DTV SWITCH The National Association
of Broadcasters wants to make sure that the government is paying
sufficient attention to the potential problems with its Wilmington,
N.C., test of the switch to digital TV.

John Eggerton, Broadcasting & Cable
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=Pj4iOEsr88E8MWP_A9xstA..

BROADCAST TV PRODUCT PLACEMENTS UP ALMOST 40 PERCENT The Nielsen
Company reported that product placements broadcast television
placements rose 39 percent, while cable television was essentially
flat.

Jack Loechner, Media Post
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=BAgcVOCb94xbj8mtTBaR-g..

STRATEGIZING TO SAVE PUBLIC TV CHANNELS A strategy session was held
to discuss ways citizens can rally and amend Florida's Consumer
Choice Act of 2007, which threatens Florida's public access, education
and government TV channels, known as PEG channels.

Dawn Morgan , WMNF-FM
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=JRwJUVrXTbi2ezmR4Defnw..

IN GROVE HALL, RADIO REBELS DIG IN To local ears, the voices on
Touch FM are familiar and authentic. But it's strange to hear them
on the radio at first. There's no other place like it on Boston's
dial. And if the FCC has its way, the station could be silenced.

Bill Forry, Dorchester Reporter
http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=hxcZRSQrLaS9LgiZA0QzBg..

ONE IN FIVE U.S. HOUSEHOLDS HAS NEVER USED E-MAIL A new survey found
that a substantial number of households have not crossed the Digital
Divide.

Parks Associates http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=BeSXxkWYVhb0b0SqubE57A..

Many of these articles are copyrighted material. We make such
material available to advance understanding of public issues, which
we believe constitutes a "fair use" of copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this email is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information for research and
educational purposes.

http://free.convio.net/site/R?i=iLhVXSa1A1b9BANrgtvUXg..

Free Press is a national organization working to increase informed
public participation in crucial media policy debates. The ultimate
aim of Free Press is to generate a range of policies that will
produce a more competitive and public-interest-oriented media system
with a strong nonprofit and noncommercial sector. Please send
comments or other feedback to newsw...@freepress.net.

Donate Now

www.freepress.net

January 27, 2008

ell the FCC and Congress You Support Net Neutrality

We got the heads up from John Laesch, Democratic candidate in the
special election to replace Dennis Hastert in IL-14. The FCC has made
provision for comments from the public on net neutrality, and on
John's request we created a special action page that pipes your
personal comments into the FCC electronic filing system, AND sends
your messages to all your members of Congress at the same time.

Net Neutrality FCC Comments:
http://www.usalone.com/laesch/pnum786.php (anyone can use this link)

Facebook Version:
http://apps.facebook.com/fb_voices/action.php?qnum=pnum786 (to use
this you must be a member of Facebook and logged in)

We have already seen blatant moves towards making a two tier toll
road out of our wide open democratic internet, as when Comcast
started discriminating against particular users recently. And you
remember when the AT&T censored Pearl Jam's criticism of Bush, and
when Verizon censored NARAL's pro choice text messages. This is our
chance to speak out and make our voices heard to defend our free
internet.

John Laesch's special primary election is coming up in just 1 week on
Feb 5th, which can help set the tone for the entire primary season to
come. Please submit the action page sponsored by John above, and
please also consider making a donation to encourage him to keep
standing strong on the issues you care about.

John Laesch Donations: http://www.usalone.com/donations_laesch.php

As the Democratic nominee in 2006, John Laesch pulled 40 percent
against the powerful incumbent Hastert in the general election, and
John is in the running again. With numbers like that, and especially
given the shift in public sentiment in the last two years, this is a
very winnable race.

Here is John's message to you on the importance of acting now to
ensure network neutrality:

***********

The FCC has bowed to pressure and is investigating complaints that a
major internet service provider is selectively blocking traffic. We
need to let the FCC and Congress know that we are willing to defend
net neutrality from big corporate interests.

The FCC is asking for public comments. Let the FCC know that you
support true net neutrality, and you oppose any attempts by giant
telecoms to weaken or dismantle it.

Paid for by Friends of John Laesch

*** End John Laesch Message ***

Please take action NOW, so we can win all victories that are supposed
to be ours, and forward this alert as widely as possible.

If you would like to get alerts like these, you can do so at
http://www.usalone.com/in.htm

September 07, 2007


US backing for two-tier internet


This is issue is not going away anytime soon, despite the fact that it lingers on the back burner; yesterday's news put it back on the front burner!! - V

There are fears that ISPs could become the web's gatekeepers

The US Justice Department has said that internet service providers should be allowed to charge for priority traffic.

The agency said it was opposed to "network neutrality", the idea that all data on the net is treated equally.

The comments put the agency at odds with companies such as Microsoft and Google, who have called for legislation to guarantee equal access to the net.

The agency submitted its comments to the Federal Communications Commission, which is investigating net access.

Several US internet service providers (ISPs), including AT&T and Verizon, have previously said that they want to charge some users more money for certain content.

This has particularly become an issue with the rise of TV and film download services.

A similar debate is ongoing in the UK.

One web

The Justice Department said imposing net neutrality regulations could hinder development of the internet and prevent ISPs from upgrading networks.

The agency said it could also shift the "entire burden of implementing costly network expansions and improvements onto consumers".

"Regulators should be careful not to impose regulations that could limit consumer choice and investment in broadband facilities," said Thomas Barnett, the department's antitrust chief.

The agency's stance is contrary to much of the internet community that believes in an open model for the internet.

Net neutrality advocates argue that a two-tier internet would allow broadband providers to become gatekeepers to the web's content.

Providers that can pay will be able to get a commercial advantage over those that cannot, they say.

In particular, there is a fear that institutions like universities and charities would suffer.

Last year, Sir Tim Berners-Lee the inventor of the web rallied against the idea of a two-tier internet.

"What's very important from my point of view is that there is one web," he said.

"Anyone that tries to chop it into two will find that their piece looks very boring."

[In 1989 he invented the World Wide Web, an internet-based hypermedia initiative for global information sharing while at CERN, the European Particle Physics Laboratory. He wrote the first web client and server in 1990. His specifications of URIs, HTTP and HTML were refined as Web technology spread.
For a transcript of his testimony before Congress, click HERE.]

See also: http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/6153
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2180557,00.asp
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2170847,00.asp
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2168915,00.asp

SavetheInternet.com

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., introduced a bill in January intended to preserve net neutrality. It was sent to the Senate Commerce Committee but has yet to see any action.

[Special Section on Net Neutrality] Introduction: The State of the Debate on Network Neutrality PDF
Jon M. Peha, William H. Lehr, Simon Wilkie pp.8
[Special Section on Net Neutrality] Network Neutrality: Words of Power and 800-Pound Gorillas PDF
David D. Clark pp.8
[Special Section on Net Neutrality] Network Neutrality: The Debate Evolves Abstract PDF
Gerald R. Faulhaber pp.21


From publicknowledge.org today:

Earlier today (Sept. 6), the Justice Department filed comments with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) opposing Net Neutrality. The DoJ, supposedly the protector of consumers and guardian of competition, said that “market forces” were sufficient to do both of those jobs.

That view, of course, is nonsense. Perhaps the DoJ failed to recall that there are no “market forces,” and that the market for broadband services is controlled by two industries and that consumers have very little choice. Just how little choice we have was made clear to me earlier this summer.

*snip*

There’s only one force powerful enough to combat all these weapons. You. You have to ask your member of Congress and your Senator, “Why don’t we have the same choice for the Internet that people in England do?” You have to ask what your representatives are going to do about this deplorable situation. And you have to keep on asking until there’s an answer.


Ten things that finally killed Net neutrality

Posted by Declan McCullagh

ShareThis